|
|
| |
Topic: Krauthammer slams Obama for ´illegal and unconstitutional´ regulatory overreach |
Krauthammer slams Obama for ´illegal and unconstitutional´ regulatory overreach
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:CarrotFarmer87, 12/27/2012 1:44:32 AM
|
| During Wednesday’s broadcast of “Special Report” on the Fox News Channel, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer criticized the Obama administration for something even President Barack Obama has admitted could be an obstacle to economic growth: the expansion of regulation through executive fiat. As the number of regulations from the federal government is continuously expanding, the comment period for regulations has been shortened from 60 days to 45 days, a move that Krauthammer said overwhelms small businesses. “At so many levels, this is a problem,” Krauthammer
|
Comments: 3,500 new regulations in the last 90 days is a bit onerous.
No wonder the amount of money the country spends is increasing exponentially.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 12/27/2012 2:21:57 AM (No. 9085207)
Its a dictatorship.
We need some governors to declare their states to be federal regulation sanctuary states. That is, declare null and void any executive order that does not stem from congress, and vow to protect and defend anyone who is threatened by the federal government for violating these regulations. We need the states to fight against Obama as we cannot do it alone -- our state governments could actually be good for something if they did this for us.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 12/27/2012 3:06:11 AM (No. 9085214)
What will congressional Republicans do about it? I thought as much.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 12/27/2012 3:40:29 AM (No. 9085220)
Barry is racing to turn the country into the Soviet Union redux.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
steveW, 12/27/2012 3:45:16 AM (No. 9085225)
Democrats are well aware that the biggest obstacle to economic growth is Obama himself. But as they are against economic growth themselves ("It´s not fair!") it´s all good to them.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
mws50, 12/27/2012 5:12:53 AM (No. 9085255)
The US Hose has the power to regulate the regulators by shutting off the money. The Senate and Executive branch can stop any lowering of funds, but if the House does not pass another bill to fund the regulators, the money dries up.
The House has all the budgetary power. Too bad we do not have leaders in the House that will use the power they have.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 12/27/2012 6:10:44 AM (No. 9085274)
It always comes back to "it´s the fault of the Republicans in the House," doesn´t it? No one expects anything good out of Democrats so the fact that they are backing Obama in every unconstitutional act goes without comment or complaint. Don´t any of you have Democrat representatives or senators you can complain about? And, if you do, why do they keep getting elected?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
pineledger, 12/27/2012 6:13:45 AM (No. 9085276)
A must-view and must think about!!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
3XALADY, 12/27/2012 6:22:32 AM (No. 9085284)
It is difficult for me to read Dr. K criticizing Zippy without remembering he was so for him early on.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Spidey, 12/27/2012 6:58:25 AM (No. 9085316)
Apparently we´ve hit the debt ceiling two months earlier "than expected".
Social Security is now running a deficit when it used to lend government money.
Still there´s millions of people wanting a mega gift from Obamaclaus.
I can´t believe how broke this country is yet there´s people on the border waiving illegals in to loot the system on top of our own slackers.The self-destruction of this country is intentional and being masterminded by the elite left and islamic adherents.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Doodah, 12/27/2012 7:14:02 AM (No. 9085328)
I do not ever remember reading an article whereby Krauthammer was "for" Obama. At the beginning when Obama was elected, K only mentioned to give him a chance and we will see. Otherwise, K would have been really racist, wouldn´t he? K is a fair player. He is very smart and many value his opinion. Conservatives who I know try to be fair otherwise we are like the left. Since Obama´s four years now, we know that O is a extreme socialist and dumb as a brick about helping our country, many say it is on purpose. Irregardless, we have to be like the French underground and strike where ever we can to change the minds of many people who are not leftoids, but simply fooled. And get voter ID by 2016. The Dems won´t bother with much voter fraud in 2014, because it is very expensive and not as much at stake.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
franq, 12/27/2012 7:35:47 AM (No. 9085346)
Keep Obama in president, you know? He gave us a phone! He gonna do more!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
vesicant, 12/27/2012 7:46:11 AM (No. 9085354)
Oooooh, Krauthammer slams obama. That ought to do it.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
knarfski, 12/27/2012 7:54:08 AM (No. 9085364)
Krauthammer is right, but the cards may be too stacked against us. Can "right"get a fair hearing in our courts? (Obama´s promises have become almost worthless.)
