A Message From Lucianne  




Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

  Topic: NY Paper to Publish Additional
Gun Owners´ Names, Addresses
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
NY Paper to Publish Additional
Gun Owners´ Names, Addresses

Breitbart Big Journalism, by Warner Todd Huston

Original Article

Posted By:JoniTx, 12/29/2012 6:55:49 PM

The New York newspaper that drew criticism for publishing the names and addresses of hundreds of legal gun permit holders is doubling down by publishing the personal information of even more law-abiding gun owners. To great criticism, the Journal News published an interactive map showing the names and addresses of the legal gun owners in Westchester and Rockland counties just before Christmas. Now the paper has announced it will next publish the names and addresses of permit-holders in Putnam County with an eye toward eventually politicizing the names and addresses of every gun owner in the state.


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Bulldog65, 12/29/2012 7:01:14 PM     (No. 9089174)

A$$es, total A$$es

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 2 - Posted by: LC Hoghead, 12/29/2012 7:02:50 PM     (No. 9089176)


  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 3 - Posted by: LC Hoghead, 12/29/2012 7:03:10 PM     (No. 9089177)


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 4 - Posted by: sternben, 12/29/2012 7:06:18 PM     (No. 9089181)

Boycott the paper and its advertisers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 5 - Posted by: Persecutor2, 12/29/2012 7:14:29 PM     (No. 9089192)

Don´t those idiot editors have an attorney advising them? The first time one of those homes gets vandalized or broken into someone´s going to court...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 6 - Posted by: chumley, 12/29/2012 7:14:47 PM     (No. 9089193)

Maybe its time to stop plying nice.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 7 - Posted by: tren9, 12/29/2012 7:15:29 PM     (No. 9089195)

It sounds like someone should do background checks on the papers employees, starting with the execs, and publish their skeletons. Every body has skeletons.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 8 - Posted by: Catherine, 12/29/2012 7:18:14 PM     (No. 9089198)

Why not just put neon signs on those who don´t have a gun. Make it even easier for the thieves.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 9 - Posted by: Keekng, 12/29/2012 7:31:36 PM     (No. 9089210)

Get real, #9. Publishing those names was nothing more than a grandstanding gotcha. Totally political crap by some lefties thinking they are scoring points. Gotta wonder if they will have the same convictions when their paper goes belly up and they cannot get jobs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 10 - Posted by: chance_232, 12/29/2012 7:35:07 PM     (No. 9089211)

RE #9

True, its a matter of public record. However, the intention of registering a gun was largely due to law enforcement. And there is a difference between you going to the county and doing a search and a news paper publishing everything.

Perhaps Briebart could publish the divorce records of everyone in that county....after all its in the public record. Or perhaps publish an interactive map of everyone that´s been adopted... or every minority home owner... or an interactive map over every registered democrat that voted in the election. Maybe publish an interactive map of luxury car owners, or a map of corporate executives, or business owners, licensed pets????

There is freedom of the press and then there is the abuse of the private citizen. This news paper is ABUSING the public record, specifically to pressure private, law abiding citizens. If this is allowed to stand, there is no end to what trouble the press can get into.

And most amazing ......... the press cant be bothered with vetting Obama, reporting ob Fast and Furious, Benghazi etc, but they have the time to badger private citizens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 11 - Posted by: joew9, 12/29/2012 7:37:47 PM     (No. 9089213)

Those that don´t make the list are in danger.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 12 - Posted by: jl80863, 12/29/2012 7:46:43 PM     (No. 9089219)

A well stated argument #12. Bravo.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 13 - Posted by: asu86pe, 12/29/2012 7:55:47 PM     (No. 9089221)

#9 Can you imagine this list in the hands of people who mean to harm you with fire arms, or use the fire arms in other criminal actions against you,or remove all fire arms altogether and force servitude over a defenseless population?

But then maybe you need someone lording over you to work 18 hrs a day, 7 days a week,and 365 days a year!!!

Good Luck in your SLAVERY ...........


