A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Charles Blow: "I Have A
Right To Not Own A Gun
And Still Feel Safe"
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Charles Blow: "I Have A
Right To Not Own A Gun
And Still Feel Safe"

Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 1/9/2013 11:14:29 AM

Charles Blow, of the New York Times, and Republican commentator Margaret Hoover discuss the power of the National Rifle Association in Washington and gun regulation on the Tuesday night broadcast of CNN´s "Anderson Cooper." CHARLES BLOW, NEW YORK TIMES: I think when we talk about gun control and we only talk about gun owners as the only people involved in that equation, that is the wrong frame. I have -- you have a right to own a gun. I have a right to not own a gun and still feel safe in this society.

Comments:
Here´s another delusional leftist wacko. I´m sure all the criminals in New York will be anxious to know he is a good mark.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 1/9/2013 11:25:38 AM     (No. 9106903)

He starts out saying that he has the right to not own a gun and still feel safe, then he starts talking about not having a gun and being safe. Feeling safe and being safe are two different things. He has every right to feel safe. However, it is not my responsibility to make him feel safe. It is NOT the government´s responsibility to make him feel safe. As to BEING safe, it is still not anybody´s responsibility but his own to arrange for him to be safe. You do not have a right to "be safe". Whether or not you are safe is more a matter of the decisions that you make. For example, I would recommend that he not go to Chicago because he is unlikely to be safe there (despite having very restrictive laws regarding gun ownership). On the other hand, if he were to go to Kennesaw, Georgia, he would probably be very safe BECAUSE they require the head of every household to own a gun.


Reply 2 - Posted by: tisHimself, 1/9/2013 11:27:52 AM     (No. 9106911)

In fact, you have a moral obligation to be able to protect yourself and your family.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Penney, 1/9/2013 11:27:56 AM     (No. 9106912)

Is Chuck a wimp, a doormat or a bully? In any case, he certainly is off in LaLaLand.


Reply 4 - Posted by: GreatGreyhounds, 1/9/2013 11:28:41 AM     (No. 9106914)

I´m sure that Charles Blow feels very safe, his gun-carrying bodyguard sees to that...


Reply 5 - Posted by: ohioTom, 1/9/2013 11:29:58 AM     (No. 9106919)

Charles you are an idiot. You feel how you feel. You have no ´right´ to force someone else to make you feel a certain way.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Cavallodifiero, 1/9/2013 11:30:12 AM     (No. 9106920)

Charlie my boy, you do have a right to not own a gun and in fact you have (somewhat) of a right to feel safe, but I can assure that you are NOT AS SAFE as those who do own a gun. Now if that works for you it certainly works for me. I think all those opposed to guns should have signs in fron of their homes saying that that home is a gun free zone!

Remember the police are only minutes away when only seconds count.


Reply 7 - Posted by: bob913, 1/9/2013 11:34:17 AM     (No. 9106932)

Stabbings are way up in merry ol England where they banned guns. The criminals also sue their victims if the victims try to defend themselves and the state backs up the criminal.

Since we know the democrat party is a criminal organization they want what England has.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: kono, 1/9/2013 11:37:44 AM     (No. 9106941)

Sigh. Nobody has a right to any kind of guaranteed outcome in life. Heck, the Left won´t even let us guarantee every person conceived the right to be safe from being killed in the womb by their own mother, and Blow wants the right to ´feel safe´ without owning any kind of self defense? Awww, isn´t that cute...


Reply 9 - Posted by: JustCause, 1/9/2013 11:41:24 AM     (No. 9106949)

Charles: Try being informed instead of just opinionated.

Feel Safe - I´d suggest Charles needs to move to a Gun Free area of Chicago. He is free to FEEL anything he wants, but he isn´t free to tell me how I feel.

Read John Lott´s - More Guns, Less Crime

You cannot argue or negotiate with people who are intellectually dishonest


Reply 10 - Posted by: Keekng, 1/9/2013 11:42:58 AM     (No. 9106953)

There is absolutely nothing in the Constitution giving anyone the right to "feel safe".


Reply 11 - Posted by: Proud2bninfidel, 1/9/2013 11:44:37 AM     (No. 9106957)

refresh my memory. which enumerated right is that?


Reply 12 - Posted by: jalo1951, 1/9/2013 11:47:13 AM     (No. 9106964)

It´s a nice thought but it´s just not reality.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: PChristopher, 1/9/2013 11:54:14 AM     (No. 9106984)

The Declaration of Independence says we have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Keeping the first two requires a knowledge of firearms...the third is up to you; you have a right to the pursuit, not the happiness/safety itself. That´s my judicial ruling for the day.


