|
|
| |
Topic: Senate approves fiscal crisis deal after missed deadline, bill goes to House |
Senate approves fiscal crisis deal after missed deadline, bill goes to House
Fox News, by Ed Henry & Chad Pergram*
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:LittleHoodedMonk, 1/1/2013 2:34:13 AM
|
| The Senate approved a scaled-down package early Tuesday morning aimed at halting historic tax hikes for most Americans and postponing across-the-board spending cuts, just hours after Congress missed a midnight deadline for action. The Senate voted 89-8 in favor of the package, which was hastily pulled together after a late-night deal between White House and Senate Republican negotiators. For the near-term, it appears a tax hike will technically go into effect on Jan. 1, as the midnight deadline was missed. In total, $600 billion in tax hikes and spending cuts are scheduled to hit in the new year
|
Comments: *[Fox News' Mike Emanuel contributed to this report].
And so, in the dead of night, like most things hiding from the light, the dRATS charade goes forward.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
yuban, 1/1/2013 2:57:44 AM (No. 9092612)
89-8 means more than Dems voted for it. The GOP is also at fault, again. No backbone or just Socialist lite?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
janylou, 1/1/2013 3:04:19 AM (No. 9092616)
Not at all crazy about this bill. Vote it down!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 1/1/2013 3:13:02 AM (No. 9092619)
At what point will the dims push their luck too far? When will all this backfire? I hope the gop has some serious surprises up their sleeve.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
CentralFLMom, 1/1/2013 3:21:36 AM (No. 9092622)
This entire process is a travesty. I am keeping close track on those GOP members who voted for this deal. I hope they enjoyed their congressional run because our movement will do everything possible to punish and replace their heartless unAmerican soles.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ketchuplover, 1/1/2013 3:53:10 AM (No. 9092630)
Oh, Pshaw! These are the hoodlums and gangsters that got us into this mess.....spending more than we took in, raiding S.S. and Medicare accounts -- all for boosting their own political prestige and personal gain. Now we are supposed to fall in reverence to their late-night struggles and "agreement?" Heck, no! Stand firm, House conservatives -- NO tax increases on anybody! Any Joe American can go in there and raise taxes, but that´s not where true courage and fortitude lie. Any Joe American who loves his country can go in there and make spending cuts, significant spending cuts and set examples that Americans will not take it anymore -- cut Congressional and Executive perks by at least 50 percent.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
MissMann, 1/1/2013 4:04:00 AM (No. 9092631)
Please, please, please House GOP: do NOT vote for this. It is time to be responsible. It isn´t often popular, but it is time for us to pay for the country we have created, else it will just get worse.
Really, even the cliff doesn´t pay for what we have already spent. It is time to start doing the right thing.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
miceal, 1/1/2013 4:11:31 AM (No. 9092634)
Stabbed in the back by Senate GOPers. A pox on them and their spawn. If "Mr. Speaker" wants to get reelected, he better turn his back on this travesty....
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
STLstudent, 1/1/2013 4:29:54 AM (No. 9092645)
The GOP believes in nothing and will fight for nothing. The constitutional republic is gone.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Spidey, 1/1/2013 4:41:23 AM (No. 9092650)
The whole idea behind this foolish exercise was to"freeze the target",that is House tea party people and make them the top villains in 2014. If Boehner brings this to the floor,it will pass with dim votes,so his only choice is not bring it to the floor and the "crisis" could go on for weeks with the media stabbing the tea party people,every single day.