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
K620, 12/27/2012 8:03:02 AM (No. 9085379)
Exactly, #8! Also on Special Report, about 5 years ago, Dr. K essentially endorsed Obama. He said Obama had a first-rate temperment and was fairly salivating over him. Sorry, Charles, you, like Peggy and Kathleen, own this presidency.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
starbaby, 12/27/2012 8:03:55 AM (No. 9085382)
Agree with #1. We need to get involved at the state (and local) level, I believe that is where we can do the most good. I´m guilty of focusing too much on Washington, expecting relief from the very people who are causing the pain. It is not working, time to stop going around that mountain and get out of the wilderness.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Maybeth, 12/27/2012 8:07:00 AM (No. 9085387)
Small business owners are overwhelmed? Well, yes .... of course! That´s the whole idea. Small business has been Obama´s target from the beginning. Did some people misunderstand?
I´m still waiting to hear the reaction of those Obama supporters who really believed his promise that they would be allowed to keep their cushy medical plans. .... Of course, it´s true. The part he didn´t explain is that the government intends to make certain that their current medical insurance becomes unaffordable, thus forcing such insurance plans into government ownership. Ooooops.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
TheMotherCO, 12/27/2012 8:07:21 AM (No. 9085388)
Thanks, #10, I am weary of those comments also. K is one of the best and I never miss his column.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
jackburton, 12/27/2012 8:17:00 AM (No. 9085402)
While it´s true that budgets come from the House, they also operate on sort of a continuing basis. The House can fund new things or cut things off only if the Senate and the House put together a bill that does that and it gets signed by the President (or his veto is over-ridden.)
Look at the current situation: The House sent up three budgets in the last two years but the Senate hasn´t passed a budget in 3 and things are still operating.
One other thing: when you dump (and I mean dump) 4 trillion dollars into the hopper and still have the worst economy in 75 years... that money is going somewhere.
Jack Burton says that it´s going for regulations. Otherwise things would be getting better.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Passion, 12/27/2012 8:25:31 AM (No. 9085417)
17 and 10, K never officially "endorsed" Obama but he clearly was under the spell, calling him "elegant" time and again, and oohing and ahhing over his intellect and temperment time and again, while pretending Sarah Palin had a room temperature IQ. Krauthammer was just this side of David Brooks and the pant crease. Not quite that bad, but almost. Don´t be fooled.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
antiquegolf, 12/27/2012 8:45:27 AM (No. 9085449)
The video edited out comments from billy k and the insufferable ab stoddard. No doubt ab stuck her arrogant nose in the air and provided predicable, agonizing nasal monotoned talking point excuses for obama. Dear Fox, please give this woman the hook.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
bubby, 12/27/2012 8:49:03 AM (No. 9085457)
As long as the House Republicans go along with these continuing resolutions then all these agencies will have enough funding to do whatever. These resolutions need to be stopped and force the Democrats in the Senate to approve a budget then cut the budgets of all regulatory agencies. The use of baseline budgeting also needs to stop. A slight decrease in the amount of increase in a budget is not a cut in spending!!!!!
