A Message From Lucianne  




Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

  Topic: Lawsuit to block punishment
of Penn State must be dropped
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Lawsuit to block punishment
of Penn State must be dropped

New York Daily News, by Editorial

Original Article

Posted By:MissMolly, 1/6/2013 5:50:27 AM

There is not the slightest doubt that Penn State’s football program enabled Jerry Sandusky to sexually abuse numerous children for numerous years. The evidence is beyond overwhelming. Sandusky has been tried, convicted and imprisoned. Former university President Graham Spanier, athletic director Tim Curley and Vice President Gary Schultz have been charged with criminal coverups. The school was ever so lucky that the NCAA withheld the death penalty from its football fund-raising colossus. Still, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett has filed a federal lawsuit to get his flagship university out from under those penalties that the NCAA did bring to bear.


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 1/6/2013 6:06:14 AM     (No. 9101093)

Clearly the NCAA overreached. Also, the NCAA is the ultimate hypocrite, with its monopolistic plantation system of athletic slavery of young athletes. On the other hand, though, didn´t the University "sign all the papers" and thereby seal its fate, no matter how inappropriate the sanctions were?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 2 - Posted by: Spidey, 1/6/2013 6:19:31 AM     (No. 9101103)

Hmmmmmmmmm..I´m not sure Corbett as the sitting governor should be the point man on this lawsuit.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 3 - Posted by: suedotsue, 1/6/2013 6:25:36 AM     (No. 9101109)

Most people didn´t think Penn St. would get the NCAA death penalty, so one wouldn´t describe them as oh so lucky to have escaped it. The 2nd most high profile person in this case, P.S. Pres. Graham Spanier, is by no means suffering so maybe NYDN could check it out. Spanier was hired by Obama shortly after he was forced out of P.S. Spanier is being paid by the US taxpayer, working for a ´top secret´ federal agency on high security matters. I´d say this places all Americans in serious danger.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 4 - Posted by: Patchy Groundfog, 1/6/2013 6:32:44 AM     (No. 9101112)

The NCAA have yet to prove that they should somehow be involved in a criminal matter.

It´s no surprise that the NY Daily News would support unaccountable bureaucrats throwing their weight around given their love of DC.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 5 - Posted by: Janjan, 1/6/2013 6:34:19 AM     (No. 9101113)

I think the punishment by the NCAA was over the top. It wasn´t the football program that caused this horrible history of child molestation and cover-up. It was the people running it. There should not be anyone left on that campus who had any involvement whatsoever to do with this and of the most guilty one is in prison and one is dead. Why punish the students, athletes and community for something they are innocent of? The NCAA did this for their own PR.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 6 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 1/6/2013 6:35:51 AM     (No. 9101115)

@#1: "monopolistic plantation system of athletic slavery of young athletes."

You´ve got to be kidding me, right? This is a joke, right? Tuition, room and board at these schools is around $50K per year and these D-1 athletes are going for free. That´s a $200,000 education--FREE of charge because they can play a sport and you equate this to slavery? Do you even know what "slavery" is?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 7 - Posted by: StormCnter, 1/6/2013 6:46:25 AM     (No. 9101130)

Thanks, #6, you beat me to it and said it better.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 8 - Posted by: IowaDad, 1/6/2013 7:01:47 AM     (No. 9101137)

Heinous crimes were committed. Severe punishment has been delivered.

So why can´t kids at Penn State play a full slate of football for the next four years?

If similar circumstances had occurred at a less prestigious football school, I seriously doubt if the press or the NCAA would have been roused to action.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 9 - Posted by: beca, 1/6/2013 7:15:49 AM     (No. 9101153)

i dont like the ncaa..........the people responsible need to be punished...not those who had absolutely NOTHING to do with it.....i say ty governor

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 10 - Posted by: BruisedOrange, 1/6/2013 7:43:05 AM     (No. 9101196)

Is there anyone still at Penn State who knowingly covered up or ignored what was going on?
Then who is being punished?

Was there ever any "wink-wink" among Penn State fans: aware, but willing to turn their heads?
Then who is being punished?

Is there any person involved who is not either in prison now or under prosecution?
Then who at Penn State is being punished?

