|
|
| |
Topic: Cornyn: ´It may be necessary to partially shut down the government´ |
Cornyn: ´It may be necessary to partially shut down the government´
The Hill (DC), by Justin Sink
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 1/4/2013 6:05:33 PM
|
| Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) suggested Friday that Republicans should be willing to shut down the government if they are unable to extract suitable concessions in the upcoming negotiations over the debt ceiling and sequestration. In an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle, Cornyn says that President Obama´s insistence that he will not negotiate over the debt ceiling again "is unacceptable" and that Republicans should put the president on notice over the potential consequences. "The coming deadlines will be the next flashpoints in our ongoing fight to bring fiscal sanity to Washington," Cornyn writes.
|
Comments: Thank you, Senator.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 1/4/2013 6:10:37 PM (No. 9099030)
Yeah... I´m sure Boehner and McConnell will make good on that threat. They´ll make a lot of noise, do the debt ceiling death dance, and then cave like a bunch of weenies, just like they always do. Too bad there is barely a spine amongst them.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
BadgerBill, 1/4/2013 6:10:51 PM (No. 9099031)
Sure, ok, let´s shut down the anti-American side of the aisle.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
woofwoofwoof, 1/4/2013 6:23:02 PM (No. 9099043)
May not be necessary, but definitely desireable.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
saguni, 1/4/2013 6:25:02 PM (No. 9099051)
OK, can I set the priorities??
First, close any office or department (and furlough all employees) that spends a majority of their time in creating regulations.
Second, close all offices (and furlough all employees) of each and every Czar.
Third, close all departments (and furlough all employees) that do not enjoy specific authorization in the Constitution.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
aintnojoke, 1/4/2013 6:30:13 PM (No. 9099065)
I bet they´ll kick the can again. Any takers?
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Pearson365, 1/4/2013 6:38:33 PM (No. 9099080)
To # 4´s list, add, Ground AIr Force 1.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
grampstosix, 1/4/2013 6:46:54 PM (No. 9099093)
I agree with Cornyn and think the pubs ought to start getting that message out NOW and keep hammering it home.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
CEP, 1/4/2013 6:47:12 PM (No. 9099095)
Start with the executive branch, leave Obama in Hawaii with no plane, no staff all he has is his snow cone.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
athina, 1/4/2013 6:47:22 PM (No. 9099096)
LOL, #6, and can we do that while he´s still in Hawaii??
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
franq, 1/4/2013 6:53:03 PM (No. 9099110)
Oh, the humanity.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Kerryman, 1/4/2013 7:01:49 PM (No. 9099120)
Ignore this. He´s running for re-election in 2014 and if a candidate like Ted Cruz emerges, he could be toast. he supported TARP and the just passed Senate Fiscal Cliff legislation including the $76 Billion of Crony Capitalism in it.
Semper Fi
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Ohiolad, 1/4/2013 7:01:55 PM (No. 9099121)
The headline should actually read: ´It may be necessary to partially shut down the government permanently´.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
terrywhite, 1/4/2013 7:15:55 PM (No. 9099143)
I have usually liked Cornyn and would agree with home here, but it really chaps my hide when guys like him voted to support the fiscal cliff deal adding 6 trillion on new debt and essentially csving to Obama then try to come out and talk tough. Eat it guys. If you haven´t figured it out yet many like me are beyond trusting anything you say.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
on fire, 1/4/2013 7:22:48 PM (No. 9099160)
I donated big when Cornyn first ran for Senate but over the years I´ve watched him support Arlan Specter, Charlie Christ, & rush to hypothesize that parts of Obamacare could be worked with right after its passage. gag.
#11 has it right too about him. I am guessing that many who felt like me called in after his latest vote and turned up the heat on him. Plus, Cruz coming to the Senate is quite a comparison & not in a good way for Cornyn.
Meanwhile....., YES, shut down the government.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Bur Oak, 1/4/2013 7:22:50 PM (No. 9099161)
We´ve seen this movie before. The Republicans fold like a cheap tent.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
KTWO, 1/4/2013 7:23:28 PM (No. 9099162)
Partial shut down? Make my day!
But #5 is right.
The deficit can only be tamed by two things:
1) Entitlement spending must fall. Period.
2) Washington must eliminate activities and programs.
But both of those require cooperation and realism by the House, Senate, and President. We don´t have it and there is no sign of a change.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
bubby, 1/4/2013 7:41:14 PM (No. 9099182)
Oh please the Republicans won´t shut down the government! You got to be kidding, the bad press they would get will get them to raising the debt ceiling limit faster than they agreed to raising taxes on the evil "rich" in this country. I can´t stomach Cornyn and his type who talk a good game and fold when tested and he is my Senator. Nothing will happen we will continue to spend a trillion dollars a year we don´t have on projects and department we don´t need. So get used to it.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Nimby, 1/4/2013 8:53:31 PM (No. 9099258)
Do they have the cajones?
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Bpl40, 1/4/2013 9:23:06 PM (No. 9099287)
#4 is right. Allow Air Force One to fly only if equivalent expense savings are identified beforehand. Lets see how far that goes.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
hamrman, 1/4/2013 9:43:42 PM (No. 9099316)
Sounds like a plan, anything to stop the playground bully, we the People are sick of it!
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 1/4/2013 10:21:59 PM (No. 9099369)
If I remember acurately, even thru the shut down, the dems still paid all the fed workers in full.
Any non-essential agency should run at bare bones... and then the house can delay, delay, delay funding them!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 1/5/2013 12:02:45 AM (No. 9099465)
You could shut down half of the gov permanently and nobody would notice. Do we really need a VP or any czars ?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 1/5/2013 5:32:03 AM (No. 9099622)
To Cornyn: Keep only the military essential jobs and retirement/medicare funded. Drop the rest. If you really want to make waves, put forth a bill to completely wipe out the EPA, Dept of Ed and other useless agencies as well as cutting down UN funding to 5%. Another thing you can do is go to the OMB website and look at their program ratings for discretionary programs and wipe all those useless programs out.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Despite the WaPost, Benghazi Is a Major Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.
|
Role of Health-Law ´Navigators´ Under Fire
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"
|
Labor unions break ranks with White House on ObamaCare
|
|
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal
|
|
Issa Warns Hillary
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee
|
|
Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM
Post Reply
|
|
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...
|
How Hope and Change Gave Way To Spying on the Press
|
|
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,
|
Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
|
|
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|