A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Republicans bet on stronger
hand in spending fight
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Republicans bet on stronger
hand in spending fight

Washington Examiner [DC], by Byron York

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/4/2013 8:59:37 AM

During the "fiscal cliff" battle, I asked several Republican lawmakers why they didn´t push harder for spending cuts in exchange for their historic concession to vote for higher taxes. They invariably answered that they were waiting for the fight over raising the debt ceiling. Then, they promised, Republicans would demand serious cuts, especially in entitlement spending, from President Obama. Their thinking was this: The GOP was on the wrong side of the polls in the battle over raising taxes on the highest earners. Surveys showed substantial public support for the president and Democrats

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: jeffkinnh, 1/4/2013 9:10:49 AM     (No. 9098028)


Reply 2 - Posted by: FunOne, 1/4/2013 9:11:27 AM     (No. 9098031)

I doubt that any L-dotter, at this point has confidence that the majority of republicans in this congress will continue to spend and increase the debt. The "victory" they will claim is that the democrats would spend more, spend faster.
That qualified as a "stronger hand". Sad.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: kanphil, 1/4/2013 9:13:16 AM     (No. 9098035)

I call BS. They´ll do some trimming around the edges, maybe, but there will be no substantive cuts. Were I king of the House, I´d do something bold, like propose abolishing the Dept of Education which has accomplished absolutely nothing except destruction of our once great public school system. Now that would be an effective cost cut.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Echohawk, 1/4/2013 9:16:21 AM     (No. 9098044)

Donald Rumsfeld used to say, "Make the problem bigger." As of January 1st, 77% of all taxpayers now pay more in taxes.
Not every Obamabot is a leech, some are taxpayers. These will see a smaller paycheck and think, ´Hey, I´m not rich! Why am I paying more?´
Now Obama´s supporters have skin in the game. Forever more, the fiscal cliff bill should be called the Obama tax hike. We should never let the Obamabots forget that Dear Leader ran up an enormous bill and now it´s time to start paying for it, and that includes them.


Reply 5 - Posted by: jeffkinnh, 1/4/2013 9:26:33 AM     (No. 9098072)

This article is all right as far as it goes. The question is, why do Republicans keep losing PR battles and having to capitulate? As long as they are losing PR battles they will continue to capitulate.

They are losing PR battles because the press is solidly supporting progressives and the majority of the public is too stupid to understand that the progressive path is a dead end. As long as that situation continues Republicans will lose.

The press is not going to change. The only option is to continue to build alternative media. The public, well, you can´t fix stupid. But, you might be able to work around it. How do you craft a message to convince dumb people to support you? Republicans tend to try to speak to the facts, which appeals to me. But it is NOT going to win the ignorant greedy masses.If we want to win, they need to be on board.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Rotten In Denmark, 1/4/2013 9:43:33 AM     (No. 9098102)

Hate to say it BUT, see Mr. Chas Brown and a Miss Lucy regarding a football, redux.


Reply 7 - Posted by: bubby, 1/4/2013 9:44:05 AM     (No. 9098103)

Look as long as the House Republicans vote to approve continuing spending resolutions the Dems in the Senate don´t need to prepare a budget and the yearly trillion dollar deficits will continue. The Republicans are more concerned about the bad press they would get if the govt shut down than they are in cutting spending so nothing will change. We will continue to spend a TRILLION dollars a year we don´t have for programs and departments we don´t NEED! Any proposed spending cuts will be tens years out and all just slight reductions in increased spending. It will be all smoke and mirrors. So sad.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 1/4/2013 9:54:35 AM     (No. 9098124)

I find it amusing that when they talk about cutting entitlements, they are always referring to Social Security and Medicare. I guess 2 years (or is that 2 years and 99 weeks) of unemployment, bennies for illegals and their families, etc. etc. are just chopped liver?


Reply 9 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/4/2013 10:25:06 AM     (No. 9098193)

The GOP always lets the left frame the arguments. For instance, the only way to fix social security is to cut benefits. Really? Why not have those that are eligible actually contribute to the fund. Now you can draw after 10 quarters of contributions. Raise that. The democrats have turned the fund into financing for their programs,i.e., there is no money in the fund. Change that. Review the eligibility for dependent children welfare payments when no money ever went into the fund. I am tired of Alinsky frame the argument tactics.


Reply 10 - Posted by: mickturn, 1/4/2013 10:29:40 AM     (No. 9098209)

Since money is a powerful drug to Liberals, just say no. Someone has to put them in rehab!


Reply 11 - Posted by: yuban, 1/4/2013 10:32:35 AM     (No. 9098217)

Every issue the GOP loses they say they want to hold out for the BIG fight. Talk about kicking the can down the road. The GOP are experts at that.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Kerryman, 1/4/2013 10:40:45 AM     (No. 9098243)

Who is going to bell the cat? Boehner? McConnell? Really? Please.

Semper Fi


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: thatsomewhereplace, 1/4/2013 10:56:19 AM     (No. 9098285)

PFFFFFT!


