A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: How Mitt Romney can
redeem himself in 2013
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
How Mitt Romney can
redeem himself in 2013

Newsday, by MARGARET CARLSON

Original Article

Posted By:WhamDBambam, 12/29/2012 7:10:21 AM

As I look back at the 2012 presidential campaign, it now all seems so obvious.Not one of those clowns performing at the hundreds of Republican primary debates this year and last was a match for the eventual nominee, Mitt Romney. And Romney clearly wasn't the candidate to defeat President Barack Obama.Yes and yes - but still. We don't always see what's happening before our very eyes. To me, the last 12 months (give or take a few) raise two central questions: If we don't learn from the flawed candidates of the past, how will we avoid taking them seriously in the future?
Staff added more text, removed byline from headline.

Comments:
Astonishingly perverse, even for Miz Carlson.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: LouD, 12/29/2012 7:15:13 AM     (No. 9088333)

We got rid of Newsweek, now it´s time to dump Newsday.


Reply 2 - Posted by: beca, 12/29/2012 7:24:23 AM     (No. 9088344)

margaret carlson....lol...go away.....i will read nothing you write


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: WhamDBambam, 12/29/2012 7:33:03 AM     (No. 9088350)

While I certainly appreciate staff´s help, your editing took away the teaser that might actually get people to read the article. Her thesis:

He can "redeem" himself by leading the gun control effort on behalf of the grabbers!


Reply 4 - Posted by: reilly, 12/29/2012 7:39:09 AM     (No. 9088352)


Maybe Margaret could become a GOP consultant. What a joke.


Reply 5 - Posted by: avital2, 12/29/2012 7:41:10 AM     (No. 9088355)

there´s nothing to redeem. Romney took two years out of his life and his family´s life to fight for the future of this country. he did his best: it was not his time. i suspect he will quietly keep doing virtuously things - not beating his chest like the current WH occupant. Carlson goes for the "show" - some of us prefer substance and good policy. we lost. now get off Romney´s back, lady.


Reply 6 - Posted by: DCGIRL, 12/29/2012 7:41:11 AM     (No. 9088356)

No thanks. Next.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Crosscut, 12/29/2012 7:48:52 AM     (No. 9088367)

Romney really is the president. The citizens whose votes really count and are paying for this circus elected him. Not Obama. Obama only got more votes because of rabble that didn´t belong anywhere near a voting booth.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Judith, 12/29/2012 7:50:23 AM     (No. 9088372)

I´n sure Gov. Romney will do what he has done most of his life....be a successful businessman and take care of his family.
But, like the rest of us, he will go to his grave bewildered by an election, a people, who chose something so foreign to what the USA has historically believed, that it is incomprehensible.


Reply 9 - Posted by: cobieone, 12/29/2012 8:08:03 AM     (No. 9088397)

"Redeem himself"?? Margaret, kiss my rear end. Romney ran a solid campaign and is one of the most decent, qualified men to ever run for POTUS. He doesn´t need to redeem himself. I like how she, like so many, continues to take out of context the 47 percent comment. Margaret, like this article, is seriously unhinged.


Reply 10 - Posted by: HerbVA, 12/29/2012 8:09:33 AM     (No. 9088400)

I did not realize the old bat was still around.


Reply 11 - Posted by: lakerman1, 12/29/2012 8:20:28 AM     (No. 9088412)

Our country has survived all these years because low information voters, for the most part, didn´t vote.
The kenyan klown´s handlers were able to use various communications methods to convince those low information voters to vote. Motor voter laws, early voting, same day registration/voting all were used as carefully as Hitler used his techniques to gain power.
We now have a dunce as president, who will do great harm to our country, and who just does not understand what it means to be an American.
Mitt Romney is a good and decent man, who tried his best to overcome his own party, the media, and the democrats, suffering more silly attacks than any presidential candidate ever suffered, in my opinion.
If the democrats capture the House and retain control of the Senate in 2014, we are sunk.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Rusino, 12/29/2012 8:25:52 AM     (No. 9088415)

Neglected to read the ByLine before I read the article. It is early I will try and make up the wasted moments later today!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 12/29/2012 8:29:05 AM     (No. 9088418)

I always though carlson was a dip and when her fav candidate was cain, it was confirmed. The libs still do not realize the harm that flapears is doing to us. They always elect the worst candidates and none of them had good reputations or for that matter a brain.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Straitpath, 12/29/2012 8:42:35 AM     (No. 9088429)

I read the headline only. Will not read the article. Governor Romney has no need of redemption


Reply 15 - Posted by: WAN2, 12/29/2012 8:49:04 AM     (No. 9088438)

Is posting Carlson proof of being fair and balanced?