Obama wants to crow victory if everything goes right or blame Biden/McConnell if it goes wrong.What a farce him coming back to DC is/was.He probably just misses the WH booze cabinet.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Keekng, 1/1/2013 6:09:30 AM (No. 9092672)
The entire Congress is made up mostly of self-serving spineless wimps, worried only about re-election. The entire lot of them should be replaced.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Ecclesiastes, 1/1/2013 6:26:46 AM (No. 9092676)
But I WANT spending cuts.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
krause, 1/1/2013 7:01:53 AM (No. 9092699)
Well, I just want to congratulate congress, especially those long-termers for the magnificent way they have handled the people´s money over the years...16+ trillion in debt. But don´t worry, these same people will solve this problem! And they all make a minimum of $174,000 per year. Oops, I forgot, they just got a raise to a minimum $174,900.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 1/1/2013 7:11:56 AM (No. 9092705)
The payroll tax will go up two percent in this ´deal´.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
mws50, 1/1/2013 7:23:14 AM (No. 9092716)
#13, no. It will go back to where it was. Cutting SS by that 2% was a stupid idea.
It would have been much more productive to reduce all government entities budgets by 1 cent on the dollar.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 1/1/2013 7:34:15 AM (No. 9092725)
Vote it down. Make this President sign a budget with actual spending cuts.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 1/1/2013 7:50:30 AM (No. 9092740)
I wish the Bill No. was in the story - I´d like to read it for myself, and I´d like to see the vote. Guess I´ll go searching.....
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 1/1/2013 8:06:44 AM (No. 9092760)
The Senate Bill is available: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00251#position
Tiny version: http://tinyurl.com/bl37oo9
Here´s the short list of Nay votes: Bennet (D-CO) Carper (D-DE) Grassley (R-IA) Harkin (D-IA) Lee (R-UT) Paul (R-KY) Rubio (R-FL) Shelby (R-AL
Another short list of Not Voting: DeMint (R-SC) Kirk (R-IL) Lautenberg (D-NJ)
And Fox News is, just this minute, reporting these specific vote totals.
So, there ya go.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
reformationmama, 1/1/2013 8:18:39 AM (No. 9092774)
I thought I heard the sound of an empty can being kicked by empty suits in DC. Both my senators, Burr (R) and Hagan (D) voted for the bill. Where´s the backbone? Let´s hope the House will do the right thing.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
uno, 1/1/2013 8:21:36 AM (No. 9092777)
Ronald Reagan knew what we going to happen and in 1985 told us in an address to the country: Every time in the past, when a government taxed the people past a certain level, trust in government began to erode. It would begin with efforts to avoid paying the full tax. This would become outright cheating and eventually a distrust in government itself until there would be a breakdown in law and order. How many times have we watched luxuries casually written off to be paid for by somebody else, that somebody being us the taxpayers. Sound familiar? We´re headed for a breakdown in law and order right now with Hobby Lobby being only one example. 27 States have filed suit against Obamacare (which is a tax) with others ready to join in. Has John Kerry paid his yacht tax yet? Our problem may be due in part to a lack of revenue, but it is certainly not due to the lack of taxes. We´ve seen them do nothing but go up! The country´s fiscal issues are due to the insane, irresponsible spending of a dysfunctional government that is drunk with power so much so that even in the face of a crippling deficit, it can´t wait to spend even more on raises, waste, fraud and hand-outs which has only resulted in a lack of confidence to invest here. Cut the spending big time. Do what makes sense and restore confidence in the American system and we will see investment come back along with a successful economy and plenty of revenue as a result. Sadly however, does anyone really expect this administration to actually do something that makes sense in light of the fact that they have not done so in four years?
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
uno_thatguy, 1/1/2013 8:26:48 AM (No. 9092785)
Byron York thinks it will pass in the House by a landslide. He says only 40 Reps are adamant about voting against it. That leaves more than 200 pubbies whom many vote for it.
Great Americans, all!!!! We´ll see.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
jerrodmason, 1/1/2013 8:30:19 AM (No. 9092790)
What about that pesky Constitution? Art 1 Section 7 states:
"All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives"
The Supreme Court has ruled that the Senate can initiate bills that create revenue, but ONLY if the revenue is incidental and not directly a tax. In US v Munoz-Flores (495 US 385 [1990]), the Court said, "Because the bill at issue here was not one for raising revenue, it could not have been passed in violation of the Origination Clause."
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
JAN, 1/1/2013 8:35:31 AM (No. 9092798)
It has been reported that 12 min. BEFORE midnight the IRS sent out the details of this deal as far as taxes are concerned.