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 14 - Posted by: Coy860, 12/29/2012 7:56:40 PM     (No. 9089222)

March and protest at their headquarters. Show up in large numbers.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 15 - Posted by: hamrman, 12/29/2012 8:00:13 PM     (No. 9089223)

Most so called news outlets are becoming extinct because they flat out refuse to report real news...they have become activist...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 16 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 12/29/2012 8:04:19 PM     (No. 9089227)

I don´t care if people know I own guns. In fact, I own lots of guns - and there´s no complete record of all of them. And I buy badass bullets for those guns to increase their stopping power. And I have a Concealed Carry Permit so one can never know if I am armed or not - so you´d better watch what you do around me. Or maybe I am just pulling your leg and want to tell you that you shouldn´t believe everything you read. Or maybe you should. Just remember to be nice around me.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 17 - Posted by: Keekng, 12/29/2012 8:28:24 PM     (No. 9089255)

Congratulations, #18. As of your post, the Feds know who you are and where you live.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment




Reply 18 - Posted by: pearlyjo, 12/29/2012 8:35:21 PM     (No. 9089268)

FTA: "Now the paper has announced it will next publish the names and addresses of permit-holders in Putnam County with an eye toward eventually politicizing the names and addresses of every gun owner in the state."
Interesting. I´m looking forward to seeing the names and addresses of all those folks in NY, especially the, uh, famous ones. You know, the politicians, entertainers, television folks, and especially those good people on the news programs. Can´t wait CynDee. What´s that? You won´t be publishing those peoples´ names? Come again? That might endanger them? So, you are flexing your 1st Amendment rights, just not toward your lefty famous buddies. Kinda being selective, huh?
We should check. Did she name everyone with a permit in those areas, or did she leave some people off the map? If she left anyone off of the map, she is a fraud, a grandstander and an incrediby reckless woman.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 19 - Posted by: Veritas2009, 12/29/2012 8:43:17 PM     (No. 9089278)

Can not some clumsy but well-meaning Do-It-Yourself spill two pounds of roofing nails in the snow covered employee parking lot of this paper?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 20 - Posted by: beth, 12/29/2012 8:46:48 PM     (No. 9089280)

They should publish a map of everyone who has ever been arrested for drunk driving. It would be far more useful in terms of public safety. At least people would know which neighborhood had the most drunks.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 21 - Posted by: Janjan, 12/29/2012 8:54:32 PM     (No. 9089289)

Right #9. This was totally innocent and they just couldn´t help themselves. No personal accountability here. It is the law´s fault. Are you a high school student?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 22 - Posted by: Calico Al, 12/29/2012 9:00:12 PM     (No. 9089294)

I´ve had many friends who had protected by Smieh&Wesson stickers on their house and car windows back in the day.What´s the big deal about publishing someones name and addresse?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Reply 23 - Posted by: Wendybird, 12/29/2012 9:05:38 PM     (No. 9089299)

New York State has no restriction on long gun purchase, no requirement to register, or license requirement. These are required for handguns. So, not having your name and address listed doesn’t mean there is not a firearm in the home. Also, almost beyond belief to some, there may even be handguns not duly reported to the authorities in some dwellings, particularly those of professional criminals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 24 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 12/29/2012 9:10:36 PM     (No. 9089303)

As a CCW holder, we are not allowed to show our carry- that why it´s called "Concealed Carry". Even if your shirt flies up in a breeze and someone sees your gun and calls a cop, you can actually be arrested for what is called "Brandishing". You must keep your weapon concealed at all times. So, this bunch of idiots in NY publishing the names is kind of a good thing. I, personally, can´t tell people I´m carrying a weapon. But, the loony publisher can do that for me. To me- that´s actually a good thing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 25 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 12/29/2012 9:22:55 PM     (No. 9089315)

Smells bad. Like 1861.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 26 - Posted by: hamrman, 12/29/2012 9:30:41 PM     (No. 9089319)

