A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Why not let taxes rise
on the middle class?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Why not let taxes rise
on the middle class?

Washington Post, by Marc A. Thiessen

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 12/28/2012 7:25:49 PM

Barring a last-minute breakthrough, taxes will go up for every American taxpayer on Jan. 1 — and that’s a development conservatives should welcome. Don’t get me wrong, it would be better not to raise taxes on anyone, pursue pro-growth tax reform and cut the size of government instead. But that’s not what the American people voted to do last month. Americans cast their ballots for big government. Now it’s time to pay for it. Until now, the growth of government under President Obama has not hit the pocketbooks of most Americans. During Obama’s first term, federal spending

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 12/28/2012 7:30:13 PM     (No. 9088005)

EXACTLY!!!

America should wolf down the Obama sandwich they voted for....DRY!


Reply 2 - Posted by: formerNYer, 12/28/2012 7:31:42 PM     (No. 9088006)

Just give the democraps EVERYTHING they want - make them own the economy hook, line and sinker or I should say stinker. In 2 years we will get back 4-6 seats in the Senate (if they can keep their mouths shut when it comes to abortion.)


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: nonsense, 12/28/2012 7:52:13 PM     (No. 9088016)

Good idea. My Liberal friend stands by Obama policies, even though I try to tell her that he has spent every single cent her beloved Grandchildren will ever earn. Maybe taking more of her money in 2013 will change her mind. Yet again, maybe not.


Reply 4 - Posted by: TXknitter, 12/28/2012 7:55:28 PM     (No. 9088020)

Amen Marc. I do not want any more bandaid fixes to avoid the pain. I don´t want any Obama voter spared from the financial consequences of their vote.


Reply 5 - Posted by: dman, 12/28/2012 8:00:28 PM     (No. 9088025)

WaPo actually printed this? Thiessen is spot on, of course. A substantial part of the electorate is ignoring or going along with NerØbama´s programs because the plan was to "tax that guy behind the tree". If everyone feels the pinch, and very few will like it, they will be forced to think about how much government they are willing to pay for. No more living off of their children´s futures.

While I´m not looking forward to the serious dent in my budget, it´s time to swallow some bitter medicine and get the nation´s fiscal house in order.

Stop the Kabuki theater. Over the cliff we go, tumbling towards the debt ceiling. Tough predicaments sometime require tough solutions.


Reply 6 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 12/28/2012 8:04:00 PM     (No. 9088029)

An increase in middle class tax rates, an `owning the economy`, will not shame the democrats. They are simply shameless and will never take responsibility for their actions. When they have exhausted every penny from a newly minted tax increase, they will be back for more tax increases. There is never enough to satisfy their appetite for economic destruction.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Lalo, 12/28/2012 8:18:22 PM     (No. 9088046)

Hey Marc. Let´s don´t and say we did. Or even better - why not go ahead and let taxes rise on the $250,000+ people and let the struggling among us off the hook for now?

But we won´t. I do admit it won´t look good for Obama & the Dims. But do you really think people will stop blaming the Republicans and Congress?? The newsbots are doing their bit for the regime as usual and are calling the Bush tax cuts the Bush "era" tax cuts. Never let it be remotely implied that Bush saved us from the type of royal fracking Obama is about to unloose upon us.

And it will hurt so many of us. But no - with all us purists on his back, Boehner won´t take the deal.. so here we go! Thanks, guys! (not)


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Davids918, 12/28/2012 8:29:32 PM     (No. 9088055)

What the Republicans need to do is stop protecting the Democrats and business-as-usual in Washington.

Stop allowing them to extend negotations, deadlines, and being nice (they´re expecting all of that and use it against you).

Democrats won´t be able to help themselves in January and will look to increase taxes on more than just the riches 2% - and republicans need to get out of their way by letting them -- blaming them all the way.

Pointedly remind every time you´re in TV or radio show that the president´s tax on the top 2% would hardly cover 1 week´s worth of the debt spending Obama wants.
And, remind "that even with the top 2% tax increase the Democrats will still be looking to borrow over $1 trillion each year".

