A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: NRA President Schools Candy
Crowley: Obama and Feinstein
Are Driving Gun Sales Not Us!
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
NRA President Schools Candy
Crowley: Obama and Feinstein
Are Driving Gun Sales Not Us!

Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/13/2013 10:56:28 AM

CNN´s Candy Crowley on Sunday floated the typical media nonsense about how the National Rifle Association is ginning up fear to sell more guns in the wake of the massacre in Newtown, Connecticut. Fortunately for State of the Union viewers, NRA President David Keene was on the set to correctly point out, "The two people who are selling so-called assault rifles are Senator Feinstein and President Obama not us" (video follows with transcript and commentary): CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: One of the big questions here has been

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: rabbit, 1/13/2013 11:09:54 AM     (No. 9114060)

No, it isn´t perfectly logical...and you don´t have to be a liberal to see it differently. When they tried to have a conversation about how to prevent another Newtown, how to prevent another unstable individual from easily getting hold of weapons that could mow down a classroom full of first-graders...the NRA´s LaPierre went out, held a press conference (at which he took no questions) to declare that every school should be armed! Completely ignored the subject...how to keep the Adam Lanza´s of the world from getting into the position where they could do such heinous acts. Instead, went all-out with the cry, "More guns are the answer! More guns in more places!"

And the NRA has the gall to claim that they aren´t the ones promoting more guns???


Reply 2 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 1/13/2013 11:12:22 AM     (No. 9114065)

Whatever else he is, he´s the best gun salesman in human history.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: killerbee, 1/13/2013 11:20:07 AM     (No. 9114087)

#1: LaPierre is the head of an organization that supports the 2nd Amendment rights of American citizens. It is not a government organization, nor is it a mental health organization. He was right. An armed responder would have at least had a chance to stop the carnage early on and all those kids might still be alive.

Feinstein´s statement about her bill was that it would affect any guns that would be purchased after the date the bill passed. Tell me that isn´t an advertisement to "buy your guns now because it´ll be too late soon!" And tell me, when her biggest benefactors -- the California teacher´s union -- has invested in gun manufacturers, that that wasn´t an attempt to help them get a windfall before they bail on the stock -- which they just announced they plan to do (after the buying frenzy, of course).


Reply 4 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 1/13/2013 11:21:01 AM     (No. 9114090)

It was up to Lanza´s mother to keep guns away from him. How many people even knew he existed?

Obama and Feinstein are driving the gun sales. We do not trust government to protect us or even to understand the problem. Put that together with distrust of Obama´s intention to transform our country into what he thinks it should be and the people begin to think about other countries, such as Russia, who disarmed their population rendering it helpless sheep for the shearing and deciding they wouldn´t let it happen here. The guns are just in case.

I used to be anti gun but I came to my senses.


Reply 5 - Posted by: farmwife, 1/13/2013 11:23:38 AM     (No. 9114093)

People can see that this president´s policies and attitude are promoting chaos. In the face of chaos, people feel like they have to be prepared to defend themselves, their homes, and their families.

Why do the politicians in Chicago tolerate large hunks of that city in utter chaos? Because it keeps people in fear and keeps them elected.


Reply 6 - Posted by: InOhio, 1/13/2013 11:33:18 AM     (No. 9114114)

#1: How many ARMED guards protect the children where Obama´s girls attend - and have been guarding it, BEFORE Obama -

How many ARMED guards protect Obama and everyone else in that administration?

So, apparently having gun to protect them is ok for the ´ruling class´ but not ok for we peons?

Home invasions, where the perpetrator violently kicks down the door and attacks the homeowners in residence are on the rise in my area. I do not plan to go quietly. Perhaps you do. I´m glad you aren´t making the decisions for MY family.