Reply 16 - Posted by: sinic, 12/29/2012 8:58:31 AM     (No. 9088448)

IMO, Romney doesn´t need to "redeem" himself in any way. The man would have made an excellent President...and I do believe he would have used the position to turn the clock back to when the country was based on morals, hard work, responsibility, and patriotism. Layabouts? Let them eat Spam.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Coy860, 12/29/2012 8:59:50 AM     (No. 9088450)

Revolting article.
Romney will enjoy his lovely family, and the returns of his hard work in the private sector. He couldn´t fix stupid.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 12/29/2012 9:07:55 AM     (No. 9088471)

We don´t always see what is before our very eyes. That is the money quote here folks. And what the media uses to excuse their rotten agenda.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Pearson365, 12/29/2012 9:10:12 AM     (No. 9088472)

Carlson is a waste of newsprint and, when on Bloomberg TV, a waste of airtime. Unlike most hardline leftists, she is not strident and dismissive in voicing dogma. Instead, she uses a whiny, mousy voice and syrupy sincerity to express her strong Democratic viewpoint. She is surely the Dem who invented the phrase, It´s for the children, to make the conservative next to her feel guilty.


Reply 20 - Posted by: bpl40, 12/29/2012 9:10:43 AM     (No. 9088474)

A far more relevant question would be - how this Carlson harridan can redeem herself after a life time of spewing perverse left wing poison and propaganda.


Reply 21 - Posted by: frankdn, 12/29/2012 9:13:07 AM     (No. 9088476)

Just remember the wisest thing Obama ever said: "Vote! Voting is the best revenge!"

I know, I know... at the time you asked, "Revenge against whom?"

Now you know.


Reply 22 - Posted by: MHR, 12/29/2012 9:19:54 AM     (No. 9088484)

Who in their right mind would give two hoots about her opinion of Mr Romney? Her ego rivals Obama´s....


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: enemyofthestate, 12/29/2012 9:28:26 AM     (No. 9088493)

Carlson, go away! I dislike you more than I dislike Noonan. I see your byline and I read no further.


Reply 24 - Posted by: msjena, 12/29/2012 9:33:16 AM     (No. 9088500)

I´m not interested in Ms. Carlson´s opinion, either. And Mitt Romney doesn´t need to redeem himself, either. It is always difficult to unseat an incumbent President. Many who voted for Obama really just voted for the status quo--and not because they liked him or because they wanted him to raise taxes or foist universal health care on us. Do I think they are brain-dead? Yes. But that is one of the costs of democracy.


Reply 25 - Posted by: stablemoney, 12/29/2012 9:49:12 AM     (No. 9088517)

I don´t buy the theme that GOP losses were due to flawed candidates. McCain or Romney would have been hundreds of percent better than Obama. The real flaw is that the GOP has stood down and let the liberals turn this country into an electorate of takers who depend on democrats for their subsidies.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 12/29/2012 10:01:52 AM     (No. 9088538)

In a nutshell, this writer explains the Media with a capital M: Newt Gingrich ... could never win the Republican nomination for president, although I wrote about him as if he could.

May I inquire as how this attitude helps friend OR foe? Mitt didn´t need Ms Carlson´s ilk to get where he is and he will not need them to go anywhere else. So with or without paragraph helps, the bottom line is this: the MEDIA is what´s wrong with the political election process.


Reply 27 - Posted by: hicokid, 12/29/2012 10:12:06 AM     (No. 9088547)

Ridiculous democrat drivel from start to finish. Romney redeems himself by becoming an obama tool, and he can start by bashing the NRA.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Udanja99, 12/29/2012 10:18:06 AM     (No. 9088554)

Mags, do you own a mirror? If so, go take a look in it and work on redeeming the person you see there. It´s almost too late. Get to work.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Republic Can, 12/29/2012 10:18:58 AM     (No. 9088555)

All this hyper intro-spection and D-I-Y proctology concerning ´why we lost´ is moot. Not ony moot but self-balkanizing. We are doing the dems work for them!

Without poised and executed fraud 0 would not be our president today. Romney, and America, were robbed. Lets concentrate on that for 2014.


