A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Dem lawmakers say courts should
resolve debt-limit standoff
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Dem lawmakers say courts should
resolve debt-limit standoff

The Hill (DC), by Alexander Bolton

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 1/8/2013 6:04:15 AM

Democratic lawmakers are urging President Obama to force Republicans to take him to court over the controversial issue of raising the debt ceiling. They believe the Supreme Court will have to ultimately resolve the battle over spending now raging between Republicans and the president. But how the courts will rule is shrouded in uncertainty because little case law exists to serve as meaningful precedent, say legal scholars. Democrats in Congress argue Obama should not feel constrained by the 1917 debt limit law, which the federal government is projected to hit in late February, because it conflicts with other laws.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Country Boy, 1/8/2013 6:15:55 AM     (No. 9104387)

This 14th Amendment argument is one of the dummest things the DIMs have come up with yet. It´s like saying I can´t make my mortgage payment to the bank this month because my Cable TV bill + combined cell phone bill is so high.

All this stuff is crystal clear in bankruptcy court. It is called Senior Debt and Subordinated Debt. Some gets paid, some doesn´t.

The Dems are the party of the stupid people. Really disgusting to be anywhere near them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/8/2013 6:24:37 AM     (No. 9104394)

When the liberals don´t like the rules,they change the rules.Digging up obscure liberal scholars to make their case,isn´t a basis for a valid argument.Borrowing 40 cents out of every dollar we spend isn´t good enough for the left. This country has spent something in the range of 19% of GDP for decades,so there wasn´t any outlandish spikes in spending vs. the revenue and growth side. It´s now spending around 25% of GDP which is an enormous leap.

The liberals are in 100% denial that amassing huge debt is a problem.We have an anemic 1.5-2% growth rate despite spending all this money so how can the left say the spending is helping the economy.

The other unfathomable side of this is Obama killing jobs which lessen revenues putting more pressure on borrowing. Obama firmly rejected the idea that you can grow out of a deficit problem.To him,central planning is the silver bullet and he needs trillions more to pull this off.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: shamus, 1/8/2013 6:26:22 AM     (No. 9104395)

The 14th amendment clearly does not apply to the debt ceiling. It concerns debt that has already been issued rather than issuance of further debt. If Obama wants to play this game he should issue the trillion dollar platinum coin (a "Geithner").

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Country Boy, 1/8/2013 6:27:53 AM     (No. 9104396)

Add to #1, the bigger lie is that raising the Debt Ceiling is only to fund future NEW debt. Meaning that "we can´t cut our Cable TV subscription for next year ..."

14th Amendment for aftermath of the Civil War, that the cost for 1861-1865 was not to be denied by any southern legislators "Wasn´t my War". It happened, and it was all in the Rear View Mirror. Past Debts.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 5 - Posted by: hamrman, 1/8/2013 6:28:26 AM     (No. 9104398)

Bull-looney...the Demoncrats have lost their minds! A wolf in sheep´s clothing!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 6 - Posted by: dittohead, 1/8/2013 6:29:34 AM     (No. 9104399)

More reasons this jerk should not have been reelected - appointments to the court - which we tried to warn people about. When he gets it stacked he can fast track anything he wants to the SC and they will give him what he wants!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: pineledger, 1/8/2013 6:45:37 AM     (No. 9104422)

The "Constitutional Scholar" [as he was called yesterday on MSNBC] is spoiling for ways to further weaken the legislative branch, now that he knows he has Roberts in his pocket.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Crosscut, 1/8/2013 6:56:26 AM     (No. 9104439)

This wouldn´t be happening if Romney had been elected. The last hope for America are the 2014 elections. Perhaps by then enough of Obama´s chumps will have had their eyes opened. The Democrat Party, public service unions and entitlement parasites will destroy this country if we let them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/8/2013 7:34:23 AM     (No. 9104487)

This is always the last resort of liberals. If they can´t circumvent the law they can always find a liberal judge to nullify it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Lonestar Jack, 1/8/2013 8:28:15 AM     (No. 9104554)

After Robert´s disgusting opinion on Obama Care -- I would expect the Dems to want to go to the Supremes on everything that is counter to the Constitution.
The Roberts Court is in Obama´s pocket

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 11 - Posted by: Judith, 1/8/2013 8:29:39 AM     (No. 9104556)

The dems are pretty darn sure about how the supreme court will rule. Wonder why?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: civilservant, 1/8/2013 8:40:39 AM     (No. 9104573)

Only reason for the Left to say this?

