A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Three in the Head
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Three in the Head
American Thinker, by William L. Gensert

Original Article

Posted By:Judy W., 12/28/2012 6:45:40 AM

I carried a gun in New York City for more than a decade -- back when there were thousands of murders a year and the Bronx led the nation in killings. On at least four occasions, that gun saved my life, and in a couple of instances, the lives of people who were with me at the time. For 13 years I had a New York City full carry permit. For a number of years I concealed and carried a gun in my son´s grammar school as well.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 12/28/2012 6:52:58 AM     (No. 9087045)

Riveting. It´s a Must Read again because it´s so good you read it too fast the first time. Many thanks, OP. The tip about the fanny pack is a great one.


Reply 2 - Posted by: srhcb, 12/28/2012 7:02:26 AM     (No. 9087050)

Amen, and thank you.

Long ago I carried a Colt 32 Police Special in my waistband, top chamber empty. (Don´t ask why)

I never had to shoot at anybody, although I was in situations where shots were fired.

For most people, it seems that the "Permit" and a weapon are more of a security blanket than actual deterrent or protection, so be it.

As Mr Gensert implies, the ability and will to use the weapon, and the perception that you can and will, is the important part, in that you can at least hope to thwart a shooting situation without shots being fired.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Bad Dog, 12/28/2012 7:37:31 AM     (No. 9087086)

For women: Take the training! Get the permit, and be prepared.

Just having the knowledge of the laws in your state and area, plus knowing the ramifications ON YOU if you DO have to shoot someone (unbelievably, in some instances you can be sued by your attacker´s survivors!), and also knowing you HAVE THE ABILITY to take someone´s life is all very daunting - BUT WORTH IT.

Just knowing all this, plus knowing your target practice puts your shots where you want them to go, gives any woman the feeling of control of your life and power to keep it that stays with you even if you are NOT carrying at the moment. That confidence, that ´just try it´ attitude you bear, deters many. Always look people in the eye.


Reply 4 - Posted by: altoona, 12/28/2012 7:40:09 AM     (No. 9087090)

What a great slice of Mr. Gensert´s life. Bonus is the line about Michael Bloomberg.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Libertygal, 12/28/2012 7:41:00 AM     (No. 9087092)

Definitely a must read. I was riveted, and these things must be read.


Reply 6 - Posted by: JAN, 12/28/2012 7:56:24 AM     (No. 9087112)

Well done, sir. Thank you.

Hubby worked in that NY-like-Beirut.

We considered it a miracle that he lived through those years.


Reply 7 - Posted by: RayLRiv, 12/28/2012 7:59:33 AM     (No. 9087119)

Excellent article.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: HisHandmaiden, 12/28/2012 8:10:27 AM     (No. 9087132)

Don´t understand how a mother could leave a child, but bless you, Mr. Gensert, for being the father your son needed... and for some of his classmates as well.

After my daughters´ dad left, Daughter #2´s best friend´s dad in seventh grade was also our Pastor. He was a gift from God as a "Father" to them those formative years... for which I am eternally grateful... as many mom´s were, I pray, for Mr. Gensert...


Reply 9 - Posted by: M2, 12/28/2012 8:32:06 AM     (No. 9087161)

Very good read.

I know quite a few dignified, educated, intelligent, married and unmarried Christian women who have conceal/carry permits and who regularly carry when out alone. If they have male companions or husbands, they also carry and are fully licensed and trained to do so, as are the women, several of whom took their weapons to church after the mass-murders became public.

The gun-women I know regularly go to target practice and have taken and passed responsible gun-ownership and safety courses.

They are not aggressive people. Quite the reverse, and they don´t want to ever have to use their weapons. But they are pragmatists in today´s America, where responsible gun owners are marginalized and where criminal gun owners go undetected until they commit a crime.

There is no logic, no intelligence, no rationality to the anti-gun-ownership people´s arguments. While I do have a question about large-magazine ownership by civilians, they pale into insignificance when I think about the flip-side of having all weapons confiscated -- which is where liberals want to take this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 12/28/2012 8:49:42 AM     (No. 9087193)

BS


Reply 11 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 12/28/2012 9:04:44 AM     (No. 9087217)

Ya....my BS meter is twitchin´ a little too.

