A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Who’s Attacking the Constitution Now?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Who’s Attacking the Constitution Now?
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle

Original Article

Posted By:zoidberg, 12/31/2012 10:33:01 AM

Many ardent supporters of the Second Amendment are not quite so ardent about the First. And vice versa. A few days ago CNN host Piers Morgan got into it with the head of a gun-rights group. Now more than 87,000 people have signed an online petition demanding that Morgan, who is British, be deported for his “hostile attack against the U.S. Constitution.” But the First Amendment does not exempt British nationals, which means those signing the petition are also committing a hostile attack against the Constitution. The irony is probably lost on them.

Comments:
An attack on cafeteria Constitutionalists.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: deepthinker, 12/31/2012 10:50:14 AM     (No. 9091393)

And we have senior Democrats like freaking Harry Reid trying to get Rush Limbaugh taken off the air, attacking him on the floor of the Senate...but that´s not an attack on the First Amendment...that´s just them exercising THEIR free speech rights.


Reply 2 - Posted by: hammondb3, 12/31/2012 11:20:41 AM     (No. 9091439)

Is Morgan a U.S. Citizen? If he is then he does qualify for protection under the U.S. Constitution.

But, even if he IS, how is the free speech expression of those who sign the petition any violation of anything at all? Are they not free to express their views?

The Constitution was never intended to be protection from the consequences of expressing one´s views. It only gives them the freedom to do so.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: yuban, 12/31/2012 11:24:19 AM     (No. 9091451)

I, for one, do not want him to shut up. I just want him to use his first amendment right from outside the USA. Please, just go away.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jed, 12/31/2012 11:25:56 AM     (No. 9091457)

Can Piers Morgan own a firearm in the U.S. legally? No, he is not a citizen. So would it not go to REASON he is not protected by the 1st Amendment?


Reply 5 - Posted by: Happy Trails, 12/31/2012 11:32:05 AM     (No. 9091484)

Wankers like Piers Morgan are ticks on the body politic, and should be unscrewed and squashed, and then the whole area douced with alcohol. Salud


Reply 6 - Posted by: lylacat, 12/31/2012 11:34:45 AM     (No. 9091491)

Piers Morgan should go back to England; his views are of no concern here in America; actually he is a moron, and his views do not count anyway.


Reply 7 - Posted by: The Other Guy, 12/31/2012 11:35:54 AM     (No. 9091495)

Freedom of speech denies government imposed censorship, it says nothing about individuals condemning what was said. I suspect that deportation, a government act, would be ultimately found unconstitutional if the petition was ever acted on. On the other hand, "fair" is the ultimate reason liberals use to justify almost everything they propose. The government of England denied Michael Savage entry into that country based on things he said on his radio show. Seems only fair if we use the same criteria and do the same to Morgan.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Salt5792, 12/31/2012 11:40:25 AM     (No. 9091504)

Morgan doesn´t have the minimum IQ needed to stay in America.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Immanuel Goldstein, 12/31/2012 11:40:45 AM     (No. 9091506)

Nobody is going to deport Piers Morgan. I doubt if anybody is seriously expecting that. The White House petition was just a way for the collected populace to give him an internet raspberry that went viral. Piers will stay with CNN, but now he knows that a huge number of Americans regard him as a moronic, arrogant blowhard. And that is all good.


Reply 10 - Posted by: 6079 Smith, W, 12/31/2012 11:53:09 AM     (No. 9091533)

The First Amendment to the Constitution is a prohibition aganinst CONGRESS. "Congress shall make no law...". I can do as I please re: Mr. Morgan without it being a constitutional crisis. Congress, on the other hand cannot do as they wish with Mr Morgan. Now, let´s discuss McCain-Feingold...


Reply 11 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 12/31/2012 12:20:08 PM     (No. 9091586)

Sorry A. Barton Hinkle, but your straw man argument won´t work with me.

What evidence do you have that "Many ardent supporters of the Second Amendment are not quite so ardent about the First."??? 64,000 signatures on a stupid petition??

Idiot.


Reply 12 - Posted by: bmw50, 12/31/2012 12:46:18 PM     (No. 9091628)

Piers wants to remove our second amendment rights so people ask him to leave the US; and we are the ones violating the Constitution?

