A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: ‘Disappointed’ NRA sees
White House ‘agenda
to attack’ gun rights
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
‘Disappointed’ NRA sees
White House ‘agenda
to attack’ gun rights

Washington Times, by David Sherfinski

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/10/2013 10:44:06 PM

The National Rifle Association said it was “disappointed” with the focus of a Thursday meeting with Vice President Joseph R. Biden and other groups over new gun measures, arguing that the White House gathering had less to do with keeping the country’s children safe and more to do “with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment.” “We attended today’s White House meeting to discuss how to keep our children safe and were prepared to have a meaningful conversation about school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals,”

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: 4Justice, 1/11/2013 4:30:02 AM     (No. 9110158)

Did they really believe Biden and the Dems wanted to discuss keeping children safe??? Why are the people who are supposed be protecting our rights so naive??? It seems like they always expect the left to be sincere about what they say. They seem to be so gullible. I don´t get it! They should KNOW that these leftists are ALWAYS scheming and are never straight with anyone to whom they are ideologically opposed.


Reply 2 - Posted by: strike3, 1/11/2013 4:32:52 AM     (No. 9110159)

I hope that the NRA spokesperson is just being diplomatic and that they actually didn´t believe they could conduct any kind of a "meaningful" talk with the gun grabbers. Barry assigned Joe to this task for a reason and it is obvious that the decisions have already been made. The meetings with "stakeholders" were a mere formality so the dictator could twist the statements into the result that "most" Americans want strict gun control.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 1/11/2013 5:11:41 AM     (No. 9110178)

There was no "conversation." It was a BiteMe harangue about evil guns!


Reply 4 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 1/11/2013 7:15:18 AM     (No. 9110246)

I can´t wait to see what they really mean by "allowing federal agencies to conduct research on gun violence".
I can envision a day when you will be refused treatment under ObamaCare unless you agree to give up all guns registered to you as well as any found in a subsequent search of your property.


Reply 5 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/11/2013 7:28:35 AM     (No. 9110267)

It was not a conversation, any more than the "conversations" about Obamacare.

People didn´t want that, either, and look what happened.


Reply 6 - Posted by: rabbit, 1/11/2013 7:53:03 AM     (No. 9110297)

The publicly-stated subject of the meeting was "gun violence". If the NRA arrived and thought the subject was "school safety", then they obviously ignored the invitation they were given as well as all of the media publicity using the term "gun violence".

The NRA may be unhappy with how the meeting went, but it is disingenuous to suggest that the White House changed the subject.


Reply 7 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/11/2013 7:55:26 AM     (No. 9110302)

I want all political meetings to be televised. Where is the ad of the faux potus telling his adoring fans that he will be the most Transparent pol in history? Ramp it up with his own words.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: faith_and_reason, 1/11/2013 8:17:05 AM     (No. 9110335)

Google searches for Hitler, Stalin and gun control or confiscation were very high in recent months. Were regime agents researching what processes worked in the past? What unforseen "obstacles" had to be overcome (or killed)?

Or were patriots arming themselves with the same information?

Both?


Reply 9 - Posted by: Judith, 1/11/2013 8:19:39 AM     (No. 9110343)

Let´s face it. Since pelosi took the gavel, the dems have made it quite clear they intend to become dictators in this country. And, because of a gutless congress and a corrupted supreme court and, it would appear, a compliant citizenry, they are achieving this goal.


Reply 10 - Posted by: LZK, 1/11/2013 8:28:49 AM     (No. 9110363)

Oh baby oh baby -- let them come for mine.....

LZK


Reply 11 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 1/11/2013 8:49:20 AM     (No. 9110397)

Poster 6, I´ve seen 10 replays of sanctimonious biden at the gun violence conference in his muffled affect talking about those "defenseless children at the Connecticut school riddled with bullets, not hit with stray bullets, but riddled." Democrats always change the subject. They specialize in emotional, straw man arguments. Democrats constantly redefine words and use euphemisms to suit their leftist agenda. So please don´t cause our eyes to roll with your silly lecture about changing the subject.