I´m trying to like this guy but something isn´t right.

Reads like a summer camp story where the details are ´stretched´ to make an important point out of fictitious fragments and fond memories.


Reply 12 - Posted by: LComStaff, 12/28/2012 9:19:51 AM     (No. 9087243)

Here´s this author´s story. Judge for yourself.

http://www.citylimits.org/news/articles/4666/deep-in-the-bluest-borough-a-conservative-blogger


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: pointyhead, 12/28/2012 9:30:25 AM     (No. 9087263)

I know why #2. My dad was a cabbie in the 30´s and his pistol fell out of the car and discharged when the hammer hit the ground and shot him in the leg. I keep all my revolvers top cylinder empty.


Reply 14 - Posted by: sadc, 12/28/2012 9:40:02 AM     (No. 9087278)

If you have concealed carry license or a NRA member, their monthly magazines are full of true story experiences without editing. Nothing fancy, just real men and women who sometimes did have to shoot and sometimes just make the weapon visible. People who carry have common sense and do not believe that all bad things happen to others, they are not immune but prepared.


Reply 15 - Posted by: larryp, 12/28/2012 10:06:49 AM     (No. 9087326)

I know I read a true story about a kid that was waving a gin around in a school cafeteria, It looked like he was going to shoot. One teacher ran to his car got his gatand ran back to the cafeteria. The kid stopped and there was order restored.
But it was never covered in the Press becuase it never fit the gun control agenda. It think Larry Elder discussed it a couple of times--KABC790 in LA as his main station.


Reply 16 - Posted by: hershey, 12/28/2012 10:10:54 AM     (No. 9087332)

The NRA mag calls it the "Armed Citizen" and it is always my FIRST read when I get the mag.


Reply 17 - Posted by: RancherJack, 12/28/2012 10:31:37 AM     (No. 9087384)

... and this ought to be SOP around the nation.

It ain´t bean bag is exactly right

BTW - I know veteran Denver cops who were SCREAMING at their politically correct superiors during Columbine because those politically correct superiors had them establish a perimeter and wait until the killing was finished before they could storm the building, led by SWAT guys.

Quote - "whatever happened to pull your weapon and go croak the SOBs?"

Many veteran patrol cops quit over being told to "stand down" rather than do their jobs to get into the building and go after whoever was shooting. That was their job and kids are dead because they were prevented from doing what they knew to be their job ... go into harm´s way that others may live.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Udanja99, 12/28/2012 10:49:07 AM     (No. 9087419)

The only problem I have with the authenticity of this story is - how does one roughhouse with little kids while carrying a hand gun in a holster? And no one sees it?


Reply 19 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 12/28/2012 10:57:21 AM     (No. 9087436)

I would take this Must Read and force-feed it into Mayor Bloomers noggen and wait for the baby wimpering to start.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Butch59, 12/28/2012 10:58:13 AM     (No. 9087438)

If one has ever been in a combat situation (I have in Vietnam) there are going to be times that you MUST react instantly or you wind up grave yard dead. The same can happen with drug crazed criminals that are attempting to steal something that can be used to get their next fix. And if it come to me or thee, I´m going to try to make sure it isn´t me.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 12/28/2012 11:41:46 AM     (No. 9087514)

Some historians believe the phrase “forewarned is forearmed” has its origin way back in the 16th Century or maybe even earlier. It’s a truism that, probably more than ever before, applies to the volatile, unpredictable 21st Century in which we now find ourselves. “Forewarned is Forearmed!” Words to live by, perhaps literally.


Reply 22 - Posted by: MDMuskrat, 12/28/2012 11:59:50 AM     (No. 9087542)

Try to imagine a world where only the police and the criminals have guns...

Start with Chicago.

Arm yourselves. Practice. And resist to your dying breath the gun control fascists in our world (e.g., Dianne Feinstein and the UN).

