A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Pentagon, defense industry
brace for looming spending cuts
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Pentagon, defense industry
brace for looming spending cuts

Fox News, by Molly Henneberg

Original Article

Posted By:JoniTx, 12/29/2012 1:32:53 AM

With Washington so far unable to avert the looming fiscal crisis, much of the attention has been on the more than $500 billion in tax hikes set to take effect Jan. 1. But failure to strike a deal also means the first wave of roughly $1.2 trillion in spending cuts will hit starting next month. Of that, about $492 billion will be carved out of the Pentagon over the next decade -- that´s about $55 billion a year starting in 2013. It was a scenario so dire that for months Defense Secretary Leon Panetta had claimed his department

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: steveW, 12/29/2012 2:06:01 AM     (No. 9088223)

America´s defense, and the defense of free nations around the globe, is indeed being weakened, and being weakened on purpose. But cutting military spending is not the primary reason. The reason is the false, seditious "presidency" of Barack Hussein Obama. The imposition of this rabid anti-American as commander in chief is more damaging to national security than any military spending cut ever proposed by the Left. Shielded by the "I got bin Laden" ruse, Barack Peace Prize can now go about making sure the USA never again is able, nor willing, to win a war. That is the Left´s greatest dream, and they are going to make it come true no matter how many people die.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Country Boy, 12/29/2012 2:45:10 AM     (No. 9088234)

Cost of high tech has been collapsing across the board for decades. Just can´t believe the DOD can´t manage to operate with a little less money.

Cut ´em. Take our chances.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: TXknitter, 12/29/2012 3:28:42 AM     (No. 9088246)

Way, way, way too many bureaucrats. Many cuts should be made there but won´t be!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Japanorama, 12/29/2012 3:46:14 AM     (No. 9088249)

Don´t worry.
The Chinese will increase theirs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Trigger2, 12/29/2012 5:02:41 AM     (No. 9088272)

Apparently Barry doesn´t care. He just gave every federal employee including the judicial & congress a pay raise. See, he´s spent the savings already.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Judith, 12/29/2012 7:44:38 AM     (No. 9088360)

The "low-information" voters will wonder why there will be so many layoffs.
They will also wonder why everything they eat or use will double in price.
And they will NOT be able to figure out why.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Janjan, 12/29/2012 10:06:00 AM     (No. 9088544)

I have some low information friends who are just now hearing about this. They are alarmed. Lol

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: lostinmassachusetts, 12/29/2012 10:33:37 AM     (No. 9088573)

"Low-information" is too polite a term for the idiots who voted for Obama and the democrats. Plus it´s too hard to enter on a tablet. Let´s just call them "dummy" voters--although some of them were actually "phantom" voters, whose existence is in doubt. In any case, Obama´s reelection is the reason for the fiscal cliff. And those who think defense cuts will affect bureaucrats are whistling past the graveyard. There are lots of hard-working, tax-paying Americans and their families who will suffer because of defense cuts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: mrduc, 12/29/2012 11:10:47 AM     (No. 9088615)

What #5 said. They can attack the West Coast for starters and there´ll be nothing to stop them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Grambo, 12/29/2012 11:28:06 AM     (No. 9088643)

The space program is an example of what happens when you defund a high tech industry. The technical talent disburses to other industries, never to return to the one that burned them. Cutting the defense industry funding will cripple it for a generation.

It’s time to oblige the low-information voters. Give them their blue States, give us our red States (those colors are backwards) and let us go forward as a Federation of red and blue States, if not divorced, then at least separated.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Quaestio, 12/29/2012 11:35:22 AM     (No. 9088661)

I think the biggest problem is that the cuts have to be distributed in a nonsense way. And you can bet that all the affirmative action civil servant hires who infest the Pentagon will be safe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Conservativegirl, 12/29/2012 1:00:10 PM     (No. 9088786)

Allow me to assure you, there will be NO federal employee cuts. I´m a retired military officer who was recently let go after 10 years providing contract support to the USAF. The government employees on staff were incapable or undermanned to provide this support themselves, so we stepped in. This will be the solution to DOD´s problem, as it always has been. Fire all the contractors, and maybe that´s not such a bad thing. Unless of course, you are one of those contractors! Something needs to be done, and this is just an element thereof.


