|
|
| |
Topic: ´I am not your peasant... I will Not be disarmed:' Marine's scathing letter to U.S. senator over her proposed ban on assault weapons |
´I am not your peasant... I will Not be disarmed:' Marine's scathing letter to U.S. senator over her proposed ban on assault weapons
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:sliver of truth, 1/4/2013 10:11:15 AM
|
| A scathing letter written by a Marine veteran blasting a proposed ban on assault weapons has gone viral online. Cpl. Joshua Boston wrote the letter to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat from California, who proposed the bill banning certain firearms and requiring gun owners to register their weapons. ´I am a Marine Corps veteran of eight years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one,´ he writes in the letter.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
jalo1951, 1/4/2013 10:18:00 AM (No. 9098179)
Cpl. thank you for your service to our country. And thank you for taking it to the ruling class in so simple a statement that even they should understand.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Jethro bo, 1/4/2013 10:19:50 AM (No. 9098182)
I believe several million Russians sent similar letters to Lenin. Wonder if the results will be any different? At least Lenin had an open mind.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
curious1, 1/4/2013 10:26:59 AM (No. 9098198)
#1, it isn´t a question of understanding. The LPs understand very well, that´s why they want to collect all the weapons - so they can do as they wish.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
rael, 1/4/2013 10:31:29 AM (No. 9098213)
But how many of you will be willing to defend your rights when the time comes? If you´re not willing to put your life on the line to defend our freedoms, which is what it will take this time around, then don´t expect to keep those freedoms. The time our forefathers warned of is fast approaching. What are you going to do about it?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
momof3, 1/4/2013 10:34:37 AM (No. 9098229)
Funny, no mention of this in the MSM.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
rep60, 1/4/2013 10:39:59 AM (No. 9098242)
Janet Reno hasn´t surrounded this fine Marine´s house yet... has she? Someone keep an eye out for black helicopters around this persons house... or IRS agents mysterious showing up at his front door, please!!!
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
chicodon, 1/4/2013 10:45:06 AM (No. 9098251)
Nice hit piece. British ex-pats wrote the Second Amendment. Today´s Brits forget that.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 1/4/2013 10:50:18 AM (No. 9098269)
George Mason, one of the authors of the 2nd Amendment, once observed..."To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
mickturn, 1/4/2013 10:52:40 AM (No. 9098276)
Feinstein, what part of: "...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT be infringed." do you NOT understand?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
J F Ackerman, 1/4/2013 10:55:05 AM (No. 9098280)
First and foremost, we are armed to protect ourselves from tyrants and tyranny. And, yes, "Americans" like DiFi, Obama, the NYT, and Democrats everywhere are tyrants in their dark and dreadful cores.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
jimmiet, 1/4/2013 10:59:36 AM (No. 9098295)
Alinsky stated that it would take approx. 25 million dead Americans to accomplish their goal. Ayers, Dornan have stated similar numbers. Russia and Germany killed how many million of their unarmed citizens (subjects)? I´d rather die fighting than exterminated.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Watlines, 1/4/2013 11:03:18 AM (No. 9098309)
Our enemies abroad may try to destroy us, but they won´t invade us. Why?
America has the largest standing army in the world.
Even the Japanese knew that prior to WWII, which is why their only hope for defeating us was a surprise attack that would destroy our navy.
No way were they going to march from Los Angeles to Washington DC on foot.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
JonR, 1/4/2013 11:03:57 AM (No. 9098311)
It just may come down to the choice of either living on our knees or dying on our feet! This Marine had declared his choice; will you?
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
yo-yo, 1/4/2013 11:08:59 AM (No. 9098322)
Di-Fi knows that when the Ponzi SScheme crashes and the benefits stop, the 47% will be coming after those responsible, and it won´t be pretty for the Schmucky Schumer types.
Also, the 53% better be stockpiling, because the 47% will be cutting out the middleman and trying to take their "entitlements" straight from the source.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Redneck In NY, 1/4/2013 11:09:32 AM (No. 9098324)
Great letter. Unfortunately, if the MSM even picks this up, it will be for his wording. Watch as "some woman" will be twisted into a sexist rant...
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
geoguy, 1/4/2013 11:13:49 AM (No. 9098331)
Poster #4 I don´t know if I would have the courage, but like so many, I like to think I would.
When I read articles like this concerning what this administration wants to do and is doing, this goes over and over in my mind; "Its time to take to the streets".
I don´t know where this is all heading, but it´s not good to think this way about our great country. I never imagined we would be in this spot.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
veritas, 1/4/2013 11:13:51 AM (No. 9098332)
Is DiFi not familiar with the caveat, "be careful what you wish for"?
