Dear God-- saw a preview-- the View on Steroids!!!

Women´s Rights, (reproductive) Better Budgeters-- Whay can´t we all get along-- All of them think we´ll have a female candidate for pres in 2016.

Way too much estrogen!

SAid to my wife this morning; and lived to tell y´all about it- that we made two mistakes in America:

We chose not to harvest our own crops.

We thought that women could handle the repsonsibility of voting.

Wrong, wrong wrong...........present company excepted of course but if I had to sacrifice your vote to regain the America we all knew and love I´d do it in a heartbeat.

Well, as angry as we all are at congress, perhaps realizing that these men will have to deal with all these women pmsing at the same time will be some comfort.

Seriously? Why don´t we judge these women on their performance rather than their gender. I have a feeling that these women have more cajones than some of the GOP men.

How many final nails can there be in America’s coffin?

Pardon my overt sexism but why is this a news story? What is is about women that everytime they do anything, they want special recognition?

Unless, of course, it involves staying home and raising their children.

The democrats are rapidly destroying our country and ABC is crowing about the number of women in the Senate. God what an awful organization ABC is. Aptly named writer, too, Sullen.

God help us.

Query: What makes conservative women so intelligent and liberal women so blasted stupid (especially the purportedly "book smart" ones with "Professor" in front of their names. See, e.g., Warren, Elizabeth)?

I demand answers.

"... more collaborative," Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said.

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said by nature women are "less confrontational."

Sen-elect Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, says that women are "problem solvers."

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., says that women have a camaraderie which helps in relationships that are key to negotiations on Capitol Hill, something she says comes natural to women more than men.

Uh huh, oh yeah, you betcha, sure thing, without a doubt, no question about it, whatever you say, dear. [Did I just arrive from Mars or am I to disregard everything I´ve observed since the first day 60 years ago when I first attended co-ed kindergarten?]

You watch. It´ll come down to the pants vs. the skirts as gals have taken to heart "save the women and children!" leaving men on deck to sink with the ship. Men are inferior wastrels after all, no? Animals-- deserving of uproarious crotch-kicks.

Cat fights, cliques, snubbing, back-stabbing. Yeah, girls get along great. Maybe not as overt and violent as the males, but it´s still there.
I´ll be glad when we stop having this all "historic" nonsense. Wait, what, it´s not ever going to stop? (sigh)

I agree that it´s too bad that after all these years a story like this is still news.

I am, however, glad to see some Republican faces among the female Senators. Let´s hope they indeed have the cajones (as #4 says) to keep their lefty sisters´ ideas in check.

As a woman who has worked with women I feel sort of sorry for all of them. As sorry as I can feel for any politician right now.

Does this mean they will stop blaming white men for all the problems in the world? Does this mean when they do the same thing they usually do (women certainly haven´t proven to be effective in cutting spending, just the opposite) that the Kneepad media will put the blame on them and not the men? Does this mean that the killing spree in Chicago will suddenly stop? Does this mean that the welfare state will suddenly come under control? Will unlimited unemployment welfare stop? Of course not. All this means is we have a new set of incompetents with no desire or intent to actually goobern.

It´s not their gender that matters, it´s their policies and their ability to lead. I´d take 100 Margaret Thatchers in our Senate over one moderate male RINO.

Ya know, I don´t give a rats patoot if they are female, male, red, yellow, green or blue, as long as they´re qualified, but all that doesn´t matter anymore. What a mess.

Nancy Pelosi has forever eliminated any special expectation or celebration of more females in Congress.

Four responsible Americans and 16 lefty witches like Granny Warren, the fake Indian.

Lets take a second and imagine if a male comedian performed pseudo oral sex on a CNN anchorwoman on a live broadcast. What would these 20 senators say? Maybe by the year 2050, we´ll have 40 female senators..... in burqas

The Senate will still be much less feminine than the media.

Repeal the 17th Amendment now!

considering that unmarried women put Clinton and 0bama in office, not sure what this portends.

I thought we were over making distinctions between men and women.

Why is the AP still harping on how many women are in the Senate?

They could at least include a sidebar from the Science Editor on how the vagina is connected to the brain. Oh, that´s right, this is a religion piece. . . /s

Among the "4 responsible Americans" - please, please, please - just one Dagny Taggart? Or does shoe only exist in Ayn Rand´s imagination?

Already posted at http://www.lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=717512.

I attended a Pennsylvania Bar Institute training session in 1980, the only non lawyer present.
And during the lunch break, I sat with several female and male lawyers. We had a discussion about the increase of women practicing law, and I offered the comment that with more women attorneys, perhaps legal conflicts, especially divorce proceedings, would become more gentle.
A woman lawyer glared at me, and said that when she represents a woman in a divorce proceeding, she will rip off the husband´s testicles to win.
I stopped talking.

And Diane Sawyer couldn´t put words together to ask " if there are so many female senators who are democrat,s why aren´t women included in the WH meetings"?