The current sanctions are in place to benefit the NCAA´s public image--no other reason that I can see.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 11 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 1/6/2013 7:59:15 AM     (No. 9101215)

Posters here are forgetting something. The players had the chance to leave! They had the option to play for a different school if they so wished and if they choose to stay then it is on their heads. The school enabled horrible crimes against kids. Some people hear sound like they are ok with that. The NCAA went easy on this school in my opinion.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 12 - Posted by: NJVol, 1/6/2013 8:02:08 AM     (No. 9101224)

#6, did you see the hit South Carolina´s Jadaveon Clowney put on a Michigan player to cause a fumble and get the ball back after the ref mistakenly awarded a first down to the Wolverines? I bet he would be a first round pick if he could declare for the draft, but he can´t: due to NCAA and NFL regulations, he has to play another year, risking injury and beaucoup bucks. For that and 500 other reasons, I despise, well at least I really don´t like, the NCAA.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 13 - Posted by: nonsense, 1/6/2013 8:42:02 AM     (No. 9101284)

I´m not a football fan, but even I can tell from the rumblings that the Left is out to banish the game of football from the American scene.

You know how the Left hates anyone getting injured, unless they are doing the damage themselves.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 14 - Posted by: TunnelRat, 1/6/2013 8:45:44 AM     (No. 9101291)

Indeed, #11, the players had a chance to leave, and some of them did. On the other hand, some chose not to abandon the ones who had recruited them and had given them a chance to play at the collegiate level.

Character matters, and I have only the greatest respect for those players who chose to remain in the face of adversity. I found myself cheering for the underdog Nittany Lions all season long.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 15 - Posted by: JimS, 1/6/2013 9:06:59 AM     (No. 9101332)

Some posters here are not aware of all the facts, and the Freeh Report had a pre-ordained outcome--blame Penn State.
In 1998, Sandusky was observed showering with a juvenile in the locker room by a school security guard. The guard reported it to his superior, who reported it to Centre County police. The Centre County DA and police conducted an investigation but found no complainants and no charges were filed. Sandusky retired from Penn State football in 1998, and thereafter had no official capacity or rule at PS. He continued to attend games and use the facilities, however, just as any retiree or alumnus would.

I am not saying that PS is blameless here. After 1998 they should have exiled him from the university, and when new allegations occurred in 2010, they should have gone public.

But why are we penalizing by PS by forfeiting all their wins back to 1998, fining them (and the state taxpayers) by $60-million, cutting their scholarships, banning them from bowl games, etc., when Centre County police and DA dropped the ball? Even if they filed no charges back then, they should have kept Sandusky under surveillance.

The NCAA is bullying PS, just as they are bullying schools with Indian names for their mascots to change them.

Yes, the $60-million fine is against the University. But as a state-funded institution, it really is levied against the PA taxpayer--and that really galls me.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 16 - Posted by: Redbone, 1/6/2013 9:13:30 AM     (No. 9101345)

State Penn covered up criminal activity and is being punished for it. State Penn´s entire campus and town is built around the stadium. Take away football and you have a true and convincing punishment, not a slap on the wrist. To challenge that decision shows that State Penn is still corrupt to the core. And while we´re prosecuting felons, might want to take a look at State Penn´s climatology program headed by Mike Mann.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 17 - Posted by: noproblems, 1/6/2013 9:41:18 AM     (No. 9101393)

and the pork to NY and NJ disguised as relief must also be stopped.

when will arrogant new yorkers understand that no one cares what they think in fly over land. The cultural rot coming out of NY does not go unnoticed

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 18 - Posted by: IdahoJoe, 1/6/2013 10:43:29 AM     (No. 9101486)

There are two purposes behind penalties. One is punishment. I agree that the perpetrators are not the ones being punished in this case. The second purpose is to deter anyone from doing that again. Officials closed their eyes to things because they thought it was in the best interest of the team. Sometimes you use punishment to make an example so that no one ever again thinks that it would be best to ignore such behavior. Removing the penalties at this stage would send a signal that such dastardly deeds are OK to ignore.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 19 - Posted by: MattMusson, 1/6/2013 10:52:38 AM     (No. 9101496)

You get the death penalty for faking grades, paying players and lying about it.

Is Penn State saying they should not be punished because what they did was much much worse than common infractions?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 20 - Posted by: right-turn, 1/6/2013 11:07:24 AM     (No. 9101517)

Simple fact .... Penn State is not guilty of anything. Individuals at Penn State are guilty beyond doubt. They are the ones who should be punished.

There is no reason to punish the innocent students, teachers and others not a part of the problem. None at all so why punish them?