Reply 12 - Posted by: bigken2, 1/11/2013 8:52:35 AM     (No. 9110402)

the fact that the head of thev NRA didnt go was all i needed to know this was obozo waggin his finger in our face telling us he is king and we had better comply whell we though out one king we can do it again up yours obozo


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 1/11/2013 8:55:26 AM     (No. 9110405)

Some people sat on their hands and did not vote for Republicans - a third party is not the answer and adds to splitting the vote and a losing one for the Pubbies. Until we have control of both houses we are dead in the water and the dims can do whatever they want.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Rinktum, 1/11/2013 9:19:09 AM     (No. 9110456)

Obama is pushing this country to violence because it will further his agenda. He wants chaos in this country and he will have it because he can´t fundamentally change this country without it. He is being provocatively contentious in dealing with the issue of gun control. He is in perpetual community organizer agitating mode. The democrats are in perpetual crisis mode. The media is in perpetual propagamda mode, and the Republicans are in perpetual whipped dog mode. Another perfect storm for governmental tyranny perpetrated on American citizens.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Rinktum, 1/11/2013 9:20:56 AM     (No. 9110460)

Sorry, I can spell propaganda. Carry on.


Reply 16 - Posted by: BetseyRoss, 1/11/2013 10:09:49 AM     (No. 9110577)

Obama has already geared up for this. His FEMA(DHS) has the training and facilities. However, at this point in time they don´t have enough people. They just have places for mass graves and ways to trasport the bodies. Make no mistake he wants to do this. He may never have enough people, but he needs to be stopped. Too bad our wimps in Congress can´t seem to get it right.


Reply 17 - Posted by: nevernaught, 1/11/2013 10:20:07 AM     (No. 9110599)

The real question is ... do you trust leaders who are sending our tanks and other armaments to the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists in Egypt to be used against Israel. The same people who sent 2000 assault weapons to the Drug Cartel in Mexico that caused the murder of 300 Mexican people. Do you trust them not use the guns they take away from you against you.

Obama and the rest of the criminals in Washington DC are about to start another civil war in this country by attempting to disarm law abiding citizens. They now have a clear record of killing innocent people around the world. They need controlling, not tax paying, law abiding people who need to protect themselves in Obama´s world. Who works for who in this twisted country today.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: pete moss, 1/11/2013 10:20:08 AM     (No. 9110600)

Number 14 is right on the money. Our elected criminals, who have spent our country broke, would like nothing more than to create a one party dictatorship. I never thought I´d live to see it, but I fear that we are well on our way to another civil war.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Butch59, 1/11/2013 10:46:32 AM     (No. 9110661)

"When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security". From the Declaration of Independence.

These are the words of Thomas Jefferson himself. And he was supposed to be the first "Democrat"?

This is what Obozo is leading up to. Whether it´s intentional or not is not worth debating. He´s doing it. And, if we believe in the Declaration, and all we have learned from the writings of the founders ( those of us who have actually read them) then the time is fasting approaching for us to rise up and throw off the tyranny that is encompassing us.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 1/11/2013 11:09:32 AM     (No. 9110715)

Maybe it´s time for a million-gun-owners march on Washington & the WH, all carrying toy wooden guns for symbolism.

How about five million or ten million. I´d be there.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Silly Old Me, 1/11/2013 11:16:14 AM     (No. 9110733)

Just thinking, but why dont they enforce some of the 20,000 gun laws already on the books?


Reply 22 - Posted by: mrduc, 1/11/2013 11:36:30 AM     (No. 9110779)

Protection of the public is just a fig leaf. Our state and federal goobermints are wearing very tiny figleaves. If they had even a decent sized pair, they would have gone after the ILLEGAL guns in our inner cities decades ago and stopped the slaughter of the minorities, innocent and not-so-innocent, who live with gun violence every night.

But they haven´t, have they?

Democrats are such racists.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: RayLRiv, 1/11/2013 11:38:53 AM     (No. 9110783)

Last night I renewed my NRA membership for three years - and I don´t even own a gun (not yet.) I let my original membership expire back in 2008. Last night I was on hold 28 minutes before I got through to a live NRA operator/associate.


Reply 24 - Posted by: a man over thirty, 1/11/2013 11:59:51 AM     (No. 9110823)

#24 - explain how please.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/11/2013 12:04:41 PM     (No. 9110836)

You could not find a clearer, unmistakably brazen assault on the Constitution than this gun offensive. The mask is off, the gloves are off, all pretense of legitimacy is gone, and the line is drawn between the governors and the governed. Benjamin Franklin told us we had been given representative republic, if we could now just keep it. He knew that in time the test would come. Well, the time is here and we are the ones who will succeed or fail. It’s us or the man from nowhere.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Grambo, 1/11/2013 12:06:50 PM     (No. 9110843)

#24 is playing his NRA (not real American) song again. It´s getting old.


