|
|
| |
Topic: Lance Armstrong´s worldwide web of lies |
Lance Armstrong´s worldwide web of lies
New York Daily News, by Mike Lupica
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 1/13/2013 5:43:55 AM
|
| To the end Lance Armstrong, desperate to remain relevant, somehow is allowed to control his own narrative. So after all the lies from Armstrong from across all the years, lies about himself and about all those who dared to tell the truth about him, there comes one last one: That he still has something we want. To the end this guy thinks he can play the whole world for suckers. Unless Armstrong and his team of lawyers and crisis managers have him back out of his interview with Oprah Winfrey at the last moment
|
Comments: Welcome to Pete Rose´s tarnished world, Mr. Armstrong. There are consequences to the brand, even for the icons.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 1/13/2013 6:33:58 AM (No. 9113632)
I´ll bet every pro cyclist uses drugs or blood doping.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
floridagator, 1/13/2013 6:57:22 AM (No. 9113646)
Is Lance a cad in his personal life? Maybe. Is he also the greatest man to have ever raced in competitive cycling? Absolutely. All of the grousing and whining in the world will never change that. Only punks, losers and old women continue to pretend that any of this truly matters. My favorite CSM was a Dominican immigrant who would stand in front of formation and pronounce, "If you´re not cheatin´, you´re not trying." Miniscule trolls like Lupica, who probably couldn´t even throw a baseball 60 feet or ride a bike 10 miles, seem to be the favored sports journalists in a community of midgets who´ve made a living sniffing the jocks of great men. Mike, you are a pathetic, little man. I don´t care how much money you have, how many awards you´ve won, or who the people are at ESPN/NY Daily News that think you´re cute. You´ve never been able to reach the top shelf of a kitchen cabinet, carry a woman in your arms, or compete mano a mano in any way. I feel sorry for you.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Pluperfect, 1/13/2013 7:01:48 AM (No. 9113654)
Sorry, #2. Lots of athletes can do wondrous things with the help of performance enhancement drugs, even racehorses. It´s not ok.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Hank Reardon, 1/13/2013 7:04:11 AM (No. 9113659)
Bet your wrong, #1.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Hank Reardon, 1/13/2013 7:04:55 AM (No. 9113661)
you´re
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 1/13/2013 7:10:54 AM (No. 9113667)
Let all these jock morons of whatever sport drug away. I don´t care.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Emerson, 1/13/2013 7:14:02 AM (No. 9113669)
Lupica has never accomplished anything, drugged or not.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
earlybird, 1/13/2013 7:17:56 AM (No. 9113673)
The "drug" that Armstrong is accused of using has been an integral part of cancer treatment, to prevent anemia by aiding in rebuilding the red blood cell production damaged by chemotherapy, for some time. He would have had to have it for that purpose. Did that get snarled up with his racing?
When you read the reports most of the griping comes from his competitors and their wives. It seems to me that they have a built-in conflict of interest.
That said, I have no interest in Oprah ever, regardless of her guest.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Spidey, 1/13/2013 7:45:14 AM (No. 9113705)
I hear ads on the radio all the time on products boosting testosterone and others selling HGH formulas but both are considered as PEDs by professional sports owners/operators.Both products are produced naturally by the body and all these supplements do is boost the levels causing quicker muscle development. I mean whey power products can do the same thing.So it´s hard for me to understand why legal products are banned from sports use. You still need a base skill to produce in any sport.
I don´t know what Armstrong is accused of,nor do I care because I hate the sport of cycling to begin with.One of Armstrong´s whistle blowers said he got death threats,more that likely some came from Armstrong himself. Whatever stupid mea culpa he does on Oprah means absolutely nothing to me.He´s only came clean after evidence cornered him in a box.I have questions about his mentality from dating Cheryl Crow,a lefty fruitcake if there ever was one.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bpl40, 1/13/2013 8:01:43 AM (No. 9113721)
This is cabinet level talent. Zippy must not let it go waste. What, no experience or qualification for the job? Even better!