Another stupid decision by power mad people in my opinion.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 21 - Posted by: edgar, 1/6/2013 11:11:37 AM     (No. 9101524)

Will NYT have the same opinion if Elmo and PBS are sanctioned for employee molesting children? Hmmm, don´t think so.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 22 - Posted by: fayebeck, 1/6/2013 11:37:48 AM     (No. 9101566)

Leave it to a Republican governor to do something this stupid.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Reply 23 - Posted by: lakerman1, 1/6/2013 12:39:51 PM     (No. 9101663)

When the initial investigation was taking place, the Centre County DA went missing, and has since been declared dead. One could surmise that had he not disappeared, the matter would have been taken care of.
The NCAA overreached by a mile on this one. If they can get away with their brand of justice, the sky will be the limit for them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 24 - Posted by: jackburton, 1/6/2013 1:41:36 PM     (No. 9101743)

I don´t believe in the little commissars that are springing up, the little czars. Who gave them this power?

Punish the guilty but leave the innocent alone! The fans, the university and the State did not participate. Death penalties on football programs are for football violations. Did we figure out what school Ken Lay went to and penalize that football program?

Diverting money and sources of revenues from the university and the state is wrong. Stop the NCAA.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 25 - Posted by: absalom, 1/6/2013 1:53:57 PM     (No. 9101762)

The NCAA is an administrative entity w/o any judicial power. As such, it´s actions against Penn State are unsupportable under the law. Corbett has a winning hand here.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 26 - Posted by: Polecat49, 1/6/2013 2:45:31 PM     (No. 9101815)

Who the H-LL is the ny daily news to say who can file for a lawsuit or not? Oh, I guess that only liberal, socialist, communist, democRAT politicians are now allowed to try for redress of transcretions in the U, S, Court System.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 27 - Posted by: KTWO, 1/6/2013 3:30:55 PM     (No. 9101859)

I am content to let the lawsuit go forward to see what happens and also to see what, if any, new evidence is presented.

1) We will learn what clout the NCAA has. Things such as past NCAA behavior, their formal rules, and membership.

2) Could the NCAA have expelled PS? That would IMO have caused other schools to refuse to play PS.

3) Professional baseball and, I believe, the NFL and NBA have some exceptions to federal laws that apply to ordinary businesses. But they are professional sports, what federal exceptions do the NCAA and PS and other universities have? Will the court dream up any?

4) Did PS create a contract, formal or not, with their players? Would a player therefore be entitled to his scholarship even if PS cannot field a team at all?

Those four are starter thoughts. And I like to keep lawyers employed. Let the suit continue.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Post Reply   Close thread 717838

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "MissMolly"

Unleashing the Socks of War
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:21:09 AM     Post Reply
President Obama is right. He told Major Garrett of CBS this week that “Mr. Putin’s decisions aren’t just bad for Ukraine. Over the long term, they’re going to be bad for Russia.” I believe that Putin’s adventures in Russia’s “near abroad” are a mistake. Indeed, they are part of a whole tapestry of wrongheadedness. It’s also bad for the Kremlin to crush dissent, censor the news, and hobble the economy by handing it over to oligarchs and a kleptocratic bureaucracy. Putin’s scapegoating and demonizing of gays isn’t only morally wrong, it’s not in Russia’s long-term interests either. That Putin prefers to

Bevin tries to put MIT flap behind him
The Hill [DC], by Alexander Bolton    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:17:06 AM     Post Reply
Matt Bevin, who is running against Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell in the Kentucky GOP primary, has come out with a new ad defending his claimed affiliation with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Bevin tries to sidestep the MIT controversy in his latest ad by claiming that he never portrayed himself as a graduate of the prestigious school. “I’m a small-business owner, I’ve not had a resume in over 20 years. I’ve never claimed on a resume or to anyone ever that I’m a graduate of MIT. This is a lie made up by Mitch McConnell to distract you from

Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

The Private Lives of Public Bathrooms
Atlantic, by Julie Beck    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/17/2014 10:55:52 AM     Post Reply
When Oprah Winfrey served on a Chicago jury in 2004, she couldn’t go to the bathroom attached to the jury room unless her fellow jurors sang to drown out the noise. One of the songs they sang was Kumbaya. When Alexis Sanchez used the bathroom in her college dorm, she brought her iPod with her. “I would blast it,” she says. “I would play ´D. A. N. C. E.´ by Justice, and some Maroon 5 song. That was my poop playlist. It had to be a ritual or else I would focus too much on if there were other girls

Fox News Poll: Christie, Bush and Paul
are top GOP picks -- today -- for 2016
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/17/2014 10:53:41 AM     Post Reply
Yes, it’s a bit early to talk about the 2016 election. It’s just too much fun not to do it. You’re welcome. With about 20 months to go before the Iowa precinct caucuses, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul lead the pack for the Republican presidential nomination. Meanwhile, former Sec. of State Hillary Clinton continues to hold a huge lead among Democrats, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday. Three possible GOP candidates capture double-digit support among self-identified Republicans: Christie receives 15 percent, which puts him just ahead of Bush and

