|
|
| |
Topic: Our progressive way of war |
Our progressive way of war
Washington Examiner, by James Carafano
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Judy W., 1/7/2013 4:56:26 PM
|
| Progressives think they are really good at fighting wars. That is the problem. A core progressive belief is that international structures of management and arbitration would check and eventually end aggression between nations. As James Srodes notes in "On Dupont Circle," a book about Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt and their cadre of young reformers, they had unshakable "faith in the powers of experts to solve political issues." And, of course, they saw themselves as the experts. When conflict came, New Deal progressives ran the war effort with authoritarian zeal.
|
Comments: As he points out, Obama is following the pattern. Gutting our defenses because he knows just how much defense we need -- i.e. little or none -- while personally choosing who to kill with drone strikes.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
woodenleg, 1/7/2013 5:07:41 PM (No. 9103733)
I work at a University and there is a reason why academics and the liberal/left are so closely aligned. They have the same character. When dealing with either you come to the realization that they are convinced they are smarter than everyone else and therefore can do any job better than anyone else. Business, governance, are all the same to them in that they are our superiors.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Theeo, 1/7/2013 5:21:01 PM (No. 9103749)
"And WWll saw America and her allies bomb the enemy into oblivion." That´s how you win wars, not by building infrastructure for the evil enemy as we foolishly do in Afghanistan. Bring our fighting men home ... NOW.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Mass Minority, 1/7/2013 5:52:00 PM (No. 9103787)
I can personally attest to the observed character flaw endemic in the academy. As a research chemist I have worked for many companies both large and small. When I interview with a small company coming out of an academic lab one of the first questions I ask is "Is the founder still here and in what capacity".
I like the founder to still there, if his vision was good enough to start and build the companys technology, he should still be a driver. I don´t want to climb on board as he bails out.
Second question " who is in charge of marketing and business development?". If the answer is so and so for this and so and so for that I´ll continue to dig into the companies viability. If the answer is the founder I´m out.
I´ve watched several companies with brilliant technologies die as a clueless academic who is tops in his scientific field decides he must also be tops in business development and marketing. Working for one of these is a nightmare, they won´t listen to anybody anout anything.
The result is as predictable as sunrise tomorrow.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 1/7/2013 8:04:44 PM (No. 9103918)
I am in full agreement with poster #3. I have also done quite a bit of business consulting and assistance. I found that the higher the person trying to build the business is from an academic point of view the lower the chances are that the business will succeed. I have tried to advice even people with business degrees, accoutning back ground, and they are complete idiots to work with. They will bob their heads, smile and then go off on some wild, crazy, unworkable tangent. You come in, fix the mess, straighten up the shop and in a month, they are right back to their loony ways. However, I could not count the number of hard working, low education types I have helped who almost all made it. They listen, work hard and are willing to do what ever it takes to make their business work. They also understand the importance of good cash flow- something the over educated idiots could never grasp. They always had the idea that if they got into trouble they could apply for a new loan, a government grant or get a relative to risk their money. Eventually, they all ran out of other people´s money and went bust.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 1/7/2013 9:03:54 PM (No. 9103991)
I, also, have come to the realization that formal education weeds out the thinkers and rewards the memorizers.
The ZOMBIES are here and they are in charge.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
eorsc, 1/7/2013 9:55:52 PM (No. 9104068)
Clinton also disrespected the military and cut it by half. A lot of the money George Bush had to spend was to build it up again--only to have another anti-American (Obama) come along and tear it down again. Word has it they don´t even have money for parts to repair equipment. Good luck to the unions when he has all the factories shut down. Lots of young men have learned pride, self-confidence and focus, and led long productive lives because of their service.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
tipover, 1/8/2013 12:27:20 AM (No. 9104233)
Sounds like when I was on active duty in the mid seventies. It sucks as you spend most of your time trying to keep the equipment running rather than training. When you are in an artillery Fire Direction Control section that means someone can die if you make a mistake. And there are many jobs in the military where a mistake means someone is injured or killed. Training saves lives.