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
tocsin, 1/13/2013 8:19:43 AM (No. 9113745)
You lost me at Opie
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
vesicant, 1/13/2013 8:38:32 AM (No. 9113767)
Maybe scumbama dopes? It would explain a lot.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 1/13/2013 8:39:27 AM (No. 9113769)
We´ll have to see what the actual ´confession´ is, but this is a huge disappointment. Perhaps cyclists like Greg LeMond feel a little bit vindicated now, since he had blowing the whistle on Armstrong and others for many years.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Edgelady, 1/13/2013 8:44:11 AM (No. 9113778)
A cheat is a cheat; his scam was so elaborate he´d have blood transfusions to get rid of evidence. He wasn´t just a bad husband and a cad - he let down a whole bunch of people at his foundation.
I´m talking about the essence of the man´s character. You can use the relativity of his enhanced prowess all you want. That memory will now be cast aside because of his other gargantuan effort: lie and fool everybody.
To me it´s perfectly pitiful that he´s taken the Oprah route. There´s historical evidence now as to how bad many her choices of champion have gone. I chose not to get her channel, but wouldn´t watch it anyway, not even to see him do the grovelling bit on TV.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
LZK, 1/13/2013 8:46:55 AM (No. 9113788)
Those who can -- DO -- those who can´t write stories and sniff jock straps....
Love that line -- poster # 2....
It´s like movie critics and food critics....
Who cares........ The man beat cancer, cycled into the history books inspite of the dogs biting at his back....
It´s not like the hilton tramps or the kardasian misfits who did "nothing" and are media pets....
Mediocre seems to be the rallying cry for this bunch -- led by lupica.
LZK
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
skedaddle, 1/13/2013 8:52:32 AM (No. 9113802)
I´m so disappointed...that Oprah is still doing interviews.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
knarfski, 1/13/2013 8:53:23 AM (No. 9113805)
Deal with it #2...reminds me of a Clinton defense: "It´s all about sex." No, it was about lies--to millions and millions of people, far and wide. POTUS!
Armstrong: the "greatest man" in competitive cycling? Greatest?
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Lawsy0, 1/13/2013 9:04:34 AM (No. 9113832)
Just as is Oprah, ´´Snakey, sneaky, awash in self importance.´´ Poster #1 wins first place for Cynic of the Day.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
navybrat, 1/13/2013 9:17:58 AM (No. 9113850)
I don´t understand all the interest in a bicycle rider. What is so wonderful about him even if he did not take drugs.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
cb, 1/13/2013 9:36:26 AM (No. 9113875)
Lance trashed a lot of people who were telling the truth. I wonder if his apology will include that.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
JAN, 1/13/2013 9:47:59 AM (No. 9113891)
Compared to the lies told by O and his cohorts, this is irrelevant.
JMO
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
postaway, 1/13/2013 9:51:11 AM (No. 9113898)
The lefty Mike Lupica is not a beloved figure on this blog and for good reason. Another athlete of a different color or race would probably be treated, if anything was said at all by Lupica, with sympathy and the kind of paternalism that now passes for compassion. But cheating is cheating. We long for heroes but are fed a steady diet f phoneys. It´s not good for our children to see us make excuses for such people. And having or having had cancer isn´t no excuse. Armstrong was living a lie rather than trying to reform a dirty sport.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
TheMotherCO, 1/13/2013 10:03:26 AM (No. 9113922)
#2 and #8 said it best - I do remember that incident and it was whiners from other countries that started that rumor and at the time, I thought it was stupid that no meds, no nothing could be taken by an athelete. Good lord, they get sick, have allergies and sometimes need medicines. The other countries were dismal.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
mozey, 1/13/2013 10:21:33 AM (No. 9113950)
Oh poor me. Armstrong is just another narcissist who will do or say or leak anything to keep himself on the front page. As an above poster mentioned, he reminds me of Pete Rose. But at least Rose has just reduced himself to whining and selling signed pictures, not crying to a bunch of foolish women and their Leader, Oprah. Armstrong has now hit bottom.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
gazela, 1/13/2013 10:31:34 AM (No. 9113973)
I can´t say I care much for Armstrong´s lies and treatment of other people, but I fail to see how taking him down does anything to vindicate the sport of cycling. It seems that everyone in the top tier of cyclists was doping and that nobody won any of the big races without doping. It´s disappointing, but not terribly surprising, that Armstrong wasn´t the super-athlete that he appeared to be, but his sport was, and probably always will be, dirty with dope.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
bldrrepub, 1/13/2013 11:02:04 AM (No. 9114040)
Good Lord people.