Reply 14 - Posted by: aposematic, 1/9/2013 11:56:10 AM     (No. 9106989)

Blow: "I have a right to not own a gun and still feel safe in this society."

If feeling safe could in any possible way actually make you safe, why would you choose to feel any other way?


Reply 15 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 1/9/2013 11:56:36 AM     (No. 9106990)

This is the most succinct and revealing example of the way liberals think that I have ever seen. It deserves to be memorialized in bronze. It would make a good epitaph.


Reply 16 - Posted by: jalo1951, 1/9/2013 11:59:43 AM     (No. 9106998)

Sorry for the 2nd post but I am sitting in a middle school that is currently getting new security measures and equipment. I would like our staff to have more protection than a stapler if someone happens to get into our building with a gun. Just imagine if a few people were armed in that school instead of just sitting there waiting to be picked off like turkeys at a shoot.


Reply 17 - Posted by: nimby, 1/9/2013 12:01:36 PM     (No. 9107003)

Blow does "blow hard"


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/9/2013 12:02:35 PM     (No. 9107005)

I wouldn´t feel safe if the government was the only ones allowed to own guns.


Reply 19 - Posted by: skedaddle, 1/9/2013 12:03:08 PM     (No. 9107008)

I´d like to see Charles Blow argue with some urban gang bangers about his "right" to feel safe without a gun. In fact, I´d like for him to be dropped off in South Chicago about midnight Friday and then he can pontificate about his rights and see how that works out.


Reply 20 - Posted by: calicojack, 1/9/2013 12:14:09 PM     (No. 9107031)

I don´t know about Charles, but for myself, I DO feel safer knowing that those around me are armed. If I can´t take out the next nut-job, one of my neighbors will.


Reply 21 - Posted by: disasterman, 1/9/2013 12:15:13 PM     (No. 9107034)

Sorry Charles, my right to self defense and to own a gun is given to me by a higher authority at birth and guaranteed by The Constitution. I just looked it up, your feelings are not mentioned anywhere in that document.


Reply 22 - Posted by: grommit, 1/9/2013 12:20:58 PM     (No. 9107050)

What was your address Chuck?


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: RightShoe, 1/9/2013 12:26:48 PM     (No. 9107063)

Just rely on the police.

When seconds count, they´re only minutes away.


Reply 24 - Posted by: cheeflo, 1/9/2013 12:30:09 PM     (No. 9107068)

No, you only have a right to own or not own a gun. Whether you feel safe or not is a different issue.


Reply 25 - Posted by: kens, 1/9/2013 12:37:29 PM     (No. 9107094)

You do not have a RIGHT to feel safe. What the hell kind of rationale is that?

You have a right to freedom. Freedom is not a perilous-free commodity.


Reply 26 - Posted by: strike3, 1/9/2013 12:38:28 PM     (No. 9107096)

If you want to feel safe, Charles, just make sure you get off the streets before dark. I should say "relatively" safe because that´s no guarantee either.


Reply 27 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 1/9/2013 12:46:18 PM     (No. 9107112)

"Blow" and "Hoover"? Talk about having opposing viewpoints.


Reply 28 - Posted by: jimmiet, 1/9/2013 12:56:45 PM     (No. 9107138)

Charles Blow your desire to not own a gun has nothing to do with anything other than you don´t own a gun therefore I can´t? Where the hell are the white coats?


Reply 29 - Posted by: coyote, 1/9/2013 1:51:18 PM     (No. 9107262)

Sure Mr. Blow, you should feel safe. But, with or without a gun, is crime going to stop? If legislation could end crime, murder would have ended millennia ago. Gun-banning legislation will not stop assaults and murders using firearms. So some people would like the protection of a handgun in addition to the police. If you prefer to not have a gun, I suggest awareness of surroundings and caution.


Reply 30 - Posted by: 901AtTheRiver, 1/9/2013 1:56:13 PM     (No. 9107282)

Charles, every right you enjoy, including freedom and the pursuit of happiness derives from the Constitution of the United States, which was established after hard fought and won wars by good people with guns. Those rights remain after many subsequent wars fought and won by good people with guns. Police are mostly good people with guns, but they are not always around when you need them. There are MANY other good people with guns, and you are safer as a result thereof. You take the guns away from the good people and you will certainly not be safer, no matter how you feel.


