A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Pentagon, defense industry
brace for looming spending cuts
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Pentagon, defense industry
brace for looming spending cuts

Fox News, by Molly Henneberg

Original Article

Posted By:JoniTx, 12/29/2012 1:32:53 AM

With Washington so far unable to avert the looming fiscal crisis, much of the attention has been on the more than $500 billion in tax hikes set to take effect Jan. 1. But failure to strike a deal also means the first wave of roughly $1.2 trillion in spending cuts will hit starting next month. Of that, about $492 billion will be carved out of the Pentagon over the next decade -- that´s about $55 billion a year starting in 2013. It was a scenario so dire that for months Defense Secretary Leon Panetta had claimed his department

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: steveW, 12/29/2012 2:06:01 AM     (No. 9088223)

America´s defense, and the defense of free nations around the globe, is indeed being weakened, and being weakened on purpose. But cutting military spending is not the primary reason. The reason is the false, seditious "presidency" of Barack Hussein Obama. The imposition of this rabid anti-American as commander in chief is more damaging to national security than any military spending cut ever proposed by the Left. Shielded by the "I got bin Laden" ruse, Barack Peace Prize can now go about making sure the USA never again is able, nor willing, to win a war. That is the Left´s greatest dream, and they are going to make it come true no matter how many people die.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Country Boy, 12/29/2012 2:45:10 AM     (No. 9088234)

Cost of high tech has been collapsing across the board for decades. Just can´t believe the DOD can´t manage to operate with a little less money.

Cut ´em. Take our chances.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: TXknitter, 12/29/2012 3:28:42 AM     (No. 9088246)

Way, way, way too many bureaucrats. Many cuts should be made there but won´t be!


Reply 4 - Posted by: Japanorama, 12/29/2012 3:46:14 AM     (No. 9088249)

Don´t worry.
The Chinese will increase theirs.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Trigger2, 12/29/2012 5:02:41 AM     (No. 9088272)

Apparently Barry doesn´t care. He just gave every federal employee including the judicial & congress a pay raise. See, he´s spent the savings already.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Judith, 12/29/2012 7:44:38 AM     (No. 9088360)

The "low-information" voters will wonder why there will be so many layoffs.
They will also wonder why everything they eat or use will double in price.
And they will NOT be able to figure out why.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Janjan, 12/29/2012 10:06:00 AM     (No. 9088544)

I have some low information friends who are just now hearing about this. They are alarmed. Lol


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 12/29/2012 10:33:37 AM     (No. 9088573)

"Low-information" is too polite a term for the idiots who voted for Obama and the democrats. Plus it´s too hard to enter on a tablet. Let´s just call them "dummy" voters--although some of them were actually "phantom" voters, whose existence is in doubt. In any case, Obama´s reelection is the reason for the fiscal cliff. And those who think defense cuts will affect bureaucrats are whistling past the graveyard. There are lots of hard-working, tax-paying Americans and their families who will suffer because of defense cuts.


Reply 9 - Posted by: mrduc, 12/29/2012 11:10:47 AM     (No. 9088615)

What #5 said. They can attack the West Coast for starters and there´ll be nothing to stop them.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Grambo, 12/29/2012 11:28:06 AM     (No. 9088643)

The space program is an example of what happens when you defund a high tech industry. The technical talent disburses to other industries, never to return to the one that burned them. Cutting the defense industry funding will cripple it for a generation.

It’s time to oblige the low-information voters. Give them their blue States, give us our red States (those colors are backwards) and let us go forward as a Federation of red and blue States, if not divorced, then at least separated.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Quaestio, 12/29/2012 11:35:22 AM     (No. 9088661)

I think the biggest problem is that the cuts have to be distributed in a nonsense way. And you can bet that all the affirmative action civil servant hires who infest the Pentagon will be safe.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Conservativegirl, 12/29/2012 1:00:10 PM     (No. 9088786)

Allow me to assure you, there will be NO federal employee cuts. I´m a retired military officer who was recently let go after 10 years providing contract support to the USAF. The government employees on staff were incapable or undermanned to provide this support themselves, so we stepped in. This will be the solution to DOD´s problem, as it always has been. Fire all the contractors, and maybe that´s not such a bad thing. Unless of course, you are one of those contractors! Something needs to be done, and this is just an element thereof.


