A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Conservatives 1, Progressives 0
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Conservatives 1, Progressives 0
National Review Online, by Douglas Holtz-Eakin

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/3/2013 7:26:10 AM

Conservatives have lost the messaging battle on taxes. The public has bought into the notion that they exclusively care about keeping taxes on the rich low (at the expense of the middle class) and that the growth effects of disguised spending (tax credits) are the same as marginal rate reductions. But stepping back to survey the larger picture, it looks like conservatives have won the war. Beginning with Ronald Reagan’s Economic Recovery Tax Act, conservatives have waged a 30-year war over low tax rates. Consider that in 1979

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: M2, 1/3/2013 9:01:44 AM     (No. 9096174)

"It could have been worse" isn´t the point.

Here´s what bothers me, especially the last phrase which I´ve bolded:

The tax code remains in need of a fundamental overhaul to improve its international competitiveness (a lower corporate rate and a move to a territorial tax system), growth incentives, and the appearance of fairness.

Who sets what "appears" to be fair? It´s always the Left who set the bar of fairness. First, "fairness" is not part of the tax code and shouldn´t be. The tax code should set a number or a percentage that all taxpayers should abide by. By doing that, it´s "fair".

But I deeply resent that the GOP never talks about the Left setting the bar for what is "fair". Were I a congressman or Senator when Obama brings up "fairness", I´d ask him if flitting around on AF1 on OUR tax dollars is fair, while his policies have cut millions of jobs out of the public sector.

And that´s just for starters. If I hear "fairness" from the Left again, I´m going to break something.


Reply 2 - Posted by: zoidberg, 1/3/2013 9:48:36 AM     (No. 9096275)

The definition of "fair" is an event where men compete to hurl dessicated bovine feces for the greatest distance.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Pinchem, 1/3/2013 10:03:23 AM     (No. 9096319)

#2...I like that except I´d change it to "where Liberals compete"....etc.


Reply 4 - Posted by: farmwife, 1/3/2013 10:32:40 AM     (No. 9096394)

The purpose of taxation is to fund the services of government. The burden should be spread over all citizens. There should be no argument over that. The only argument we should be having is what we chose to fund. And I wouldn´t fund more than half og what government presently spends.


Reply 5 - Posted by: stablemoney, 1/3/2013 10:39:38 AM     (No. 9096412)

I don´t think people have bought into anything. As for conservatives losing, I think it has been conservatives winning, and GOP go along get along types losing.


Reply 6 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 1/3/2013 11:14:32 AM     (No. 9096492)

I do not believe the public has bought the idea. Our reps and senators just say that to justify their own greed for more power more money. Did you know they lie in Washington D.C.?



Post Reply   Close thread 717508




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



The press must have
the ability to ask questions
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/25/2013 12:31:00 AM     Post Reply
A FREE press in a democracy demands a delicate balance. The First Amendment means the media must have the right to inquire without hindrance. The government has a legitimate interest in keeping some national security information secret. When these come into conflict, the balance often has been struck this way: The media are free to pursue secrets, but it is up to those in government to keep them. When the media come into possession of information that, if disclosed, could be damaging, the government can plead the case for secrecy — and the media generally are open to persuasion.

The Inevitable Decline
of Great Britain (Cont.)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/24/2013 11:54:00 PM     Post Reply
The brutal murder of an off-duty soldier by two Muslim activists continues to dominate the news in Great Britain. The scene was utterly bizarre: in broad daylight, in a busy section of London, the two Muslims apparently ran the soldier down with a car, within a block or two of his barracks, and then attacked him with knives and a meat cleaver. They attempted to behead him, apparently not quite successfully, as hundreds of passers-by looked on. No one stopped them–private ownership of firearms being illegal in the U.K.–but three random women

GOP widening Sebelius
shakedown probe
Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/24/2013 8:41:11 PM     Post Reply
A day after insurers complained that Kathleen Sebelius and the Obama administration had pressured them to fund Enroll America, a House committee sent them a request for more information on the matter. The Energy and Commerce Committee had already begun looking into whether Sebelius had broken any laws by attempting to get donations from an industry that will be heavily regulated by her under ObamaCare, and now The Hill reports this new request as a widening of that probe (via Rare): House Republicans have widened their probe of Health and Human Services

Obama signals retreat in
the fight against terrorism
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:23:10 PM     Post Reply
President Obama delivered an address today at the National Defense University called “The Future of our Fight Against Terrorism.” Actually, part of the speech was about the past, including much self-congratulation and some shots at President Bush. This part of the speech is revisionist rubbish. As Max Boot explains: Obama said, for example, that after he came into office, “we unequivocally banned torture, affirmed our commitment to civilian courts, worked to align our policies with the rule of law, and expanded our consultations with Congress.” Umm, actually all of that happened in Bush’s second term.