And don´t be too hard on #10 here. I´m sure he meant to type "BZ" but those S and Z keys are so close.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: sonofboomercat, 12/28/2012 12:32:08 PM     (No. 9087589)

I carry. Have done so for fifty years plus.
Have I ever shot at anyone? Sure, during combat. As a civilian, I´ve only had to show a weapon to keep things civil a few times and then wait for the police to arrive and cart a miscreant away. ...........In 2011, according to the FBI, there were 14,612 victims of homicide in the U.S., down 14.7% from 2007. Of those 14,612, only 323 were murdered with any type of rifle. More than five times as many were killed with knives. More were killed with blunt objects, and more than twice as many were killed with the assailant’s bare hands. So it is hard to understand the current obsession with semiautomatic rifles.
It must all be about control.


Reply 24 - Posted by: kono, 12/28/2012 3:36:50 PM     (No. 9087808)

I sense a bit of "Red Rascal" in this story. Great read, and I won´t accuse it of being high fiction. But I does seem a tad sensationalized.


Reply 25 - Posted by: geoman, 12/28/2012 5:09:11 PM     (No. 9087900)

FTA: "I would take the straightest line to the bank, right hand on my gun in its holster, finger on the trigger."

I´m kind of surprised no one caught this violation of common sense weapon handling. There is no excuse for it; the finger stays out of the trigger guard unless and until it is time to make the gun go bang.


Reply 26 - Posted by: weejun, 12/28/2012 6:17:54 PM     (No. 9087957)

You´re trying to use logic and facts, #24: two things liberals refuse to consider. Çontrol? Absolutely. The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting: it was included in the Constitution by our forefathers because they recognized that a disarmed population is a controlled population. I never thought I would live in a time when it might be necessary for loyal citizens to resist their government, but we are quickly headed down that path. Liberals are feeling their oats and are bound and determined to alter this country forever. Feinstein is just following the liberal mantra of "never let a good crisis go to waste." And the 50% or so who voted to continue with the wreck in the White House have no idea what they have done, thanks to the press and the sorry education system we´ve allowed to evolve.


Reply 27 - Posted by: ursamajor, 12/28/2012 9:11:07 PM     (No. 9088086)

13 & 2 -- There is no reason to carry a modern, double action revolver with an empty chamber under the hammer. Rugers, Smiths, Colts, Llamas etc have a hammer block that prevents the firing pin from contacting the primer unless the trigger is pulled. But always use a holster that covers the trigger guard so that nothing can accidentally depress the trigger.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 12/28/2012 9:11:45 PM     (No. 9088088)

Ever wonder why the gun grabbers want to punish honest citizens?

Ever notice that the gun grabbers NEVER address the bad guys.

"If you had been staying at home he would not have assaulted and robbed you."

Long live Paul Kersey and Vince Majestyk.
We need them everywhere, especially in Chicago, Detroit, Philly, DC, Miami, Watts, East St Louis, Camden and lots of other places.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Bobn.T, 12/28/2012 9:17:38 PM     (No. 9088094)

I´m with #15, sounds like a fictitious movie scenario and script.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Doc Obiwan, 12/28/2012 10:07:54 PM     (No. 9088118)

Two in the head is the way I was trained. But I carry (carried) a .45.

This caused a little conflict when I took this state´s CCW class, taught by a police officer, assisted by other police officers. But when I talked about body armor (they teach center-of-mass, which is best for most), and I demonstrated that I could put them there, they understood, and let me slide.

(Same thing happened at an anti-terrorist course on the east coast about 3 years ago. If you´re good enough, you can make your own rules.)

Either way--2 or 3--head shots pretty much settle it.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Doc Obiwan, 12/28/2012 10:14:05 PM     (No. 9088121)

Dittoes, #´s 21 and 28.


Reply 32 - Posted by: lana720, 12/28/2012 10:20:10 PM     (No. 9088124)

Thanks, Staff for the link to Mr. Gensert´s blog. No bragging here, just facts. He is a real man!
Got to get to the range more often.
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.


Reply 33 - Posted by: doublesharp, 12/28/2012 11:44:57 PM     (No. 9088171)

BS. The Beretta 92compact doesn´t weigh 4 1/2 lbs. Think about it,that is 72 ounces. My Glock 27 ,very comparable, weighs 30 oz with a 14 rd extended mag. Can´t take him serious when he exaggerates so blatantly on such an easily verified statement.



Post Reply   Close thread 716942




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."