Girl´s Hubby


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Muguy, 12/29/2012 1:07:32 PM     (No. 9088800)

Thank Speaker Boener and his dupes for being lured into a "committee" to discuss these spending cuts while believing true cuts were going to be made.

Also, blame people like Rep. Jeb Hensarling who would be a person who would make cuts, if any were to be made, who was made out to be a fool, by taking the Speaker´s bait.

Ultimately, blame Zippy, who never had any intention of making any cuts, and is going to use the "so-called savings" of not spending the money on the military, as a way to further help "pay for" (read:subsidize) the extra spending he wants to subject us to when we do not have the money to pay for it.

Lesson learned--don´t make deals with the devil--he never bargains in good faith and all you do is get screwed over!! Where´s my damn Obamaphone?


Reply 14 - Posted by: namvet66, 12/29/2012 3:00:42 PM     (No. 9088928)

The thing that the Dims haven’t figured out, even studying history, is that we can’t deal with the rest of the world from a position of weakness. Carter, Clinton and now Obama trying to tread in the same hole of quicksand. Proving once again history will repeat itself.


Reply 15 - Posted by: dman, 12/29/2012 3:21:22 PM     (No. 9088964)

It will be painful, but the military knows how to handle adversity - even this kind. They will get through it. Right now the internal fiscal threat is more fatal to the Republic. Runaway spending on the domestic and entitlement programs must be stopped, and the "cliff" seems to be the only way to start the process. What good is it to have a Cadillac military and a bankrupt economy? I´m all for "peace through strength" and a non-hollow military, but in this case perfect is the enemy of good. Remember that Reagan collapsed the Soviet Union by breaking its economy. The ex-Communists, still-Marxists, environmentalists, Islamo-fans, and other Alinsky disciples are trying to return the favor. It´s the economy, stupid.

Country first. Look at the overall picture. There are no more easy solutions.


Reply 16 - Posted by: philemon1967, 12/29/2012 6:39:06 PM     (No. 9089155)

I think the term low information voters give these people more credit than they deserve. Why don´t we call them what they are: selfish traitors. They choose to not know - they are willingly ignorant - of the dangers of a feckless demagogue like Barack Obama for the wages of mere trinkets like the Obamaphone. Yes, I am calling the Obamaphone lady a traitor who sold her country out for a bribe. When she and her type (and I don´t care any more if I´m called a racist) are done with pillaging the wealthy of the US, good luck on trying to tax other nations to support her lazy posterior.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Catherine, 12/29/2012 7:17:18 PM     (No. 9089196)

When a government ´cuts´ spending, it´s not the bureaucrats who get cut. It´s at the bottom end, those who provide services. Then people start screaming about how long it´s taken for them to get their free stuff. Been there.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: ArtieC, 12/29/2012 7:26:08 PM     (No. 9089202)

Democrats have been waiting for this for 30 years. Ever since Reagan rebuilt the military that Jimmy Carter shattered. They´re thanking whatever god democrats pray to.



Post Reply   Close thread 717024




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"



On Leno: Kids Ask Obama
the Darndest Questions
Newsbusters, by Geoffrey Dickens    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/21/2013 10:36:55 PM     Post Reply
Ever since he announced he was stepping down as Tonight Show host Jay Leno has seemingly been harder on Barack Obama. Well on Monday´s Tonight Show with Jay Leno that trend continued as Leno featured a clip of schoolchildren peppering the President with the tough questions that the press should be hammering him with on a daily basis. Watch and laugh. (Video after the jump)-JAY LENO: Actually President Obama made a surprise visit to a school in Baltimore on Friday. And these kids, you know these little kids are so much more sophisticated nowadays.