Lot of posturing for some unknown reason.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Judith, 1/1/2013 8:36:11 AM (No. 9092801)
Don´t quote the Constitution to this people, especially the potus. To quote the potus "a flawed and irrelevant document". Seems our congress agrees with him.
Can you imagine running your own home/finances this way? Have no idea what your budget is, be heavily in debt, do nothing to curb spending or pay down your debt, just find another credit card and....CHARGE!
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Starlady, 1/1/2013 8:39:14 AM (No. 9092805)
A guest on Fox and Friends during the 6 a.m. Hour from American Majority Action said he thought the bill would be passed by the House Dems with a couple dozen moderate House GOPers to complete the votes needed. If it comes to a vote it will be interesting to see how the GOP leadership votes. Will they be voting their own demise? This guest said he thought well over 100 conservative House members would not vote FOR this solution.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
strike3, 1/1/2013 8:48:17 AM (No. 9092817)
Higher taxes but delayed spending cuts. I was so blindsided by this development.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
achingbackfarm, 1/1/2013 8:50:05 AM (No. 9092820)
Anyone who thinks the ship of fools that is our goobermint would do what is good for AmeriKa, is delusional.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Eileen Tudor-Wright, 1/1/2013 8:54:48 AM (No. 9092829)
*** We are now in permanent crisis mode. ***
That was a primary goal of the socialists.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
bubby, 1/1/2013 9:08:11 AM (No. 9092843)
My Senator John Cornyn from Texas voted to increase taxes on the "rich"! He´s part of the problem and he needs to go. The spending cuts will never materialize. What a joke the Republican party has become. If the House approves this load of bull droppings I will leave the Republican party!
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Udanja99, 1/1/2013 9:21:39 AM (No. 9092864)
Spending cuts? Ha ha ha ha ha. Zippy already said that the new revenue would be used for spending.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 1/1/2013 9:44:20 AM (No. 9092905)
GOP representatives were not elected to vote for tax increases and no spending cuts.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
federale, 1/1/2013 9:45:04 AM (No. 9092907)
The tax bill that past the Senate seems reasonable. Spending cuts can be handled during the "raise-the debt-limit" process.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
GOPSecretary, 1/1/2013 9:49:41 AM (No. 9092915)
Well, on the bright side, the Senate passed a bill. First one,right? Didn´t Iraq have the same problem until they threatened to stop thier salaries.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
aasilver, 1/1/2013 9:53:12 AM (No. 9092923)
Time to send a clear message to the GOP.
Re-register ´Independent´ tommorrow.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
surfhut, 1/1/2013 9:54:21 AM (No. 9092925)
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
surfhut, 1/1/2013 9:56:03 AM (No. 9092930)
Sorry about that. Both of my senators here in OK voted for this. I´m beyond tired of politicians.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
tangles, 1/1/2013 9:56:56 AM (No. 9092931)
The drama queens have given us 2 more months of BS!
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
OperaBuff, 1/1/2013 10:16:50 AM (No. 9092961)
"Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? Let him shew out of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom. But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth.
"This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.
"But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace."
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Butch59, 1/1/2013 10:17:13 AM (No. 9092964)
I don´t think that anyone should take comfort that the House hasn´t yet passed this monstrosity. As previously posted, all it takes is a handful of RINO´s to vote for it along will all the Dims, and it will be on it´s way to Obozo. And then the bragging about it will began in earnest.
As for handling spending cuts during the next round of debit ceiling negotiations, don´t bet the farm on it. I´m still waiting for the cuts promised to Regan, by Clinton, and to W. Bush. If we have those spending cuts, we wouldn´t need to raise the debit ceiling again. In short, there aren´t going to be any spending cuts, now or as long as dims control the Senate and the W.H.
The RINO´s need to go too.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Bpl40, 1/1/2013 10:21:27 AM (No. 9092972)
$615 billion taxes and $15 billion ´expense savings´? To quote Queen Nancy "Are you serious.? Are you serious?"
