|
|
| |
Topic: White House Prepares to Defeat NRA with Speedy Legislation |
White House Prepares to Defeat NRA with Speedy Legislation
Breitbart´s Big Government, by John Nolte
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/5/2013 11:37:05 AM
|
| According to TPM, America´s favorite never-let-a-crisis-go-to-waste administration is preparing to ram through a number of restrictions to our Second Amendment civil rights as early as Jan 15. The idea behind this strategy is to strike while people´s heightened emotions are still scrambling common sense: The White House and gun control supporters are gearing up for a whirlwind month, with plans to pass reform legislation before outrage over the Sandy Hook massacre has a chance to fade. House Democrats are moving ahead with their own plans as well.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
noproblems, 1/5/2013 11:49:02 AM (No. 9100234)
I am sure the Repugs will have appropriate hearings on these proposals to make sure that they make sense.
Gun safes are the only thing I can see that make sense in response to Sandy Hook.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
killerbee, 1/5/2013 11:53:02 AM (No. 9100240)
This was in Talking Points Memo, a leftist site. They´re blatantly admitting that they´re capitalizing on a tragedy. They´re twisting the facts. Their followers will applaud the tactic because they don´t care about the truth.
@#1: None of their proposals are enforceable without digging into people´s lives even more. And since nobody alive even knows how Adam Lanza got hold of his mother´s guns, it´s only a supposition that a gun safe would have stopped him.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
kanphil, 1/5/2013 11:54:13 AM (No. 9100244)
Whatever the creeps in Washington do, they´re not taking away the people´s guns. There would be civil resistance on a scale never before known if they tried.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
MattMusson, 1/5/2013 11:58:16 AM (No. 9100252)
Too Late!
The tide has already turned. Gun control fever wilted over Christmas. You won´t get the votes now.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
curious1, 1/5/2013 11:58:28 AM (No. 9100253)
#1, no way. Letting the camel´s nose into the tent means the whole camel soon follows. The 2nd amendment says ´keep´ too, in the activities that ´...shall not be infringed´. Over 20k gun laws and laws against murder didn´t stop that madman. He should have been put away - but that´s the nasty little gift from the LPs several decades ago that they don´t like to discuss - why he couldn´t be. The constitution isn´t stopping the LPs until it is backed up by armed force by the citizens. This is a long-term game by the LPS to disarms us. Please pay attention. As the founders said, (paraphrased) ´Jealously guard the tree of liberty and look with suspicion upon all who approach it´. Especially when they claim an encroachment is ´for the chilluns´ or ´for your own good´.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bwebb, 1/5/2013 12:00:40 PM (No. 9100259)
Obama-Biden continues to be "dead-wrong " about guns and recent mass murders. Example of facts...Mother who has guns and uses them...also knows she has a son with mental health issues that were getting worse and worse. The Mother delayed "intervention to both confine and treat her son...and also remove her guns from her home as a precaution". Time long since ran out...in fact in hind sight...the Mother used poor judgement. It was only the Mother who could prevent this massacre and she was the first person shot.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
formerNYer, 1/5/2013 12:13:51 PM (No. 9100279)
gun safes? You better keep one out and ready or they are useless. Excuse me bad person let me just open my gun safe...
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
krause, 1/5/2013 12:32:34 PM (No. 9100316)
I don´t think they should mess too much with people that have legal guns.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DocH, 1/5/2013 12:40:28 PM (No. 9100336)
Call. Your. Congressman. Now!
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
JHHolliday, 1/5/2013 12:46:28 PM (No. 9100355)
There have been some nice technological for gun owners lately. There are several small gun safes on the market that sit on your bedside table. Some are biometric...it reads your fingerprint and pops open. On others you hit a three letter code and it opens.
Not ideal perhaps but it keeps your pistol handy and secure and the kids and others can´t get to it.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
rabbit, 1/5/2013 1:21:46 PM (No. 9100420)
#5, why should he have been "put away"? He had no police record, no evidence of any previous crime. There is no evidence he had ever been hospitalized for mental health reasons. An FBI investigator said there were no psychiatric meds in the house.
Are you going to have him "put away" because he may have had a diagnosis on the autism spectrum? The current rate for autism is 1 in 88 children - 1 in 59 males. This is the first time anyone on the autism spectrum has been implicated in a mass murder. How would you have picked him out to have him "put away"? He had brown hair, too...does that mean that we should put all the people with brown hair away?