Totally Whacked Out Left Leaning Tree Hugging so called news journal, maybe normal people will ignore and boycott them altogether!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 27 - Posted by: LouD, 12/29/2012 9:36:50 PM     (No. 9089322)

#27, you can´t tell people you are carrying, but you can tell them you have a CCW permit. Maybe they will make the assumption that you are carrying. If someone asks "Are you carrying"? you can always respond "I´m not allowed to tell you I am carrying" and let them assume what they will.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 28 - Posted by: 4Justice, 12/29/2012 9:41:34 PM     (No. 9089324)

#12 stated it perfectly. There are many things that are available in public record, but most people would be horrified to have that information broadcast to the world. And that is exactly what the paper did...BROADCAST the information to the world. That is totally irresponsible. You do remember that even with a free press and free speech, there is such a thing as a limitation on rights when it infringes on the rights of others. You can yell "fire" in a crowded theater but expect to pay the consequences for your actions as people get stampeded to death in the panic. Even if no one is hurt, they can still arrest you for endangering the lives of others,

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 29 - Posted by: Davids918, 12/29/2012 9:45:58 PM     (No. 9089325)

Now, the criminals have a better idea of who NOT to rob, and who TO rob thanks to the media.

When one is harmed they´ll sue this paper.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 30 - Posted by: Muggins, 12/29/2012 10:14:42 PM     (No. 9089333)

Class Action Lawsuit. Make the newspaper pay dearly for targeting of private citizens. The NRA should step in with a team of lawyers and get the ball rolling.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 31 - Posted by: mossley, 12/29/2012 10:19:44 PM     (No. 9089339)

Ages and ages ago, I worked for a local newspaper chain. We never had problems, because the managing editor refused to hire any journalism or communications majors. After the new owner forced that editor out, the very liberal new editor decided to publish a very striking color photo of a car fire in which a mother of 3 was killed on the cover of the year-end review edition.

The family sued, claiming it no longer had any news value, as the accident had happened at the beginning of the year. The courts agreed, all through the appeal process.

Legal gun owners following the law are not newsworthy. It was an attempt to intimidate them. They should sue.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 32 - Posted by: chumley, 12/29/2012 10:21:42 PM     (No. 9089340)

#9 at it again. Its ok to stretch the first amendment and interpret it any way you want, but its not ok to interpret the second exactly as it is written and exercise it at all.
Can you say lefty hypocrite?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 33 - Posted by: ColonialAmerican1623, 12/29/2012 10:22:13 PM     (No. 9089341)

Why stop in NY ? List the members of Congress that own guns.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 34 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 12/29/2012 10:30:10 PM     (No. 9089346)

Walk up and down the sidewalk in front of their business while carrying a sign that says the business and it´s employees are unarmed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 35 - Posted by: 4ladyk, 12/29/2012 10:47:45 PM     (No. 9089352)

Is the ACLJ on this?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 36 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 12/29/2012 11:17:19 PM     (No. 9089367)

Number 9 specializes in liberal talking point bait posts. So it´s best to ignore him/her, as seminar posters generally weed themselves out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 37 - Posted by: vesicant, 12/29/2012 11:22:33 PM     (No. 9089369)

Gun owners are not public figures. The paper has no right to publish any information about them. Not only is it a form of libel ("these are whacko gun owners), they can sue the paper for reckless endangerment.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 38 - Posted by: oh-heck, 12/30/2012 12:18:57 AM     (No. 9089406)

Is the customer list of Planned Parenthood protected information. How would this rag react if someone were to take pictures of all young women entering the building obviously pregnant and then pictures of them leaving just a little bit skinnier? Gun owner have made a decision to protect themselves. Those who choose to abort a child are defending their convenience from a consequence of a bad decision.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 39 - Posted by: bogeegolf, 12/30/2012 12:31:35 AM     (No. 9089414)

I would like to know who the people in my town that are getting foodstamps. Of course we can´t do that though.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 40 - Posted by: trapper, 12/30/2012 12:32:03 AM     (No. 9089415)

This newspaper is clearly up to something, and we have no reason to assume that they are just doing it on their own. They are doubling down, and doing it rather outrageously, attempting to inhibit law abiding private citizens from exercising their constitutional rights. That´s quite a big fight to pick. Why are they doing it? What are they trying to accomplish? What are they trying to make happen? What response are they trying to invite? I have an idea.

