A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Putin says he will sign
anti-US adoptions bill
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Putin says he will sign
anti-US adoptions bill

Associated Press, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 12/27/2012 7:40:27 AM

MOSCOW — Russian President Vladimir Putin says he will sign a controversial bill banning Americans from adopting Russian children.Putin told a televised meeting on Thursday that he "doesn´t see any reasons" against the bill and said that he "intends to sign it" into law. The president said U.S. authorities deny access to adopted Russian children and lets Americans suspected of violence towards Russian adoptees go unpunished.Critics say that the bill will deprive many Russian orphans of an opportunity to get a family.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Judith, 12/27/2012 7:52:34 AM     (No. 9085363)

The children don´t matter. It is another sign of the contempt putin has for the USA and a further step down the trail of public humiliation of the USA that obama so enjoys.


Reply 2 - Posted by: rustycfc, 12/27/2012 8:02:24 AM     (No. 9085377)

Good, lets adopt our own children,surly
we have plenty in this country.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: RayLRiv, 12/27/2012 8:03:40 AM     (No. 9085381)

That´s OK Vladimir. I have no intention of ever adopting you.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Balogreene, 12/27/2012 8:08:11 AM     (No. 9085392)

There have been multiple problems with American adopters, I don´t see why a country can´t control where their children end up, especially if the screening process doesn´t work. There are plenty of American children out there, we just have to work on regulations that make it hard to adopt.
That said, they say this is political, about American sanctions.


Reply 5 - Posted by: rabbit, 12/27/2012 8:19:26 AM     (No. 9085408)

Those of you saying "let´s just adopt American children" obviously don´t know the U.S. procedure. Young Caucasian children are in short supply, thanks to abortion. Young African-American children are plentiful, but African-American leaders are against them being placed in homes with Caucasian parents, and there are not enough intact African-American homes (mom+dad) to absorb them all.

Also, American agencies have nearly totally turned to "open adoptions". We don´t yet know how that will turn out in the long run - a generation of kids who had adoptive parents but birthmom and birthfamily had the right to continue to be a presence throughout the growing years - that is, when it was convenient for birthmom. They present this as a ´loving´ option...it may be a cute idea for a newborn, but imagine the 10 year old whose birthmom hasn´t bothered to call for the past 3 years and then suddenly shows up with the two younger siblings via new boyfriend she decided to keep. Not a pretty sight.


Reply 6 - Posted by: lakerman1, 12/27/2012 8:49:42 AM     (No. 9085458)

Mrs. Lakerman and I adopted a brother and sister from Moscow, in 1996. He was 4, and she was 7.
We learned alot about the system in Russia. First, there is no foster care network as there is in the U.S. Second, bad parents are not given a second chance - the judge terminates parental rights, and places the children into an orphanage (known in Russia as a children´s home.) The facilities vary in quality, but they are all substandard,lack funds, and cannot really provide the personal care necessary for a little one to thrive.
So American families adopting Russian children represented a financial plus for the children´s homes, and in addition, a pressure valve release, if you will.
And those children who remain in the children´s homes are turned out into the streets at age 16. The boys most likely become criminals, the girls, prostitutes.
And the Russians know this, but are posturing, pretending that they don´t need the help of Americans.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 12/27/2012 8:53:36 AM     (No. 9085463)

I guess now more American children will get a chance at a family- Oh, that´s right- Americans don´t want to go through all that "Red" tape- uh, pardon the pun :>


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: lakerman1, 12/27/2012 8:54:18 AM     (No. 9085469)

(continued) We could not adopt in the U.S. because I was 53, wife 42- too old by U.S.standards.
Finally, I am friends with a husband and wife who had open adoptions for their three children. (Both husband and wife are MDs.)
One of their sons went back to his drug addicted birth mother when he was 15, got involved in drugs with mommy, and it took a year for him to realize that he belonged with the adoptive parents.
A russian adoption is final, the birth parents are not told anything. And there can be no court challenges to the adoption by the birth parents.


Reply 9 - Posted by: FLCracker, 12/27/2012 9:06:37 AM     (No. 9085497)

Is Putin going to do something about American men "adopting" all those Russian wives?

Isn´t that a black eye on his country, too?


Reply 10 - Posted by: Pc1eszm, 12/27/2012 9:18:47 AM     (No. 9085523)

A coworker of mine adopted 2 girls from Russia 3 years ago for the exact reason #8 cited. The birth parents will never try to re-establish parental rights.


Reply 11 - Posted by: jlw509, 12/27/2012 9:35:07 AM     (No. 9085563)

My husband and I adopted a 5-year-old from Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy in Russia, after we had tried for years, unsuccessfully, to adopt in the USA. In our state, you have to offer fostercare for several years before you are allowed to adopt via the Dept of Children´s Services. Fostercare means temporary placements: you get to have your heart broken several times, while you helplessly watch children have their hearts broken as well. We couldn´t tolerate that.

We knew a couple who tried to adopt an American baby, only to have it all fall through because the baby-daddy reappeared and asserted his paternal rights, clearly because he wanted to either get back "with" the mother, or get back "at" her.

We ended up turning to Russia. God bless our little Ivan Nikoleivitch, and all the little ones at the "Detsky Dom" he left behind.


Reply 12 - Posted by: KingBubo, 12/27/2012 10:18:43 AM     (No. 9085673)

#8, for your doctor friends, I am available for adoption. I am potty trained, Christian and say please/thank you.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 12/27/2012 10:19:58 AM     (No. 9085679)

One of the dirty secrets of adopting from the American pool is money. The Children´s Services system in each state gets so much per head for each child in the system and there is no incentive to help the adoption process along. In fact, it is to the benefit of the State to drag its feet. When child is adopted, the money goes away. Thats a big reason people go to other countries to adopt their children.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Udanja99, 12/27/2012 12:21:13 PM     (No. 9085984)

The best way to adopt in the US is to do it privately. It takes some effort on your part but it´s a lot simpler, usually faster, less expensive and less invasive than trying to go through an agency or government entity. We did it and got our daughter when she was less than a day old. Both birth parents signed away their parental rights and we have had no contact with either of them in 22 years. Our daughter knows that she is adopted and also knows who her real parents are - us.


Reply 15 - Posted by: broken01, 12/28/2012 9:07:00 AM     (No. 9087220)

Great now thanks to this jerk precious children (does it matter what country they´re from?)will not have a chance at being adopted. Putin you are only hurting the kids with your crummy bill. Way to stick it to my beloved country pal. A country BTW that even though our current blockhead in charge sucks up to you regular people like me know that you´re nothing but a commie stooge. Now put that in you glass of vodka and drink it you fool.



Post Reply   Close thread 716839




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

   

 

  


 
Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

   

 



 
Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

54 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

44 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part

Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi
auditor Thomas Pickering

39 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM     Post Reply
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

39 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 716839





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~