It must be common knowledge in the democrat party that the Presnidebt OWNS John Roberts.

Much like it was common knowledge in the muslim ´community´ that it was their bretheren who committed 9/11.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Chance_232, 1/8/2013 8:52:38 AM     (No. 9104593)

The courts have no authority over the budget, spending or borrowing. Their function is to rule on the law, and the law clearly states, in so many words, that CONGRESS, determines how the money is raised and spent.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/8/2013 9:18:56 AM     (No. 9104645)

I don´t care what dems say. Everything they say or do reduces my freedom and the costs are shifted to me, while they, the elite, eat steak prepared by their chefs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 1/8/2013 9:19:43 AM     (No. 9104646)

#2, I don´t believe for a fractured second that the libs are in denial. This is Cloward and Piven hyperventilating. I.E. so encumber the country with debt that it has to be completely re-invented; i.e. communism.

Keep your powder dry. Our liberties are about to go under the bus!!!!! The fight will not be in congress with the limp-wristed ones, but on the streets before long.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/8/2013 10:00:51 AM     (No. 9104737)

Shouldn´t we be depending upon Constitutional law and not the made up convoluted Liberal/Leftist/Progressive scam of "case" law?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: jackie, 1/8/2013 10:42:22 AM     (No. 9104823)

Ah yes... the Supremes...Obama has Judas aka Roberts on a string like a puppet... Of course the Dems want to go there... I hope someday we will know what Obama & Co have on him and find out if he thought it was worth destroying this country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/8/2013 1:00:38 PM     (No. 9105211)

This is already done...all spending comes from the House, not the President, the Senate or barky morons that work for government or the press.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 19 - Posted by: saguni, 1/8/2013 1:45:43 PM     (No. 9105303)

FTA: The 14th Amendment states, “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,

So, is 0bama asking Congress to please, please pass a new budget that cuts all funding to only what was authorized by a law (which was also passed by Congress)...no more money to pay any Czar (or the offices and other employees) that was not vetted and approved by Congress...no more funding for any trips on Air Force One unless the trip is specifically approved and enacted by Congress...no more regulations written by departments that lack a specific "authorizing" law...no more funding for any expense incurred by Executive Order??

I could accept that!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: heartlandconservative, 1/8/2013 5:38:47 PM     (No. 9105777)

OK class, one more time. The so called President and the Senate have no real say so over the budget. All spending bills originate in the house and they and they alone tell the pres and the senate how much is available. That is unless you have bonehead involved in which case the other guy wins. That being said, both sides ignore the law.
And we let them, shame on us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: beca, 1/9/2013 5:27:49 AM     (No. 9106382)

wrong dims...we have a congress.....they get paid plenty to do this job.....leave the courts OUT OF IT........

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 718051




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Advice to Democrats: Don´t say ´recovery´
Associated Press, by David Espo    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/18/2014 10:15:20 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - Election-year memo to Democratic candidates: Don´t talk about the economic recovery. It´s a political loser. So say Democratic strategists in a blunt declaration that such talk skips over "how much trouble people are in, and doesn´t convince them that policymakers really understand or are even focusing on the problems they continue to face." In addition, Stan Greenberg, James Carville and others wrote that in head-to-head polling tests the mere mention of the word "recovery" is trumped by a Republican assertion that the Obama administration has had six years to get the economy moving and its policies haven´t worked. Coincidentally or not,

Iran Gets an Unlikely Visitor, an American
Plane, but No One Seems to Know Why
New York Times, by Michael Corkery*    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/18/2014 10:12:11 AM     Post Reply
President Obama has warned that Iran is not open for business, even as the United States has loosened some of its punishing economic sanctions as part of an interim nuclear pact. Yet, on Tuesday morning, Iran had an unlikely visitor: a plane, owned by the Bank of Utah, a community bank in Ogden that has 13 branches throughout the state. Bearing a small American flag on its tail, the aircraft was parked in a highly visible section of Mehrabad Airport in Tehran. But from there, the story surrounding the plane, and why it was in Iran — where all but a few

Cost of Treatment May Influence Doctors
New York Times, by Andrew Pollack    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/18/2014 10:07:22 AM     Post Reply
Saying they can no longer ignore the rising prices of health care, some of the most influential medical groups in the nation are recommending that doctors weigh the costs, not just the effectiveness of treatments, as they make decisions about patient care. The shift, little noticed outside the medical establishment but already controversial inside it, suggests that doctors are starting to redefine their roles, from being concerned exclusively about individual patients to exerting influence on how health care dollars are spent. “We understand that we doctors should be and are stewards of the larger society as well as of the patient in

