|
|
| |
Topic: A Bad Deal Beats a Calamitous Outcome |
A Bad Deal Beats a Calamitous Outcome
Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 1/2/2013 9:45:46 PM
|
| The deal to avoid going over the so-called fiscal cliff was a lousy one: tax rate increases during a weak economy, no spending reductions, nothing on entitlement reform. And yet if House Republicans had succeeded in derailing this deal, negotiated between Senator Mitch McConnell and Vice President Joe Biden, it would have been disastrous. It would have led to much higher tax increases on all Americans, even beyond the increase in payroll taxes that will now go into effect, and triggered decimating cuts in the defense department. And it would have done a great deal to advance the storyline
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
JAN, 1/2/2013 9:51:24 PM (No. 9095663)
Bush tax cuts codified for 99% of Americans but the bazillionaire loudmouths are unhappy.
Everyone should suffer on their behalf??
Fact is that the evil doer won and we have to live with it.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
right-turn, 1/2/2013 10:11:38 PM (No. 9095677)
What makes this loud mouth an expert on a bill he hasn´t read?? Perhaps if the less than astute politicians in congress had done the right thing and passed a bill that favors the good of the country we wouldn´t be in this mess.
Rubio is one of 8 senators with enough brains to vote against it.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
sickened, 1/2/2013 10:23:35 PM (No. 9095688)
A 10% cut in defense spending is not "decimating". And, if higher tax rates kicked in for everyone, it would have brought home to Obama voters what his spending is costing the country. In other words, it would have been a good thing. Boehner needs to go, as does all the GOP leadership that was convinced by the MSM that the Cliff had to be avoided.
Now we can only look forward to inflation, collapse of the US dollar, and a Greece-like future.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
dr fate, 1/2/2013 10:28:43 PM (No. 9095697)
Nothing against Rubio personally, but of course he voted no, he´s running for President. This is how our cynical political class works. This time he gets to be the good guy; next time it´s someone else´s turn to be our shining light.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Quaestio, 1/2/2013 11:30:58 PM (No. 9095772)
I would have liked at least one Republican to demand real spending cuts or to allow all the tax cuts to expire - say either we must cut spending, or everyone has to pay a little more. Now the masses of idiots will never realize they pay no taxes because of President Bush.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 1/3/2013 12:30:38 AM (No. 9095823)
Sadly 4, you are so right. The repubs played it all wrong. Let the country go over the cliff, let EVERYONE feel the real cost and pain of big government, then start a tax reform bill at the start of the next congress and fix the tax system, not add more.
Now the repubs have to live with losing 15% or more of the voter base that are fiscally conservative/tea party. They won´t get the votes of the "47%" and they now have finished losing the trust of many of the rest of us. In 2014, they will now lose the House.
It is so time for a third party.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
49 Ford, 1/3/2013 2:37:21 AM (No. 9095871)
Nah, if we had gone over the fiscal cliff it wouldn´t have played out politically as #6 suggests. Rather than accept the cost of the colossal government they chose, this dumbed down electorate would have placed the blame on the GOP as the evil protectors of "the rich". That certainly would have been the narrative pushed by the administration and the MSM.
I don´t see any magic bullets or wake up calls in the offing. Eventually we will have to hit bottom, and only the Good Lord knows what that will look like.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
belwhatter, 1/3/2013 3:56:22 AM (No. 9095890)
The sooner we hit bottom the better . The boneheads who voted in the second term will not capitulate until their freebies and bennies have disappeared in a puff of smoke - it´s the dose of tough love that the 51% of the country has got to experience - like being hit by a two by four - to bring some common sense into the space between their ears.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Country Boy, 1/3/2013 4:40:26 AM (No. 9095902)
Stupid premise by this author.
The Jan 1 tax deal did NOTHING to address the real problem, the Debt Bomb.
We have two choices ahead. Cut spending in Washington, across the board, and take a normal recession. We will live through it.
Or, do nothing and take the real Fiscal Cliff, total insolvency, hyperinflation, and probably a massive war.