Reality is that it needs to be more difficult for people who are mentally unstable, for whatever reason, to get hold of guns - especially the type that can quickly fire shot after shot. I keep hearing people say that a conniving criminal could figure out how to get around such systems, which may be true. But mentally unstable people generally are not conniving; they have one way of doing things in mind and, if you make that path harder to for them, they won´t dream up alternatives. You can´t lock up a sizable portion of the population on the off-chance that one of them might do something bad. At least, not in the America I know.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
leftcoastmom, 1/5/2013 1:25:25 PM (No. 9100426)
won´t pass house
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
grounded, 1/5/2013 1:37:53 PM (No. 9100442)
#9, my congressman is a freshman female democrat who was just sworn in and both senators are big-time lefty ´Rats. Good luck with calling any of them.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Sheepfarmer, 1/5/2013 1:55:14 PM (No. 9100468)
I hope it won´t happen, but people are in a panic. Have you been in a gun store lately? Many guns are back-ordered, ammo is swooped up as soon as it comes in. For some guns, the wait is months. It´s insane.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
strike3, 1/5/2013 2:12:03 PM (No. 9100489)
You are correct, #11, BUT - In order to make it difficult for the mentally challenged to gain access to firearms, you have to restrict the entire population, a proposition that is not acceptable to us for obvious reasons. There are plenty of other means and devices to kill on a mass scale if you are inclined but firearms are the only thing that stand between a tyrant and the people he would rule.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
mossley, 1/5/2013 2:15:55 PM (No. 9100494)
#14, a local gun range offers NRA First Step courses twice a week. The earliest class I could get in is in February. People are buying guns like never before.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
pineledger, 1/5/2013 2:26:05 PM (No. 9100518)
Further gun control law makes no sense. We can´t let them do it.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
ledbythnose, 1/5/2013 2:39:01 PM (No. 9100533)
If there is an encroachment on the SA on the 15th I suppose we will be in a State of War with the Gubmint on the 16th. EVERYONE I have spoke with this week is ready.Most of us are tired of the threats. Let´s get this party started. It´s not the NRA they should be worried about. It´s the 150 million gun owners out here who are locked and loaded.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
4Justice, 1/5/2013 2:55:39 PM (No. 9100554)
#11, a lot of mentally ill and unstable people are conniving. You don´t know much about mental illness, do you?
#1, while I understand a lot of people are very upset and disappointed in the Republican Party, I find it highly inappropriate and reprehensible to use the term "repugs" to describe anyone in the party. It is a term used by slimeball leftists who hang out in places like the Daily Koz and Democrat Underground. It would serve one well to carefully consider how people may view a person who uses such terminology on a site where most of the members are either Republicans or conservatives. By the way, the party is the people and the principles--NOT the elected politicians nor the unelected party bosses/workers. If there is a problem with the party, it is incumbent upon the people to clean it up.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
william1, 1/5/2013 2:56:39 PM (No. 9100558)
I find it odd that we know so little about this shooting. I sensed an extraordinary amount of energy being expended by the cops on this investigation. Why? Could there be some major malfunction by the PD about this? I´m to understand that it took the cops 20 minutes to respond to the first 911 call. Seen other websites that transcribe the chronology and text of the PD commo, but it doesn´t appear the response time was nailed down.
Also, do we definitively know what weapon the shooter used?
Seems there is much more heat than light here.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
4Justice, 1/5/2013 3:00:00 PM (No. 9100565)
#9, yes...I agree. Let´s blow up their phones...and those of our Senators too!! We need to let them know we will NOT accept any further infringements on our rights!!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
BadgerBill, 1/5/2013 3:24:41 PM (No. 9100584)
Easy. Just say (vote) NO.
Repeat after me---just vote NO!
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
saguni, 1/5/2013 4:43:45 PM (No. 9100645)
Before Christmas, it was reported that the NRA was gaining new members at an average of 8,000 a day.
How many new supporters are the White House and gun-grabbers gaining these days??
If gun control laws work, can someone explain Chicago and Washington, D.C.? Both have very restrictive gun control laws and very high rates of gun-related crime.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 1/5/2013 5:13:40 PM (No. 9100675)
What we do know, #2, is that Adam Lanza´s mother went on a two-night getaway immediately prior to his rampage, leaving him home alone. Then, when she returned, he shot her in the face in her bed. Who knows if a gun safe was even used. He had a couple of days to figure out how to get it open.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
TUSKER, 1/5/2013 5:40:23 PM (No. 9100709)
Join the NRA. Support the NRA.
Resist Bow-Boy and his fall-down rummy/liquor cabinet.
From a NRA Life/Benefactor.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 1/5/2013 5:57:51 PM (No. 9100727)
#9 and #19 - I agree. I know it may seem our phone calls to Congress are a waste of time but they are not! We need to burn up those switchboards! We can do it! Let the fighters we do have know they have our vigorous support.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
hamrman, 1/5/2013 5:59:43 PM (No. 9100729)
I agree with #4, and while president horse´s rear was gloating over the Bullying of the Fabricated Fiscal Cliff Fiasco, most Americans were getting new guns for Christmas!