Reply 27 - Posted by: bob913, 1/11/2013 12:21:06 PM     (No. 9110875)

Hypocrite!!


obama gives himself lifetime protection with armed guards 24/7...

FLASHBACK: obama opposed bill to allow person to use gun to save own life in own home...


Reply 28 - Posted by: LadyHen, 1/11/2013 1:01:35 PM     (No. 9110970)

Of course the NRA knew going in that the Obama administration were not plain dealers and would not be serious. They also know what the American people care about, safety. Hence the statement and hence not letting Obama reframe the real argument.

Not allowing over emotional know nothing pols reframe the real argument is a classic tactic of coming from a position of rational strength. Try it sometime.. pretty liberating.


Reply 29 - Posted by: 4Justice, 1/11/2013 1:07:59 PM     (No. 9110985)

#24 never explains himself, but I think his argument is that because the NRA added in the provision to the ACA that doctors should be discouraged from asking if people have a gun in their home that somehow they helped support and pass the bill. I don´t see it that way. I think they knew it was likely going to be pushed through anyway so they threw in the provision to keep them from using the information against gun owners. I don´t think that necessarily was a cause for the passage of Zerocare, however.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Marzon, 1/11/2013 1:13:06 PM     (No. 9110997)

Wasn´t it one of Obama´s cabinet members who said at a graduation speech that "like Mao, we realize the only real power comes from the barrel of a gun"? They believe it and therefore they want to be the only ones with the guns.

They crave total power and they don´t care if they have to kill to get it. (See Fast & Furious). I believe they are perfectly willing to ignite a civil war to get it. The struggles of the coming days are exactly what the 2nd Amendment was written for. But how may Americans are willing to fight, kill, and possibly die, to defend thier liberties? Too few I fear...


Reply 31 - Posted by: JoElla Bee, 1/11/2013 1:17:49 PM     (No. 9111013)

I had a conversation recently with a woman who had gone to a new doctor. She was asked to fill out a questionnaire. One of the questions was whether or not she had guns in her household, and, if so, how many.

I asked what on earth that had to do with healthcare. She said she didn´t know, but that there were other questions about such things as income, etc., that seemed equally odd for such a questionnaire.

Reminds me of the questionnaire for members of the military that I was told about during the Clinton years. One of the questions dealt with the willingness of the person to fire on U.S. citizens. And, we all remember the military tanks at Waco.

These things, of course, didn´t come about overnight, or as the result of recent events. Lefist comrades in spirit, who are long since dead, dreamed of these times when their dreams are coming to fruition.


Reply 32 - Posted by: flatwater, 1/11/2013 1:50:09 PM     (No. 9111089)

#6,

Your friends at democraticunderground.com and communistpartyusa.org miss you terribly. Why don´t you go back and join them?

Whatever the White House pays you to troll here, it´s way, way too much.


Reply 33 - Posted by: tocsin, 1/11/2013 2:12:06 PM     (No. 9111150)

OH!#6-Elmer Fudd would like a word with you.


Reply 34 - Posted by: lana720, 1/11/2013 2:27:30 PM     (No. 9111188)

Why aren´t these meetings or "Conversations" on C-SPAN?
Seems we should at least be able to see a transcript of who said what.


Reply 35 - Posted by: rmyersne, 1/11/2013 3:32:54 PM     (No. 9111297)

NRA was very smart to send a representative so they could at least hear the dialogue that took place in that room. I am sure going in that the NRA knew that the Whitehouse would not listen to their suggestions.


Reply 36 - Posted by: peterfleming, 1/11/2013 6:33:51 PM     (No. 9111575)

What other lobbying bodies are out there? Let´s not put all our gun defending eggs in one NRA basket. Imagine all this new socialist nazi pressure, more than ever before, and all of it focused on the NRA. The NRA likely will not fold, but now is the time to introduce new voices, new institutions to speak up. More voices. Dear Ted is not the only spokesman. And, we have to ask, where is OUR British guy, who is not a communist, OUR counter-terrorist Brit who can spar with Herr Piers Adolph Morgan.
OUR guy who can tell us how miserable things
are in England, having no guns, while being over run by totalitarian muslims and tons more socialism. Let´s get our own Olympic
Pro Gun Team out there.


