A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Mexico Still Battling
Against SB 1070 in Court
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Mexico Still Battling
Against SB 1070 in Court

Townhall, by Katie Pavlich

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 12/28/2012 12:19:27 PM

It´s been more than two years since Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed SB 1070 and six months since the Supreme Court upheld many parts of the law, including allowing local law enforcement authorities to question immigration status after a crime has been committed. Regardless, Mexico is still fighting the legislation in court. The Mexican government has asked the 9th District Court of Appeals to block a piece of the law that prohibits harboring of illegal immigrants, something the Supreme Court did not consider during their ruling last summer. Lawyers representing Mexico asked the 9th Circuit Court

Comments:
What an utter travesty this is. Since when should Mexico have any say in our country?? The world is indeed upside down.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 12/28/2012 12:29:53 PM     (No. 9087584)

I am confused as to why Mexico has standing to challenge a state law.


Reply 2 - Posted by: stonepony, 12/28/2012 12:30:17 PM     (No. 9087586)

one of the great legal arguments of the left is the lack of standing… will someone please explain to me how Mexico has standing in this case.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Twinkle93, 12/28/2012 12:36:21 PM     (No. 9087592)

AZ´s law is pale to Mexico´s immigration laws.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Manitouman, 12/28/2012 12:36:57 PM     (No. 9087593)

All Mexico has to do is create the conditions inside its own borders that allow people to get wealthy, and this is all moot.


Reply 5 - Posted by: VinGoombatz, 12/28/2012 12:41:38 PM     (No. 9087603)

How about a president willing to invade northern mexico. I´d vote for that. Many problems would be solved very easily.


Reply 6 - Posted by: graniteman2009, 12/28/2012 12:45:49 PM     (No. 9087613)

If we want to shake up mexico, take their immigration laws and apply it here. Then watch their heads explode.

At the same time apply Chinese business policies here and watch the Chinese curl up in the fetal position.


Reply 7 - Posted by: trapper, 12/28/2012 12:54:45 PM     (No. 9087631)

Mexico doesn´t have standing. All they did was file a friend of the court brief in US v. Arizona. Since the case affects Mexican nationals, the government of Mexico would be incredibly remiss if it didn´t formally present its position in the case. That is why we build court houses in America.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: killerbee, 12/28/2012 1:00:11 PM     (No. 9087636)

What kind of pathetic, useless president are you if you sue a country for not letting your citizens escape your country into theirs to find work?

Can he just tattoo a giant "L" on his head for "loser"? I mean, really, he has zero shame that he and his country are a complete failure. All he has is the "gimme reflex". If I were him I wouldn´t show my face. But then, I do have a sense of shame. And right and wrong. It would never even occur to me to announce to the world that I and my nation are abject failures and demand someone else pick up the tab -- and keep picking it up -- whilst I continue the policies that led to my nation´s failure in the first place.


Reply 9 - Posted by: DaBigGuy, 12/28/2012 1:02:13 PM     (No. 9087640)

It is utterly ridiculous that Mexico has standing to file anything, whereas American citizens who are a party to the Consitutional contract have no standing to challenge the WH poseur.

That and what #6 said.


Reply 10 - Posted by: kctiger, 12/28/2012 1:16:39 PM     (No. 9087656)

How/Why is it; that a foreign government can even make a request like this?

It´s a good thing I don´t have my finger on the little RED button. I would launch them all stright up so that they come straight back down!

WE ARE DOOMED!!!!


Reply 11 - Posted by: SourKraut, 12/28/2012 1:17:15 PM     (No. 9087659)

Agree with # 5

Invade, annex the top tier of Mexican states (?) provinces ? whatever they call them.

Any opposition, take over the entire country, divide it into several States, put a stop to the drug trade and illegals all at once.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Japanorama, 12/28/2012 3:51:24 PM     (No. 9087821)

Mexicans can´t control their own "country," so they try to control ours.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: CentralFLMom, 12/28/2012 5:50:53 PM     (No. 9087935)

This is truly disgusting...Mexico is hardly even a real country.
I agree with #5, except if we invaded we would win... Then all those lazy, procreating people would be on welfare and food stamps...and then claim US citzenship.