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Bur Oak, 12/27/2012 8:54:14 AM (No. 9085468)
Several years ago I worked for a medium-size company. We were having problems complying with a regulation. Finally I called Washington and talked to the guy who wrote the regualtion. His response, "Gee I never thought of that." I have even traveled to Washingtion to speak to other bueracrats. Most are quite ingorant about the world they are writing regulations for. I did find a few helful ones.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 12/27/2012 9:00:31 AM (No. 9085485)
Yo to the left and those who would not vote on November 6th, still time to wake up and smell the coffee. But, the door is closing real fast. More regulatory overreach to come. You ain´t seen nothing yet. Obie has "plans" for us.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
plumnellie, 12/27/2012 9:19:09 AM (No. 9085526)
We know you by how you react to Palin, Dr K and others. Stands to reason that Dr K would drool over the elegant Obama and diss the authentic Palin. Like Tebow we know the hearts of those who mount personal attacks against them. Do I want Palin for President. I don´t know. Is Tebow the greatest quarterback ever. No. But, attacks against them show us all we need to know. Who hates Christians? Democrats, liberals, Socialists, Muslims, atheists, etc. And, policy is not how the attacks by Dr K and posters go..it is always personal. Always. Always. Always. So posters own it. You are as much a part of the enablers of Obama as is any free phone voter.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 12/27/2012 10:08:22 AM (No. 9085657)
"Ah gee whiz Miss Crabtree." -- the daily Krauthammer.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
geoman, 12/27/2012 10:28:55 AM (No. 9085694)
Re: #24 - I read the article and found nothing anti-Christian in it, nor do I see a justification for attacking posters who generally support positions as described by Krauthammer. Krauthammer´s writings display a consistent, but not perfect, conservative core - as do Will´s and Sowell´s. I differ with K on specific opinions but find him to be anything but an Obama enabler.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
chiller, 12/27/2012 10:30:47 AM (No. 9085701)
Correct, Safari Man. If the house won´t cut funding it´s up to the governors who would legally be within their rights to refuse fiat, and only recognize properly constituted regulations.
It´ll eventually hit the Supremes, so we better begin the challenge now, before the court moves further left.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 12/27/2012 10:59:55 AM (No. 9085771)
#2 - Think Longshanks.
"We´ll offer them lands and titles if they will turn on their people."
Courtier - "And when they do?"
Longshanks - "Then after a couple of years we´ll slaughter the lot of them. How could I ever trust a man who will turn on his own people?""
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
curious1, 12/27/2012 11:15:22 AM (No. 9085815)
#1, Excellent idea. Lets start getting our local reps, senators and gov´s attention in each state.
#21 has the right of it. Without the spineless libtards in the house going along with the continuing resolutions, and shaking in their boots that the libtard propaganda arm will say bad things about them (well, a little more than usual) the funds would dry up.
#27 - as the founder said, the SCOTUS isn´t the final arbiter of the constitution, but the people are. More people need to wake up to that idea.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
knarfski, 12/27/2012 11:19:36 AM (No. 9085831)
Come on..90% good K overshadows the other stuff.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
NJVol, 12/27/2012 12:22:09 PM (No. 9085986)
I´m not sure that the 90% of the time when Charles is the good Doctor, which he is, outweighs the times he assured all Krauthammer fans (and others)prior Obama´s first election that Obama was a moderate, supremely intelligent, of superb temperment, and suited for the Presidency. If only Dr. K had seen what so many of us did. I admire Krauthammer and enjoy his take on issues, but I´m still waiting for his mea culpa.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Butch59, 12/27/2012 12:50:40 PM (No. 9086036)
I think I´ll stop jumping on Dr. K and comment on the thrust of the article.
Since a majority of these rules and regulations do not come from laws passed by congress but from executive orders issued by Obozo, I would like for someone, anyone, show me just where in the U.S. Constitution where it gives the president or anyone else the power to issue an executive order that has the power of law. I thought that the Congress was the only body that can pass a law. Maybe I´m living in the wrong century.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 12/27/2012 1:01:02 PM (No. 9086054)
#24 The only one making a personal attack is you. Dr K criticized Obama and only Obama in the piece . The litmus test on fealty to FOX pundit Palin is ridiculous and sounds just like the left demanding the same towards Obama. Now that Obama controls the presidency , the Senate , the media and will eventually completely control the Supreme Court the shrinking majority of House Republicans from Jan 2013 to Jan 2015 will have less and less power and influence. Obama can obviously act like a dictator and get away with it. If the Democrats gain 17 seats in Nov 2014 , the power goes back to them and Obama´s last two years will be unimaginable. The red states may be the only hope for some sanity.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
plumnellie, 12/27/2012 1:41:27 PM (No. 9086108)
I do not care if anyone likes Palin or not. I do see personal attacks on her as a sign of a person´s heart and mind. A pattern that shows up is the same people who bash Palin and defend Dr K often shows up in other ways. What do I care what someone thinks. But I sure am welcome to my own opinion. Comparing me to litmus tests leftwingers administer to others is ridiculous. I am stating how I believe and feel and judge the opinions of others. If you are saying I am trying to suppress people who disagree I larf and larf and larf. Silly and too too sensitive. Get over it. I can still give my impressions. Is me having an opinion in some way suppressing you? If so you are pretty easy to suppress and might even be one who likes to be a victim.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
RedWhiteBlue, 12/27/2012 1:51:51 PM (No. 9086129)
As I´ve asked my liberal senator and congressman...where and how is our constitution protected from runaway socialism? The Snake in the whitehouse has been getting away with this stuff all his life..as well as the politicians that serve him (and NOT the people!). But I guess when the fox is watching the hen house this is what we get! I never got a rely to any of those letters that I sent asking the question.