Reply 14 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 1/4/2013 11:44:31 AM     (No. 9098393)

Does that mean they will whine for 30 minutes instead of 15 minutes before surrenduring and giving NØbama exactly what he wants???

When exactly did the Republicans lose their cajones and start emulating France instead of Ronald Reagan???


Reply 15 - Posted by: TXknitter, 1/4/2013 11:46:43 AM     (No. 9098395)

#11, you beat me to it. Same litany of excuses for how many years now".? Here are a few: next time, we have to choose our battles, we´re in a tough spot, we have no power, it´s the best we could do and of course, the promises that W had this brilliant poker strategery that would box the Democrat´s ears. The media will not change. The GOP either learns to frame issues clearly and intelligently, stop complimenting their enemies and put some fresh bold conservatives into leadership or do not expect any wins from now on. Winners act. Winners don´t whine.


Reply 16 - Posted by: tocsin, 1/4/2013 1:07:57 PM     (No. 9098527)

Exactly! #12-if the House pubbies wanted to send ØweBama a message, they would have fired Boehner.



Post Reply   Close thread 717633




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Authorities: Hofstra student
was killed by police
Associated Press, by Frank Eltman    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:24:56 AM     Post Reply
MINEOLA, N.Y. — A Hofstra University student being held in a headlock at gunpoint by an intruder was accidently shot and killed by a police officer who had responded to the home invasion at an off-campus home, police said Saturday. Junior public relations major Andrea Rebello was shot once in the head early Friday morning by an officer who opened fire after the masked intruder pointed a gun at the officer while holding the 21-year-old student, Nassau County homicide squad Lt. John Azzata said. In a tense confrontation with the officer, gunman Dalton Smith "menaces

Three Cheers for Tesla
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 6:26:59 PM     Post Reply
I have always been skeptical of electric vehicles, mostly because of my perception that electric car makers are more interested in subsisting on government subsidies than in competing on a level playing field for my business. So I was intrigued when I got an email this morning from Jeff Evanson, Tesla Motors’ Vice-President of investor relations. Evanson, a long-time Power Line reader, pointed out that the company raised over $1 billion last week, and will use a portion of those proceeds to pay off its loan with the Department of Energy ahead of schedule. This will make Tesla

This Is What Tyranny Looks Like
American Thinker, by Bryce Buchanan    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 10:55:48 AM     Post Reply
Here is a woman we will need to learn much more about in the coming weeks. Sarah Hall Ingram is a highly valued employee at the IRS. In the last three years she has received $103,390 in bonuses for her excellent work. She was the Commissioner of the Tax-Exempt and Government Entitles Division. Under her leadership, groups that expressed a fear of large, out-of-control government were systematically crushed by her branch of our large, out-of-control government. They were specifically singled out for harassment for political reasons. Secret information about the conservative applicants was leaked to leftist

GOP eager to link IRS scandal to
‘Obamacare’ takedown efforts
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:27:20 AM     Post Reply
An exasperated Rep. Pat Tiberi on Friday asked the former acting chief of the IRS to explain to Congress why he would move the leader of the division that targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status to a branch that is overseeing one of the most partisan issues of recent memory — President Obama’s health care law. “Because she’s a superb civil servant, sir,” Steven Miller, who resigned under duress last week, told the Ohio Republican at a hearing before the House Committee on Ways and Means. The transfer of Sarah Hall Ingram to the helm

What If the Obama Scandals
Had Surfaced Last Fall?
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:19:58 AM     Post Reply
I was on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show last night, talking about the Benghazi talking point emails. Near the end of the segment, Hugh asked whether I thought the presidential election might have turned out differently if Obama and Clinton had not succeeded in covering up the truth about Benghazi. I was skeptical. The story of the election, I said, was the Obama campaign’s ability to turn out, once again, a large majority of the low-information voters who swept Obama into office in 2008. Few of those low-information voters, I said, would either have understood, or cared about, Benghazi

   

 



 
A Breach of Trust
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Susan Combs    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:15:18 AM     Post Reply
As tax collector for the nation’s second-largest state, I know it’s a necessary function — from the fire station to the space station, nothing government does is possible without taxes. But it’s sure no path to popularity. Tax collectors have had a rotten reputation since biblical times. For all the services and all the people that depend on it, our work has to be viewed as fair and even-handed. It’s a basic bond of trust, and once that trust is lost, it’s hard to get back. Our entire nation was born when the colonists decided Britain’s taxes were unfair

Durbin Asked IRS’ Shulman
to Probe ‘Several’ Conservative
501(c)(4) Groups in 2010
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:28:31 PM     Post Reply
While many Democrats have joined Republicans in public shaming of the Internal Revenue Service for singling out conservative groups, others say the scandal is just a byproduct of muddied rules about nonprofits and political activity in the wake of the Citizens United ruling — and they’re hoping that they can steer the conversation from outrage over political targeting to fuel for campaign finance reform. But senior Dems may have much more than an opportunity to try to turn scandal to their advantage: they may have a degree of culpability as one especially vocal proponent



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

51 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

42 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Camelot Is Burning
40 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 717633





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~