Your Move, Media: The Obama
Administration Dares The
Press To Respond To
Intimidation Tactics
Mediaite, by Noah Rothman    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/21/2013 10:30:01 PM     Post Reply
These are historic and troubling times. The unprecedented and brazen efforts by high-ranking elements within the Obama administration to silence whistleblowers and intimidate any reporters that would speak with them have starkly framed the choice the political press now faces. The administration has thrown the gauntlet down before the media with their display of abject disregard for the watchdog Fourth Estate. To the White House’s chagrin, the media will respond. In a two-fold assault on the freedom of the press, President Barack Obama’s Department of Justice has been implicated in efforts designed to intimidate both the press and

Journalism advocates call
leak investigations chilling
USA Today, by Aamer Madhani & Kevin Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/21/2013 9:54:02 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department says it hasn´t prosecuted journalists for obtaining or publishing classified information and has no plans to. But open government and journalism advocates say the aggressive investigations of classified leaks by government officials under the Obama administration´s watch are having a chilling effect on news organizations´ ability to play a watchdog role. The renewed criticism of the Obama administration comes after new revelations that federal authorities secretly obtained the e-mails and tracked the movements of Fox News reporter James Rosen

   

 



 
‘Yes we can’ chant breaks
out as Senate panel passes
immigration bill
Daily Caller [Washington DC], by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/21/2013 9:46:10 PM     Post Reply
The Senate Judiciary Committee’s passage of a sweeping immigration bill was expected. But the explosion of chants of “Yes we can! Yes we can!” and “Leahy! Leahy!” came as a surprise. The “Gang of Eight” bill passed by a wide 13-5 margin early Tuesday evening. Amid the cheering, Democratic committee chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont could be seen motioning spectators to come up and participate in the celebration. The “Yes we can” chant was made popular by then-Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama in his 2008 presidential run.

White House IRS timeline shifts again
Politico, by Jennifer Epstein & Reid J. Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/21/2013 5:56:09 PM     Post Reply
The White House’s explanation of what it knew about the investigation into the IRS’s scrutiny of conservative political groups and how it planned for the eventual release of that information shifted once again Tuesday. Just a day after telling reporters that chief of staff Denis McDonough and other senior White House staff learned of the situation nearly a month ago, press secretary Jay Carney revealed Tuesday that White House officials had consulted with the Treasury Department on how to make the findings public.(Snip) Carney said he hadn’t revealed more information about which officials

IRS ‘Blemish’ Prompts Scorn
From Unappeased Senators
ABC News, by Jeff Zeleny    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/21/2013 5:40:04 PM     Post Reply
Douglas Shulman, the former commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, said today he was “dismayed and saddened” that his agency had improperly targeting conservative groups, but declined to offer a direct apology and dismissed suggestions that he mislead Congress. The testimony from Shulman, who was making his first public appearance since the IRS controversy broke into the open two weeks ago, did not satisfy members of the Senate Finance Committee. He faced more than three hours of stern questioning from Democrats and Republicans, but said “I don’t believe I was aware” when asked

Justice Department IG
issues report accusing
officials of smearing Fast
and Furious whistleblower
American Thinker, by Rick Moran    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/21/2013 5:16:50 PM     Post Reply
For a "failed scandal," Fast and Furious sure brought out the heavy hitters at the Department of Justice to deal with a whistleblower. The department´s inspector general has released a report accusing one US attorney, Dennis Burke, of leaking a document that smeared John Dodson, a key witness in the Fast and Furious scandal, and accusing other officials in the department of coming up with a strategy to discredit him. Breitbart: The DOJ IG said it found "Burke´s conduct in disclosing the Dodson memorandum to be inappropriate for a Department employee and wholly unbefitting a U.S. Attorney."



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

47 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care

   

Post Reply   Close thread 717024





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~