Reply 7 - Posted by: johnny45, 1/13/2013 11:34:11 AM     (No. 9114116)

You want to prevent the Adam Lanza´s of the world from getting guns? Easy, commit them to mental institutions. My rights shouldn´t suffer because this person´s mother was stupid. She had firearms in the home, accessible to a mentally ill person. It never ceases to amaze me the stupid things people do that result in someone being killed.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: rellimpank2, 1/13/2013 11:35:10 AM     (No. 9114118)

--as has been pointed out on the gun forums, the suggestion of armed guards in schools was proposed as legislation during the Clinton years and of course , wasn´t laughed at and otherwise denigrated because it came from an ´acceptable source´--

--and , had Wayne LaPierre got on his knees , begged forgiveness and agreed to go along with the Feinstein gun grab, the response from the left would have been ´that it didn´t go far enough´ and handguns and sniper rifles would have been the next ´target´---


Reply 9 - Posted by: tearza, 1/13/2013 11:37:02 AM     (No. 9114122)

Need a background check for owning a gun .....
Don´t even stop an illegal alien for looking
like an illegal alien....thats against the law...I´m spell bound...


Reply 10 - Posted by: Shagpoke, 1/13/2013 11:38:23 AM     (No. 9114125)

#1, go troll somewhere else - like DU where you belong.


Reply 11 - Posted by: tren9, 1/13/2013 11:51:55 AM     (No. 9114149)

It doesn´t matter whether it will help or not. Just do something. Show the American people that ´we care.´ It doesn´t matter if it help.
/so


Reply 12 - Posted by: lzboy, 1/13/2013 12:07:56 PM     (No. 9114182)

#1 troll´s and runs.Ignore him.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: MissouriMan, 1/13/2013 12:10:42 PM     (No. 9114186)

#1 Molon Labe!!


Reply 14 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/13/2013 12:55:39 PM     (No. 9114286)

Hello, Earth to Candy, come in over, can you read us...Candy lost in orbit?


Reply 15 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/13/2013 12:57:07 PM     (No. 9114291)

#1 lost in orbit with Candy...come in over!


Reply 16 - Posted by: harper, 1/13/2013 2:01:31 PM     (No. 9114389)

Important public institutions, such as schools and political leaders should have the same level of protection. If Democrat politicians want schools disarmed, they should disarm and fire their own security.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Sinatra5, 1/13/2013 2:45:21 PM     (No. 9114452)

# 1...Your mother is calling you up from the basement for lunch....Must not be late. I´d suggest to take a seat and watch a football game but somehow I bet you aren´t interested in such things


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 1/13/2013 3:51:03 PM     (No. 9114519)

Amen no 6, don´t do as we do,but do as we say.


Reply 19 - Posted by: pliades, 1/13/2013 4:14:36 PM     (No. 9114548)

Repeal the 16th Amendment, THEN we will talk about repealing the 2nd Amendment...


Reply 20 - Posted by: Skyliner, 1/13/2013 4:25:18 PM     (No. 9114560)

My wise son pointed out that Diane Feinstein packs a pistol as well as her bodyguards. She owes her political career to gun violence - see Dan White, Harvey Milk, etc.


Reply 21 - Posted by: coldborezero, 1/13/2013 4:33:23 PM     (No. 9114571)

We will never be able to keep weapons out of the hands of people who want to do harm. To think otherwise is to live in a fantasy. Meth amphetamines, heroin, cocaine, etc. are all "banned". Anyone can get them, anywhere in the world. We as a nation once banned alcoholic beverages. It did not work. In fact, every society in history has "banned" murder. It has not worked. Bans on anything will never work. If you are honest with yourself you already know that. All any ban has ever done is increase demand, spawn black markets and taken away the liberty of law-abiding people. Fact.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Boneshaker, 1/13/2013 6:21:19 PM     (No. 9114668)

Why the senseless rush to create more laws controlling guns?

If laws worked there would be no crime right now.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: tonyl, 1/13/2013 7:29:28 PM     (No. 9114741)

The liberals are driving guns sales. It´s like everything they do, it has the opposite effect.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Italiano, 1/13/2013 7:38:24 PM     (No. 9114747)

It´s completely lost on our repetitive, tiresome serial poster that it isn´t the NRA´s job to police the nutcases. If he has ideas, let´s hear them. Otherwise, get lost. It´s getting really old, and credibility is long gone.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Nimby, 1/13/2013 8:10:33 PM     (No. 9114778)

This fat behind also has a fat mouth!