Its not (just) about the doping. It is the trafficking, the lying, the bribery to the UCI, and USADA, the witness intimidation in a Federal case, the threatening of other riders´ wives, the public humiliation of anyone who dared question the myth, and on and on.
His own "Doctor" who started his doping program (Ferrari) thought that his early doping in the 90s gave him his cancer.
Get a clue.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
capt scurvey, 1/13/2013 11:03:34 AM (No. 9114044)
Lupica would probably do a lot better better if he started juicing, #2...
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
nonsense, 1/13/2013 11:07:30 AM (No. 9114054)
Very strange, the interview has not taken place, yet we have all the "details". Very psychically interesting.
If only we had the same type of intellectual interest in the drug users who live and reign at the highest levels of the national government.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
mamafrog, 1/13/2013 11:10:46 AM (No. 9114063)
Cycling is a sport where everyone cheats, I learned that decades ago when I saw Breaking Away. I really don´t care about whether Lance cheated. I do admire his fight against cancer and I hope that he can go on to have a productive and meaningful life. But most of all I am glad that he has a life because he beat cancer.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
TexaTucky, 1/13/2013 11:27:33 AM (No. 9114103)
He threw his family away.
My hero.
But at least he has a sniffable jock.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
califedup, 1/13/2013 11:41:07 AM (No. 9114129)
Just the fact that Lance Armstrong is confessing his "sins" to the most worthless obese lump of flesh in existence (except Michael Moore) , Oprah Winfrey, who´s own "career" was built on a mountain of lies tells you just what kind of person Armstrong really is and how the moral standards of this country are almost to rock bottom. These two (Oprah and Lance)deserve each other.
Must not see TV. Gross.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
navyjag907, 1/13/2013 11:46:23 AM (No. 9114139)
I stopped being excited about being able to ride a bicycle when I turned 11. And I don´t own a TV so I can´t watch all the trash stuff. But Armstrong is a loser and a crook; if wants forgiveness, there are churches in that business.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
columba, 1/13/2013 11:48:58 AM (No. 9114144)
You have to hand it to Obama ... uh Lance: his lies are often believable.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 1/13/2013 11:59:54 AM (No. 9114162)
Obama´s Life coach
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
bluefindad, 1/13/2013 12:10:15 PM (No. 9114185)
Lance has been confronted with his own version of the ´blue dress´. It is destroying him.
Does Armstrong deserve his fate? Oh, yes. But wait, maybe he doesn´t. After all, what happened to the first man to be confronted with the blue dress?
Could there be different standards for politicians than sports figures?
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
woofwoofwoof, 1/13/2013 12:25:17 PM (No. 9114221)
I´m conflicted about all of this. I tend to think, he got away with it fair and square, and probably most of his competitors were doing it too. He put in a lot of work cheating, it was very risky to himself, and that should be respected.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
bldrrepub, 1/13/2013 1:56:38 PM (No. 9114382)
Let´s not forget a meeting with Senator Diane Feinstein; two weeks later, his charity Livestrong makes a $100,000 donation to Planned Parenthood. One week later, Feinstein protege and US Attorney Andre Birotte drops the Justice Department´s criminal investigation with no consultation with the Federal investigators and only 15 minute notice.