Yeah, he has a right to say what he wants and so do we. Nobody has taken any action to deport him although we could as a nation legally if he was guilty of a crime. So get off your high horse.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: hicksvillekid59, 12/31/2012 12:52:59 PM     (No. 9091640)

I guess A. missed the joke and the sarcasm engendered in the petition.

Nobody on that petition ever thought that he would be deported. If A. thought it was serious he is dumber than the usual leftist.


Reply 14 - Posted by: kanphil, 12/31/2012 1:09:29 PM     (No. 9091663)

I agree with #9.


Reply 15 - Posted by: BcdErick, 12/31/2012 1:29:59 PM     (No. 9091697)

This is an embarrassing and dumb essay. First, the one person in America who is pleased beyond words by this kerfuffle is...Piers Morgan. His lousy, narcissistic talk show was almost totally unwatched and he was likely going to get fired. He has made it crystal clear over and over again that he would rather people know who he is and hate him than not know who he is and ignore him. That´s been his whole career plan and it has made him very rich (net worth ~ $20 million).

Well guess what? His ratings are up because of this non-story and he´s milking the phony controversy with every drop of energy in this body. Second, as has been pointed out by numerous observers, in this example by James Taranto of the WSJ, here’s the reality. "Your (Morgan´s) opinion is protected; your presence in the U.S. is not. See Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972)” Taranto tweeted to Morgan.

Taranto linked to transcripts from a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the U.S. Attorney General’s refusal to allow a foreign journalist into the United States did not violate the First Amendment. The case resulted from Nixon administration attorney general Richard Kleindienst’s refusal to grant a temporary nonimmigrant visa to Marxist Belgian journalist Ernest Mandel.

Morgan is a sleazeball who made his name in the British tabloids (editor of "News of the World") and was caught up in the "phone hacking" scandal. He was fired in Britain. That´s the #1 reason he came to America. And now "Reason" is helping him out. That´s dumb and embarrassing.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Quigley, 12/31/2012 1:34:40 PM     (No. 9091707)

Hey, stupid, the petition is nothing more than a First Amendment expression of contempt for a contemptible public figure. There will be no governmental action against the nitwit puff fish for what he said or by virtue of the petition.


Reply 17 - Posted by: BlueSkies, 12/31/2012 2:52:16 PM     (No. 9091823)

The petition is tongue in cheek; the proposed legislation is a real threat. These two things are not the same.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Penney, 12/31/2012 3:02:05 PM     (No. 9091833)

Why are so many of America´s political enemies, (-enemies of the tried & true principles of freedom itself as proved by the successes of the Constitutional ideals), given any credibility when, after experiencing the historical lessons of just the recent past century, this re-emerging statist gang of Liberty´s naysayers represent the same old failed political fabrications which have employed the same pattern of deceit & brutality throughout history in order to attain their pyramid scams over the lives of others? Even when these historical statist elites have managed through brute force to dictate over the citizens of their particular realm for a time, eventually they have all demonstrably failed, been destroyed and are lost in history´s ash heaps. ...Yet statist PC scammers always seem to come along & try the same trickery agenda all over again.

Freedom & equality for every human life is respected & secured in the US Constitution, which has proved its worth in the USA, which remains the beacon of Life, Liberty and Justice for ALL on the planet.


Reply 19 - Posted by: robwin, 12/31/2012 3:12:05 PM     (No. 9091849)

Oh, lighten up, Hinkle. As someone else said the petition is tongue in cheek and only the most obtuse think Morgan will really be deported because of it. It was just a way for people to express their distaste for that British jerk in a somewhat humorous way.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Iraengneer, 12/31/2012 5:00:22 PM     (No. 9091994)

Bah, humbug!
No one is seriously proposing execution, imprisonment, or even public flogging for this worthless dolt. Though selling tickets for the viewing of the latter might help defray the national debt. Scratch that -- the idea´s too tempting.
But as a non-citizen, Piers has no rights to be inside the borders of the nation. None whatever. He is permitted here, like any other non-citizen, at OUR sufferance. He can be deported with no notice whatever.
Since he´s proven himself to be a meddlesome, ungrateful guest, it´s time for him to leave. Before midnight. Now.



