|
|
| |
Topic: God Bless Richard M. Nixon |
God Bless Richard M. Nixon
American Spectator, by Ben Stein
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 1/4/2013 1:27:18 PM
|
| One hundred years ago, as of January 9, in a small home in Yorba Linda, a suburb of Los Angeles, Richard Nixon was born in a house his father built. Without family connections, without family money, with a natural shyness, he became a U.S. Representative when he was in his early 30s, and a U.S. Senator very shortly afterwards, and then Vice President to Dwight Eisenhower from 1953-61. He lost a squeaker of an election that many observers believe was stolen by the Chicago Democratic machine in 1960 to John F. Kennedy.
|
Comments: I was, and remain, a big Nixon fan. I consider him to be misunderstood, unfairly vilified, and unrecognized for his real accomplishments. Thank you, Ben Stein, for knowing better and telling us about it.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
avidyananda, 1/4/2013 1:33:11 PM (No. 9098555)
Thanks for writing this, Ben. Now that I am in my sixties (and I deliberately use the word sixties to echo coming of age during that era...) I can see how if the media wants you dead, you are dead, all merit aside. And if the media wants you to live, you live, all incompetency or crimes aside. And when we say ´the Sixties,´ what we really mean are the Seventies--the Sixties of irresponsible rebellion really didn´t begin to happen until about 1966. All the insane behavior and ways of thinking of those days became institutionalized--the New Normal of the times--in the Seventies. And part of the required beliefs of the Seventies was the unquestioned villainy of Nixon. Such thinking has continued to be part of what people believe now, resulting in the election then re-election of what we have now.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
coldborezero, 1/4/2013 1:40:51 PM (No. 9098564)
"..he brought us the EPA...".
For this alone, I will forever curse Nixon´s name. Whatever good he ever did was erased by this most intrusive and oppressive of federal agencies. Every breath taken by EPA bureaucrats is an insult to the constitution.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
fljack, 1/4/2013 1:52:14 PM (No. 9098593)
During the Watergate mess, I wrote Nixon and told him of my support for him. It still stands. In return I received a letter, signed by him, expressing his thanks. While my wife thinks it is funny, I really treasure the letter, personally.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
zoidberg, 1/4/2013 2:41:31 PM (No. 9098679)
DEA, EPA, wage and price controls. That makes him a big government liberal.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 1/4/2013 2:46:52 PM (No. 9098683)
I lost more than one friend to Nixon Derangement Syndrome....this form of groupthink mobocracy has become the left´s favorite WMD.
Covering for the Messiah of the Moment is the other half of this wicked game.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DanvilleBill, 1/4/2013 3:36:49 PM (No. 9098747)
I was a solid supporter of RN for many years. Over time, however, my opinion of him has gone down. A lot of the inflation from the Carter era was due to Nixon´s disastrous wage/price controls and resultant material shortages that lasted for years. His Supreme Court appointee (Blackmun) authored Roe v. Wade. His ´Saturday night massacre´ destroyed any hope that the brilliant Robert Bork would (later on) make it to the big court. Some of his staff people, including VP Agnew, were hideous; with some of them (Liddy, Hunt, et al) directly causing Watergate and related scandals. And of course, as noted by above posters, we have the EPA, OSHA, DEA and other big government garbage that we suffer with today because of his presidency. Overall, Nixon turned out to be a moderate Republican who set policies that tacked between the liberals that ran Congress and conservatives who had no one else to look to.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
tocsin, 1/4/2013 4:06:38 PM (No. 9098797)
#6-´´Overall, Nixon turned out to be a moderate Republican who set policies that tacked between the liberals that ran Congress and conservatives who had no one else to look to.´´ So similar to today´s Elite Establishment Republican political hacks, underminers of genuine conservatives.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
franq, 1/4/2013 6:14:53 PM (No. 9099035)
Nixon may have mixed reviews, but he was a heck of a lot smarter and more patriotic than what we have now!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 1/5/2013 1:09:18 AM (No. 9099501)
Compared to what we have today, Nixon looks like a real winner. No one ever said he was unpatriotic.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
|
It’s.The.Law
|
|
American Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 6:17:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Last Thursday, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) started a Twitter prairie fire with his call for people to describe #ObamacareInThreeWords. (My contribution was “Sorry, Doctor retired.”) (Snip) The White House, never shy to jump into social media, responded with a flurry of tweets, including “It’s. The. Law.” which smacked, more than anything, of typical Obama chest-thumping. Is the administration sure they want to aggressively take credit for a law which, for almost the entire three years since its passage, has had more Americans supporting its repeal than supporting the law itself and which, according to Rasmussen Reports
|
Tooth and Nail: Fluoride Fight Cracks Portland´s Left
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Joel Millman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:57:35 AM
Post Reply
|
|
PORTLAND, Ore.—In the 1950s, after health authorities began fluoridating U.S. water supplies, they faced opposition from groups like the John Birch Society, which called it "an unconstitutional mass medication of the public." Sixty years later, the fight over fluoridation has erupted in Portland, where the battle has drawn in the city´s craft-beer brewers, organic-food purveyors and environmentalists. Even some of the city´s famed indie-rock musicians are taking sides. The debate has prompted something of an existential crisis in this self-consciously liberal city, which votes Tuesday on whether to overturn the city council´s 2012 decision to fluoridate.