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Agent Orange, 1/4/2013 11:18:36 AM (No. 9098351)
On March 27, 1962 I took an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic and I have never relinquished my oath. If the evil SOBs of the current administration want to try to take my guns, I will die for my right to keep them.
Happy New Year from a Retired MSgt with an ability to still hit the bulls eye on almost every shot.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Feebie, 1/4/2013 11:30:23 AM (No. 9098373)
word.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
wilarrbie, 1/4/2013 11:34:01 AM (No. 9098380)
Good on this soldier, but I can´t help but worry, remembering how easy New Yorkers gave up their Big Gulps. Gov´t needs their worker bees fit and healthy you know. And unarmed.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Quaestio, 1/4/2013 11:35:10 AM (No. 9098383)
This would be the same senator who made a fortune by buying stock in a green energy company right before it conveniently received a buttload of federal money, without which it wouldn´t have existed?
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
RayLRiv, 1/4/2013 11:59:10 AM (No. 9098426)
Awesome. At some point we´ll have to make a choice. I´d like to think the Libs (who were so cowardly during the Vietnam War) WON´T dare to physically fight against those of us who adhere to the 2nd Amendment. They´re too chicken - that´s why they hide behind the rerwriting and reinterpreting of laws.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Michaelus, 1/4/2013 11:59:11 AM (No. 9098427)
I bet the Corporal submits to drug tests and breathalyzers all the time and I am damn sure he takes his boots off for the TSA. So much for resisting tyranny.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
fayebeck, 1/4/2013 12:17:47 PM (No. 9098447)
What is this blowhard´s opinion of 6 year old boys with finger guns? A "hero" blowhard Marine. A real Marine keeps his mouth shut and just does it.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
chumley, 1/4/2013 12:23:42 PM (No. 9098454)
#22 makes an excellent point. I have never seen a lib willing to do his own fighting. They will gladly send the law or the military, but when it comes time to man the battlements themselves they shrink away and whimper. That may be their Achilles heel. We should explore ways to exploit it.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
mitzi, 1/4/2013 12:28:53 PM (No. 9098460)
#25 ... or hire their own personal armed guards.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
SouthSanAntonio, 1/4/2013 12:48:58 PM (No. 9098497)
If NØbama declared Martial Law tomorrow and ordered the military and police to confiscate weapons from law abiding citizens, I firmly believe they would resoundingly refuse that order.
That is why NØbama will secretly start forming his ´´Civilian Defense Militia´´, with their trademark brown shirts. They will be made up of members of the New Black Panthers, La Raza, and assorted union thugs (who lost their jobs due to NØbamanomics). They will be outfitted with the finest of body armor and highest tech weapons that our tax dollars can afford.
When NØbama gives the order, expect groups of 25 or so of these Civilian Defense Militia members to come crashing through your door and windows, hold your wife and kids at gunpoint, and give you one minute to turn in every weapon and piece of ammo that you own. If you can´t turn them in, or claim that they were ´´stolen´´, then you are a terrorist and your family is dead. They will make sure and make you watch your family die before they haul you away for ´´interogation´´.
I´m sure NØbama is talking to his Commie buddies in the Chinese government and the old KGB and Stasi forces for pointers...
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
a6bump, 1/4/2013 1:03:33 PM (No. 9098524)
Molon Labe.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Rafter, 1/4/2013 1:24:38 PM (No. 9098544)
Semper Fi... YESSS!!
Di-Fi... not so much.
She gunna lose this one.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Smaj, 1/4/2013 1:38:09 PM (No. 9098560)
#22 is right- the left are physical and moral cowards and would never themselves attempt to disarm is. They will send their easily duped minions and those who put more importance on a paycheck and/or pension than their rights. If it comes to confiscation, any military member or police officer who takes part is a traitor.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
dvc, 1/4/2013 1:39:16 PM (No. 9098561)
I sincerely hope that the Congress does not pass any laws restricting firearms any more than they are now. If they try to confiscate guns, the possibilities for violence are high. This is not good, and let us pray that we are able to stop this push for more gun restrictions in the normal, civil way in Congress.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 1/4/2013 1:49:20 PM (No. 9098583)
We must resist all false arguments about what is ´needed´ for self defense of hunting.