Obama’s Speech: Hamlet
as Wartime Leader
National Review Online, by Bing West    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:19:52 PM     Post Reply
In seventy lugubrious paragraphs, President Obama today asked America whether as commander-in-chief he should bomb terrorists. He concluded that sometimes he should, and sometimes he shouldn’t. He couldn’t quite make up his mind. Therefore, he would appoint a panel to advise him. Mr. Obama has already authorized more than 200 such drone bombings. His staff has bragged that before ordering a bombing, he personally reviews who lives and who dies. Imagine if Prime Minister Churchill or President Truman had appeared on television to announce an advisory panel before bombing our enemy. We would be appalled

   

 



 
Cars, people in the Skagit River
after I-5 Bridge collapse
KOMO-TV [Seattle, WA], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:15:26 PM     Post Reply
MOUNT VERNON, Wash. -- The Interstate 5 bridge over the Skagit River collapsed Thursday evening, injuring an unknown number of people. Both the northbound and southbound portions of the bridge dropped into the river sometime before 7 p.m., according to Washington State Patrol trooper Mark Francis. Francis said several cars were on the bridge when it collapsed, and some are now in the water. Bart Treece with the Washington State Department of Transportation was unsure when the bridge was last inspected. "All of our bridges in the area are pretty old," he said.

Fox News’s Roger Ailes responds
to Justice Dept. investigation
Washington Post, by Erik Wemple    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:00:19 PM     Post Reply
Fox News chief Roger Ailes has sent a memo to his subordinates at the leading cable news network. He sent this memo to his staff today in connection with the federal investigation into an alleged leak to Fox News reporter James Rosen, a story that the Washington Post’s Ann E. Marimow broke earlier this week. The memo’s a masterpiece, too. For all those who wonder what it is about Ailes that endears his people to him — and that makes him such a good interviewee for any media reporter lucky enough to get an audience



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

54 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Eva Longoria graduates with
master´s degree in Chicano studies

52 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad    Original Article
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/23/2013 3:03:53 PM     Post Reply
Eva Longoria is backing up her beauty with a whole lot of brain. The actress graduated with a master´s degree Wednesday. Longoria, 38, took home a real degree (not an honorary one) in Chicano studies from Cal State Northridge, where she physically attended classes for three years, according to TMZ. "Big day today!!! Very excited to graduate for my master´s degree in Chicano studies! You´re never too old or too busy to continue your education!" the actress wrote on her Who Say site Wednesday, sharing loads of pics of her big day, posing with her family, cohorts and diploma.

Mark Levin Tears Into Obama: ‘Flat-
Out, Bald-Faced Lie’ That He Knew
Nothing About IRS Targeting

51 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 9:48:28 PM     Post Reply
Conservative radio host Mark Levin is very skeptical of the idea that President Obama had absolutely no idea about the IRS tea party targeting before the story broke in the news mere weeks ago. Levin declared adamantly that it is a “flat-out, bald-faced lie” that Obama didn’t know beforehand, citing prior reports by a few conservative news outlets picking up on the news well before the 2012 presidential election. Levin said, “I don’t believe for two seconds that Obama wasn’t aware of this.”

   

 

  


 
Obama nominates Nuland for
assistant secretary of state

51 replie(s)
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM     Post Reply
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping

Why was the Department
of Homeland Security monitoring
Tea Party IRS demonstrations?

50 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM     Post Reply
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state

Anthony Weiner says Houston
psychiatric facility made
him ‘a new man’

50 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM     Post Reply
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose

The Mystery Night
43 replie(s)
Politico, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: RappVol- 5/23/2013 7:36:59 AM     Post Reply
On “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, White House aide Dan Pfeiffer was asked about President Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi. This was the night when we lost our first ambassador in 30 years, and when three other Americans were killed in an attack that lasted all night long at multiple locations within the eastern Libyan city. Since the president is commander in chief, one would think where he was and what he did during such an event would be of obvious public concern.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 717508





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~