But isn´t there a recourse to these tyrannical acts? And whose job is it to bring them all up on charges?
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
suncitypro, 12/27/2012 2:01:48 PM (No. 9086142)
#1--you said it all. Thanks. Let´s force this issue as much and as hard as we can.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
janylou, 12/27/2012 3:59:57 PM (No. 9086340)
Our gov, Jan Brewer, has taken on Goliath and has done pretty well for AZ. I hope she continues.
#16, my son has a friend who works at the PHX. She along with almost all the employees of the Zoo will be having their hours cut back to under 25 hours a week because of Obamacare. It is starting.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Mickturn, 12/27/2012 4:47:53 PM (No. 9086391)
All small business has to do is this:
Ignore the rules.
And when the govt thugs show up wimpy tell them your employees are all on strike...the thugs are legally bared from crossing a strike picket line, manned or not.
Use their rules against them!
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 12/27/2012 7:38:03 PM (No. 9086608)
#8, agree with you. I remember when Dr. K. was praising Obama´s temperament, both on television and in print.
Perhaps if more people like Dr. K. had seen what we see in Obama, and wrote about it in 2008, we wouldn´t be stuck with him as President now.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
billa, 12/27/2012 8:30:06 PM (No. 9086690)
Unfortunately, States that refuse to enforce federal regulations will likely not receive federal funds. That occurred with States complying with road regulations, drinking age and speed limits.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
artlover, 12/27/2012 10:24:34 PM (No. 9086797)
Thats another way that Obama is taking over this country. We are no longer a free nation. There are no more freedoms in this country. We will be told what to do and when to do it and there is nothing we can do about it.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 12/28/2012 1:23:06 AM (No. 9086953)
My My so Dr. K doesn´t pass some perfection test many of the posters have perpetuated and must be trashed regularly. Of course that test has been used to the point where those in nay mode have --not voted --us into this extreme situation. Hero fixers don´t arrive on the wings of chance. Alas that perfection doesn´t exist in human realms and will never do so. You have merely thrown away our nation and can rant in vain the rest of your lives. it will come to only one sad recourse to restore a fraction of our liberty. We all know what must be and a new martyr ingrained into our legends..
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 12/28/2012 6:51:24 AM (No. 9087043)
And the worst of this is that the majority (?) of Americans still look upon this "great man", who has sacrificed a day or so of his 4 million dollar (on our dime) Hawaiian vacation to come back to settle without offering anything at all. And I am also sure that when he renames the Bush tax cuts the OBAMA tax cuts they will sigh with delight---Obama is as much a cult of personality as Cesar Chavez, with as many irreparable results. I feel terrible for those of us who will suffer, lose jobs, have inadequate insurance and all the rest, but have a general contempt for those who voted this man back in---especially my well educated Democratic friends. I really hope they suffer alone with the rest of us. But most of all, I hope they finally recognize what they have elected!
