A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: How the fiscal cliff fight will end,
(unhappily for Republicans)
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
How the fiscal cliff fight will end,
(unhappily for Republicans)

Washington Examiner, by Byron York

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 12/29/2012 10:27:47 AM

The word among some Senate Republicans is that a fiscal cliff deal is likely to be struck by Sunday, or Monday at the latest. (And Monday, being December 31st, is in fact the latest a deal could be struck to avoid January 1 tax increases.) Those Senate Republicans hope the final deal will make permanent current tax levels — Bush tax cut levels — for everyone who makes below $500,000.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: ronbet, 12/29/2012 10:36:18 AM     (No. 9088575)

Actually it´s most likely to end unhappily for America!


Reply 2 - Posted by: VinGoombatz, 12/29/2012 10:36:35 AM     (No. 9088576)

The Republicans should state the size of the budget deficit then say FY to Barry.

But...no balls.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 12/29/2012 10:37:10 AM     (No. 9088578)

One more reason we need a third party.


Reply 4 - Posted by: cartcart, 12/29/2012 10:37:51 AM     (No. 9088581)

My gardener and cleaning lady will be pleased to know that their income from our household is gone as far as they are concerned. I would rather pay them for their services than the government for what little we get by way of services.


Reply 5 - Posted by: jdh, 12/29/2012 10:43:11 AM     (No. 9088587)

Those who voted for Obama may think they won the election, but overall we all lost. The voters, their children, their grandchildren and their grandchildren´s children all lost. After that generation, there won´t be much left to lose or to tax. All of the ´rich´ people will be either dead or in other countries with better tax laws...


Reply 6 - Posted by: DaddyO, 12/29/2012 10:46:21 AM     (No. 9088590)

Actually, if the deal is to make the bush tax rates permanent and nothing else, that would be okay with me. Cut a deal to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for spending reductions in january.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Barkingkangaroo, 12/29/2012 10:50:07 AM     (No. 9088593)

The Repubs could pass a bill to keep everything the same rate and have The One veto it. Someone appears not to be trying.

Why would Barry want to avoid the "Cliff" anyway? Tax rates will just be the same as when Clinton was boss. Dems like more taxes. Why would they not like more taxes from everybody, not just the "Rich"?

This President gets away with a big tax increase (positive) and blames it on the Repubs (another positive).

The only ones who don´t win is us.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: TheMom, 12/29/2012 10:52:16 AM     (No. 9088598)

No deals! No new taxes, cut spending now, not in maybe 10 years. But that would make too much sense...


Reply 9 - Posted by: bluehouse, 12/29/2012 10:53:12 AM     (No. 9088599)

If the Bush era tax cuts are made permanent for 99% of taxpayers, then the Republicans won´t have to fight over them again. That would take a huge bargaining chip away from the Democrats.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Bpl40, 12/29/2012 11:06:18 AM     (No. 9088611)

The government takes in $2.2 trillion and spends $3.8 trillion. There is no other question in the public domain that even comes close to that in gravity and urgency. This debate over tax rates for $250k or $500k or $385.457k is a fool´s errand. If the Republicans agree to it the ´Rats and the MSM will simply invent something else to blame them with. But the Stupid Party will probably walk right into it.


Reply 11 - Posted by: noproblems, 12/29/2012 11:08:33 AM     (No. 9088613)

as long as the spending cuts are maintained, then 0bama and the Dimms can own the tax increases.

Elections do have consequences. Maybe next time the Repugs will run someone outside of the establishment.

the real battle is over the debt limit increase.



Reply 12 - Posted by: Twinkle93, 12/29/2012 11:24:45 AM     (No. 9088640)

It is the spending, stupid!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: mikeman, 12/29/2012 11:35:23 AM     (No. 9088662)

The democrats (obama), and to a large part the republicans have become irrelevant. They both exist to increase the federal bureaucracy and to promote job killing regulations.

Our entire system of govt. exists to confiscate private income and distribute to unions, federal employees, and welfare deadbeats( domestic and imported ).




Reply 14 - Posted by: MisterDickens, 12/29/2012 11:45:46 AM     (No. 9088676)

Republicans in Congress need more money to spend, too. Votes are not free, you know. I don´t think any elected Republican will be unhappy, except in public statements, if taxes go up.

After all, the House could stop Zerocare by not funding it but they haven´t taken any steps in that direction that I am aware of.

Pubs like increased revenue just like Dims.


Reply 15 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 12/29/2012 11:55:40 AM     (No. 9088698)

The Democrats said to the Republicans, ´´Your side of the canoe is sinking.´´


Reply 16 - Posted by: Country Boy, 12/29/2012 11:56:18 AM     (No. 9088701)

obama´s strength is that he knows how to lie to stupid people. Beyond that, he is not qualified cut the grass at the White House.


Reply 17 - Posted by: reilly, 12/29/2012 12:00:09 PM     (No. 9088704)


Talk about the debt limit, stupid. That´s the lever we control. No spending cuts, no debt limit. Up the uppity´s.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Grambo, 12/29/2012 12:03:04 PM     (No. 9088711)

All together now, there is no such animal as a permanent tax cut. Congress, like a woman, has a right to change its mind. It can change a “permanent” tax rate with the stroke of a pen.