Prominent Local Church Leader
Responds to Sex Allegations
WOAI [San Antonio, TX], by Jim Forsyth    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/17/2014 10:24:19 AM     Post Reply
Long time home schooling leader and former Boerne church official Doug Phillips is fighting back today against allegations raised by his former nanny that he ´groomed her to be his sex object.´ "This more seems like an attempt to kill a Christian movement than it does just as an attack against Doug Phillips," Jason Jakob, who is Phillips´ attorney, tells 1200 WOAI´s Michael Board. The plaintiff, Lourdes Torres, claims in her lawsuit that Phillips forced her into a relationship which featured frequent sexual assault, imprisonment, and participation in deviant sexual activity. As part of the lawsuit, Torres claims that Phillips told her

Landrieu faces her toughest
political storm to stay in Senate
CNN, by Halimah Abdullah    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/17/2014 7:24:31 AM     Post Reply
Washington -- Louisiana Democrat Sen. Mary Landrieu is in the middle of a storm. She is beset by well-funded forces on the right who sense the Gulf Coast Democrat´s vulnerability in trying to defend a Senate seat in a red state. On the left, she is trying to avoid being pulled down by the undertow of a president whose decline in approval ratings and controversial health care reform law might not play well with her state´s conservative sensibilities. She´s been buffeted by rough re-election fights before, and in previous successful bids for the state legislature, state treasurer´s office and eventually

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Kim Novak responds to post-
Oscars ridicule: ‘I was bullied.’

48 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Soroya Nadia McDonald    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 4/18/2014 5:02:40 AM     Post Reply
After presenting at the Academy Awards this year, Kim Novak didn’t want to leave her house. The Hitchcock screen siren, 81, was too humiliated to venture from her home near the Rogue River in Oregon. She read the cruel posts and Internet snark about her appearance, and it was just too much. “It got to me like it gets kids and teenagers,” she told the Associated Press. The “Vertigo” actress, considered one of the great beauties in her day, posted a note on her Facebook wall Thursday, acknowledging that she’d gotten fat injections in her face and addressing her halted

Analysis: Obama Celebrates
Eight Million ´Enrollments,´
Again Declares Debate ´Over´

42 replie(s)
Townhall, by Guy Benson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/17/2014 8:56:28 PM     Post Reply
President Obama addressed the White House press corps today, announcing that with the final numbers in, Obamacare´s exchanges have attracted eight million sign-ups -- 35 percent of whom are "under the age of 35," he said. Several elements of his comments were misleading: (1) At first blush, the 35 percent stat is both significant and impressive. As recently as last month, the share of "young invincibles" signing up for plans was struggling in the 25 percent range, far short of the actuarial target of nearly 40 percent. A leap into the mid-30´s, while still shy of the goal, would constitute a major step, and would bode well for the risk pools'

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

The Folly Of The Bundy Ranch Rebellion
39 replie(s)
The Federalist, by Grace Olmstead    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/18/2014 4:21:46 AM     Post Reply
It’s the stuff of Westerns: a showdown on the desert plains, the big bad government against an underdog farmer. Though the story has only grabbed national headlines in the past several days, rancher Cliven Bundy has illegally grazed cattle on the Nevada land surrounding his farm for over 20 years. He hasn’t paid grazing fees since 1993, and refuses to renew the necessary grazing permit.(Snip)Rather than using the avenues and pathways presented to him, Bundy has staunchly declared his own law and allegiances. Unfortunately, reality doesn’t work this way. If only it did—we could rebel for paying stupid taxes, refuse to

Students Demand Acknowledgement of
Robert E. Lee´s ´Racist and Dishonorable Conduct´

39 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by AWR Hawkins    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/18/2014 12:35:28 PM     Post Reply
A group of seven multiracial Washington and Lee University (W&L) students are demanding the school remove all Confederate flags from campus and "acknowledge" General Robert E. Lee´s "dishonorable side." According to the Roanoke Times, "seven multiracial students, calling themselves ´The Committee,´" have also demanded the school "acknowledge and apologize for participating in chattel slavery." They want recognition of "Martin Luther King Jr. Day on the undergraduate campus" and an end to "neo-Confederates" marching across campus "to the Lee Chapel on Lee-Jackson Day." The students say they will "engage in civil disobedience" if their demands are not met by September 1st. They added: "The

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

Post Reply   Close thread 717838

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.