Reply 26 - Posted by: philemon1967, 1/13/2013 10:07:25 PM     (No. 9114867)

#7: One of the possible motives Adam Lanza went berserk was that his mother was allegedly in the process of getting him committed. Retrospectively, we would say she should have done it earlier. I think it is not difficult to criticize the mother for doing a stupid thing like encouraging him to use guns when she knew of his impulsivity, but sometimes, being a parent blinds one to the evil nature of one´s offspring.

The problem continues to fester because society still doesn´t know how to responsibly deal with people with mental illness. Competing interests in protecting society from the mentally ill and ensuring the mentally ill are not mistreated. The solution will not soon be reached because the poisonous atmosphere, for which I mostly blame the progressives, between left and the right kills any good faith discussion.



Post Reply   Close thread 718843




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Petraeus’s role in drafting Benghazi
talking points raises questions
Washington Post, by Scott Wilson and Karen DeYoung    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 11:03:01 PM     Post Reply
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault. It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack. “We had some new members on the committee, and we knew the press would be very aggressive on this, so we didn’t want

With more clarity, White House
adds to confusion on IRS
Washington Post, by Dan Balz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:59:54 PM     Post Reply
It is never good for an administration when a front-page newspaper article about an ongoing controversy begins as follows: “The White House offered a new account Monday of how and when it learned .?.?. ” That’s what readers of The Post awoke to on Tuesday. In trying to contain the controversy and protect President Obama, White House officials have only added to questions about what happened. Until this week, the story of how White House officials learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups was fairly straightforward. White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was notified in late April

In AP, Rosen investigations,
government makes
criminals of reporters
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:56:21 PM     Post Reply
There are various reasons you might not care about the Obama administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen and labeling him a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor” in an espionage case. Liberals may not be particularly bothered because the targeted journalist works for Fox News. Conservatives may not be concerned because of their antipathy toward the news media generally. And the general public certainly doesn’t have much patience for journalists’ whining. But here’s why you should care — and why this case, along with the administration’s broad snooping into Associated Press phone records, is more serious than the other supposed

White House meltdown: A truth deficit
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:53:11 PM     Post Reply
There seems to be bipartisan consensus that whatever the White House is doing to fend off scandal is making things worse. Howard Fineman sounds a lot like Right Turn these days: “White House aides are tempting fate with their reluctant, piecemeal and contradictory disclosures of what they knew and when they knew it, especially about a report on the Internal Revenue Service’s 18-month effort to target tea party and other conservative groups for special scrutiny.” The constantly shifting stories from Jay Carney and the IRS dissembling and pleas of ignorance only heighten concern that there has been serious wrongdoing.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

‘Rosen’s in the Wind!’
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:29:36 PM     Post Reply
John Podhoretz has a good column today on the Obama administration’s travails. I did not know this bit until I read the column: Even more startling, the search warrant makes clear that the FBI already had everything it needed on the leaker, as the request for a search warrant features quotes from an interview that were tantamount to a confession. It asked that the warrant be sealed — in other words, that Rosen not be told — because knowledge might “cause subjects to flee”! Imagine it: Rosen, an on-air reporter

All of Obama´s Scandals Are
Ultimately About Information Control
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM     Post Reply
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

39 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.

McCain warns Obama-Nixon
comparisons are ‘overreaching’

38 replie(s)
Boston Herald, by Hillary Chabot    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/20/2013 9:36:39 PM     Post Reply
U.S. Sen. John McCain bucked the party line coming from many of his fellow conservatives this morning, saying suggestions that compare the trio of scandals gripping the White House to Watergate are “overreaching.” “I think it’s overreaching. We need a full and complete investigation and then we will decide the dimensions of it,” said McCain while campaigning for Republican Senate candidate Gabriel Gomez in Dorchester. “It is terrible but we have to have a full investigation before we leap to conclusions.” The maverick’s caution is a sharp contrast to the response of many Republicans


Post Reply   Close thread 718843





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~