Many think the debt and deficit are the same thing, and the rich paying more will balance the budget.

Expose the democrats.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Janjan, 12/28/2012 8:35:28 PM     (No. 9088057)

The Obamas spent way more than every penny I have ever paid into the federal tax system in my lifetime last weekend in Hawaii. And believe me I have paid a lot. I no longer care who they raise taxes on. I am in full agreement to let these ignorant pansy ass liberals who think they are so smart pay for what they have done - and if I have to pay along with them so be it. And that goes double for the Republicans who stayed home because Romney wasn´t conservative enough. Really?


Reply 10 - Posted by: Scribelus, 12/28/2012 8:43:22 PM     (No. 9088070)

H L Mencken: The theory of democracy is that the common people know what they want, and they deserve to get it Good And Hard!


Reply 11 - Posted by: janylou, 12/28/2012 8:43:37 PM     (No. 9088072)

#9, those republicans should be taxed double as a penalty for giving us four more years of Obomination.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 12/28/2012 9:02:18 PM     (No. 9088081)

This is a nonsense article. If 47 % of our citizens pay no income tax, they and another 10- 15% returned this Democratic administration to power fof the coming four years.

You can blame some of the little old ladies... the feeble minded... the closet Mormon haters.. the Ron Paul enthusiasts... and a few others for the outcome, but it wasn´t responsible, conscientious, hard working, innovative, entrepreneurial people who bought into this.

So having brought back the Solyndra and the union crowd, should we relax and let them feel good abour impoverishing our children and grandchildren? I think not.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: vesicant, 12/28/2012 9:40:33 PM     (No. 9088104)

I didn´t vote for scumbama. Why should my taxes be raised? Raise them on registered Democrats.


Reply 14 - Posted by: fiddle ed, 12/28/2012 10:25:37 PM     (No. 9088129)

Just give me one state, or county, or precinct where I can escape these Marxist monsters.


Reply 15 - Posted by: jalo1951, 12/28/2012 11:08:22 PM     (No. 9088143)

Then the 47% who pay no income taxes need to be added to that list of tax payers. I am not talking SS or Medicare I am talking income. Everyone chips in something.


Reply 16 - Posted by: trapper, 12/28/2012 11:42:58 PM     (No. 9088168)

Your spouse will not stop buying stuff until the Mastercard bill comes due and you have to give up one of the cars and cable TV to pay it. Drive it over the cliff.

America wanted this dunce who never took a business or accounting course, instead of an experienced turnaround guy. Well, you got it. Now choke on it.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Penney, 12/28/2012 11:50:46 PM     (No. 9088174)

´´Why not let taxes rise on the middle class,´´ ...or, ´´How America came to be OVER-TAXED and, ´love,´ it?!!´´ ...YIKES!!! This is NOT a positive plan for securing our Constitutional freedoms and passing them safely on to the next generations, eh?


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: tomishere, 12/29/2012 1:13:15 AM     (No. 9088210)

The middle class will feel tax increases under obama care, the question is will they be smart enough to realize it.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Trigger2, 12/29/2012 5:28:34 AM     (No. 9088282)

There is already a trillion dollar tax increase because of Barry´s Death Bill. I agree with the previous poster who said raise taxes on each and every demonrat. They voted for the idjet in the WH; therefore they should have to reap the benefits.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/29/2012 8:02:54 AM     (No. 9088392)

The problem with this logic is most of the people who voted for Obama don´t pay taxes.The only way to make this work is a VAT tax,which I would be in favor of if they froze government spending (-) 2% a year. Make the idiots who voted for Obama pay for his idiotic socialist policies. Same with Obamcare,make the freebie crowd pay a $10 access fee at every level of treatment.

Raising taxes on the middle class punishes the wrong people who are trying to make the country work.

Even if Obama get his tax increase on the rich,it would barely cover the cost of the hurricane bill,so what´s the point. Whatever happened to pay go, Pelosi imposed when she was speaker?
The republicans actually do it and get bashed for it.