Liberals register shock and disbelief at the notion that the 2nd Amd. exists exclusively as an indictment of all governments for all time as being rapacious and malignant and often in need of active trimming by all means including military.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Penney, 1/4/2013 3:45:42 PM (No. 9098762)
The Second Amendment´s purpose wasn´t to enable, ´´hunting!´´ The Founders certainly did not secure any of the Bill of Rights for the purposes of entertainment & hobbies for American citizens, but rather for freedom itsdelf! They made that very clear in their writings and in the way they lived their lives. Each of the ten Bill of Rights were secured to protect themselves as well as future generations of American citizens from the same central-planning, ´one-size fits all,´ and outrageous TAXATION tyrannies which had been experienced by the Founders themselves under BIG Governmental tyranny by a distant King.
...As Mark Levin´s best seller illustrates, the choice for voters is the same now as it has always been which is between, ´´Liberty and Tyranny.´´ Americans have always cherished the principles which secure each individual freedom´s which rely upon equal respect for Life & Liberty secured by the U.S. Constitution. We The People dare not risk cavalierly tossing aside those temeless & proved principles secured for each of us equally in the U.S.A. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
vesicant, 1/4/2013 5:22:50 PM (No. 9098936)
Joshua, don´t let Baba Yaga Feinstein talk you into a private meeting or beers or whatever.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
kafir091101, 1/5/2013 2:04:19 AM (No. 9099543)
All this is just posturing and ‘Prepping the Battle Field’ by the Fascists in DC. This is a coordinated effort with no wasted or counterproductive moves.
Any astute student of Saul Alinsky would be able to scribe it all out for us including probable time lines.
They will continue to antagonize us to force reactions that will cause a majority of voters to demand ‘Sensible Gun Regulations’ including total registration. Obviously, confiscation would begin soon after.
Congress will be swept up and the Robert’s Court will make extremely dumb 5/4 decisions and the Second Amendment will be reinterpreted into meaningless words.
No amendment will be needed to repeal it. It will just go the way of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments and simply become an historical artifact.
It will all be done by Executive Order and agency regulations. No grand national debate or fiery speeches in Congress, just a simple whimpering death.
And the result:
Life in America will make the history of Northern Ireland look like a Sunday picnic that went bad. And the world will follow us into darkness and mankind will be controlled by Fascists and Islamist.
It won’t happen with this Congress but those from Chicago are moving the groundwork forward.
Remember, ‘Never let a good crisis go to waste’.
Meanwhile I continue to invest in precious metals, brass and lead, and if need be, I’ll crawl through urine soaked broken glass to make my presence known when the ‘ball goes up’.
Why? Because I am a citizen and not a subject.
Just keep in mind:
One thousand Independent Operators could bring this country to its economic knees. Just think what ten million could accomplish!
Well, I guess I’ll sit down with an adult beverage and wait for the knock on the door……..
Kafir
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
mitzi, 1/5/2013 2:56:08 PM (No. 9100555)
I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.
Why would Feinstein need to carry a gun? And, what kind of gun and how long has she had it?
Does she carry it at work? When traveling?
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
kafir091101, 1/5/2013 10:03:52 PM (No. 9100904)
#36:
Back during the furor over the Assault Rifle Ban, it was reported that she had a Concealed Carry Permit.
Years later it was reported that she no longer had her permit. Wheather she had ever carried, I don’t recall any reports to that effect.
How much is Urban Legend and how much is truth, who knows?
Kafir
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "sliver of truth"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "sliver of truth"
|
Law enforcement applaud ruling on DNA swabbing
|
|
WKTV-TV [Utica, NY], by Joleen Ferris
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sliver of truth- 6/3/2013 8:31:15 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Supreme Court has ruled that is now legal for law enforcement to take the DNA of people arrested, even though they have not yet been convicted of a crime. The decision was a big victory to police and victim rights groups in the fight over how and when your DNA can be used, with the justices being nearly split down the middle. While the justices approving believe they are solidifying DNA as the fingerprint of the 21st Century, there is concern over whether or not the decision violates the Fourth Amendment while police and prosecutors say they are happy for what the ruling
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
|
|
FOX News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
Obama: You Can´t Fathom ´Complexities´ of Syria Policy ´If You Haven´t Been in Situation Room´
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.
|
G8: Barack Obama looks like a president going through the motions
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s
|
The IRS Immigration Fraud Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Jeffrey Lord
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 10:37:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Marco Rubio. Paul Ryan. The IRS. Illegal immigration. And fraud to the tune of billions.. Now there’s a combustible mix. Let’s start with the IRS, illegal immigration and fraud. We’ll come back in a minute to Senator Rubio and Congressman Ryan. For those who came in late, a year before the IRS scandals burst onto the scene in early May of 2013, an alert investigative reporter for WTHR-Indianapolis (Channel 13), Bob Segall by name, produced a stunning piece of journalism. Segall’s video report is found here and we will quote from his story for the basics.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|