A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Putin says he will sign
anti-US adoptions bill
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Putin says he will sign
anti-US adoptions bill

Associated Press, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 12/27/2012 7:40:27 AM

MOSCOW — Russian President Vladimir Putin says he will sign a controversial bill banning Americans from adopting Russian children.Putin told a televised meeting on Thursday that he "doesn´t see any reasons" against the bill and said that he "intends to sign it" into law. The president said U.S. authorities deny access to adopted Russian children and lets Americans suspected of violence towards Russian adoptees go unpunished.Critics say that the bill will deprive many Russian orphans of an opportunity to get a family.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Judith, 12/27/2012 7:52:34 AM     (No. 9085363)

The children don´t matter. It is another sign of the contempt putin has for the USA and a further step down the trail of public humiliation of the USA that obama so enjoys.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: rustycfc, 12/27/2012 8:02:24 AM     (No. 9085377)

Good, lets adopt our own children,surly
we have plenty in this country.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: RayLRiv, 12/27/2012 8:03:40 AM     (No. 9085381)

That´s OK Vladimir. I have no intention of ever adopting you.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 4 - Posted by: Balogreene, 12/27/2012 8:08:11 AM     (No. 9085392)

There have been multiple problems with American adopters, I don´t see why a country can´t control where their children end up, especially if the screening process doesn´t work. There are plenty of American children out there, we just have to work on regulations that make it hard to adopt.
That said, they say this is political, about American sanctions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 5 - Posted by: lakerman1, 12/27/2012 8:49:42 AM     (No. 9085458)

Mrs. Lakerman and I adopted a brother and sister from Moscow, in 1996. He was 4, and she was 7.
We learned alot about the system in Russia. First, there is no foster care network as there is in the U.S. Second, bad parents are not given a second chance - the judge terminates parental rights, and places the children into an orphanage (known in Russia as a children´s home.) The facilities vary in quality, but they are all substandard,lack funds, and cannot really provide the personal care necessary for a little one to thrive.
So American families adopting Russian children represented a financial plus for the children´s homes, and in addition, a pressure valve release, if you will.
And those children who remain in the children´s homes are turned out into the streets at age 16. The boys most likely become criminals, the girls, prostitutes.
And the Russians know this, but are posturing, pretending that they don´t need the help of Americans.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 12/27/2012 8:53:36 AM     (No. 9085463)

I guess now more American children will get a chance at a family- Oh, that´s right- Americans don´t want to go through all that "Red" tape- uh, pardon the pun :>

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: lakerman1, 12/27/2012 8:54:18 AM     (No. 9085469)

(continued) We could not adopt in the U.S. because I was 53, wife 42- too old by U.S.standards.
Finally, I am friends with a husband and wife who had open adoptions for their three children. (Both husband and wife are MDs.)
One of their sons went back to his drug addicted birth mother when he was 15, got involved in drugs with mommy, and it took a year for him to realize that he belonged with the adoptive parents.
A russian adoption is final, the birth parents are not told anything. And there can be no court challenges to the adoption by the birth parents.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: FLCracker, 12/27/2012 9:06:37 AM     (No. 9085497)

Is Putin going to do something about American men "adopting" all those Russian wives?

Isn´t that a black eye on his country, too?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Pc1eszm, 12/27/2012 9:18:47 AM     (No. 9085523)

A coworker of mine adopted 2 girls from Russia 3 years ago for the exact reason #8 cited. The birth parents will never try to re-establish parental rights.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 10 - Posted by: jlw509, 12/27/2012 9:35:07 AM     (No. 9085563)

My husband and I adopted a 5-year-old from Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy in Russia, after we had tried for years, unsuccessfully, to adopt in the USA. In our state, you have to offer fostercare for several years before you are allowed to adopt via the Dept of Children´s Services. Fostercare means temporary placements: you get to have your heart broken several times, while you helplessly watch children have their hearts broken as well. We couldn´t tolerate that.

We knew a couple who tried to adopt an American baby, only to have it all fall through because the baby-daddy reappeared and asserted his paternal rights, clearly because he wanted to either get back "with" the mother, or get back "at" her.