Reply 30 - Posted by: mary Ellen, 12/29/2012 10:19:12 AM     (No. 9088556)

Why does she think Romney has to redeem himself? After this is all over she will see that it is the dems and the fraud in the White House who will have to beg for forgiveness for being the traitors they are. I hope they all rot in Hell.


Reply 31 - Posted by: bighambone, 12/29/2012 10:19:16 AM     (No. 9088557)

If Romney were to do any of the things that the liberal media says he should do he would just be showing the country that he is really stupid.

For the last year that liberal media supported Obama 100% as the Obama crew fraudulently trashed Romney personally, practically destroying his personal and business reputations with over half the country. Romney from now on should stay home and take care of his family, in the end he will be a lot better off.


Reply 32 - Posted by: mamafrog, 12/29/2012 10:28:16 AM     (No. 9088569)

The analysis of the campaigns was quite accurate, it may be hard to admit but it was. The idea that Mitt might lead a campaign against the NRA is laughable. I expect Romney to go back to his private life and live well. Complaining that citizens you do not like are allowed to vote is very anti-democratic. We have a democracy, women can vote, ethnic minorities can vote, and even the unemployed can vote. Elections are won by appealing to a majority of the voters not by insisting that only people who agree with you should be able to vote.


Reply 33 - Posted by: PoliticalJunky, 12/29/2012 10:42:30 AM     (No. 9088585)

Reply 34, "citizens we don´t like" have a right to vote but I do not think it is too much to ask that voters of any ilk educate themselves nor do I think we should be faulted for wishing that they would do so.


Reply 34 - Posted by: hot coffee, 12/29/2012 10:43:40 AM     (No. 9088588)

I stopped reading this article when I got to "by Margaret Carlson".


Reply 35 - Posted by: nigella, 12/29/2012 11:08:57 AM     (No. 9088614)

#11 said it all for me...


Reply 36 - Posted by: mainecoonmama, 12/29/2012 11:15:22 AM     (No. 9088622)

If I were Romney, I´d shoot this country a big collective "bird" and get on with my life.


Reply 37 - Posted by: StormCnter, 12/29/2012 11:29:54 AM     (No. 9088649)

Margaret Carlson was always a twit, but she lost any remaining shred of dignity and respect when she stalked Fred Thompson and his new girlfriend. Her hysteria was junior highish.


Reply 38 - Posted by: snapper451, 12/29/2012 11:33:19 AM     (No. 9088655)

This is a case where someone who is mentally ill should be reported. This woman is completely delusional.


Reply 39 - Posted by: PageTurner, 12/29/2012 11:45:22 AM     (No. 9088675)

Romney doesn´t need to ´redeem´ himself, Mags. We´re all done with Romney. Next time, we will vote for a radical free-market extremist, the kind who give liberals like yourself hives.


Reply 40 - Posted by: killerbee, 12/29/2012 11:48:46 AM     (No. 9088684)

The only reason I clicked on the article (don´t want to give this cow any more numbers) was to see if there were any comments that took her to task. There were no comments at all. About sums up her readership.


Reply 41 - Posted by: mikeman, 12/29/2012 11:51:42 AM     (No. 9088692)

carlson is the stereotypical libtard wimp.

Its disrespectful to Lucianne readers to even reprint her brand of garbage.

I don´t care what barbara walters, sharpton, or madonna have to say either, so why promote carlson´s sheet sandwich?


Reply 42 - Posted by: proudsaber, 12/29/2012 1:13:38 PM     (No. 9088807)

They crucified Jesus Christ. Did they give him a chance to redeem himself?

If you look at what Mitt did during his lifetime, He lived mere like Christ then Obama did.

I am no Mormon but I can read up on him and not the crap that was fed to us by the mainstream media.


Reply 43 - Posted by: Kurto, 12/29/2012 1:22:03 PM     (No. 9088822)

Flawed Candidate? Take a look in the White House. That dope is a mosaic of flaws! All of his policies are patchworks of flaws. The entire administration is staffed with flawed idiots.

They who need to redeem themselves are the flawed voters who gave us four more years of suffering.

Romney was rejected by the takers, he owes them NOTHING!


Reply 44 - Posted by: antidem, 12/29/2012 1:35:55 PM     (No. 9088850)

The only mistakes the GOP makes are when they take advice from, or try to please, leftists.


Reply 45 - Posted by: LC Chihuahua, 12/29/2012 1:59:08 PM     (No. 9088874)

Romney has his problems, but the Republican party let him down. They did not get out the vote. They never figured out how to handle the liberal media character assassination and policy attacks.

