A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Lawsuit to block punishment
of Penn State must be dropped
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Lawsuit to block punishment
of Penn State must be dropped

New York Daily News, by Editorial

Original Article

Posted By:MissMolly, 1/6/2013 5:50:27 AM

There is not the slightest doubt that Penn State’s football program enabled Jerry Sandusky to sexually abuse numerous children for numerous years. The evidence is beyond overwhelming. Sandusky has been tried, convicted and imprisoned. Former university President Graham Spanier, athletic director Tim Curley and Vice President Gary Schultz have been charged with criminal coverups. The school was ever so lucky that the NCAA withheld the death penalty from its football fund-raising colossus. Still, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett has filed a federal lawsuit to get his flagship university out from under those penalties that the NCAA did bring to bear.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 1/6/2013 6:06:14 AM     (No. 9101093)

Clearly the NCAA overreached. Also, the NCAA is the ultimate hypocrite, with its monopolistic plantation system of athletic slavery of young athletes. On the other hand, though, didn´t the University "sign all the papers" and thereby seal its fate, no matter how inappropriate the sanctions were?


Reply 2 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/6/2013 6:19:31 AM     (No. 9101103)

Hmmmmmmmmm..I´m not sure Corbett as the sitting governor should be the point man on this lawsuit.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: suedotsue, 1/6/2013 6:25:36 AM     (No. 9101109)

Most people didn´t think Penn St. would get the NCAA death penalty, so one wouldn´t describe them as oh so lucky to have escaped it. The 2nd most high profile person in this case, P.S. Pres. Graham Spanier, is by no means suffering so maybe NYDN could check it out. Spanier was hired by Obama shortly after he was forced out of P.S. Spanier is being paid by the US taxpayer, working for a ´top secret´ federal agency on high security matters. I´d say this places all Americans in serious danger.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 1/6/2013 6:32:44 AM     (No. 9101112)

The NCAA have yet to prove that they should somehow be involved in a criminal matter.

It´s no surprise that the NY Daily News would support unaccountable bureaucrats throwing their weight around given their love of DC.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/6/2013 6:34:19 AM     (No. 9101113)

I think the punishment by the NCAA was over the top. It wasn´t the football program that caused this horrible history of child molestation and cover-up. It was the people running it. There should not be anyone left on that campus who had any involvement whatsoever to do with this and of the most guilty one is in prison and one is dead. Why punish the students, athletes and community for something they are innocent of? The NCAA did this for their own PR.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 1/6/2013 6:35:51 AM     (No. 9101115)

@#1: "monopolistic plantation system of athletic slavery of young athletes."

You´ve got to be kidding me, right? This is a joke, right? Tuition, room and board at these schools is around $50K per year and these D-1 athletes are going for free. That´s a $200,000 education--FREE of charge because they can play a sport and you equate this to slavery? Do you even know what "slavery" is?


Reply 7 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/6/2013 6:46:25 AM     (No. 9101130)

Thanks, #6, you beat me to it and said it better.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: IowaDad, 1/6/2013 7:01:47 AM     (No. 9101137)

Heinous crimes were committed. Severe punishment has been delivered.

So why can´t kids at Penn State play a full slate of football for the next four years?

If similar circumstances had occurred at a less prestigious football school, I seriously doubt if the press or the NCAA would have been roused to action.


Reply 9 - Posted by: beca, 1/6/2013 7:15:49 AM     (No. 9101153)

i dont like the ncaa..........the people responsible need to be punished...not those who had absolutely NOTHING to do with it.....i say ty governor


Reply 10 - Posted by: BruisedOrange, 1/6/2013 7:43:05 AM     (No. 9101196)

Is there anyone still at Penn State who knowingly covered up or ignored what was going on?
Then who is being punished?

Was there ever any "wink-wink" among Penn State fans: aware, but willing to turn their heads?
Then who is being punished?

Is there any person involved who is not either in prison now or under prosecution?
Then who at Penn State is being punished?

The current sanctions are in place to benefit the NCAA´s public image--no other reason that I can see.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 1/6/2013 7:59:15 AM     (No. 9101215)

Posters here are forgetting something. The players had the chance to leave! They had the option to play for a different school if they so wished and if they choose to stay then it is on their heads. The school enabled horrible crimes against kids. Some people hear sound like they are ok with that. The NCAA went easy on this school in my opinion.


Reply 12 - Posted by: NJVol, 1/6/2013 8:02:08 AM     (No. 9101224)

#6, did you see the hit South Carolina´s Jadaveon Clowney put on a Michigan player to cause a fumble and get the ball back after the ref mistakenly awarded a first down to the Wolverines? I bet he would be a first round pick if he could declare for the draft, but he can´t: due to NCAA and NFL regulations, he has to play another year, risking injury and beaucoup bucks. For that and 500 other reasons, I despise, well at least I really don´t like, the NCAA.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/6/2013 8:42:02 AM     (No. 9101284)

I´m not a football fan, but even I can tell from the rumblings that the Left is out to banish the game of football from the American scene.