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "CarrotFarmer87"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "CarrotFarmer87"
|
Mark Steyn warns of ´serious secession movements´ if drift toward socialism not reversed
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: CarrotFarmer87- 5/16/2013 5:46:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Radio host Dennis Miller and National Review columnist Mark Steyn considered Thursday the possible outcomes if the United States continues down the path of socialism. If socialism became the prevailing governing philosophy, Miller speculated, escaping it wouldn’t require a move to the Australian outback. Instead he suggested heading for the state of Texas, because it would be the first place to push back against it. “If I ever do flee, don’t think fleeing has to involve you going over to Alice Springs or something,” Miller said. “I’m going to Texas because that’ll be the first place that pushes
|
Mark Levin may have prompted IRS-conservative group revelations
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: CarrotFarmer87- 5/10/2013 5:26:00 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Conservative radio talker Mark Levin appears to have touched off the investigation into Internal Revenue Service targeting of conservative political groups back in March 2012. In a letter last year on behalf of the Landmark Legal Foundation, an organization he heads, Levin requested an investigation into what he called “misconduct.” On Friday, the Internal Revenue Service revealed that it had improperly targeted conservative groups for audits during the 2012 election. During a conference call, Lois Lerner, the IRS’s director of exempt organizations, explained that IRS staffers selected groups that
|
Mark Levin at the NRA: ´It´s not a bill of needs — it´s a bill of rights. The 2nd Amendment is included´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: CarrotFarmer87- 5/4/2013 11:58:47 AM
Post Reply
|
|
At the National Rifle Association Convention in Houston on Friday, conservative talker Mark Levin told attendees that the Bill or Rights were “under attack” from progressives in Washington, D.C. “The forces that are gathering now in Washington and in the states to destroy our Second Amendment right are ominous,” Levin the author of “Ameritopia: The Unmaking of America,” said. “They’re not focused on criminals. They’re not focused on mass murderers. They’re focused on ‘we the people.’ The fact of the matter is these are very, very perilous times. The federal government is becoming increasingly powerful.
|
A tale of two Joe Scarboroughs: From rabid gun rights crusader to gun control advocate
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: CarrotFarmer87- 4/25/2013 8:04:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Over the past four months, former Florida Republican Rep. Joe Scarborough has used his “Morning Joe” program on MSNBC as a platform to be an outspoken critic of the National Rifle Association and anyone else standing in the way of what he calls “common sense” gun control legislation. On more than one occasion over the past month, Scarborough has accused NRA-loyal Republicans of putting the interests of “rapists” ahead of other Americans. “I can’t believe those Republicans are going to allow the entire Republican Party to be the party that basically put rapists’ rights over parents’ rights to
|
Bill O´Reilly unloads on CAIR executive director Nihad Awad
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: CarrotFarmer87- 4/24/2013 7:47:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On his Tuesday program, “The O’Reilly Factor” host Bill O’Reilly took on Nihad Awad, the founder and executive director of the controversial pro-Muslim group the Council on American-Islamic Relations. O’Reilly asked Awad to explain why it was incorrect to take aim at extremist elements in Islam in aftermath of last week’s Boston bombing, particularly since there are indications that Islam was the inspiration for the suspects’ actions. Awad denied that sentiment was representative of Muslims. “First of all, thank you for having me on the show again,” Awad said. “I really appreciate it because it’s important to bring
|
Bill Maher: Comparing violence of Islam to Christianity ´liberal [blank]´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: CarrotFarmer87- 4/20/2013 3:07:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On HBO’s “Real Time” on Friday night, host Bill Maher entertained UC-San Bernardino professor Brian Levin, director of the Center for Study of Hate and Extremism, who maintained that despite the events in recent days, religious extremism isn’t only a product of Islam. But Maher took issue with that claim, calling it “liberal ********” and said there was no comparison. “You know what, yeah, yeah,” Maher said. “You know what — that’s liberal ******** right there … they’re not as dangerous. I mean there’s only one faith, for example, that kills you or wants to kill you if you draw
|
Mark Steyn: Media will downplay Boston bomber-Muslim link, same as Ft. Hood, underwear bomber
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: CarrotFarmer87- 4/19/2013 2:16:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Rush Limbaugh’s Friday program, fill-in host Mark Steyn reminded listeners of Limbaugh’s Tuesday comments predicting the media would “circle the wagons” for Islam if it turned out that the suspects in Monday’s Boston Marathon bombing Muslims, saying that the prediction will come true. As it turned out, the suspects Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev were indeed Muslims, and Steyn, author of “After America: Get Ready for Armageddon,” said the media wagon-circling would begin “any moment now.” “As we now know, these guys are Muslim,” Steyn said. “One of them was Muslim. He’s dead
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|