Undoing the Brainwashing
Creators, by Thomas Sowell    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/22/2013 8:23:59 AM     Post Reply
This time of year, as college students return home for the summer, many parents may notice how many politically correct ideas they have acquired on campus. Some of those parents may wonder how they can undo some of the brainwashing that has become so common in what are supposed to be institutions of higher learning. The strategy used by General Douglas MacArthur so successfully in the Pacific during World War II can be useful in this very different kind of battle. General MacArthur won his victories while minimizing his casualties --

Why Aren´t There More
Storm Cellars in Oklahoma?
Atlantic, by Megan Garber    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/22/2013 6:50:51 AM     Post Reply
"You had to be underground," The Weather Channel´s Mike Bettes put it, "in order to survive this tornado." He was not exaggerating. The massive storm that hit Moore, Oklahoma yesterday -- featuring winds up to 200mph -- didn´t simply put those aboveground at risk of being swept up in its funnel. The tornado also took the smallest objects of everyday life -- down to pebbles and even dust -- and effectively converted them into bullets and shrapnel. Much of the carnage that so often results from tornadoes is the result of a terrible phenomenon known by an appropriately terrible

Five senators who know how
to control federal spending
Washington Examiner, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/21/2013 8:06:05 AM     Post Reply
This will come as a shock to those who believe the only significant news in recent weeks has been the Benghazi, IRS and AP/Fox News intimidation scandals, but there have been some significant developments on other issues. Consider the May 14 "Dear Colleague" letter by Republican Sens. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, Rand Paul of Kentucky, and John McCain and Jeff Flake of Arizona. One sentence in particular stands out: "We, therefore, are notifying you of our intention to object to the consideration of any legislation that fails to meet any

Never Mind Impeachment; Keep
your Eyes on the Prize
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/21/2013 7:33:37 AM     Post Reply
Conservatives and Republicans would be unwise to pursue President Obama´s impeachment as my colleague Bruce Walker today argues. The odds are the effort would backfire, and there is a much more important goal that should be at the center of our political strategy: sweeping Democrats out of office in 2014 and 2016 in numbers sufficient to enact structural reforms, including replacement of the tax system and junking the IRS and outlawing public employee unions. President Obama is handing his opponents the means, if only they have the wit to pursue the bigger goal.

Virginia’s High-Octane GOP Ticket
National Review, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/20/2013 11:10:38 AM     Post Reply
The battle lines are drawn for the November election in Virginia, with Democrats seeking to portray the GOP ticket that emerged from the party’s state convention this weekend as “extreme” and “all Tea Party, all the time.” (Snip) Now Democrats think they can discredit E. W. Jackson, the minister and lawyer the GOP nominated for lieutenant governor after four ballots this weekend. He told delegates on Saturday he was “not an African American, but an American” and vowed to “get the government off our backs, off our property, out of our families, out of our health care

The Impeachment Option
National Review, by Robert Costa    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/20/2013 10:06:41 AM     Post Reply
Representative Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican, says President Barack Obama may face impeachment over his administration’s response to the Benghazi attack. (Snip) Chaffetz’s tension with the White House has been building for months, ever since he took a fact-finding trip to Libya last October, less than a month after the terrorist attack. During that visit, he huddled with several U.S. diplomats, including Gregory Hicks, a former deputy chief of the Libya mission. But the heavy-handed tactics of the president’s advisers, he complains, sullied his investigation from the start.

Oslo Journal, Part III
National Review, by Jay Nordlinger    Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/20/2013 8:45:34 AM     Post Reply
Editor’s Note: Last week, Jay Nordlinger attended the Oslo Freedom Forum, the annual human-rights conference held in the Norwegian capital. I have a friend named Mileydi Fougstedt, who’s a Cuban journalist resident in Stockholm. Her first name is pronounced pretty much like “m’lady.” So when you’re speaking to her, you feel like you’re speaking to a high-class Englishwoman. (Snip) One of the speakers here is the prime minister of Tibet — the democratically elected prime minister of Tibet. I’m speaking, of course, of what’s called the “Central Tibetan Administration”: Tibet’s government-in-exile, located in Dharamshala, India.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
72 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
54 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.


Post Reply   Close thread 716942





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~