Could they be attempting to bait the NRA into responding? Could they be attempting to lure the NRA into an expensive legal battle with the ACLU, pitting the First Amendment against the Second Amendment? Could they be attempting to bait the NRA into depleting their resources over this nonsense rather than preserving it for the bigger fight over the gun control legislation we will see passed in 2013?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 41 - Posted by: rambo77, 12/30/2012 12:54:44 AM     (No. 9089431)

Almost every home in Texas has, as a standard item, a directory of all the people in the area that own guns and are, therefore, armed. We use it all the time for many different purposes. We call it "the phone book."

Get real, people.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 42 - Posted by: fiddle ed, 12/30/2012 1:18:51 AM     (No. 9089443)

The insult is to the unarmed households who are prey to any criminal who wants a gun free place to invade. The shame is most of those who wouldn´t be caught dead with a gun will stand a much better chance now of being caught dead without one.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 43 - Posted by: LanieLou, 12/30/2012 3:48:31 AM     (No. 9089492)

I´m with poster #48; Something is driving this action. By publishing all gun owners this way, it´s easy for Code Pinko to deploy idiots to picket private citizens.

I also think Obama´s re-election buddies used the nat´l database to determine how many votes to cast / steal in swing states.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Reply 44 - Posted by: mickturn, 12/30/2012 11:33:08 AM     (No. 9090042)

Fine, the list with your names will be expanded to show your addresses, phone numbers, members of the family, income etc.

AND whether you have guns or not...if you do you´re a hypocrite, if not the bad guys will love to come visit.

Want to keep playing this game?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

Post Reply   Close thread 717091

Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"

Al Gore´s youngest daughter Sarah,
35, gets remarried under an old
pine tree in casual outdoor service
in California
Daily Mail (UK), by Meghan Keneally    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/23/2014 4:25:00 AM     Post Reply
Al Gore´s youngest daughter has gotten remarried under a historic tree in Santa Monica. Sarah Gore has a very casual outdoor service on Sunday morning outside a coffee shop with her famous father walking across a patch of grass that served as the makeshift aisle. Wearing a loose, off-white lace dress with bell sleeves, Sarah made her way towards her groom, realtor Patrick Maiani, who was waiting for her beside the outline of a heart in the shape of rose petals.The brief service was officiated by a female religious leader and attended by about a dozen invited guests. The rest of

Obama’s lies have led to global mistrust
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/23/2014 3:39:14 AM     Post Reply
As a young reporter, I once expressed shock at how routinely and reflexively government officials lied to the press. A savvy newspaper vet who overheard me just smiled and told me not to take it personally. “Why shouldn’t they lie to you?” the late, great Murray Kempton asked. “They lie to themselves all the time.” His observation came back to me as I read about President Obama’s trip to Asia. He’s going, the White House says, to tell our allies face to face that America is committed more than ever to their security and prosperity. In ordinary times, the trip and

Tea party candidate Curt Clawson
wins Republican primary to replace
former Rep. Trey Radel
Tampa Bay Times (FL), by Alex Leary    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/23/2014 3:29:00 AM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Curt Clawson, a businessman who was little known months ago in Southwest Florida, won a contentious GOP primary Tuesday to fill the U.S. House seat left open by the scandalous downfall of Trey Radel.Clawson, 54, pitched himself as an outsider against more established candidates and was embraced by the tea party. He poured more than $2 million into television ads. In one, the former Purdue basketball player challenged President Barack Obama to a three-point contest. The Bonita Springs resident took about 38 percent of the vote in the Congressional District 19 race, besting several rivals, including state Sen.

