A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: ´I am not your peasant... I will Not be
disarmed:' Marine's scathing letter to
U.S. senator over her proposed ban
on assault weapons
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
´I am not your peasant... I will Not be
disarmed:' Marine's scathing letter to
U.S. senator over her proposed ban
on assault weapons

Daily Mail [UK], by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:sliver of truth, 1/4/2013 10:11:15 AM

A scathing letter written by a Marine veteran blasting a proposed ban on assault weapons has gone viral online. Cpl. Joshua Boston wrote the letter to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, who proposed the bill banning certain firearms and requiring gun owners to register their weapons. ´I am a Marine Corps veteran of eight years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one,´ he writes in the letter.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: jalo1951, 1/4/2013 10:18:00 AM     (No. 9098179)

Cpl. thank you for your service to our country. And thank you for taking it to the ruling class in so simple a statement that even they should understand.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 1/4/2013 10:19:50 AM     (No. 9098182)

I believe several million Russians sent similar letters to Lenin. Wonder if the results will be any different? At least Lenin had an open mind.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: curious1, 1/4/2013 10:26:59 AM     (No. 9098198)

#1, it isn´t a question of understanding. The LPs understand very well, that´s why they want to collect all the weapons - so they can do as they wish.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: rael, 1/4/2013 10:31:29 AM     (No. 9098213)

But how many of you will be willing to defend your rights when the time comes? If you´re not willing to put your life on the line to defend our freedoms, which is what it will take this time around, then don´t expect to keep those freedoms.
The time our forefathers warned of is fast approaching. What are you going to do about it?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: momof3, 1/4/2013 10:34:37 AM     (No. 9098229)

Funny, no mention of this in the MSM.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: rep60, 1/4/2013 10:39:59 AM     (No. 9098242)

Janet Reno hasn´t surrounded this fine Marine´s house yet... has she? Someone keep an eye out for black helicopters around this persons house... or IRS agents mysterious showing up at his front door, please!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: chicodon, 1/4/2013 10:45:06 AM     (No. 9098251)

Nice hit piece. British ex-pats wrote the Second Amendment. Today´s Brits forget that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Freeloader, 1/4/2013 10:50:18 AM     (No. 9098269)

George Mason, one of the authors of the 2nd Amendment, once observed..."To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/4/2013 10:52:40 AM     (No. 9098276)

Feinstein, what part of: "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT be infringed." do you NOT understand?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 1/4/2013 10:55:05 AM     (No. 9098280)

First and foremost, we are armed to protect ourselves from tyrants and tyranny. And, yes, "Americans" like DiFi, Obama, the NYT, and Democrats everywhere are tyrants in their dark and dreadful cores.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: jimmiet, 1/4/2013 10:59:36 AM     (No. 9098295)

Alinsky stated that it would take approx. 25 million dead Americans to accomplish their goal. Ayers, Dornan have stated similar numbers. Russia and Germany killed how many million of their unarmed citizens (subjects)? I´d rather die fighting than exterminated.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Watlines, 1/4/2013 11:03:18 AM     (No. 9098309)

Our enemies abroad may try to destroy us, but they won´t invade us. Why?

America has the largest standing army in the world.

Even the Japanese knew that prior to WWII, which is why their only hope for defeating us was a surprise attack that would destroy our navy.

No way were they going to march from Los Angeles to Washington DC on foot.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: JonR, 1/4/2013 11:03:57 AM     (No. 9098311)

It just may come down to the choice of either living on our knees or dying on our feet! This Marine had declared his choice; will you?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: yo-yo, 1/4/2013 11:08:59 AM     (No. 9098322)

Di-Fi knows that when the Ponzi SScheme crashes and the benefits stop, the 47% will be coming after those responsible, and it won´t be pretty for the Schmucky Schumer types.

Also, the 53% better be stockpiling, because the 47% will be cutting out the middleman and trying to take their "entitlements" straight from the source.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Redneck In NY, 1/4/2013 11:09:32 AM     (No. 9098324)

Great letter. Unfortunately, if the MSM even picks this up, it will be for his wording. Watch as "some woman" will be twisted into a sexist rant...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: geoguy, 1/4/2013 11:13:49 AM     (No. 9098331)

Poster #4 I don´t know if I would have the courage, but like so many, I like to think I would.

When I read articles like this concerning what this administration wants to do and is doing, this goes over and over in my mind;
"Its time to take to the streets".

I don´t know where this is all heading, but it´s not good to think this way about our great country. I never imagined we would be in this spot.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: veritas, 1/4/2013 11:13:51 AM     (No. 9098332)

Is DiFi not familiar with the caveat, "be careful what you wish for"?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Agent Orange, 1/4/2013 11:18:36 AM     (No. 9098351)

On March 27, 1962 I took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic and I have never relinquished my oath. If the evil SOBs of the current administration want to try to take my guns, I will die for my right to keep them.

