|
|
| |
Topic: ObamaCare, 2013, and the Start of the GOP Comeback |
ObamaCare, 2013, and the Start of the GOP Comeback
Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 12/31/2012 11:09:11 PM
|
| Right now the political landscape is grim for Republicans–and in the short term, thanks to the so-called fiscal cliff, things may get grimmer still. But moments like these can pass, often quicker than we think. And next year may turn out to be one in which the pernicious effects of the Affordable Care Act–aka ObamaCare–really begin to kick in, from higher premiums to the loss of employer-based health insurance to the start of enrollment in insurance exchanges. It will become more and more clear to the public what a nightmarish law
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
janylou, 12/31/2012 11:31:54 PM (No. 9092496)
I hope Peter is right and 2014 will far surpass 2012 as far as winning seats!
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 12/31/2012 11:43:40 PM (No. 9092511)
What good is a comeback, if they don´t change ?
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Cleanhousein2012, 1/1/2013 1:10:34 AM (No. 9092570)
In order for there to be a comeback, the GOP will need to win back the many of us that they dissed over the course of the 2010 and 2012 elections.
As far as I personally am concerned, barring some miraculous change I cannot see supporting anyone from either the Repub or the Dem party in the future.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 1/1/2013 1:55:35 AM (No. 9092593)
Love the optimism but the fact is, this whole fiscal cliff crisis was invented by the progressive marxists to blame the costs of ObamaCare on the GOP.
That is why he hit the campaign trail over the fiscal cliff... to make sure the low informed know to blame the GOP if any of their COL goes up.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Cat Ballou, 1/1/2013 3:20:27 AM (No. 9092621)
A comeback would depend on the amount of voter fraud that takes place. My guess would be quite a lot of fraud will occur, because it worked so well in 2012.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Spidey, 1/1/2013 6:11:39 AM (No. 9092673)
The destructive nature of Obamacare is a poor option to pin your hopes on as far as a backlash orcomeback.At least half the country knew it would be devastating back when it first passed.Don´t think for a minute that the authors of this bill did everything they could to protect Obama´s voters from feeling the pain of it.
At some point when you come up for treatment,they´ll have some sort of profile on you to determine whether you"deserve" treatment or not. For every older person that croaks early,it´ll be more money for people like broodmares and illegal aliens to keep voters coming.
At some point,you´re going to have to supply proof of insurance when you file your taxes. If you don´t have proof,the fine will come out of your refund,if you have one coming.It´s possible people will be shocked and mad when this happens and it´ll lead to people not filing returns at all.
It going to lead to a lot more people working under the able,working 30hour weeks and employers using temp services.All this will kill the general revenue base and killthe economy,what´s left of it.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 1/1/2013 6:57:20 AM (No. 9092695)
Socialist Democrats, looters and moochers, public service unions, teachers have got real Americans outnumbered. It may be too late to do anything except don´t spend money, keep your families close and hang on. Only some horrific huge catastrophic event could turn this around.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DCGIRL, 1/1/2013 7:24:35 AM (No. 9092717)
the first thing that needs to happen is fire McConnell in the senate and Beohner in the house. That´s a start. They are both broken and needs to get out of the way.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Gretchen, 1/1/2013 7:40:47 AM (No. 9092732)
Still working off the old paradigm, I see.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
provide, 1/1/2013 7:57:05 AM (No. 9092748)
The number of exceptions for Obamacare will grow as groups see it implemented. Like no birth control provision for Muslims.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
EnsignO´Toole, 1/1/2013 8:30:23 AM (No. 9092792)
#5 is right. Until accuracy of the vote is achieved and guaranteed, we are no better than a third-world dictatorship.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 1/1/2013 8:49:59 AM (No. 9092819)
#6 is exactly right. And his summary and conclusions are exactly what Obama and his progressive left had planned. It´s all going according to The Plan.
And #9 is also clued in. That ´fundamental transformation´ Obama promised in 2008? It has ALREADY HAPPENED. We need to think like they think in order to combat their plans, without giving up our own souls.
Tough task. Can we do it with what remains of us?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
cobieone, 1/1/2013 8:51:55 AM (No. 9092825)
#4 is correct and it looks like it worked on Posters #2 and #3. Most of this spending damage was done in Zero´s first two years when he had a Democrat Congress. The Republicans were elected in 2010 to stop this spending craze and did a pretty good job. What did we conservatives do in 2012... we stayed home and lost the momentum big time. Now we will pay and the Democrats (and the media) will successfully blame it all on the Republicans. In 2014, many more conservatives will fall for the "blame the Republicans" nonsense and we will lose even more seats. Extremely hard for me to be optimistic after what happened in November.