Girl´s Hubby

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Muguy, 12/29/2012 1:07:32 PM     (No. 9088800)

Thank Speaker Boener and his dupes for being lured into a "committee" to discuss these spending cuts while believing true cuts were going to be made.

Also, blame people like Rep. Jeb Hensarling who would be a person who would make cuts, if any were to be made, who was made out to be a fool, by taking the Speaker´s bait.

Ultimately, blame Zippy, who never had any intention of making any cuts, and is going to use the "so-called savings" of not spending the money on the military, as a way to further help "pay for" (read:subsidize) the extra spending he wants to subject us to when we do not have the money to pay for it.

Lesson learned--don´t make deals with the devil--he never bargains in good faith and all you do is get screwed over!! Where´s my damn Obamaphone?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: namvet66, 12/29/2012 3:00:42 PM     (No. 9088928)

The thing that the Dims haven’t figured out, even studying history, is that we can’t deal with the rest of the world from a position of weakness. Carter, Clinton and now Obama trying to tread in the same hole of quicksand. Proving once again history will repeat itself.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: dman, 12/29/2012 3:21:22 PM     (No. 9088964)

It will be painful, but the military knows how to handle adversity - even this kind. They will get through it. Right now the internal fiscal threat is more fatal to the Republic. Runaway spending on the domestic and entitlement programs must be stopped, and the "cliff" seems to be the only way to start the process. What good is it to have a Cadillac military and a bankrupt economy? I´m all for "peace through strength" and a non-hollow military, but in this case perfect is the enemy of good. Remember that Reagan collapsed the Soviet Union by breaking its economy. The ex-Communists, still-Marxists, environmentalists, Islamo-fans, and other Alinsky disciples are trying to return the favor. It´s the economy, stupid.

Country first. Look at the overall picture. There are no more easy solutions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: philemon1967, 12/29/2012 6:39:06 PM     (No. 9089155)

I think the term low information voters give these people more credit than they deserve. Why don´t we call them what they are: selfish traitors. They choose to not know - they are willingly ignorant - of the dangers of a feckless demagogue like Barack Obama for the wages of mere trinkets like the Obamaphone. Yes, I am calling the Obamaphone lady a traitor who sold her country out for a bribe. When she and her type (and I don´t care any more if I´m called a racist) are done with pillaging the wealthy of the US, good luck on trying to tax other nations to support her lazy posterior.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Catherine, 12/29/2012 7:17:18 PM     (No. 9089196)

When a government ´cuts´ spending, it´s not the bureaucrats who get cut. It´s at the bottom end, those who provide services. Then people start screaming about how long it´s taken for them to get their free stuff. Been there.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: ArtieC, 12/29/2012 7:26:08 PM     (No. 9089202)

Democrats have been waiting for this for 30 years. Ever since Reagan rebuilt the military that Jimmy Carter shattered. They´re thanking whatever god democrats pray to.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 717024




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "JoniTx"



Book: White House scrambled
after Joe Biden´s gay marriage comments
Politico, by Edward-Isaac Dovere    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 11:18:17 PM     Post Reply
Vice President Joe Biden really did get ahead of President Barack Obama on accepting gay marriage in 2012 — and the White House really wasn’t happy about it, despite the two leaders’ many attempts to claim otherwise. That’s the story laid out in Jo Becker’s new book, “Forcing the Spring,” which documents the past few years of successful efforts to expand the legalization of gay marriage, according to an advance copy obtained by POLITICO. Speculation that Biden’s comments on “Meet the Press” in May 2012 were meant as a trial balloon, Becker writes, came from people “not privy to the

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Obama: Russia doesn´t
want war with US
The Hill (Washington DC), by Peter Sullivan    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:23:41 PM     Post Reply
President Obama said Wednesday that Russia realizes the U.S. military is “significantly superior” to its own and does not want war with the United States. Asked in an interview with CBS News about a Russian fighter buzzing a U.S. Navy ship in the Black Sea on Saturday, Obama said, “They’re not interested in any kind of military confrontation with us, understanding that our conventional forces are significantly superior to the Russians.” Obama accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of being behind uprisings in Ukraine in which government buildings have been taken over. Ukraine’s government has launched an operation against the separatists

   

 