Post Reply   Close thread 716976




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Liberal Juan Williams: ‘Journalism
Has Been Criminalized’ by DOJ
Cybercast News Service, by Taylor Knopf    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 9:09:56 PM     Post Reply
Juan Williams, a liberal commentator and a Fox News Channel contributor, criticized the Department of Justice (DOJ) for “criminalizing journalism,” when asked about Fox’s Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen being labeled as a possible co-conspirator in a government leak investigation. “I think what you’ve got here is a situation where somehow, now, journalism has been criminalized, especially in this Rosen case,” Williams said on Fox & Friends on Tuesday. “There’s just no justification for somehow making it out that a reporter, who is trying to cultivate a source, by doing so is a co-conspirator in terms

Senate Dem tells Tea Partier that
he’s acting like a ‘dictator’
Washington Examiner, by Joel Gehrke    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 9:02:50 PM     Post Reply
Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., scolded Tea Party Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, for acting like a “dictator” by demanding that Senate Democrats promise not to raise the debt limit during conference meetings with House Republicans. “We don’t have kings anymore,” Landrieu said in response to Lee on the Senate floor this afternoon. “We don’t have dictators anymore. We don’t have people with special powers . . . not anyone in this chamber is entitled to write the budget exactly the way they want it.” Lee took to the floor to oppose moving to a budget conference between House

Obama administration
threatens Keystone veto
Washington Times, by Stephen Dinan    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:55:28 PM     Post Reply
The White House on Tuesday threatened to veto a House bill designed to approve building the Keystone pipeline, saying President Obama should have final say over the controversial project to bring oil from Canada to the U.S. “Because [the bill] seeks to circumvent longstanding and proven processes for determining whether cross-border pipelines are in the national interest by removing the presidential permitting requirement for the Keystone XL pipeline project, if presented to the president, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto this bill,” the White House budget office said in a statement of policy.

   

 

  


 
IRS Offices Closed in Northern
Arizona on Day of Tea Party Protests
Townhall, by Katie Pavlich    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:49:11 PM     Post Reply
IRS offices in Flagstaff and Prescott, Ariz. were temporarily closed Tuesday as protests of IRS offices around the country were planned by Tea Party activists. "They have a notice up that says ´temporarily closed," said Tom Case, a Lake Havasu resident.Case drove three hours and 200 miles Tuesday with his wife to participate in the IRS protest of the Flagstaff office, located at 1633 S. Plaza Way. This was going to be Case´s first rally. "I follow the politics of the Tea Party, I´m not necessarily a hardcore tea party person," Case said. "This IRS thing to me is

Taking the Fifth -- What It
Does (& Doesn´t Do) for Lerner
Townhall, by Carol Platt Liebau    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:36:48 PM     Post Reply
Tomorrow, Lois Lerner -- director of Exempt Organizations at the IRS when all the targeting occurred -- is going to come to Capitol Hill and take the Fifth Amendment. It will be quite a spectacle. As a matter of law, a jury cannot use someone´s invocation of the Fifth Amendment as evidence of guilt. But we are not in a court of law -- we are in the court of public opinion, as everyone in The White House knows, and Lerner wouldn´t be taking the Fifth unless she was in danger of prosecution . . . or

Three Labor Unions, Including
Teamsters, Want ObamaCare
Repealed; When Will Media
Report?
NewsBusters, by Matt Vespa    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:28:00 PM     Post Reply
As the media, by and large, ignores the train wreck that is on the horizon with ObamaCare, yet another union has jumped ship on the president’s health care overhaul. Back in April, you may recall, the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers, and Allied Workers officially said thanks but no thanks to the president’s plan. Well, now, a major labor union in the grocery industry is balking at the policy. According to The Hill: The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president —

BuzzFeed’s Anburajan: Ted Cruz a
‘LINO’ — ‘Latino in Name Only’
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 8:20:46 PM     Post Reply
In a post on her Twitter account, Buzzfeed Director of Partnership Development Aswini Anburajan took a swipe at Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz’s ethnicity, calling him a “LINO,” or a “latino in name only.” Anburajan, who is also a contributor to WNYC’s “It’s a Free Country” blog, the website for the New York City NPR affiliate, also knocked Cruz’s presidential aspirations for his opposition to giving undocumented immigrants government benefits : “Ted Cruz is a LINO ‘latino in name only’ good luck w/ prez aspirations w/ that stand on undoc immig and benefits”



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

61 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

   

 



 
BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

44 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

Democratic Senator uses Okla.
tornado for anti-GOP rant
over global warming

39 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor    Original Article
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM     Post Reply
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care

   

Post Reply   Close thread 716976





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~