Yeah, every bike racer does that - because they all do it. I saw it in a movie.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
trapper, 1/13/2013 2:10:11 PM (No. 9114397)
Lance Armstrong apparently took substances he knew were against the rules and then lied about it. Not once, which would make him weak and human, but over and over and over again, which makes him a liar and a cheat. Once one´s lack of character has been confirmed, only a lifetime of pennance and demonstrated change can earn back the trust that was destroyed. There is no quick fix.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
SaguaroJack, 1/13/2013 2:12:09 PM (No. 9114402)
The fix to doping is simple. Have two categories - the undoped and the doped. The undoped would be the only ones eligible to win a competition.
The doped could race and all that, but couldn´t win anything. Or perhaps have a 1st, 2d and 3d among the dopers.
The award ceremony would have to come a week or so after an event to allow for dope testing.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
MariettaGator, 1/13/2013 2:40:39 PM (No. 9114444)
#2 you´re an idiot and I´m ashamed you claim to be a Gator...
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
suncitypro, 1/13/2013 2:50:12 PM (No. 9114458)
#26--Absolutely right! Lance, plain and simple is a liar. But then again liberals think that is a resume´ enhancer.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
thelmalou, 1/13/2013 2:52:36 PM (No. 9114460)
I knew all I needed to know about Lance Armstrong when he threw away his wife and kids for the glamour of fame and fortune. So this surprises me not one whit. Just another lying cheat who wants everybody to overlook his indiscretions so he can "move ahead" with the work of the people. Or something.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
LoneVoice, 1/13/2013 3:06:21 PM (No. 9114478)
I don´t understand the continued hero worship of a man who shown himself to be an absolute creep.
I saw the same thing when Clinton lied under oath.
I guess the rules that apply to us little people don´t apply to your heros.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
bob913, 1/13/2013 3:18:10 PM (No. 9114488)
Will he give up all the money he made by lying and cheating? Nope.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 1/13/2013 3:55:02 PM (No. 9114529)
Many contemporary celebrities (athletes included) subscribe to the idea that the ends justify the means, because, once famous and rich, one can afford as many mea culpas as needed to pacify the law-abiding, uncelebrated suckers.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
oldvlc, 1/13/2013 4:05:29 PM (No. 9114539)
Lance used epogen, a red blood cell multiplier that, guess what, thousands of kidney patients and others use to maintain some level of energy through their day. I used to give myself injections of it daily when I was on dialysis, not that it helped greatly in the treatment of dying kidneys. I do NOT consider that substance much of an aid to the blood. Lance was the greatest cycling athlete since the Belgian Eddy Merkx, and his accomplishments should not have been ignored because of epogen. It just is not that much of a stimulant, if at all.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
oldvlc, 1/13/2013 4:11:58 PM (No. 9114547)
#4 you don´t know the seedy underside of professional European cycling. #1 would probably win a bet with you; the pressure and stakes are enormous for riders who routinely ride an average of 28 to 30 MPH over hundreds of miles, or in the case of the Tour, thousands. These kids see racing as their only hope out of desparate conditions, and are superstitious to the max along with willing to try anything to give them an edge.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
kelty, 1/13/2013 5:28:12 PM (No. 9114626)
Breaking News: Asshat remains an asshat
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
leftcoastmom, 1/13/2013 8:15:22 PM (No. 9114782)
If they were all doping then the "playing field" was still equal...yes? He is going to say that the drugs were for his cancer...probably true. This whole thing is sad. Please continue to support Livestrong!
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 1/13/2013 8:57:33 PM (No. 9114809)
Whether it´s Lance Armstrong, Tiger Woods, Pete Rose, Michael Vick or other athletes, kids look up to you and you lied and cheated when given extraordinary opportunities they can only hope to have one day.
This is poor representation of the US worldwide.