Happy New Year from a Retired MSgt with an ability to still hit the bulls eye on almost every shot.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Feebie, 1/4/2013 11:30:23 AM     (No. 9098373)

word.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: wilarrbie, 1/4/2013 11:34:01 AM     (No. 9098380)

Good on this soldier, but I can´t help but worry, remembering how easy New Yorkers gave up their Big Gulps. Gov´t needs their worker bees fit and healthy you know. And unarmed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Quaestio, 1/4/2013 11:35:10 AM     (No. 9098383)

This would be the same senator who made a fortune by buying stock in a green energy company right before it conveniently received a buttload of federal money, without which it wouldn´t have existed?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 22 - Posted by: RayLRiv, 1/4/2013 11:59:10 AM     (No. 9098426)

Awesome. At some point we´ll have to make a choice. I´d like to think the Libs (who were so cowardly during the Vietnam War) WON´T dare to physically fight against those of us who adhere to the 2nd Amendment. They´re too chicken - that´s why they hide behind the rerwriting and reinterpreting of laws.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Michaelus, 1/4/2013 11:59:11 AM     (No. 9098427)

I bet the Corporal submits to drug tests and breathalyzers all the time and I am damn sure he takes his boots off for the TSA. So much for resisting tyranny.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: fayebeck, 1/4/2013 12:17:47 PM     (No. 9098447)

What is this blowhard´s opinion of 6 year old boys with finger guns? A "hero" blowhard Marine. A real Marine keeps his mouth shut and just does it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: chumley, 1/4/2013 12:23:42 PM     (No. 9098454)

#22 makes an excellent point. I have never seen a lib willing to do his own fighting. They will gladly send the law or the military, but when it comes time to man the battlements themselves they shrink away and whimper.
That may be their Achilles heel. We should explore ways to exploit it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: mitzi, 1/4/2013 12:28:53 PM     (No. 9098460)

#25 ... or hire their own personal armed guards.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 1/4/2013 12:48:58 PM     (No. 9098497)

If NØbama declared Martial Law tomorrow and ordered the military and police to confiscate weapons from law abiding citizens, I firmly believe they would resoundingly refuse that order.

That is why NØbama will secretly start forming his ´´Civilian Defense Militia´´, with their trademark brown shirts. They will be made up of members of the New Black Panthers, La Raza, and assorted union thugs (who lost their jobs due to NØbamanomics). They will be outfitted with the finest of body armor and highest tech weapons that our tax dollars can afford.

When NØbama gives the order, expect groups of 25 or so of these Civilian Defense Militia members to come crashing through your door and windows, hold your wife and kids at gunpoint, and give you one minute to turn in every weapon and piece of ammo that you own. If you can´t turn them in, or claim that they were ´´stolen´´, then you are a terrorist and your family is dead. They will make sure and make you watch your family die before they haul you away for ´´interogation´´.

I´m sure NØbama is talking to his Commie buddies in the Chinese government and the old KGB and Stasi forces for pointers...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: a6bump, 1/4/2013 1:03:33 PM     (No. 9098524)

Molon Labe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Rafter, 1/4/2013 1:24:38 PM     (No. 9098544)

Semper Fi... YESSS!!

Di-Fi... not so much.

She gunna lose this one.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Smaj, 1/4/2013 1:38:09 PM     (No. 9098560)

#22 is right- the left are physical and moral cowards and would never themselves attempt to disarm is. They will send their easily duped minions and those who put more importance on a paycheck and/or pension than their rights. If it comes to confiscation, any military member or police officer who takes part is a traitor.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: dvc, 1/4/2013 1:39:16 PM     (No. 9098561)

I sincerely hope that the Congress does not pass any laws restricting firearms any more than they are now. If they try to confiscate guns, the possibilities for violence are high. This is not good, and let us pray that we are able to stop this push for more gun restrictions in the normal, civil way in Congress.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 1/4/2013 1:49:20 PM     (No. 9098583)

We must resist all false arguments about what is ´needed´ for self defense of hunting.

Liberals register shock and disbelief at the notion that the 2nd Amd. exists exclusively as an indictment of all governments for all time as being rapacious and malignant and often in need of active trimming by all means including military.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 33 - Posted by: Penney, 1/4/2013 3:45:42 PM     (No. 9098762)

The Second Amendment´s purpose wasn´t to enable, ´´hunting!´´ The Founders certainly did not secure any of the Bill of Rights for the purposes of entertainment & hobbies for American citizens, but rather for freedom itsdelf! They made that very clear in their writings and in the way they lived their lives. Each of the ten Bill of Rights were secured to protect themselves as well as future generations of American citizens from the same central-planning, ´one-size fits all,´ and outrageous TAXATION tyrannies which had been experienced by the Founders themselves under BIG Governmental tyranny by a distant King.