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Rinktum, 1/1/2013 10:21:35 AM (No. 9092973)
We are witness to the biggest con in history. The grifters in Washington DC have pulled off, once again, nothing more than trickery in order to commit theft. Just once, I wish that the Republicans would stand on their principles but they ALWAYS cave which indicates to me they have no honor. The major concern for most of these knuckleheads is considering what the vote will do to effect their chances of re-election. Every Republican should have declined the pay raise that Lord Bountiful signed by Executive Order. It may be a small gesture but by accepting a raise when we are in dire financial straits is very telling. The mindset in Washington DC is so engrained in their thinking, that nothing will change it. They are the epitome of the entitlement class. We are living under a tyrannical government not much different than that of King George III. All that is missing are the powered wigs and spiffy red coats.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 1/1/2013 10:27:05 AM (No. 9092985)
I didn´t create a fiscal crisis
You didn´t create a fiscal crisis
Why do you and I have to pay for a fiscal crisis LOSERS created?
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
6079 Smith, W, 1/1/2013 11:16:02 AM (No. 9093074)
It is the first day of 2013 and I fear we will have much more of this throughout the year. Happy New Year, everybody!
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Janjan, 1/1/2013 11:31:56 AM (No. 9093104)
This bill gets us nothing. A few billion more for these worthless politicians to spend. Obama talks about the deficit like he just got to Washington yesterday. His comments from the standard liberal playbook about how much tax cuts ´cost´ the government are typical and expected, like all income is theirs and what they let us keep is a gift. They are all a depressing bunch of incompetent arrogant fools and we are stuck with them and keep re-electing them. I am sorry to say I no longer really care what happens to this country.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
chicodon, 1/1/2013 11:34:27 AM (No. 9093108)
Yes, let´s dump it in Boehner´s lap. If it goes down they will blame the Tea Party with clean hands and replace them with blue blooded Republicans in 2014. I wouldn´t put it past them.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
Lalo, 1/1/2013 11:37:51 AM (No. 9093116)
This is what I´ve been hoping for in the realm of realistic hopes - staving off the tax spikes and raising the income limit from $250,000 to $400,000. I do hope and assume the House will consent; otherwise, I will write the Republicans off as idiots for sure. I cannot afford to stand on principle on this and go down with the ship.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
Polecat49, 1/1/2013 11:38:36 AM (No. 9093120)
As far as I´m concerned, little spineless mitch and the majority of senate so-called republicans can go straight to H-LL. mitch has sold us down the river once too many times. All compromise means to a democRAT is when "I drop my drawers, you kiss my butt".
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
noproblems, 1/1/2013 11:56:49 AM (No. 9093136)
vote it down then remove the delay for the previously agreed to spending cuts.
The Repugs have no credibility left for agreeing to delaying the spending cuts. Time for a new party to replace the Repugs.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino, 1/1/2013 12:17:48 PM (No. 9093172)
God bless the Pubbies!
We can always count on them to be the tax collectors for the welfare state. This bill has $41 in tax increases for every $1 in alleged spending cuts.
Way to go, Pubbies! The welfare state will live forever!
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua, 1/1/2013 12:19:01 PM (No. 9093177)
Sounds like 90% of the senate is for more taxes and spending. Have to wonder how many of the ´no´ votes wanted more taxes and spending.
Thats what our government does. They trade legislation for votes and donations. Its like a form of prostitution. Too bad the taxpayer has to foot the bill.
Alot of people need to be reminded about the role of government.
Alot of our reps need to be fired.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
Grambo, 1/1/2013 12:19:15 PM (No. 9093179)
Tell me where in the constitution it says that historic tax and spend bills shall be arrived at, not by our elected representatives in open and thoughtful debate in Congress, but by the Vice President and Senate Minority leader in closed room in the dark of night?
Washington is broken. I no longer trust them with my money, and don’t want any from them. Include me out.