IRS employees with tax and
conduct issues still got awards,
watchdog report finds
Fox News*, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/23/2014 3:15:24 AM     Post Reply
IRS employees who had been disciplined for tax and conduct issues were nonetheless rewarded with monetary awards or time off, according to a watchdog report released Tuesday. The report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration found that while for the most part the reward program for IRS workers complied with federal regulations, employees who had themselves failed to pay their federal taxes and had discipline problems were also rewarded. "While not prohibited, providing awards to employees who have been disciplined for failing to pay federal taxes appears to create a conflict with the IRS’s charge of ensuring the

Why True American Conservatives
Cannot Be Extremist and How Progressives
are Ultimately Tyrants
Independent Journal Review, by Kyle Becker    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/23/2014 3:05:18 AM     Post Reply
It seems only yesterday, before the soothing elixir of “hope and change” was spoonfed to us by present-President Barack Obama, that Republicans could disagree with Democrats without being branded “teabaggers,” KKK-members, anarchists, Nazis, bomb throwers, arsonists, political terrorists or extremists. The unspeakable crime of conservatives? Their heartless desire to live their own lives and to be left alone by the bullying U.S. government. What has been the conservative outcry since disco was still a thing? Follow the Constitution, be fiscally responsible, and restore limited government. Not to impose their will on anyone; and if anything, simply to work, prosper, express

Madigan: Votes not there yet on
income tax, minimum wage hike
Chicago Tribune, by Ray Long    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/22/2014 10:36:42 PM     Post Reply
SPRINGFIELD — As the General Assembly heads into its final month of session, House Speaker Michael Madigan said Tuesday that he doesn’t have enough votes lined up yet to extend the state’s income tax increase or raise the minimum wage. The speaker, talking to reporters the day he was easily elected to a fifth term as Illinois Democratic Party chairman, said voting to keep the personal income tax rate at 5 percent instead of letting it fall to 3.75 percent on Jan. 1 will be a “difficult roll call.” “Every person in the legislature is going to be called upon

This Simple Graph Compares
Reagan’s and Obama’s ‘Recoveries’
Independent Journal Review, by Michael Hausam    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/22/2014 10:07:28 PM     Post Reply
How often have you heard a Democrat prattle on and on about how well Barack Obama has done with the economy, given the mess he inherited? Usually, it’s some version of, “Things are getting better, but the economy the President started with was so awful, so he’s done as well as anyone could expect.”When Ronald Reagan took over from Jimmy Carter in ’81, things were actually worse economically compared to when Obama took over from George W. Bush in ’08. Consider these three important comparisons of economic indicators, then and now: - Unemployment was at 10.8% versus 7.7% - Inflation (Consumer

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)

Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Benghazi attack could have been prevented if
US hadn´t ´switched sides in the War on Terror´
and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach
al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

45 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 7:02:40 PM     Post Reply
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn´t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier. ´The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,´ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline. She blamed the Obama administration

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

Michelle Obama:
´splurging is the key to life´

40 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/21/2014 9:31:25 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Michelle Obama said "splurging is the key to life" if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries. "How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?" she asked. "You couldn´t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries." The first lady took questions from children reporters Monday after appearing at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She told the children that if they eat right the majority of the time, then a splurge or snack is not going to hurt them. "I still splurge when I can, but that's why I try to exercise almost every day," she said.

Why Does Nation Tolerate A
Habitual Liar As President?

40 replie(s)
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/22/2014 2:10:54 PM     Post Reply
Public Trust: Sixty-one percent polled say President Obama lies "some of the time" or "most of the time" on matters of national importance. Americans have to ask: Why do we let him get away with it? It´s no surprise that a Fox News poll of 1,012 registered voters last week found immense distrust of a president whose main domestic initiative was based on a lie. The shock is that the same poll found his disapproval level down to its lowest since last fall. Asked, "How often do you think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters?" 37% replied "most of

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning

Post Reply   Close thread 717091

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google

© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.