In a bad economy, the Republicans could not even pick up seats in the senate?

Did the Republican party really want to win? Are there some moderate Republicans that would rather have a liberal Democrat instead of a conservative Republican? The left like to infiltrate everything. I can imagine leftists in the Republican party disrupting it. I see some Republicans that do nothing but critizise Republicans. A little more unity perhaps?

Are moderate and conservative Republicans even compatible? Hilite either group and the other leaves.

Was Romney a conservative or a moderate? I have heard him called both. He tried to be both. Is that even possible? Did that make it hard for him to define his message? It made him easy to attack.


Reply 46 - Posted by: Sunhan65, 12/29/2012 2:31:42 PM     (No. 9088892)

Some comparisons are instructive. In 2008, McCain won the primary but left his main rival undamaged to run again. In 2012, Mitt won the nomination by destroying his Republican rivals. Romney scorched the earth in order to clear the field, leaving him with national favorable/unfavorable polling numbers that doomed his campaign before Obama´s even began. It was ugly, stupid, and unnecessary. Those of us who saw this coming and warned against it were routinely derided by Romney supporters. Next time, we need to remember that how our candidates run is almost as important as who they are, and we need to hold them to Reagan´s Eleventh Commandment throughout our primary process. Leave the lies, attack ads, and opposition research drops to the Democrats.


Reply 47 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 12/29/2012 8:28:43 PM     (No. 9089257)

Unfortunately- the best thing Romney had going for him was that he was not Øbama- a bit overly cautious, ill prepared to serve up all the Øbama failings- and define himself rather than letting the radical leftists define him. Was he really that dim? Well, hopefully we will do better next time.


Reply 48 - Posted by: Philipsonh, 12/29/2012 9:28:20 PM     (No. 9089317)

I only read the headline, but what does Mr Romney have to redeem himself from. He is wealthy, moral, ethical,patriotic, and charitable. You would have to look far and wide to find a better American or a better human being. He is personally far better off NOT being president, only the USA is far worse off. The Country got left to fall off a cliff with a bunch of cretins running the show. Even all the folks that live on one type of Government benefit or another will end up worse off. The supply of money is not
endless, though that is what the Administration would have you believe.



Post Reply   Close thread 717046




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "WhamDBambam"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "WhamDBambam"



Fewer Americans Now View
Their Income Taxes as Fair
Gallup Politics, by Jeffrey M. Jones    Original Article
Posted By: Whamdbambam- 4/15/2013 4:04:54 PM     Post Reply
This Tax Day, 55% of Americans regard the income taxes they have to pay as fair, the lowest percentage Gallup has measured since 2001. The results are based on Gallup´s Economy and Personal Finance poll, conducted April 4-7, and annually since 2001. The recent high in Americans´ perceptions that their taxes were fair, 64%, came in 2003, after President Bush signed tax cuts into law and weeks after the Iraq war began.
Please split headlines longer than 6 words.

Fiscal Cliff Deal: $1 In Spending Cuts
For Every $41 In Tax Increases
Breitbart, by Matthew Boyle    Original Article
Posted By: WhamDBambam- 1/1/2013 10:40:42 AM     Post Reply
According to the Congressional Budget Office, the last-minute fiscal cliff deal reached by congressional leaders and President Barack Obama cuts only $15 billion in spending while increasing tax revenues by $620 billion—a 41:1 ratio of tax increases to spending cuts. When Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush increased taxes in return for spending cuts—cuts that never ultimately came—they did so at ratios of 3:1 and 2:1.
Headline corrected by staff to remove All Caps. Do not post in All Caps
even if article has them

How Mitt Romney can
redeem himself in 2013
Newsday, by MARGARET CARLSON    Original Article
Posted By: WhamDBambam- 12/29/2012 7:10:21 AM     Post Reply
As I look back at the 2012 presidential campaign, it now all seems so obvious.Not one of those clowns performing at the hundreds of Republican primary debates this year and last was a match for the eventual nominee, Mitt Romney. And Romney clearly wasn't the candidate to defeat President Barack Obama.Yes and yes - but still. We don't always see what's happening before our very eyes. To me, the last 12 months (give or take a few) raise two central questions: If we don't learn from the flawed candidates of the past, how will we avoid taking them seriously in the future?
Staff added more text, removed byline from headline.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement


Post Reply   Close thread 717046





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~