You know how the Left hates anyone getting injured, unless they are doing the damage themselves.


Reply 14 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 1/6/2013 8:45:44 AM     (No. 9101291)

Indeed, #11, the players had a chance to leave, and some of them did. On the other hand, some chose not to abandon the ones who had recruited them and had given them a chance to play at the collegiate level.

Character matters, and I have only the greatest respect for those players who chose to remain in the face of adversity. I found myself cheering for the underdog Nittany Lions all season long.


Reply 15 - Posted by: JimS, 1/6/2013 9:06:59 AM     (No. 9101332)

Some posters here are not aware of all the facts, and the Freeh Report had a pre-ordained outcome--blame Penn State.
In 1998, Sandusky was observed showering with a juvenile in the locker room by a school security guard. The guard reported it to his superior, who reported it to Centre County police. The Centre County DA and police conducted an investigation but found no complainants and no charges were filed. Sandusky retired from Penn State football in 1998, and thereafter had no official capacity or rule at PS. He continued to attend games and use the facilities, however, just as any retiree or alumnus would.

I am not saying that PS is blameless here. After 1998 they should have exiled him from the university, and when new allegations occurred in 2010, they should have gone public.

But why are we penalizing by PS by forfeiting all their wins back to 1998, fining them (and the state taxpayers) by $60-million, cutting their scholarships, banning them from bowl games, etc., when Centre County police and DA dropped the ball? Even if they filed no charges back then, they should have kept Sandusky under surveillance.

The NCAA is bullying PS, just as they are bullying schools with Indian names for their mascots to change them.

Yes, the $60-million fine is against the University. But as a state-funded institution, it really is levied against the PA taxpayer--and that really galls me.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Redbone, 1/6/2013 9:13:30 AM     (No. 9101345)

State Penn covered up criminal activity and is being punished for it. State Penn´s entire campus and town is built around the stadium. Take away football and you have a true and convincing punishment, not a slap on the wrist. To challenge that decision shows that State Penn is still corrupt to the core. And while we´re prosecuting felons, might want to take a look at State Penn´s climatology program headed by Mike Mann.


Reply 17 - Posted by: noproblems, 1/6/2013 9:41:18 AM     (No. 9101393)

and the pork to NY and NJ disguised as relief must also be stopped.

when will arrogant new yorkers understand that no one cares what they think in fly over land. The cultural rot coming out of NY does not go unnoticed


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: IdahoJoe, 1/6/2013 10:43:29 AM     (No. 9101486)

There are two purposes behind penalties. One is punishment. I agree that the perpetrators are not the ones being punished in this case. The second purpose is to deter anyone from doing that again. Officials closed their eyes to things because they thought it was in the best interest of the team. Sometimes you use punishment to make an example so that no one ever again thinks that it would be best to ignore such behavior. Removing the penalties at this stage would send a signal that such dastardly deeds are OK to ignore.


Reply 19 - Posted by: MattMusson, 1/6/2013 10:52:38 AM     (No. 9101496)

You get the death penalty for faking grades, paying players and lying about it.

Is Penn State saying they should not be punished because what they did was much much worse than common infractions?


Reply 20 - Posted by: right-turn, 1/6/2013 11:07:24 AM     (No. 9101517)

Simple fact .... Penn State is not guilty of anything. Individuals at Penn State are guilty beyond doubt. They are the ones who should be punished.

There is no reason to punish the innocent students, teachers and others not a part of the problem. None at all so why punish them?

Another stupid decision by power mad people in my opinion.


Reply 21 - Posted by: edgar, 1/6/2013 11:11:37 AM     (No. 9101524)

Will NYT have the same opinion if Elmo and PBS are sanctioned for employee molesting children? Hmmm, don´t think so.


Reply 22 - Posted by: fayebeck, 1/6/2013 11:37:48 AM     (No. 9101566)

Leave it to a Republican governor to do something this stupid.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: lakerman1, 1/6/2013 12:39:51 PM     (No. 9101663)

When the initial investigation was taking place, the Centre County DA went missing, and has since been declared dead. One could surmise that had he not disappeared, the matter would have been taken care of.
The NCAA overreached by a mile on this one. If they can get away with their brand of justice, the sky will be the limit for them.


Reply 24 - Posted by: jackburton, 1/6/2013 1:41:36 PM     (No. 9101743)

I don´t believe in the little commissars that are springing up, the little czars. Who gave them this power?

Punish the guilty but leave the innocent alone! The fans, the university and the State did not participate. Death penalties on football programs are for football violations. Did we figure out what school Ken Lay went to and penalize that football program?

Diverting money and sources of revenues from the university and the state is wrong. Stop the NCAA.


Reply 25 - Posted by: absalom, 1/6/2013 1:53:57 PM     (No. 9101762)

The NCAA is an administrative entity w/o any judicial power. As such, it´s actions against Penn State are unsupportable under the law. Corbett has a winning hand here.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Polecat49, 1/6/2013 2:45:31 PM     (No. 9101815)

Who the H-LL is the ny daily news to say who can file for a lawsuit or not? Oh, I guess that only liberal, socialist, communist, democRAT politicians are now allowed to try for redress of transcretions in the U, S, Court System.


