|
|
| |
Topic: When will Obama decide to make a deal? |
When will Obama decide to make a deal?
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 12/30/2012 3:35:14 PM
|
| The president never quite sounds like a man who wants a deal. He instead invariably sounds like a pol seeking advantage over opponents, which is peculiar given that he faces no future election but will face a GOP House majority for at least two more years. He wants the other side to lose more than he wants a substantial deal to improve our fiscal situation. The Post reports that Senate discussions on a fiscal cliff-avoiding deal have experienced a “major setback.” Presumably, Democrats won’t include any serious spending cuts to accompany revenue hikes. This predictable result
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
ColoWapiti, 12/30/2012 4:07:17 PM (No. 9090355)
Never. He does not want a deal.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Spidey, 12/30/2012 4:10:23 PM (No. 9090359)
Everybody predicted Obama wanted to go over the cliff so he could come back next year with a heroic tax cut of his own.Of course he´ll then dare House republican to vote against it. This will also give him an excuse to get away from Mo,flying around the country in front of union goons or college students to push his "plan".
He´s already bankrupting SS with his stupid payroll tax cut,which didn´t help the economy one bit.
So the left will rally behind Obama´s tax cuts even though they´ve railed against them for years and blamed the deficit on them. Truth is Bush´s tax cuts only account for 10% of the deficit since they passed,the rest has been pure spending.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
pineledger, 12/30/2012 4:20:36 PM (No. 9090365)
All he wants is to rig things so he has something else to blame on the Republicans. We will have a steady stream of such maneouvers from now until 2014. This is all about regaining the house, and Axelgrease´s fingerprints are all over this.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
steveW, 12/30/2012 4:25:26 PM (No. 9090370)
Our problem per se is not Obama´s bad intentions and lies, nor the MFM´s shameless cover-up of Obama´s bad intentions and lies. The problem is that Obama voters, now the majority, like that Obama has bad intentions and that he lies. They support him not in spite of his destructiveness, but precisely because of it. That´s our problem.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
drkillj0y, 12/30/2012 4:35:15 PM (No. 9090373)
Why make any deal when the opposition is more than willing to capitulate ?
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
bogeegolf, 12/30/2012 4:53:23 PM (No. 9090383)
When it suits him.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Mr. Hanky, 12/30/2012 5:04:24 PM (No. 9090393)
It´s easy, Obama hates this country. If they lose, we lose or whatever. The economy is not his concern.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
saguni, 12/30/2012 5:22:55 PM (No. 9090406)
0bama and the MS-pravda want everyone--or at least the taxpaying public to believe (FTA) They lost the election, and with that nearly all power to force the president to do what he is loath to do, namely control spending.
This is far from the truth, the Republican controlled House of Representatives have always and still now control the purse strings...all spending must begin in the House...and if the House leadership had any testosterone...0bama would be told--at the start of every negotiation meeting...you do your job and allow us to do ours.
I wish someone would school the know-nothings about who exactly is the do-nothing when it comes to legislation, the only reason we are "facing a fiscal cliff" is Harry Reid refused to do his job and bring the House tax bill to the floor in August.
Harry Reid has violated his Oath of Office in failing to vote on every bill the House passes. Obama has violated his Oath of Office to "protect and defend the Constitution" when he writes clearly unconstitutional Executive Orders and allows the government to operate without a current, Constitutionally enacted budget. They should both be impeached!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Barkingkangaroo, 12/30/2012 5:28:23 PM (No. 9090414)
Why do so many people think he wants to avoid running the economy and the country into the ground? His words and actions are designed to "cut this country down to size". What better way than to continue the course? Higher taxes for everyone is better for big government. Big spending cuts for the military are the liberals dream.
Running over the cliff is his goal.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Woodenleg, 12/30/2012 5:30:39 PM (No. 9090415)
#7 Is right. Obama is never running for re-election, he has the Republicans on the run and he can destroy the economy along with the middle class. Rejigger the economy along Marxist principles, make what was the middle class dependent on government subsidy and the left will rule this country for ever.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Starlady, 12/30/2012 5:42:21 PM (No. 9090422)
Obama will deny Ms Lindsey the privilege of having the Dems walk all over him as he was eager to do when he appeared on Fox News Sunday this morning. He left his conservative personality at home in the closet and donned the Super RINO suit for today.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
bpl40, 12/30/2012 5:56:25 PM (No. 9090438)
Any meaningful deal will require trimming seriously the $1600 billion that he is spending every year over and above the government´s income. Giving in on that will bring the whole tent down. IMO - never.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Arizona Chief, 12/30/2012 6:05:42 PM (No. 9090451)
Its all according to the plan. Can there be any doubts?
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
krause, 12/30/2012 6:43:58 PM (No. 9090481)
Obama is not a serious player in this ´cliff´ negotiation. His goal is his revenge tax on the ´rich,´ which is a non-starter in the problems we face. He doesn´t want to reduce the debt. He just wants to keep spending, which is his way of crippling our country. And he has a lot of people wanting him to do just this, including all the dem politicians.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
curious1, 12/30/2012 8:00:16 PM (No. 9090546)
#4, No, the O´tard voters aren´t the majority. They (and the vote fraud) were the majority of those who voted, but out of almost 220 million eligible voters only 129+ million voted, a hair under 59%. So the cheating LPs are about 65 million out of 220 million. That´s not a majority even if the propaganda arm of the LPs tries hard to make the gullible and weak-minded believe it is.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Pros7767, 12/30/2012 8:43:18 PM (No. 9090581)
When the end comes for each of the MSM´s journalists, God will not look kindly on them. It will get ugly.
He will not look kindly on their cooperation in the destruction of His great nation.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
FormerDem, 12/30/2012 11:58:50 PM (No. 9090788)
Jennifer is shrewd.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Polecat49, 12/31/2012 1:16:02 AM (No. 9090820)
The answer is NEVER. He is doing everything he can to Destroy this Country as we know it. Therefore, he can become a dictator because the house, senate and so-called supreme court have betrayed America and do not have enough backbone to serve as the Constitution requires them to do.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 12/31/2012 2:43:53 AM (No. 9090859)
Anyone who believes the president has a right to interfere with Congress´ law making duty is too far gone to be called an American free citizen.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Despite the WaPost, Benghazi Is a Major Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.
|
Role of Health-Law ´Navigators´ Under Fire
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"
|
| |
|
Labor unions break ranks with White House on ObamaCare
|
|
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal
|
|
Issa Warns Hillary
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee
|
|
Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM
Post Reply
|
|
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...
|
How Hope and Change Gave Way To Spying on the Press
|
|
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,
|
Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
|
|
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
| | |
|
|