|
| |
|
What Angelina Jolie forgot to mention
|
|
CNN, by H. Gilbert Welch
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:54:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I first saw the headline early Tuesday on Real Clear Politics, a political news site where I generally start my morning. It´s not where I expect to see a story on breast cancer. Then I checked my e-mail messages -- they all seemed to be about Angelina Jolie´s op-ed. Students in my undergraduate class wanted to discuss it in our next session. Colleagues expressed concern and wondered what the right response was. People I don´t even know sent e-mails. One, from a research fellow at the International Agency for Research on Cancer, nicely summed up the general concern:
|
|
Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
|
|
National Review Online, by John Fund
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:46:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The late columnist William Safire once said that a good clue that someone in Washington was engaged in “an artful dodge,” i.e., a cover-up, was that they used the phrase “mistakes were made.” Safire defined it as a “passive-evasive way of acknowledging error while distancing the speaker from responsibility for it.” The phrase became infamous when both Richard Nixon and Ron Ziegler, his press secretary, deployed it to explain away Watergate without explaining who did what and when or whether any ill motive was involved. Astonishingly, the Internal Revenue Service resurrected the Nixonian expression within hours
|
Deval as Holder’s fill-in? That just wouldn’t be just
|
|
Boston Herald, by Holly Robichaud
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:27:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Just when you think the news surrounding Obamagate cannot get any worse, it does. Some say U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s days on the job are numbered and that it’s just a matter of when he’ll be forced to resign. While I’ll not shed a tear over Holder’s departure, one of the replacement names being floated has me reaching for tissues: Gov. Deval Patrick. Patrick has denied he’s interested — but the job isn’t on offer yet. If it is, President Obama should not select him nor should he be confirmed by the Senate for a plethora of reasons.
|
|
How the white hat got stained
|
|
New York Daily News, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:20:32 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Don’t let anyone fool you: Everyone in politics is tempted to believe that their noble ends could justify unethical and illegal means. Those who had hoped that President Obama would usher in a new era of higher standards in Washington must be shell-shocked by last week’s revelations: -The Internal Revenue Service admitted to delaying conservative organizations’ tax-exempt status while quickly approving groups that had liberal or progressive orientations. The IRS asked these groups all sorts of invasive questions, including what kind of books they read, and leaked some information to the media. -The Department of Justice secretly obtained
|
|
The Arab collapse
|
|
New York Post, by Ralph Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:15:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Arab Spring has unleashed the Arab Collapse. Everybody still standing in the region is picking the flesh of the helpless. The Islamist cancer proved more virulent than Arabs themselves expected, while dying regimes behave with unrestrained ruthlessness. And our diplomats still think everyone can be cajoled into harmony. We’re witnessing a titanic event, the crack-up of a long-tottering civilization. Arab societies grew so corrupt and stagnant that violent upheaval became inevitable. That’s what we’re seeing in Syria and Iraq — two names, one struggle — and will find elsewhere tomorrow.
|
| |
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
| |
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
| | |
|
|