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
gwmcclintok, 1/1/2013 12:41:30 PM (No. 9093232)
I am now beginning to respect Obama. He fights for his beliefs; he respects his base; he uses the power he won in an election; he is not ashamed of his left wing ideology; he refuses to appear on news programs that are not friendly; he spits on the opposition; he doesn´t answer questions he doesn´t like. Now the Republicans are a bunch of chicken #@%^&*%$ butt kissers, compromising losers; arrogant haters of the regular guy(the base); wannabe lovers of the MSM; unprincipled money hogs. Just remember republican politicians: people feed pigs, they slaughter hogs.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
reilly, 1/1/2013 12:54:04 PM (No. 9093259)
Unless there´s real spending cuts, kill the bill. Obama wants no part of this for a reason. Make him deal with the math. Meanwhile, his second term agenda gets buried. Let it wait.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
stealthy, 1/1/2013 1:01:39 PM (No. 9093273)
Will Obama need a vacation now?
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
MEMcL, 1/1/2013 1:58:30 PM (No. 9093334)
I have so-o little respect for the entire process and the elected officials on both sides. What kind of business rams a complex contract through in the dead of night and at the very last second! This is another case of not having time to read the bill and not finding out what is in it until after it passes. Major spending is just acquiesced to (such as green energy subsidies) because there are other major issues to fight for. That is a HUGE slush fund for Obama supporters that the Repubs just agreed to without close analysis. "We´ll give you energy and you give us milk subsidies." We will all be told "we don´t really like it, but it is the best we could do."
What company agrees to a contract that is disastrous for their business? Realizing how impossible it will be to prevail, I am getting close to wanting a 3rd party, or at least re-registering as a Conservative. The Republicans are impotent and will let you down every time.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 1/1/2013 2:59:54 PM (No. 9093395)
The 47% of moochers that do not pay taxes are our problem. The Senate gives them extended Unemplyment Insurance so they need not work.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "LittleHoodedMonk"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "LittleHoodedMonk"
|
House committee takes up tough immigration bill
|
|
Associated Press, by Erica Werner
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 6/18/2013 11:43:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington - A key committee in the Republican-led House has taken up a tough enforcement-focused immigration bill, but the proceedings were immediately interrupted by protesters shouting "Shame, shame!" More than a dozen protesters began chanting as soon as Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte of Virginia gaveled the committee hearing open Tuesday. Goodlatte stopped the proceedings until the protesters were ushered into the hall, where their shouts could still be heard. Goodlatte said the bill under consideration, which empowers local law enforcement to enforce federal immigration
|
NASA´s new astronauts: Will these men and women fly to Mars?
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Karen Kaplan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 6/17/2013 11:03:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It’s been two years since NASA’s space shuttle program came to an end, but thousands of Americans still dream of becoming astronauts. Eight of them – four men and four women – were introduced Monday as NASA’s astronaut candidate class for 2013. (Snip) The bios of the eight people selected will probably make you feel like a bit of a slacker. Two of them have PhDs and one is a physician training in sports medicine. Four have experience as test pilots for the Navy or Air Force. One person is working at the Pentagon on ways to defeat the homemade bombs that have plagued troops in Iraq and
|
G.O.P. Pushes New Abortion Limits to Appease Vocal Base
|
|
New York Times, by Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 6/17/2013 10:44:27 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington - After Republicans lost the presidential election and seats in both the House and the Senate last year, many in the party offered a stern admonishment: If we want to broaden our appeal, steer clear of divisive social and cultural issues. Yet after the high-profile murder trial of an abortion doctor in Philadelphia this spring, many Republicans in Washington and in state capitals across the country seem eager to reopen the emotional fight over a woman’s right to end a pregnancy. (Snip) The bill stands no chance of becoming law, with Democrats in control of the Senate and the White House.
|
President-Elect of Iran Talks of Easing Tensions With U.S.