Reply 31 - Posted by: The Architect, 1/9/2013 2:02:51 PM     (No. 9107303)

Charles, I´m going to type this real slowly and use small words so you can understand. Nobody and I do mean nobody is insisting that you have a gun. Your fellow travelers are however insisting that nobody should have them just because they don´t want anybody to have one. Do you see the difference here? And as other posters have stated, the Constitution does not guarantee your right to "feel" or not "feel" anything or anyway. It does most certainly guarantee the right of citizens to bear arms.


Reply 32 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/9/2013 2:04:15 PM     (No. 9107309)

Remember a leftist is that way until they are robbed at gunpoint, then somehow they magically become conservative and get a gun.

Some people are just morons and don´t know anything...we have here a couple of examples of the latter.


Reply 33 - Posted by: John21, 1/9/2013 2:18:55 PM     (No. 9107354)

Yes, you have that right but your safety is ensured by good people carrying guns.

I know that Mr. Blow is a liberal with little mental capacity and no understanding of how the world works but stupidity is not an excuse.
Mr. Blow you are under the mistaken assumption that anyone outside your little bubble thinks you have any credibility or integrity but your hypocray is too much to pass up. No one cares what you oppinion is if you are unhappy with the country do us a favor leave (and take that idiot Piers Morgan with you) go to the EU you will enjoy the lack of rights and socialist justice you find there.
Do the real world a favor go get another Kool-aid and sit quietly in corner and try and count your toes (I know its hards to count that high)


Reply 34 - Posted by: coldborezero, 1/9/2013 3:37:55 PM     (No. 9107510)

MY RIGHTS are mine at birth and derive from Nature and Nature´s God, not the Constitution. The Constitution guarantees my rights WILL NOT BE INFRINGED BY A TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT. It is an important distinction.


Reply 35 - Posted by: LadyVet, 1/9/2013 4:25:56 PM     (No. 9107590)

I´d like to feel safe from ever seeing "Blow" and "Anderson Cooper" in the same sentence or paragraph or any close proximity.


Reply 36 - Posted by: KTWO, 1/9/2013 4:39:32 PM     (No. 9107610)

New human rights emerge constantly. About one a week.

Is how you feel a human right Blow thinks so.

As #3 said "You have no ´right" to force someone else to make you feel a certain way."


Reply 37 - Posted by: Italiano, 1/9/2013 4:45:10 PM     (No. 9107621)

You want to feel safe, Charlie? Stay out of "certain areas of" Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia and DC after dark.


Reply 38 - Posted by: Boneshaker, 1/9/2013 5:11:28 PM     (No. 9107681)

Charlie doesn´t want to own a gun.
And doesn´t really want other citizens to own guns.

But watch him squawk if it became illegal for people like him, or employers like his, to have access to armed security.



Post Reply   Close thread 718233




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Columbia´s Cons: Ivy League
social work program run by
team of former prisoners
Fox News, by Perry Chiaramonte    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 2:59:09 PM     Post Reply
EXCLUSIVE: In the hallowed halls of Columbia University, a nest of ex-cons — who have served time for murder, attempted murder, robbery and assault — hold court on their unique brand of social justice for admiring students enrolled in the school´s social work program, a FoxNews.com investigation has found. The ex-cons work for or with the Criminal Justice Initiative (CJI), co-founded in 2009 by former Weather Underground operative and Columbia adjunct professor Kathy Boudin, who pleaded guilty to felony murder for her role in an infamous 1981 armed robbery that left two police officers and a security guard dead.

Ted Cruz blasts Gang of
Eight immigration reform
bill on Rush Limbaugh show
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 2:37:36 PM     Post Reply
On Rush Limbaugh’s radio show this afternoon, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, denounced the Gang of Eight immigration reform bill, encouraging his audience to call their member of Congress to oppose the bill. Cruz noted there were about 20 Republican Senators that were on the fence about voting for the bill, but that he believed that it was “politically foolish” and “terrible for the country.” “It doesn’t fix the problem,” Cruz said. “We need to fix the problem, secure the borders and improve legal immigration.” Cruz dismissed the Congressional Budget Office report showing that the bill would actually decrease federal

Irish parliamentarians spar over
´war criminal´ Obama´s summit visit
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 2:25:30 PM     Post Reply
President Obama´s visit to the Group of Eight summit has created a political row in Ireland after an outspoken liberal lawmaker on Wednesday denounced the U.S. president as a “war criminal” for his drone use and his decision to arm the Syrian rebels. Parliamentarian Clare Daly said her country´s government had showcased the country “as a nation of pimps, prostituting ourselves in return for a pat on the head,” The Irish Times reports. The “unprecedented slobbering” during Obama´s two-day visit to Northern Ireland, she said, had even led to speculation that “you were going to deck the