Reply 21 - Posted by: franq, 12/29/2012 9:33:06 AM     (No. 9088499)

Sorry #5, swallowing "bitter medicine" will not get the country´s financial house in order. This rogue, spendthrift administration is spending money it doesn´t even have, or ever will have. That is what needs fixed. See comments of #12.


Reply 22 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 12/29/2012 10:40:21 AM     (No. 9088582)

As long as the federal government can simply borrow $1 trillion+ year, nothing is going to change. Just be locked & loaded in time for the next recession. It will make the last one look like a Sunday picnic.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 717004




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Three Cheers for Tesla
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 6:26:59 PM     Post Reply
I have always been skeptical of electric vehicles, mostly because of my perception that electric car makers are more interested in subsisting on government subsidies than in competing on a level playing field for my business. So I was intrigued when I got an email this morning from Jeff Evanson, Tesla Motors’ Vice-President of investor relations. Evanson, a long-time Power Line reader, pointed out that the company raised over $1 billion last week, and will use a portion of those proceeds to pay off its loan with the Department of Energy ahead of schedule. This will make Tesla

This Is What Tyranny Looks Like
American Thinker, by Bryce Buchanan    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 10:55:48 AM     Post Reply
Here is a woman we will need to learn much more about in the coming weeks. Sarah Hall Ingram is a highly valued employee at the IRS. In the last three years she has received $103,390 in bonuses for her excellent work. She was the Commissioner of the Tax-Exempt and Government Entitles Division. Under her leadership, groups that expressed a fear of large, out-of-control government were systematically crushed by her branch of our large, out-of-control government. They were specifically singled out for harassment for political reasons. Secret information about the conservative applicants was leaked to leftist

GOP eager to link IRS scandal to
‘Obamacare’ takedown efforts
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:27:20 AM     Post Reply
An exasperated Rep. Pat Tiberi on Friday asked the former acting chief of the IRS to explain to Congress why he would move the leader of the division that targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status to a branch that is overseeing one of the most partisan issues of recent memory — President Obama’s health care law. “Because she’s a superb civil servant, sir,” Steven Miller, who resigned under duress last week, told the Ohio Republican at a hearing before the House Committee on Ways and Means. The transfer of Sarah Hall Ingram to the helm

What If the Obama Scandals
Had Surfaced Last Fall?
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:19:58 AM     Post Reply
I was on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show last night, talking about the Benghazi talking point emails. Near the end of the segment, Hugh asked whether I thought the presidential election might have turned out differently if Obama and Clinton had not succeeded in covering up the truth about Benghazi. I was skeptical. The story of the election, I said, was the Obama campaign’s ability to turn out, once again, a large majority of the low-information voters who swept Obama into office in 2008. Few of those low-information voters, I said, would either have understood, or cared about, Benghazi

A Breach of Trust
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Susan Combs    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:15:18 AM     Post Reply
As tax collector for the nation’s second-largest state, I know it’s a necessary function — from the fire station to the space station, nothing government does is possible without taxes. But it’s sure no path to popularity. Tax collectors have had a rotten reputation since biblical times. For all the services and all the people that depend on it, our work has to be viewed as fair and even-handed. It’s a basic bond of trust, and once that trust is lost, it’s hard to get back. Our entire nation was born when the colonists decided Britain’s taxes were unfair

Durbin Asked IRS’ Shulman
to Probe ‘Several’ Conservative
501(c)(4) Groups in 2010
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:28:31 PM     Post Reply
While many Democrats have joined Republicans in public shaming of the Internal Revenue Service for singling out conservative groups, others say the scandal is just a byproduct of muddied rules about nonprofits and political activity in the wake of the Citizens United ruling — and they’re hoping that they can steer the conversation from outrage over political targeting to fuel for campaign finance reform. But senior Dems may have much more than an opportunity to try to turn scandal to their advantage: they may have a degree of culpability as one especially vocal proponent

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

43 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

39 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 717004





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~