Post Reply   Close thread 717228




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "zoidberg"



Obama Continues His War on the
Fourth Amendment
Reason, by Andrew Napolitano    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 5/2/2013 7:25:35 AM     Post Reply
Here they go again. The Obama administration has asked its allies in Congress to introduce legislation that would permit the feds to continue their march through the Fourth Amendment when it comes to obtaining private information about all of us. The Fourth Amendment, which guarantees the right to be left alone, was written largely in response to legislation Parliament enacted in the colonial era that permitted British soldiers to write their own search warrants and then use those warrants as a legal basis to enter private homes. The ostensible purpose of doing that was to search through the colonists´ papers

   

 



 
Who Cares What the Majority
Wants on Guns?
Reason, by David Harsanyi    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 4/18/2013 7:25:25 PM     Post Reply
President Barack Obama has been struggling to wrap his head around the "unimaginable" idea that Congress may "defy" the American people and stop a vote on a gun control package compromise. The notion, he says, resists the "overwhelming instinct of the American people" after the massacre in Newtown, Conn., to pass gun control legislation. Well, the unthinkable happened. The Senate´s sweeping gun legislation came up short on the votes required to move forward. And despite all the idealistic calls for passage and despite the fact that many pundits and advocates seem to believe that something should be law simply

Will the Right Come Around on Pot?
Reason, by A. Barton Hinkle    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/11/2013 10:52:26 AM     Post Reply
Advocates of treating marijuana more like alcohol gained another ally recently: the United Nations. The U.N. would claim otherwise. In fact, the U.N.’s International Narcotics Control Board would hotly deny it. The agency’s latest report laments the legalization of pot in Colorado and Washington, declaring the approval of recreational marijuana use “in contravention to” the 1961 U.N. Convention on Narcotics.(Snip)Here in the U.S., United Nations disapproval can only help the cause of legalization where it needs help the most: on the right.(Snip)The syllogism is easy enough to follow: The U.N. should not tell Washington what it can do

The Right to Self Defense
Isn´t Negotiable
Reason, by Andrew Napolitano    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/7/2013 11:03:51 AM     Post Reply
In all the noise caused by the Obama administration´s direct assault on the right of every person to keep and bear arms, the essence of the issue has been drowned out. The president and his big-government colleagues want you to believe that only the government can keep you free and safe, so to them, the essence of this debate is about obedience to law. To those who have killed innocents among us, obedience to law is the last of their thoughts. And to those who believe that the Constitution means what it says

Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul
Join Forces to Legalize Hemp
Reason, by Matthew Hurtt    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 3/4/2013 2:27:24 PM     Post Reply
Supporters of industrial hemp gained a powerful ally in Washington several weeks ago when Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) joined fellow Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul and Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) as a co-sponsor of S.359, the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2013. The House companion, sponsored by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), has 28 co-sponsors. The bills would amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp, the domestic production of which has been illegal since 1970. Though manufacturing hemp is currently just as illegal as growing smokable pot, 10 states already have frameworks

Broken Justice
National Review Online, by Conrad Black    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/28/2013 3:27:51 PM     Post Reply
I observed Washington’s birthday by participating in a Federalist Society telephone forum on the American justice system with two other panelists.(Snip)These are, in the briefest synopsis, that American prosecutors win 99.5 percent of their cases, a much higher percentage than those in other civilized countries; that  97 percent of them are won without trial, because of the plea-bargain system in which inculpatory evidence is extorted from witnesses in exchange for immunity from prosecution, including for perjury; that the U.S. has six to twelve times as many incarcerated people per capita as do Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan

State of the Union: Rand Paul
Brings Libertarianism to the GOP
Reason, by Brian Doherty    Original Article
Posted By: zoidberg- 2/14/2013 1:31:36 PM     Post Reply
The official Republican response to President Obama’s State of the Union address last night was from Florida Sen. Marco Rubio. But the Republican Party is a house (partially) divided now, with a self-conscious rebel wing, and the semi-official “Tea Party” response came from Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul. Paul won his Senate seat on a Tea Party anti-establishment wave in 2010, defeating establishment favorite Trey Grayson for the GOP nomination. (He wrote about it in his campaign memoir The Tea Party Goes to Washington.)



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care

   

Post Reply   Close thread 717228





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~