A recession is the best outcome we can have.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
hamrman, 1/3/2013 5:15:11 AM (No. 9095917)
Bull-Loney...this theater was all scripted and fabricated...the losers in this are We the People!
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
minuteman, 1/3/2013 7:19:10 AM (No. 9096018)
You could easily cut 10% from every taxpayer funded program and nobody would no the difference, except those who were let go from their cushy government jobs.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Tea party looks to take advantage of moment
|
|
Associated Press, by Thomas Beaumont
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 11:02:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DES MOINES, Iowa — Is the tea party getting its groove back? Shouts of vindication from around the country suggest the movement´s leaders certainly think so. They say the IRS acknowledgement that it had targeted their groups for extra scrutiny — a claim that tea party activists had made for years — is helping pump new energy into the coalition. And they are trying to use that development, along with the ongoing controversy over the Benghazi, Libya, terrorist attacks and the Justice Department´s secret seizure of journalists´ phone records, to recruit new activists incensed about government overreach.
|
America Waiting on Big Decisions from SCOTUS
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ken Klukowski
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:49:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Several major cases will be decided by the Supreme Court over the next six weeks, including historic issues such as gay marriage and affirmative action. These cases make the remainder of the Court’s term—which ends in June—one of the most carefully watched terms by millions of Americans. In addition to several significant cases that have already been decided this year, the justices of the High Court have at least ten important issues to decide before adjourning for the summer. Two headline cases involve race relations
|
The Emerging Scandal Narrative: To Make Obama Pay, GOP Blasts ´Culture of Intimidation´
|
|
National Review Online, by Eliana Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:47:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Since his emergence as a national political figure, Barack Obama has managed to deflect accusations of wrongdoing and impropriety with ease. Republicans on Capitol Hill are determined to put that to an end by making him pay for the unfolding scandal at the Internal Revenue Service. “Ultimately responsibility lies with the president. Obama has spent the better part of the last five years doing non-stop campaigning,” says a senior Republican Senate aide who points to the administration’s larger pattern of “using political offices to intimidate and harrass” its opponents. “When bureaucrats see the leader
|
Obama’s turn inward poses risk for U.S. interests abroad
|
|
Washington Post, by Fred Hiatt
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:41:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“And the war will end by the end of next year .?.?. ” In the elusive search for an Obama Doctrine, that struck me as a telling phrase when I heard the president deliver it last week as he and British Prime Minister David Cameron took a couple of questions from reporters. Obama was speaking about the withdrawal of U.S. and allied combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014. “Our troops will continue to come home, and the war will end,” he said. In fact, the war is unlikely to end. It may well accelerate as the Taliban
|
A rare peek into a Justice Department leak probe
|
|
Washington Post, by Ann E. Marimow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:39:22 PM
Post Reply
|
|
When the Justice Department began investigating possible leaks of classified information about North Korea in 2009, investigators did more than obtain telephone records of a working journalist suspected of receiving the secret material. They used security badge access records to track the reporter’s comings and goings from the State Department, according to a newly obtained court affidavit. They traced the timing of his calls with a State Department security adviser suspected of sharing the classified report. They obtained a search warrant for the reporter’s personal e-mails. The case
|
| |
|
How the IRS seeded the clouds in 2010 for a political deluge three years later
|
|
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Kimberly Kindy
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:35:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In early 2010, an Internal Revenue Service team in Cincinnati began noticing a stream of applications from groups with political-sounding names, setting in motion a dragnet aimed at separating legitimate tax-exempt groups from those working to get candidates elected. The IRS officials decided to single out one type of political group for particular scrutiny. “These cases involve various local organizations in the Tea Party movement,” read one internal IRS e-mail sent at the time. A few hours north in Fremont, Ohio, the owners of a drainage supply shop, Tom and Marion Bower, were wondering why it was taking so long
|
Obama´s Counsel Told of IRS Audit Findings Weeks Ago
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Peter Nicholas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 9:04:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House´s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys that an inspector general´s report was nearing completion, the White House official said. In that conversation, Ms. Ruemmler learned that "a small
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
| |
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
| | |
|
|