If the Republicans think they’re getting a negotiated concession in the form of a “permanent” tax rate, I have a bridge to sell them.

Sheesh!


Reply 19 - Posted by: Davids918, 12/29/2012 12:11:51 PM     (No. 9088724)

#20, they´re set to expire, so making them a permanent rate is helpful.

Sure they could be raised again, but Democrats know it´s hard to raise income tax rates which is why they attack businesses to generate revenue streams. People then blame the "greedy" business owners and stick it to them again.

Don´t raise the debt limit for much more than $500 billion, and demand that the Obama spending binge be restrained.

Obama wants to push this out over 2 years with the hopes of taking back the House and having full control, again, in his last 2 years so they can REALLY finish the liberal agenda.


Reply 20 - Posted by: retcpo, 12/29/2012 12:25:43 PM     (No. 9088739)

The best thing is to go over the cliff and stay there. This country is in serious jeopardy as the number of those not paying any Federal income tax at all approaches 50%, while we are building a permanent unemployed class with benefits seemingly that are approaching infinity and disability claims are the new, early, early retirement plans.

I really do not want to pay more taxes but I prefer a system that more evenly takes from all of us rather than makes of us a nation of envy rather than aspiration.

While the political rherotic soars nobody seems to notice that fiscal year 2013, which started October 1, 2013 the borrowing makes the excesses of the past few years seem paltry.

For the first time the Social Security system has paid out more than it took in by $47B, putting it in the red. This only happened because Social Security revenues was foolishly cut by more than 20% for the past few years.

The Democrat strategy is to build a permanent voting class that pays absoulutely no taxes whatsoever but can be counted on to reliability vote for greater and greater taxes for those who have to support them. The Republicans, seemingly the inept, stupid party keep falling victim to this strategy.

So one more chance, let the sequestration on cuts go into effect, let the tax rates go up, stop permanent unemployment compensation, restore Social Security revenue and cut more spending or we won´t have to worry about falling off the clift, we will drop of Mt. Everest.


Reply 21 - Posted by: oh-heck, 12/29/2012 12:52:05 PM     (No. 9088775)

The key to plan B was all the stuff below the radar:

It fixed AMT permanently
It ended some Stimulus tax credits PAYED TO the poor
It ended the emergency extension of unemployment benefits
It fixed the inheritance tax
It made the doctor fix permanent

If they are going to cave on taxing the rich, it would be far better to bring up Plan B instead.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Muguy, 12/29/2012 12:53:22 PM     (No. 9088776)

An interesting take by Byron York, who normally has a very worthy opinion.

The truth is, Zippy believes himself to be God of everything, and so this is going to end unhappily for everyone--in the end, WE ALL GET SCREWED OVER.

That of course not being the Obamaphobes who are already on the dole.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: msctex1, 12/29/2012 1:22:00 PM     (No. 9088821)

Enormous spending cuts kick in if we go over "the cliff."

We are thus completely in control, because Obama could no more allow spending cuts than go without food or air.

We will, of course, ignore this completely and cave in to whatever the arrogant SOB wants.


Reply 24 - Posted by: nonsense, 12/29/2012 1:30:05 PM     (No. 9088836)

The plan is to destroy the Republican party and have one party rule, the one party being the communist party. It´s ok though because 56% of Americans approve of the Obama agenda. Crazy, huh?


Reply 25 - Posted by: beancounter, 12/29/2012 1:35:53 PM     (No. 9088849)

A few problems I have with this article:

1. If Boehner had so much support for Plan B why did he pull it off the table?

2. The article doesn´t say what will happen to the Obama tax cuts. The payroll tax cut will probably go away, but what about the refundable tax credits and other goodies?

The Republicans should say that they support PayGo. The president said that he supported PayGo. Therefore, any bill to reduce taxes on the middle class should come with spending cuts to pay for them.


Reply 26 - Posted by: DonQuijote, 12/29/2012 1:36:09 PM     (No. 9088851)

After the cave, I´m leaving the party, and I told the RNC so yesterday when they called to ask for my annual contribution. I´m small fry, so it doesn´t make a difference, but at least I won´t be bothered with those pesky calls any more. Plus, better to be an independent. We don´t really have any sy in who the nominee is anyway, and no one can assume which way your vote will go, thus polling will be off.


Reply 27 - Posted by: marthaville, 12/29/2012 5:37:06 PM     (No. 9089094)

#3 - the third party candidate Ross Perot gave us Bill Clinton for president. That really worked out well, don´t you think?

#23 - you are one of the few that have touched on the real issues behind Obama´s aim. He wants all the provisions proposed in his budget voted down by the Senate 98-0. This is not about raising the top two rates from 33% and 35% to 36% and 39.6%.

It is all those other provisions Obama has included to raise taxes. Don´t forget his plan to raise the capital gains tax to 20% on top of the Obama care 3.8% tax on investment income, increasing the tax rate on qualified dividends from 15% to 39.6% (plus 3.8%). Obama and his handlers know the media is behind them and the American people think he will balance the budget by raising the top rate on couples making over $250,000.

Stupid is as stupid does.



Post Reply   Close thread 717051




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
75 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.


Post Reply   Close thread 717051





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~