We ended up turning to Russia. God bless our little Ivan Nikoleivitch, and all the little ones at the "Detsky Dom" he left behind.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: KingBubo, 12/27/2012 10:18:43 AM     (No. 9085673)

#8, for your doctor friends, I am available for adoption. I am potty trained, Christian and say please/thank you.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 12 - Posted by: Chuzzles, 12/27/2012 10:19:58 AM     (No. 9085679)

One of the dirty secrets of adopting from the American pool is money. The Children´s Services system in each state gets so much per head for each child in the system and there is no incentive to help the adoption process along. In fact, it is to the benefit of the State to drag its feet. When child is adopted, the money goes away. Thats a big reason people go to other countries to adopt their children.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Udanja99, 12/27/2012 12:21:13 PM     (No. 9085984)

The best way to adopt in the US is to do it privately. It takes some effort on your part but it´s a lot simpler, usually faster, less expensive and less invasive than trying to go through an agency or government entity. We did it and got our daughter when she was less than a day old. Both birth parents signed away their parental rights and we have had no contact with either of them in 22 years. Our daughter knows that she is adopted and also knows who her real parents are - us.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 14 - Posted by: broken01, 12/28/2012 9:07:00 AM     (No. 9087220)

Great now thanks to this jerk precious children (does it matter what country they´re from?)will not have a chance at being adopted. Putin you are only hurting the kids with your crummy bill. Way to stick it to my beloved country pal. A country BTW that even though our current blockhead in charge sucks up to you regular people like me know that you´re nothing but a commie stooge. Now put that in you glass of vodka and drink it you fool.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 716839




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.

   

 



 


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´America´s royal baby´: How Chelsea´s first
child could give Hillary Clinton a boost in
the polls if she runs for president in 2016

42 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Jessica Jerreat    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:12:10 PM     Post Reply
For Hillary Clinton, having her own baby grandchild to kiss on the campaign trail, could be one of the biggest boosts to her possible presidential election campaign. Although the former Secretary of State and First Lady has not said if she will run in 2016, the arrival of her first grandchild will soften her image, analysts have said. While Chelsea only revealed her pregnancy on Thursday, supporters of her mother have already started cooing over a possible baby in the White House. With the Clintons having a near-royal status in the U.S., the announcement of a new arrival due this fall has sent

Living in the New York Times World
39 replie(s)
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

Barack Obama and the politics of lies
35 replie(s)
Washington Examiner [DC], by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/20/2014 5:45:25 AM     Post Reply
That was quite a victory dance President Obama did Thursday while claiming Obamacare is “working” because eight million people have now supposedly signed up for the health care program. He even indulged in some less-than-subtle mockery of Republicans - and by extension the majority of Americans who have disapproved of Obamacare since before it became law. "The repeal debate is and should be over,” Obama said, taking a dig at Republicans who are “going through, you know, the stages of grief … anger and denial and all that stuff …” But a president who is viewed by most Americans as less

In a Hole, Golf Considers
Digging a Wider One

32 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bill Pennington    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/19/2014 10:48:33 AM     Post Reply
GREENSBORO, Ga. — Golf holes the size of pizzas. Soccer balls on the back nine. A mulligan on every hole. These are some of the measures — some would say gimmicks — that golf courses across the country have experimented with to stop people from quitting the game. Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years. People under 35 have especially spurned the game, saying it takes too

White House asks American parents to
monitor their children for signs of terrorism

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Eric Owens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/19/2014 5:50:04 PM     Post Reply
In a speech earlier this week, Lisa O. Monaco, President Barack Obama’s assistant for homeland security and counterterrorism, insisted that American parents must be vigilant because their “confrontational” children could be on the verge of becoming terrorists. Monaco’s full, prepared text is available here. She presented the speech, entitled “Countering Violent Extremism and the Power of Community,” at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government on April 15. Monaco began her remarks by eloquently describing the lives tragically lost last year during the Boston Marathon bombings. Interestingly, the Harvard grad failed to mention the religion or the motive of brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan

Obama: ´For me, Easter is a story of hope,
a belief in a better day to come´

30 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Andrew Malcolm    Original Article
Posted By: SurferLad- 4/19/2014 9:16:36 AM     Post Reply
Hi, everybody. For millions of Americans, this time of year holds great meaning. Earlier this week, we hosted a Passover Seder at the White House, and joined Jewish families around the world in their re-tellings of the story of the Exodus and the victory of faith over oppression. And this Sunday, Michelle, Malia, Sasha, and I will join our fellow Christians around the world in celebrating the Resurrection of Christ, the salvation he offered the world, and the hope that comes with the Easter season. These holy days have their roots in miracles that took place long ago. And yet, they still inspire us, guide us, and strengthen us today. They remind us of our

Harry Reid calls dissident Nevada ranchers
´domestic terrorists´ following show of
force against the federal government

30 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/19/2014 9:29:17 AM     Post Reply
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday that a family of dissident ranchers and their supporters in his home state of Nevada are ´domestic terrorists,´ citing this week´s standoff with the federal government´s Bureau of Land Management. Cliven Bundy has refused to pay grazing fees for land where his hundreds of cattle roam every day. The land is owned by the federal government, which says he owes more than $1 million. Bundy, however, insists that since his family has been using the land since the 1870s, Uncle Sam can´t collect the grazing fees. A tense standoff developed this week after

   

Post Reply   Close thread 716839





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~