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Udanja99, 1/5/2013 6:00:33 PM (No. 9100730)
Are they pushing this because they want us to react as we are reacting? Do they want armed conflict with us? Is this why Social Security, DHS etc have bought over a billion rounds of ammo? Is this why some small town police forces now have tanks? Is this Owebama´s excuse to fulfill Ayre´s dream of wiping out 25 million Americans and throwing the rest of us conservatives into those FEMA camps for re-education? Yes, it sounds like tinfoil hat stuff, but I´m beginning to wonder.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
ladydawgfan, 1/6/2013 2:14:39 AM (No. 9101027)
#9:
My congresscritter is the insipid Peter Welch. My Senators are Leaky Leahy and Bernie Sanders (I-Cuba).
Frankly, I would get better results by lifting my cat´s tail and discussing my concerns with her backside!!!
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Keekng, 1/6/2013 8:28:06 PM (No. 9102199)
#19, thanks for that post. The leftists spend full time attempting to tear Conservatives / Republicans apart. They do not need our assistance.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Senate Committee Poised to Beat Up On Apple
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 10:17:46 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Steve wrote this morning about a hearing being held this week by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, in which Apple’s CEO, Tim Cook, will testify tomorrow. The subcommittee apparently is trying to highlight supposed tax avoidance on the part of American companies, as the Associated Press reports: Apple Inc. employs a group of affiliate companies located outside the United States to avoid paying billions of dollars in U.S. income taxes, a Senate investigation has found. The world’s most valuable company is holding overseas some $102 billion of its $145 billion in cash, and an Irish
|
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee Urged Feds to ´Investigate True the Vote´ in 2010
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Brandon Darby
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 10:06:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) asked Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate election integrity org True the Vote and its associated Tea Party group, King Street Patriots, immediately before the IRS and DOJ began targeting the group in June 2010. Rep. Jackson Lee sent a letter to Holder which alleged that True the Vote was intimidating voters and their election monitors were crossing the line in unspecified “instances” of voter intimidation. The letter went on to directly assert that the “alleged events” were factual and that the True the Vote effort was behind the crimes
|
Gunmaker tops list of Massachusetts’ 100 best companies
|
|
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:54:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Gunmaker Smith & Wesson tops the list of best businesses in bright blue Massachusetts — after not making the list at all last year — a new report in the Boston Globe found. The 161-year-old company, based in a state with some of the stricter gun control laws in the nation, tried to diversify its holdings by acquiring a security company in recent years, only to do an “about-face” by focusing on its product line, the newspaper said in its explanation of the Springfield firm’s top spot. “We went back to what we do best, which is handguns,”
|
Justice Department’s scrutiny of Fox News reporter James Rosen in leak case draws fire
|
|
Washington Post, by Ann E. Marimow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:49:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Journalists, First Amendment watchdogs and government transparency advocates reacted with outrage Monday to the revelation that the Justice Department had investigated the newsgathering activities of a Fox News reporter as a potential crime in a probe of classified leaks. Critics said the government’s suggestion that James Rosen, Fox News’s chief Washington correspondent, was a “co-conspirator” for soliciting classified information threatened to criminalize press freedoms protected by the First Amendment. Others also suggested that the Justice Department’s claim in pursuing an alleged leak
|
IRS´s Lerner Had History of Harassment, Inappropriate Religious Inquiries at FEC
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Mark Hemingway
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:30:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Perhaps no other IRS official is more intimately associated with the tax agency´s growing scandal than Lois Lerner, director of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Division. Since admitting the IRS harassed hundreds of conservative and Tea Party groups for over two years, Lerner has been criticized for a number of untruths—including the revelation that she apparently lied about planting a question at an American Bar Association conference where she first publicly acknowledged IRS misconduct. Still, Lerner has her defenders in the government and the media. Shortly after the scandal broke, The Daily Beast published an article headlined "IRS Scandal’s Central
|
Obama administration mistakes journalism for espionage
|
|
Washington Post, by Eugene Robinson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/20/2013 9:24:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama administration has no business rummaging through journalists’ phone records, perusing their e-mails and tracking their movements in an attempt to keep them from gathering news. This heavy-handed business isn’t chilling, it’s just plain cold. It also may well be unconstitutional. In my reading, the First Amendment prohibition against “abridging the freedom .?.?. of the press” should rule out secretly obtaining two months’ worth of the personal and professional phone records of Associated Press reporters and editors, including calls to and from the main AP phone number at the House press gallery in the Capitol
|
Tea party looks to take advantage of moment
|
|
Associated Press, by Thomas Beaumont
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 11:02:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DES MOINES, Iowa — Is the tea party getting its groove back? Shouts of vindication from around the country suggest the movement´s leaders certainly think so. They say the IRS acknowledgement that it had targeted their groups for extra scrutiny — a claim that tea party activists had made for years — is helping pump new energy into the coalition. And they are trying to use that development, along with the ongoing controversy over the Benghazi, Libya, terrorist attacks and the Justice Department´s secret seizure of journalists´ phone records, to recruit new activists incensed about government overreach.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|