AP CEO Says Government
Sources Won’t Talk After
Justice Department Probe
BuzzFeed.com, by Evan McMorris-Santoro    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 2:16:53 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — The CEO of the Associated Press told an audience Wednesday that the Department of Justice has succeeded in muzzling government employees from talking to AP reporters in the weeks since the seizure of AP phone records was revealed. “What I learned from our journalists should alarm everyone in this room and I think should alarm everyone in this country. The actions of the DOJ against AP are already having an impact beyond the specifics of this particular case,” AP CEO

For Billionaire Ron Perelman,
Cantor’s Wife Is Just Latest
Board Pick From Political World
National Journal, by Shane Goldmacher    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 1:57:18 PM     Post Reply
Billionaire businessman Ronald Perelman has helped land the wife of Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor on the board of directors of Revlon—the latest politically connected appointment to the board of a company he controls. Perelman, 70, has been a political player for decades. He dishes out large campaign checks. He employs a team of lobbyists to patrol the nation’s capital to protect his business interests. And he has ensured that a steady stream of political elites land on the payrolls or boards of directors of his businesses. Among the political bold-named faces that have filled

Obama downplays rift as Karzai
pulls out of Taliban peace talks
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Justin Sink    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 1:15:47 PM     Post Reply
President Obama on Tuesday downplayed Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s decision to suspend talks on a long-term security deal with the U.S. in protest of the launch of formal peace talks with the Taliban. Karzai also pulled out of peace talks with the Taliban the Obama administration agreed to hold in Qatar, which are to begin Thursday. Obama said his administration had always anticipated "difficult negotiations." "We had extensive conversations with President Karzai both before and after the Taliban opened the office in Doha," Obama told reporters at a joint press conference in Berlin with German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Marco Rubio´s approval ratings
take a hit over immigration issues
Washington Examiner, by David M. Drucker    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/19/2013 1:11:46 PM     Post Reply
It probably wouldn´t have shocked political observers if Sen. Marco Rubio´s job approval ratings had taken a hit since becoming the Republican face of comprehensive immigration reform earlier this year. But the Florida Republican´s numbers in his home state are actually close to their best ever, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll released on Wednesday, though the senator did get low marks from voters for his handling of both immigration and gun control. Rubio had a job approval rating of 51 percent to 35 percent, the survey of registered voters found.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence
in new documentary, claim original
conclusion about cause of crash is wrong

96 replie(s)
FOX News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM     Post Reply
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded

Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says
Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress

52 replie(s)
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM     Post Reply
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.

Edward Snowden Is In The
Process Of Destroying Any Support
And Sympathy He Has Built Up

48 replie(s)
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM     Post Reply
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information

Obama: You Can´t Fathom
´Complexities´ of Syria
Policy ´If You Haven´t Been
in Situation Room´

36 replie(s)
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM     Post Reply
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.

G8: Barack Obama looks like
a president going through the motions

36 replie(s)
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM     Post Reply
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s

The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal
35 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 10:37:24 AM     Post Reply
Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. The IRS. Illegal immigration. And fraud to the tune of billions.. Now there’s a combustible mix. Let’s start with the IRS, illegal immigration and fraud. We’ll come back in a minute to Senator Rubio and Congressman Ryan. For those who came in late, a year before the IRS scandals burst onto the scene in early May of 2013, an alert investigative reporter for WTHR-Indianapolis (Channel 13), Bob Segall by name, produced a stunning piece of journalism. Segall’s video report is found here and we will quote from his story for the basics.

At least try to look interested,
girls! Now Michelle Obama takes
her daughters to see the ruins of
an Irish monastery (but they get
to have lunch with Bono later)

35 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by Louise Boyle, Jill Reilly    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/18/2013 1:37:11 PM     Post Reply
The Obamas never miss an opportunity to mingle with the stars and during a two-day trip in Dublin, who better to have lunch with than iconic Irish rocker and philanthropist Bono? First Lady Michelle along with daughters Malia, 14, and Sasha, 11, started Tuesday with an hour-long visit to picturesque Glendalough in the Wicklow Mountains--but the two girls looked like they would have rather slept in at their luxury hotel. Glendalough is famous for its Medieval monastic settlement founded in the 6th century by St Kevin, the hermit priest. After appearing less than thrilled on Monday while viewing Medieval manuscripts


Post Reply   Close thread 718233





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~