I also agree with #11... election fraud is a huge issue.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Grambo, 1/1/2013 9:09:54 AM (No. 9092844)
Obamacare is Social Security’s last best hope for survival. When SS was launched, precious few people lived long after retirement at age 65, which meant the plan didn’t have to support too many for too long. With our greater longevity now, the math works against SS. Enter the Obamacare death panels. Bingo, the SS longevity problem goes away. Brilliant.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Starlady, 1/1/2013 9:24:51 AM (No. 9092870)
Since the election of 2012 when I read thread after thread here on various topics I see Alinsky has won. One of his tenets calls for discouraging the opponent. Well, we all sound very discouraged. I feel we must fight against this emotion, not give in to it. We have become very negative (myself included), in our thinking. Last night I was remembering a more hopeful time for posters here just a year ago. Can you remember our hope, our expectations as the New Year 2012 came into being? We were excited at the opportunities ahead. A few days after the election I decided that my family needed to focus on things closer to home if we were going to survive the next four years. We will celebrate the good things in our personal lives, like weddings and graduations and new births and relationships with friends. We will look to these for happiness, not the government or Washington DC. Although I have no good thoughts about the man who occupies the WH, I will not allow him or his family to influence my level of happiness. He will not make me discouraged, he will not win. That is Resolution #1 for me through 2016.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
balogreene, 1/1/2013 10:16:22 AM (No. 9092960)
Thank you #15. We have to get involved in local politics, and turn things around. Other than that, we have to be happy at home and work, and with our families. Something I heard a long time ago, I think it´s from St. Paul, "Be content in all things". It´s not always easy, but remember there are things you can´t change, stop fighting emotion and be content. With your family, your little world, be content.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Bpl40, 1/1/2013 10:23:16 AM (No. 9092975)
They will do well in´14 but blow it in 16.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Muguy, 1/1/2013 10:24:04 AM (No. 9092977)
I´d love to believe that we will see a change-- but the unwanted visitors are not at the front door--they´ve already taken over the parlor, raided and plundered the kitchen and are heading for the bedroom!
Making up law to one´s whim, disregarding the laws already on the books, out and out graft and corruption-- these are the very reasons why the Founders crafted the Constitution with checks and balances--because they knew the corrupt nature of man.
Maybe enought [r]epublicans will take over the local politics and then the individual states before the federal Leviathan tramples the rights of the states completely.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
arkfamily, 1/1/2013 10:38:09 AM (No. 9093002)
#15, I really appreciate what you are saying because I basically had arrived to that conclusion in order to swallow what happened in the election. It is getting more difficult.
Thankfully, my husband found a job after he was laid off. First time in his life. He had a small layoff in college but it was insignificant. I am employed after being a stay-at-home mom and it has helped our financial situation. My husband took a substantial cut in pay and our health insurance costs skyrocketed. We no longer have co-pays but have to meet a yearly deductible. There was no other choice. Yes, I am thankful we have insurance but when you have to cough up a substantial amount of money because of an injury, a person realizes the benefits of co-pays.
I think it is discrimination in its purest form when taxation occurs at 400,000 or even 250,000. There is no accountability for the social programs so fraud can occur at any time. Of course, to reform those programs would be offensive to this administration.
I don´t know I am trying to be hopeful but when no accountability takes place in government, it reeks havoc on the taxpayer. Everyone seems to look away. I will say it again - charity comes from the heart and should not be mandated by the government. A cheerful giver? Not so much anymore but I still do. We work hard for our money and I want to know that it isn´t going to be blown on things that are not necessaries.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Butch59, 1/1/2013 10:47:17 AM (No. 9093018)
Once again I will state that the only solution for what ails this once great nation is for enough people get mad enough and rise up and engage in another revolution. Completely throw out everyone in D.C. Re-write the constitution to strengthen it where there are weaknesses. Have term limits for one. Have Senators elected by their respective state legislatures, like the founders originally intended, etc. These are just to few, but more are there. Just don´t deviate from the original intent. That´s the key.
I would join up in a heart beat if this could happen. And I´m 67yrs old.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Boneshaker, 1/1/2013 11:23:09 AM (No. 9093089)
Its not a comeback.
At best it is a Dead Cat Bounce. .
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Republic Can, 1/1/2013 12:17:35 PM (No. 9093171)
We wouldn´t have to wring our panties and second-guess eachother today if we had secured the vote in November. There are things you can do to help. Investigate.
Our ENTIRE system is predicated on one-man-one-vote and all that that concept entails. We ARE the majority, and a bulletproof voting booth would have proven that. The devil´s greatest accomplishment is making us believe he doesn´t exist. Now he´s got us counting angels on a pin-head instead of realizing that this year, he thrived inside our sacred voting machines as well as in the parasitic electorate.