The Bigger They Are
Washington Free Beacon, by Matthew Continetti    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/18/2014 5:11:40 AM     Post Reply
Hillary Clinton may end up deciding she wants to spend the 935 days until election 2016 making corporate speeches and spoiling her grandchild. Recent events have exposed weaknesses in Clinton’s supposedly impregnable armor, gaps through which a Democratic or Republican challenger could damage, perhaps even defeat her. The bad headlines to which she has been subjected are enough to make anyone—anyone who isn’t a Clinton—think twice about running for president. Look at the polls. This week’s Fox News poll has Clinton’s favorable rating at its lowest point in six years. She is at 49 percent favorable, 45 percent unfavorable—similar to her

Obama offers new insults,
then laments gridlock
Daily Caller, by Neil Munro    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/18/2014 5:09:52 AM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama used his Thursday press conference to diagnose Republicans as fear-mongering, spiteful, obstinate, petulant and obstructive, as he again declared mission-accomplished in his effort to put the nation’s health-care under government control. “I recognize that their party is going through the stages of grief — anger and denial and all that stuff — and we’re not at acceptance yet,” Obama told reporters, where he announced that his Obamacare network had claimed 8 million subscribers. Obama coupled his passive-voice diatribe with his more-in-sorrow-than-anger promise that he “would much prefer a constructive conversation with the Republicans about how do we get some

´Deeply Ashamed´ Ferry Captain
Among First to Abandon Ship
ABC News, by Joohee Cho & Dan Good    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/18/2014 4:59:40 AM     Post Reply
The captain of a ferry that sank off the coast of South Korea Wednesday, leaving nearly 300 people missing, is under investigation as a possible criminal and was one of the first people to escape the doomed vessel, Coast Guard officials said. Lee Joon-seok, 69, left the ferry on a lifeboat 32 minutes after reporting an accident, officials said. The captain appeared on Korean television today, his face covered by a gray hoodie. “I am really sorry and deeply ashamed,” he said, as he was being questioned at the Mokpo Coast Guard Office. It´s unclear which of his actions could be considered criminal.

CBO shows it’s Paul Ryan 4,
Obama 0 on budget targeting
Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/18/2014 4:54:22 AM     Post Reply
Soon after the tea party era began in Congress in 2011, President Obama and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan each released their budgets, proposing how much the government should tax and spend over the rest of the decade. Three years into that budget showdown, Mr. Ryan and his Republican colleagues are winning. Government spending has slowed, and Mr. Obama’s plans for higher taxes and higher spending have fallen by the wayside. “The discretionary spending has in fact been driven by Republicans post-2010 clamping down,” said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office who is now president of the



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

48 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´

43 replie(s)
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
40 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to

Students Demand Acknowledgement of
Robert E. Lee´s ´Racist and Dishonorable Conduct´

39 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/18/2014 12:35:28 PM     Post Reply
A group of seven multiracial Washington and Lee University (W&L) students are demanding the school remove all Confederate flags from campus and "acknowledge" General Robert E. Lee´s "dishonorable side." According to the Roanoke Times, "seven multiracial students, calling themselves ´The Committee,´" have also demanded the school "acknowledge and apologize for participating in chattel slavery." They want recognition of "Martin Luther King Jr. Day on the undergraduate campus" and an end to "neo-Confederates" marching across campus "to the Lee Chapel on Lee-Jackson Day." The students say they will "engage in civil disobedience" if their demands are not met by September 1st. They added: "The

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL

33 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Pelosi assists in Holy Week
foot-washing ritual

28 replie(s)
San Francisco Chronicle, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe- 4/18/2014 11:46:54 AM     Post Reply
To "honor the dignity and work of immigrants," Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi helps Bishop Marc Andrus wash the feet of two children Thursday at Saint John the Evangelist Episcopal Church in San Francisco. Pelosi also used the occasion to talk about passing HR15 - bipartisan immigration legislation that her office says would "reduce the deficit by nearly $1 trillion, secure our borders, unite our families, protect our workers and provide an earned pathway to citizenship." The Democratic leader´s ceremony coincides with Pope Francis´ similar ceremony in Rome to mark Holy Week.


Post Reply   Close thread 718051





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~