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
Polecat49, 1/13/2013 9:00:10 PM (No. 9114811)
#48. kind of sounds like any athlete who wants to turn pro OR kid wanting to be a democRAT politician.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Moonspinner, 1/13/2013 9:19:24 PM (No. 9114831)
I really don´t care what Lance Armstrong did or didn´t do. I am more concerned about what politicians are doing to this country. Wish the media went after Obama and his ilk like they have been after Armstrong.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Boehner: House won´t just ´take up and accept´ Senate immigration bill
|
|
The Hill [DC], by Russell Berman & Mike Lillis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 3:26:29 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Thursday said the House won't pick up the Senate immigration bill and pass it. "The House remains committed to fixing our broken immigration system, but we will not simply take up and accept the bill that is emerging in the Senate if it passes," said the statement from Boehner, his top three lieutenants and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction on immigration. "The House remains committed to fixing our broken immigration system, but we will not simply take up and accept the bill that is emerging in the Senate if it passes," the statement said. "Rather, through regular order,
|
|
Holding AWOL Obama Accountable
|
|
American Spectator, by Betsy McCaughey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 6:20:22 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama offers only weasel words to explain deaths in Libya and IRS abuses. He’s the master of verbal evasion. House Republicans need to replace debate with action to hold the president accountable on these issues. To get to the bottom of why four Americans died in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, House Republicans should issue a formal resolution demanding to know where the president was on the night September 11 and what role he played. Obama needs to be put on the hot seat. Benghazi- For eight months, the White House has maneuvered
|
|
What the White House Really Thinks
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:59:25 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Much has been written and said about the astoundingly tone deaf performance of White House spokesman Jay Carney during this past month of scandals. The former journalist has lost the confidence of the people who were once his colleagues due to his unwillingness to tell the truth about his own deceptive statements (never mind those he represents in front of the press) about the Benghazi talking points or even to acknowledge that he has changed his story. The same applies to the shifting story he has told about the Internal Revenue Service scandal
|
|
All in the Family
|
|
Washington Free Beacon, by C.J. Ciaramella
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:44:55 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A nonprofit connected to Rep. Corrine Brown (D., Fla.) and run by a local political power player overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million, the Florida Times-Union reported. According to an audit by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, the Community Rehabilitation Center in Jacksonville overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million. Reggie Gaffney, a former Jacksonville Port Authority board member, runs the nonprofit, which provides medical services for mental illness, substance abuse, and HIV/AIDS for low-income residents. Brown’s daughter, Shantrel, is a lobbyist for Arlington-based Alcade and Fay, whose clients include the nonprofit. C
|
|
Slain Russian ‘intimidated’ neighbors
|
|
Boston Herald, by Laurel J. Sweet*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:40:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Cambridge neighbors of a Russian mixed martial arts brawler shot dead by an FBI agent early yesterday in Florida — after ?being questioned about his ties to the marathon bombing and a Waltham triple murder — said he was nasty. Ibragim Todashev, 27, also hung around with slain marathon bombing mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26 — swilling beer and eating chicken on a stoop on Harding Street, they said. “I was the happiest person when they moved. ... It’s a little more peaceful since they left,” a neighbor told the Herald yesterday of the Russian buddies.
|
|
The Real Voter Suppression of 2012
|
|
National Review Online, by John Fund
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:29:41 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The 2012 election season was filled with angry cries of “voter suppression,” almost all of them regarding attempts by states to require voter ID and otherwise improve ballot integrity. Bill Clinton warned that “there has never been — in my lifetime, since we got rid of the poll tax and all the other Jim Crow burdens on voting — the determined effort to limit the franchise that we see today.” Democratic-party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said “photo-ID laws, we think, are very similar to a poll tax.” All of this proved to be twaddle.
|
|
The ‘Criminal’ press
|
|
New York Post, by Michael A. Walsh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:24:39 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Justice Department’s secret seizure of phone records from The Associated Press and its monitoring of Fox News reporter James Rosen are nothing less than thuggish attempts to criminalize the practice of journalism — the only profession specifically protected by the US Constitution. Free and open inquiry is also the cornerstone of our democracy, a legacy of the Enlightenment that found its clearest expression in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” By which the Founders specifically meant political speech. They understood that, even with the checks and balances
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Lois Lerner´s Brief And Awful Day On Capitol Hill
|
|
NPR, by Frank James
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to
|
Criminality Appears To Lie at the Heart of the IRS Scandal
|
|
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Why was the Department of Homeland Security monitoring Tea Party IRS demonstrations?
|
|
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|