|
|
New York Times, by Thomas Erdbrink
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 6/17/2013 10:32:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Tehran - President-elect Hassan Rowhani of Iran, speaking Monday for the first time since his election victory, said he wanted to reduce tensions with the United States but ruled out direct talks between the two estranged nations. In his first news conference after winning Friday’s presidential election promising more freedoms and better relations with the outside world, Mr. Rowhani called the issue of nonexistent relations between Iran and the United States “an old wound, which must be healed.” Iran, he said, wants to reduce tensions between the two countries, which have no diplomatic relations and are
|
Supreme Court Lets Regulators Sue Over Generic Drug Deals
|
|
New York Times, by Edward Wyatt
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 6/17/2013 10:19:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington - Pharmaceutical companies that pay rivals to keep less-expensive generic versions of best-selling drugs off the market can expect greater federal scrutiny after a Supreme Court ruling on Monday. In a 5-to-3 vote, the justices effectively said that the Federal Trade Commission can sue pharmaceutical companies for potential antitrust violations, a decision that is likely to increase the number of generic drugs in the marketplace and benefit consumers. Specifically, the justices threw out lower-court rulings that said the agreements were legal, provided that a deal did not keep a generic
|
Obama Meets Putin Amid G-8 Tension Over Syria
|
|
Bloomberg News, by Mike Dorning & Ilya Arkhipov
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 6/17/2013 10:08:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Barack Obama and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, put their escalating differences over Syria on display even as they agreed to urge both sides in the civil war there to the negotiating table. (Snip) “We do have differing perspectives,” Obama said, while adding that “we share an interest in reducing the violence.” Some Western leaders publicly rebuked Putin for his support of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad as the Group of Eight summit of industrial nations began. Obama and Putin focused on areas of agreement in remarks after the talks, their first one-on-one meeting
|
Snowden rejects suggestions he is a spy for China
|
|
Reuters, by Laura MacInnis & John Whitesides
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: LittleHoodedMonk- 6/17/2013 9:53:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington - Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency contractor who exposed the U.S. government´s top-secret surveillance programs, fought back against his critics on Monday and denied allegations that he was a spy for China. Snowden told an online forum run by Britain´s Guardian newspaper that he revealed the programs in part out of disappointment with President Barack Obama, who he said had expanded "abusive" government programs while in office. (Snip) "I have had no contact with the Chinese government," said Snowden, who has vowed to stay in the Chinese-run former
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
|
|
FOX News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.
|
Obama: ´If Catholics Have Their Schools and Buildings and Protestants Have Theirs ... That Encourages Division´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 3:46:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Likening religious schools to segregation--a racist system that forced blacks to attend different schools and use different facilities than whites in the American South--President Barack Obama told a town hall meeting for youth in Belfast, Northern Ireland on Monday that there should not be Catholic and Protestant schools because such schools cause division. "Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--symbols of history that are a source of pride for some and pain for others--these are not tangential to peace; they’re essential to it,"
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
G8: Barack Obama looks like a president going through the motions
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s
|
Paula Deen admits in deposition using N-word, telling racist jokes, reports says
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Hobbiest- 6/19/2013 6:03:40 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Celebrity chef Paula Deen admitted in a recorded deposition to telling racist jokes, using the N-word, and planning a slavery-themed wedding, according to multiple reports. The May 17 deposition where she made the alleged admissions is part of a $1.2 million lawsuit brought by Lisa Jackson, the former manager of a Savannah, Georgia, restaurant run by Deen and her brother Bubba Hiers. Jackson alleges in the suit that Deen used the N-word at the restaurant and that Hiers sexually harassed her. According to the reports, in the deposition, Deen replied “Yes, of course,”
|
How Democracies Perish, Deathbed Edition
|
|
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: steveW- 6/18/2013 6:11:46 AM
Post Reply
|
|
This is the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of How Democracies Perish, an analysis of the spread of world communism by Jean-François Revel, one of freedom´s most serious French defenders since Tocqueville. At the heart of this work, Revel details "The Tools of Communist Expansion," among which the most relevant for understanding our current situation comes in Chapter 16, "Ideological Warfare and Disinformation." The profound simplicity of Revel´s nuts and bolts account of totalitarianism´s Cold War advance, far from being obsolete
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|