We can´t ´keep the Republic´ without all the parts. The vote is Part Number One.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
bhkat, 1/1/2013 1:01:06 PM (No. 9093271)
Given that typical Odumbo voters are stupid, they will believe the dums when they blame republicans for whatever problems they have due to obamacare.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
dodge boy, 1/1/2013 3:37:17 PM (No. 9093435)
Destroy obie, the msm and the entertainment industry, then we can talk about a comeback.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
4Justice, 1/1/2013 3:43:25 PM (No. 9093439)
#24, you keep saying the NRA passed Obamacare...where do you get your information??? Please cite sources. I can see no relation between the two.
Thanks #15 & 22. I still think that one of our biggest problem is that we are not active enough in demanding that our reps adhere to the Constitution and that they hold this administration accountable. We need to be vocal. We need to bombard them with our voices and writing. It is too easy to sit back and point fingers or expect (hope) others will fix things. It is our job--nobody else´s. The left knew it and have been infiltrating every corner they can for years. But we still really are the majority. We are the silent majority though, and they will keep winning until we all take action and stop waiting to be saved. If we don´t, they will eventually become the majority and then we will have lost it all.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
guybee, 1/1/2013 6:11:18 PM (No. 9093604)
When O goes out on the trail and promotes his agenda - he is talking to himself. Those who voted for him will vote for anything he proposes. When Rahm or Michelle run in 2016, the useless idiots will fall in line and vote for them.
Approximately 75,000,000 voters did NOT vote in the 2012 election. Romney lost by 377,000 votes. Seems like the GOP needs to do a better job of getting the vote out to turn this around.
2014 is not that far away. We need to hang on til then and win back the Senate and grow the House majority.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
philemon1967, 1/1/2013 8:44:54 PM (No. 9093761)
Obama and the Democratic Party are not the first corrupt oligarchy in the world, and the fact that they use underhanded tactics like fear-mongering and voter fraud to win, rather than well-reasoned arguments, does not mean that it is impossible for the US to rid them of this corrupt bunch of Chicagocrats (apologies to Chicago denizens).
Many corrupt one-party regimens have fallen when people finally looked beyond the lies and developed non-mainstream ways of communication to finally effect the "preference cascade" that sweeps these tyrants from their perches. America has not yet reach that point. Even low information voters will be open to thinking when the freebies run out but unfortunately, others will also have to suffer from confiscatory seizures of their hard-earned cash before the country runs out of money to reach that point.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
rsgonner, 1/1/2013 9:06:29 PM (No. 9093792)
Galt´s Gulch....the time has come
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Petraeus’s role in drafting Benghazi talking points raises questions
|
|
Washington Post, by Scott Wilson and Karen DeYoung
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 11:03:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault. It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack. “We had some new members on the committee, and we knew the press would be very aggressive on this, so we didn’t want
|
With more clarity, White House adds to confusion on IRS
|
|
Washington Post, by Dan Balz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:59:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is never good for an administration when a front-page newspaper article about an ongoing controversy begins as follows: “The White House offered a new account Monday of how and when it learned .?.?. ” That’s what readers of The Post awoke to on Tuesday. In trying to contain the controversy and protect President Obama, White House officials have only added to questions about what happened. Until this week, the story of how White House officials learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups was fairly straightforward. White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was notified in late April
|
In AP, Rosen investigations, government makes criminals of reporters
|
|
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:56:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There are various reasons you might not care about the Obama administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen and labeling him a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor” in an espionage case. Liberals may not be particularly bothered because the targeted journalist works for Fox News. Conservatives may not be concerned because of their antipathy toward the news media generally. And the general public certainly doesn’t have much patience for journalists’ whining. But here’s why you should care — and why this case, along with the administration’s broad snooping into Associated Press phone records, is more serious than the other supposed
|
|
White House meltdown: A truth deficit
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:53:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There seems to be bipartisan consensus that whatever the White House is doing to fend off scandal is making things worse. Howard Fineman sounds a lot like Right Turn these days: “White House aides are tempting fate with their reluctant, piecemeal and contradictory disclosures of what they knew and when they knew it, especially about a report on the Internal Revenue Service’s 18-month effort to target tea party and other conservative groups for special scrutiny.” The constantly shifting stories from Jay Carney and the IRS dissembling and pleas of ignorance only heighten concern that there has been serious wrongdoing.
|
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
|
‘Rosen’s in the Wind!’
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:29:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
John Podhoretz has a good column today on the Obama administration’s travails. I did not know this bit until I read the column: Even more startling, the search warrant makes clear that the FBI already had everything it needed on the leaker, as the request for a search warrant features quotes from an interview that were tantamount to a confession. It asked that the warrant be sealed — in other words, that Rosen not be told — because knowledge might “cause subjects to flee”! Imagine it: Rosen, an on-air reporter
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|