|
|
| |
Topic: White House responds to secession
petitions, calls for unity instead |
White House responds to secession
petitions, calls for unity instead
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Alexandra Jaffe
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/12/2013 1:20:09 PM
|
| The White House has responded to a handful of petitions calling for various states to be given the right to secede from the United States, calling for unity and participatory government instead. "In a nation of 300 million people — each with their own set of deeply-held beliefs — democracy can be noisy and controversial. And that´s a good thing. Free and open debate is what makes this country work, and many people around the world risk their lives every day for the liberties we often take for granted," writes Director of the Office of Public Engagement
|
Comments:
Uh huh, since 0bama and his out of control regime are such unifiers. s/o There is so much hypocrisy in that response you don´t even know where to start. That jerk is ripping this country apart and it sure isn´t going to improve over the next four years.
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
richwill, 1/12/2013 1:30:05 PM (No. 9112813)
I read the lead in and that was enough for me. Hussein is the worst president this nation has ever had. He makes Jimmy Carter look like a prince.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Spidey, 1/12/2013 1:30:36 PM (No. 9112814)
Everybody knows these petitions were largely to send a message of dissatisfaction with Obama´s abuse of power and other power grabs.For these idiots to then stand there and call for unity is absurd,when they´re the ones provoking all the disunity.
You can´t read one new site where Obama isn´t planning on going around congress on one issue or another.The government was intentionally split up so a power craving marxist couldn´t declare full authority.
The debt ceiling is about to go to 18+ trillion which means Obama will spend more borrowed money in 6 years than all other presidents before him combined.Even worse is there will be no bang for the buck in any of it.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
paulfromTexas, 1/12/2013 1:42:32 PM (No. 9112840)
Talk of unity while subverting it......next time, there will be no petitions, no polite entreaties.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Starlady, 1/12/2013 1:56:08 PM (No. 9112868)
The Director of the Office of Public Engagement? Sounds like something from "1984".
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Blackeagle, 1/12/2013 2:01:06 PM (No. 9112877)
So which it they want? Unity or diversity? They are not the same thing.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Refried, 1/12/2013 2:28:33 PM (No. 9112915)
GO GREEN!!!
Recycle Wash. DC
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
M2, 1/12/2013 2:43:36 PM (No. 9112943)
That there are so many States wanting to secede is amazing. At least they recognize what Obama is doing to the USA -- disuniting them.
It´s all on his head. Personally, I´d like to see the secession movement grow. Big.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
nonsense, 1/12/2013 2:56:15 PM (No. 9112962)
This from the administration that is about to confirm at least 3 anti-Americans to cabinet positions. Lew refuses to work with the Republicans at all, and refuses to do anything to pay down the debt or deficit. He and the others work for Mr.O, not for the American people.
The national givernment no longer represents the American people. How can the most divisive potus in history expect the citizens to work for unity when he does not.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
noproblems, 1/12/2013 4:33:46 PM (No. 9113106)
we need to go back to having the states be the principle tax and spend governmental unit. there is too big a divide in the country and it will continue to grow.
i dont care to live in California, NY and NJ and dont want to spend my tax dollars supporting the way they do things. i am sure they feel the same about states like TX, AZ, Florida etc.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
MissMann, 1/12/2013 4:36:58 PM (No. 9113111)
What the heck are we doing, groveling, hat in hand to ask our uberloard 0bama PERMISSION to secede? I´m pretty sure that is not how the founders intended it, regardless of Lincoln´s "folly."
The states joined of free will and are entitled--have always had the RIGHT--to leave.
No one should ever be forced to stay in a relationship, as Jefferson so elegantly declared. We have a divine right to liberty!
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
starboard, 1/12/2013 4:42:52 PM (No. 9113116)
For them to address this topic publicly sounds like it´s more than a casual issue. Obama´s moves this week have made me suspicious of what´s happening behind the scenes. His quick plan to end the war and vacate Afghanistan makes one wonder. Also, what was this lifetime protection bill he signed? Now the secession remark...doesn´t sound like a happy White House.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
verdantheart, 1/12/2013 4:46:27 PM (No. 9113123)
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives citizens the right "to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” That is a legal issue. The White House response is a public relations response, and I don´t blame them for trying it. But if people have grievances, they can seek relief under the law, as I read the Constitution.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 1/12/2013 5:12:11 PM (No. 9113157)
Aww But Obe the those millions of independent thinkers are what is called a Republic > A Constitutional Republic is stated in the Constitution and by law as our official form of Government.
In the form of a representative Republic NOT a Democracy.