|
| |
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
|
|
Obama´s most fiendish plot yet
|
|
Daily Caller, by Mickey Kaus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/17/2013 8:55:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An idea so crazy it just might … Opponents and supporters of “comprehensive immigration reform” (i.e. amnesty) agree it doesn’t do well on the front burner of public debate. (Snip) Back in March, I didn’t see how the Obama team, however brilliant, was going to protect its amnesty bill from this threat of publicity, given that the mainstream press was “commmitted to overcovering this issue.” Now we know the answer! In its most fiendish strategem yet, Team Obama has launched a series of not-quite-devastating but press-obsessing scandals against itself! The confluence of the Internal Revenue Service, Benghazi and AP
|
In defense of Jason Richwine and Charles Murray
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Michael Barone
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 8:52:17 PM
Post Reply
|
|
My American Enterprise Institute colleague Charles Murray came to the defense of our former colleague Jason Richwine, who was fired by the Heritage Foundation amid protests about his Harvard Ph.D. thesis, on nationalreview.com. Charles was entirely accurate in stating that Richwine’s conclusion that Hispanics have lower-than-average IQs is accurate and, among specialists in this area, non-controversial. Richwine was careful to say that the average Hispanic IQ might rise over time, as has been observed of other groups’ average IQs. And the Heritage Foundation paper co-authored by Richwine estimating the fiscal cost of legalizing current illegal immigrants
|
Obamacare isn´t about health care, it´s about power
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Jim DeMint
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 8:27:29 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Members of the House of Representatives are scheduled to vote Thursday to repeal all of Obamacare. Given that the House voted to repeal the law last year, some commentators and observers have questioned the need for another repeal vote. However, the scandals coming to light over the last week perfectly make the case for why Congress must eradicate the law from the statute books. (Snip) While we don´t yet know all the details about these scandals, we do know that the IRS grossly abused its power at a time when Obamacare grants it massive new authority.
|
Even liberals are leaping off bandwagon
|
|
Boston Herald, by Margery Eagan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 7:09:14 AM
Post Reply
|
|
You know the worm has turned when even MSNBC’s Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow hold their noses at the stench from Barack Obama’s scandals — when so many stories from the so-called liberal press now describe the erstwhile Messiah as “aloof,” “arrogant” and “holier than thou.” (Snip) The same media types accused of covering Obama on bended knee — such as myself — are now turning our collective backs. And no wonder. What we’re learning about his administration has undermined our basic trust in government. Yet the president seems oblivious to how serious and unsettling these scandals are,
|
| |
|
Quabbin Reservoir Tests Normal After Trespassing
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 6:08:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
BELCHERTOWN, Mass. — Testing done on water samples from the Quabbin Reservoir showed no abnormalities after seven people were seen at a reservoir park entrance shortly after midnight, officials said Wednesday. The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority said water quality samples were analyzed at its lab Tuesday and all came back normal after the alleged trespassing incident. The central Massachusetts reservoir supplies drinking water to Boston. State police spokesman David Procopio said a trooper saw two cars parked at a reservoir park entrance at 12:30 a.m. Tuesday, then saw five young men and two young women
|
Soros Gave $6.1 Million to Groups Linked to Pressure on IRS to Target Conservative Nonprofits
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Mike Ciandella
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/15/2013 1:12:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
With Soros funding, anything is possible. The growing scandal where the IRS unfairly targeted politically-conservative groups can be traced back to a lobbying effort begun by George Soros-funded liberal groups in 2010, after the Supreme Court´s Citizens United ruling. The talking points of these groups then bounced around a carefully created progressive "echo chamber," until they eventually made their way into established media outlets. Key IRS policy changes about how it investigated conservative groups took place soon after it received three separate letters sent by Soros-funded liberal organizations.
|
|
True Grit
|
|
Townhall, by John Stossel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/15/2013 7:55:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Are you a real man (or woman)? Do you have "grit"? Compare yourself to the man on the $20 bill: Andrew Jackson, our seventh president. During the Revolutionary War, Jackson volunteered to fight. He was just 13 years old at the time. The British captured him and made him a servant for British officers. (Snip) Jackson had grit. Do your kids have that much grit today? I doubt it. Parents now try to protect kids from all danger. In New York City, some won´t let teenagers go to school by themselves. Lenore Skenazy, author of Free-Range Kids, thinks that´s absurd.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
| |
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
| |
|
|
|