 
With Eyes on 2016, Perry
Is Mired in the Past
New York Times, by Manny Fernandez    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:18:05 PM     Post Reply
AUSTIN, Tex. — The last nine months of Rick Perry’s tenure as the longest-serving governor of Texas were supposed to be a political victory lap. Greg Abbott, the Republican state attorney general, and Wendy Davis, the Democratic state senator, both of whom are vying to replace Mr. Perry, have been sparring across Texas. Meanwhile Mr. Perry has been traveling the country and the world promoting the robust Texas economy and bolstering his national profile as he considers another run for president in 2016. Mr. Perry, who began serving as governor in December 2000 and who leaves office in January 2015

9/11 Victim Families: Obama
Administration Sabotaging Trials
Washington Free Beacon [DC], by Adam Kredo    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 9:47:54 PM     Post Reply
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE—Victims of the 9/11 terror attacks expressed shock that the FBI may be meddling in the hearings here, and some speculated that it is part of an effort by the Obama administration to completely derail the hearings and force them into federal court stateside. Families of those killed in the 9/11 terror attacks traveled here with the intent of watching their family members’ accused killers face justice. However, many say they were horrified earlier this week when pre-trial hearings came to a halt over revelations that the FBI had launched an investigation into the accused terrorist’s defense

Today’s IRS Documents:
What Do They Show?
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 9:42:00 PM     Post Reply
Earlier today, Judicial Watch made public a batch of documents that it received from the IRS in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. The documents consists of a series of emails relating to the IRS’s treatment of applications for 501(c)(4) status from “Tea Party” or otherwise conservative organizations. I am still working my way through the emails, but have a few preliminary observations. First, the most significant ones I have seen so far have already been widely discussed. The email below documents a call from the Department of Justice about whether non-profits that “lied” about doing political activity

MSNBC Panel Hits ´Offensive´
Republican ´Extremism,´ GOP
´Going to Cease to Exist´
Newsbusters, by Brad Wilmouth    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 9:31:16 PM     Post Reply
On the Wednesday, April 16, PoliticsNation on MSNBC, far left host Al Sharpton berated what he viewed as "extreme" and "intolerant radical views" of Republican candidates for U.S. Senate in Mississippi and North Carolina as he highlighted comments that he considered "offensive." Guest Jonathan Capehart of the Washington Post went so far as to hyperbolically suggest that the GOP is "going to cease to exist" unless Republican Party leaders who are "aghast at the far-right extremists" do not react against these candidates. Below is a transcript of the relevant portion of the Wednesday, April 16, PoliticsNation on MSNBC: AL SHARPTON:



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

47 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

43 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Biden Tells Boston Bombing
Survivors, ´It Was Worth It´ (Video)

41 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Instablog, by Debra Heine    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:28:18 PM     Post Reply
Less than a minute into his speech at the Boston marathon bombing memorial on Tuesday, Vice President Joe Biden went tragically off script and told the crowd of Boston bombing survivors that "it was worth it." After expressing how impressed he was with the tribute, he said somberly, "let me say to those ´quote survivors,´ my God, you have survived and you have soared. It was worth it. I mean this sincerely - just to hear each of you speak. You´re truly, truly inspiring." The audience sat in stunned silence until Biden declared, "I´ve never heard anything so beautiful than

Casual marijuana use linked with
brain abnormalities, study finds

40 replie(s)
Fox News, by Loren Grush    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 6:12:53 PM     Post Reply
Casual marijuana use may come with some not-so-casual side effects. For the first time ever, researchers at Northwestern University have analyzed the relationship between casual use of marijuana and brain changes – and found that young adults who used cannabis just once or twice a week showed significant abnormalities in two important brain structures. The study’s findings, to be published Wednesday in the Journal of Neuroscience, are similar to those of past research linking chronic, long-term marijuana use with mental illness and changes in brain development. Dr. Hans Breiter, co-senior study author, said he was inspired to look at the effects of casual

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

White babies just 15 months old show racial
bias when picking playmates, study found

34 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2014 10:23:35 PM     Post Reply
Toddlers show racial bias when picking playmates, a study reveals. They also take account of how fairly others behave. Researchers tested the reaction of white 15-month-olds as toys were distributed. Two white adults divided the toys, one equally and the other unequally. Seventy per cent of the toddlers chose to play with the researcher who distributed the toys fairly. But in a second test, when one researcher favoured a white recipient over an Asian one, they picked the ‘fair’ researcher less often, the journal Frontiers in Psychology reports. And the babies are more likely to help those who share the same ethnicity, which is known as

   

Post Reply   Close thread 717024





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~