Take your democracy worded as one unit tuned to obey you and drop it into the nearest trash compactor crawl in with it and close the lid.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
provide, 1/13/2013 9:10:59 AM (No. 9113844)
This is a preemptive "binding up the wounds" Gettysburg Address speech theft.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
National Review Hammers Gang
of Eight for Promoting Amnesty
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by Warner Todd Huston
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:40:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In a new editorial, the folks at National Review came out strongly against the immigration plan being sponsored by the "Gang of Eight," a group of Senators that includes Marco Rubio (R-FL), calling the bill "Rubio´s Folly." National Review urges Senator Rubio to vote against the bill he has helped craft. It slams the proposed legislation as, "an amnesty-first, enforcement-maybe program drawn up mainly to reflect the priorities of 11 million citizens of other countries rather than the concerns of more than 300 million citizens of the United States." The editors point out that many of the
|
Bipartisan bill would
soften ObamaCare mandate
|
|
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Sam Baker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:35:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A pair of centrist senators introduced a bill Wednesday to soften the employer mandate in President Obama´s healthcare law. The healthcare law requires employers to offer coverage to employees who work more than 30 hours per week. Some employers have said they will reduce workers´ hours to avoid the mandate. Sens. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) proposed a bill to move the threshold to 40 hours per week, saying the employer mandate should match the traditional definition of a full-time worker. "What we´ve tried to do is be reflective of the businesses we work with,"
|
| |
|
|
Another likely Rubio whopper
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:22:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Marco Rubio made another one of his seemingly endless appearances on Sean Hannity’s program to advocate amnesty legislation. Rubio told Hannity that he has opposed amendments by Republican Senators to improve the legislation’s enforcement provisions because a new enforcement provision will be proposed tomorrow that is tougher and more effective than what has been proposed so far. Rand Paul’s amendment, which Rubio voted against, would have given Congress, not the Department of Homeland Security, the ultimate authority to determine if the border is effectively secure. It would also have included enhanced security measures, such as requiring a
|
How Obamacare Is Being Used to
Create a Permanent Democratic Majority
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:16:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
To a remarkable degree, liberalism has been institutionalized as an official ideology, funded by your tax dollars. This editorial in Investors Business Daily explains, in shocking detail, how Obamacare is being used to fund Democratic Party operatives and drive Democratic Party enrollment: The Obama administration granted a whopping $910 million to California to set up its insurance exchange. That money is not for bandages, surgery, nurses and doctors to care for the sick. …Shockingly, the $910 million is slated for bureaucracy, including rich compensation packages for exchange employees ($360,000 a year for the executive director) and contracts for
|
Kaiser: Faith in Obamacare
plummets to just 35%
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 10:02:16 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The popularity of Obamacare has crashed to its lowest level in nearly two years, according to a new Kaiser Family Foundation poll. Kaiser´s monthly tracking poll found that just 35 percent have a favorable view of the health reform being put into place Jan. 1 while 43 percent view it unfavorably. The favorability rating of Obamacare has been worse only once, in October 2011, when it fell to 34 percent. Not only is the June poll bad news for the president as his administration struggles to have the health reform program ready for people to begin signing up
|
We´re all potential suspects and
should be treated as such, apparently
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Ashe Schow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 9:49:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Americans are already wary of the federal government having collected their phone records, but now we have Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., setting up a slippery slope of more and more data collection. Earlier today, a Washington Examiner editorial warned that "if phone records are useful now in stopping terrorist attacks, how long before politicians and bureaucrats decide archiving the entire phone call would be even more useful? How long before the limitations and safeguards now in place are set aside?" Within a few hours, King provided an illustration of precisely what the Examiner editors fear. Responding to a
|
Right rips Rubio as Republican
immigration votes slip away
|
|
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Alexander Bolton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 9:42:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is feeling the heat as potential GOP allies are now turning against his immigration reform bill. Republican colleagues who were previously viewed as possible “yes” votes are keeping their distance from the 1,075-page measure. On Wednesday, conservative activists ripped Rubio and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) — both sponsors of the bipartisan immigration measure — at a Capitol Hill rally. The crowd, which was protesting the bill’s effort to put millions of illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship, booed at the mention of Rubio’s name during the six-hour event.
|
| |
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence
in new documentary, claim original
conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
|
|
FOX News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says
Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.
|
Obama: ´If Catholics Have
Their Schools and Buildings
and Protestants Have Theirs ...
That Encourages Division´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 3:46:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Likening religious schools to segregation--a racist system that forced blacks to attend different schools and use different facilities than whites in the American South--President Barack Obama told a town hall meeting for youth in Belfast, Northern Ireland on Monday that there should not be Catholic and Protestant schools because such schools cause division. "Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--symbols of history that are a source of pride for some and pain for others--these are not tangential to peace; they’re essential to it,"
|
Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
G8: Barack Obama looks like
a president going through the motions
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s
|
Obama: You Can´t Fathom
´Complexities´ of Syria
Policy ´If You Haven´t Been
in Situation Room´
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.
|
How Democracies Perish, Deathbed Edition
|
|
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: steveW- 6/18/2013 6:11:46 AM
Post Reply
|
|
This is the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of How Democracies Perish, an analysis of the spread of world communism by Jean-François Revel, one of freedom´s most serious French defenders since Tocqueville. At the heart of this work, Revel details "The Tools of Communist Expansion," among which the most relevant for understanding our current situation comes in Chapter 16, "Ideological Warfare and Disinformation." The profound simplicity of Revel´s nuts and bolts account of totalitarianism´s Cold War advance, far from being obsolete
|
| | |
|
|