Reply 27 - Posted by: KTWO, 1/6/2013 3:30:55 PM     (No. 9101859)

I am content to let the lawsuit go forward to see what happens and also to see what, if any, new evidence is presented.

1) We will learn what clout the NCAA has. Things such as past NCAA behavior, their formal rules, and membership.

2) Could the NCAA have expelled PS? That would IMO have caused other schools to refuse to play PS.

3) Professional baseball and, I believe, the NFL and NBA have some exceptions to federal laws that apply to ordinary businesses. But they are professional sports, what federal exceptions do the NCAA and PS and other universities have? Will the court dream up any?

4) Did PS create a contract, formal or not, with their players? Would a player therefore be entitled to his scholarship even if PS cannot field a team at all?

Those four are starter thoughts. And I like to keep lawyers employed. Let the suit continue.





Post Reply   Close thread 717838




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"



Analyze this
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Ideological Revenue Service
Weekly Standard, by Mark Hemingway    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:22:26 AM     Post Reply
With three different scandals threatening to consume the White House last week—the Benghazi cover-up, the Justice Department’s seizure of the phone records of dozens of Associated Press reporters, and the revelation of an anti-Tea Party inquisition by the Internal Revenue Service—CNBC’s John Harwood offered his journalistic peers some advice on Twitter: “Those of us in political-media world should just shut up about ‘narratives’ and focus on what’s true.” CBS anchor Scott Pelley joined in: “We are getting big stories wrong, over and over again.” The fact that these sentiments needed to be expressed is a damning indictment of the media,

Revenge, ego and the
corruption of Wikipedia
Salon, by Andrew Leonard    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 6:02:51 AM     Post Reply
In the wee hours of the morning of January 27, 2013, a Wikipedia editor named “Qworty” made a series of 14 separate edits to the Wikipedia page for the late writer Barry Hannah, a well-regarded Southern writer with a taste for the Gothic and absurd. Qworty cut paragraphs that included quotes from Hannah’s work. He removed 20 links to interviews, obituaries and reminiscences concerning Hannah. He cut out a list of literary prizes Hannah had won. Two edits stand out. Qworty excised the phrase “and was regarded as a good mentor” from a sentence that started:

Zogby: Scandals cost Obama liberals,
majority -- ´Are locusts next?´
Washington Examiner, by Paul Bedard    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 5:45:04 AM     Post Reply
Pollster John Zogby reports in our weekly White House report card that President Obama´s scandal-filled disaster week has cost him his majority support and sapped enthusiasm for his second term. "As Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth might have said, this was ´weekus horribilis´ for President Obama. Three fires in the form of three scandals to put out in one week. Are locusts next? While Obama has tried to get ahead of each -- Benghazi, the Associated Press, and the IRS vs. the Tea Party -- the time to get ahead of these things is, well, ahead of them.

The Biggest Obama Scandals
Are Proven and Ignored
Atlantic, by Conor Friedersdorf    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 5:41:48 AM     Post Reply
Prompted by Peggy Noonan´s claim in The Wall Street Journal that "we are in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate," Andrew Sullivan steps forward to defend Pres. Obama´s honor. "Can she actually believe this?," he asks incredulously. "Has this president broken the law, lied under oath, or authorized war crimes? Has he traded arms for hostages with Iran? Has he knowingly sent his cabinet out to tell lies about his sex life? Has he sat by idly as an American city was destroyed by a hurricane?

Boise terror suspect pleads
not guilty, faces trial in July
KTVB [Boise, ID], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/18/2013 6:21:43 AM     Post Reply
BOISE -- An Uzbekistan national arrested in Boise has pleaded not guilty in federal court to charges he conspired with a terrorist group on a scheme to use a weapon of mass destruction. Fazliddin Kurbanov, 30, appeared before a federal judge at 8:30 a.m. He used an interpreter over the phone to communicate his not-guilty plea. Kurbanov´s trial is now set for July 2, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. The 30-year-old Uzbekistani also faces a detention hearing on Tuesday to determine whether he´ll stay in custody until his trial. KTVB has obtained documents that show prosecutors

What is the real number
of illegal border crossings?
Washington Examiner, by Byron York    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/18/2013 5:52:45 AM     Post Reply
Security along the U.S. border with Mexico is perhaps the key factor in the debate over comprehensive immigration reform. Those who believe the border is mostly secure already are more inclined to support the plan of the bipartisan Gang of Eight in the Senate -- legalization first, followed by enhanced security. Those who believe the border is still far from secure are more likely to oppose the Gang of Eight´s approach, insisting that heightened security measures be in place before the nation´s estimated 11 million illegal immigrants are legalized. Now, a new report from the Council on Foreign Relations



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

50 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

42 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

39 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.


Post Reply   Close thread 717838





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~