...As Mark Levin´s best seller illustrates, the choice for voters is the same now as it has always been which is between, ´´Liberty and Tyranny.´´ Americans have always cherished the principles which secure each individual freedom´s which rely upon equal respect for Life & Liberty secured by the U.S. Constitution. We The People dare not risk cavalierly tossing aside those temeless & proved principles secured for each of us equally in the U.S.A. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: vesicant, 1/4/2013 5:22:50 PM     (No. 9098936)

Joshua, don´t let Baba Yaga Feinstein talk you into a private meeting or beers or whatever.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 35 - Posted by: kafir091101, 1/5/2013 2:04:19 AM     (No. 9099543)

All this is just posturing and ‘Prepping the Battle Field’ by the Fascists in DC. This is a coordinated effort with no wasted or counterproductive moves.

Any astute student of Saul Alinsky would be able to scribe it all out for us including probable time lines.

They will continue to antagonize us to force reactions that will cause a majority of voters to demand ‘Sensible Gun Regulations’ including total registration. Obviously, confiscation would begin soon after.

Congress will be swept up and the Robert’s Court will make extremely dumb 5/4 decisions and the Second Amendment will be reinterpreted into meaningless words.

No amendment will be needed to repeal it. It will just go the way of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments and simply become an historical artifact.

It will all be done by Executive Order and agency regulations. No grand national debate or fiery speeches in Congress, just a simple whimpering death.

And the result:

Life in America will make the history of Northern Ireland look like a Sunday picnic that went bad. And the world will follow us into darkness and mankind will be controlled by Fascists and Islamist.

It won’t happen with this Congress but those from Chicago are moving the groundwork forward.

Remember, ‘Never let a good crisis go to waste’.

Meanwhile I continue to invest in precious metals, brass and lead, and if need be, I’ll crawl through urine soaked broken glass to make my presence known when the ‘ball goes up’.

Why? Because I am a citizen and not a subject.

Just keep in mind:

One thousand Independent Operators could bring this country to its economic knees. Just think what ten million could accomplish!

Well, I guess I’ll sit down with an adult beverage and wait for the knock on the door……..

Kafir







  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: mitzi, 1/5/2013 2:56:08 PM     (No. 9100555)

I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

Why would Feinstein need to carry a gun? And, what kind of gun and how long has she had it?

Does she carry it at work? When traveling?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: kafir091101, 1/5/2013 10:03:52 PM     (No. 9100904)

#36:

Back during the furor over the Assault Rifle Ban, it was reported that she had a Concealed Carry Permit.

Years later it was reported that she no longer had her permit. Wheather she had ever carried, I don’t recall any reports to that effect.

How much is Urban Legend and how much is truth, who knows?

Kafir




  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 717637




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "sliver of truth"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "sliver of truth"



Seattle officials call for ban on
´potentially offensive´ language
FoxNews.com, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: sliver of truth- 8/2/2013 8:45:35 AM     Post Reply
Government workers in the city of Seattle have been advised that the terms "citizen" and "brown bag" are potentially offensive and may no longer be used in official documents and discussions. KOMO-TV reports that the city´s Office of Civil Rights instructed city workers in a recent internal memo to avoid using the words because some may find them offensive. "Luckily, we´ve got options," Elliott Bronstein of the Office for Civil Rights wrote in the memo obtained by the station. "For ´citizens,´ how about ´residents?´"

Law enforcement applaud
ruling on DNA swabbing
WKTV-TV [Utica, NY], by Joleen Ferris    Original Article
Posted By: sliver of truth- 6/3/2013 8:31:15 PM     Post Reply
The Supreme Court has ruled that is now legal for law enforcement to take the DNA of people arrested, even though they have not yet been convicted of a crime. The decision was a big victory to police and victim rights groups in the fight over how and when your DNA can be used, with the justices being nearly split down the middle. While the justices approving believe they are solidifying DNA as the fingerprint of the 21st Century, there is concern over whether or not the decision violates the Fourth Amendment while police and prosecutors say they are happy for what the ruling

´I am not your peasant... I will Not be
disarmed:' Marine's scathing letter to
U.S. senator over her proposed ban
on assault weapons
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: sliver of truth- 1/4/2013 10:11:15 AM     Post Reply
A scathing letter written by a Marine veteran blasting a proposed ban on assault weapons has gone viral online. Cpl. Joshua Boston wrote the letter to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, who proposed the bill banning certain firearms and requiring gun owners to register their weapons. ´I am a Marine Corps veteran of eight years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one,´ he writes in the letter.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

54 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

46 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

32 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it


Post Reply   Close thread 717637





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~