Reply 37 - Posted by: wsdiego, 1/11/2013 7:15:23 PM     (No. 9111633)

As long as we have an administration that want to take away our constitutional rights there is no such thing as too many guns!



Post Reply   Close thread 718497




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



"When Fascism Comes to America . . ."
National Review Online, by Mona Charen    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 7:54:10 AM     Post Reply
Liberals used to love to quote the (apparently apocryphal) line from a Sinclair Lewis character “When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and waving a cross.” Wonder if they’re reflecting on that this week? We knew that early in the first term, the White House attempted to exclude a news agency from pool reports. Now come revelations that the Justice Department engaged in sweeping eavesdropping on AP journalists; that the IRS targeted conservative private citizens while favoring liberal ones; that the EPA charged fees to conservatives groups while waiving them for “green” activists;

Crews dig through night
after deadly Okla. twister
Associated Press, by Nomaan Merchant and Tim Talley    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 7:42:54 AM     Post Reply
MOORE, Okla. — Spotlights bore down on massive piles of shredded cinder block, insulation and metal as crews worked through the night lifting bricks and parts of collapsed walls where a monstrous tornado barreled through the Oklahoma City suburbs, demolishing an elementary school and reducing homes to piles of splintered wood. At least 51 people were killed, including at least 20 children, and those numbers were expected to climb, officials said Tuesday. The storm stripped leaves off trees and left scores of blocks in Moore barren and dark. Rescuers walked through neighborhoods where Monday´s powerful twister flattened home after home

Senate Committee Poised
to Beat Up On Apple
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 10:17:46 PM     Post Reply
Steve wrote this morning about a hearing being held this week by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, in which Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook, will testify tomorrow. The subcommittee apparently is trying to highlight supposed tax avoidance on the part of American companies, as the Associated Press reports: Apple Inc. employs a group of affiliate companies located outside the United States to avoid paying billions of dollars in U.S. income taxes, a Senate investigation has found. The world’s most valuable company is holding overseas some $102 billion of its $145 billion in cash, and an Irish

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee
Urged Feds to ´Investigate
True the Vote´ in 2010
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Brandon Darby    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 10:06:28 PM     Post Reply
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) asked Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate election integrity org True the Vote and its associated Tea Party group, King Street Patriots, immediately before the IRS and DOJ began targeting the group in June 2010. Rep. Jackson Lee sent a letter to Holder which alleged that True the Vote was intimidating voters and their election monitors were crossing the line in unspecified “instances” of voter intimidation. The letter went on to directly assert that the “alleged events” were factual and that the True the Vote effort was behind the crimes

Gunmaker tops list
of Massachusetts’
100 best companies
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Gunmaker Smith & Wesson tops the list of best businesses in bright blue Massachusetts — after not making the list at all last year — a new report in the Boston Globe found. The 161-year-old company, based in a state with some of the stricter gun control laws in the nation, tried to diversify its holdings by acquiring a security company in recent years, only to do an “about-face” by focusing on its product line, the newspaper said in its explanation of the Springfield firm’s top spot. “We went back to what we do best, which is handguns,”

Justice Department’s scrutiny of
Fox News reporter James Rosen
in leak case draws fire
Washington Post, by Ann E. Marimow    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:49:35 PM     Post Reply
Journalists, First Amendment watchdogs and government transparency advocates reacted with outrage Monday to the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks. Critics said the government’s suggestion that James Rosen, Fox News’s chief Washington correspondent, was a “co-conspirator” for soliciting classified information threatened to criminalize press freedoms protected by the First Amendment. Others also suggested that the Justice Department’s claim in pursuing an alleged leak

IRS´s Lerner Had History of
Harassment, Inappropriate Religious
Inquiries at FEC
Weekly Standard, by Mark Hemingway    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:30:25 PM     Post Reply
Perhaps no other IRS official is more intimately associated with the tax agency´s growing scandal than Lois Lerner, director of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Division. Since admitting the IRS harassed hundreds of conservative and Tea Party groups for over two years, Lerner has been criticized for a number of untruths—including the revelation that she apparently lied about planting a question at an American Bar Association conference where she first publicly acknowledged IRS misconduct. Still, Lerner has her defenders in the government and the media. Shortly after the scandal broke, The Daily Beast published an article headlined "IRS Scandal’s Central



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

44 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

42 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement


Post Reply   Close thread 718497





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~