|
|
| |
Topic: Tax fight sends GOP into chaos |
Tax fight sends GOP into chaos
Washington Post, by Karen Tumulty
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 12/21/2012 10:30:58 PM
|
| The main thing that has held Republicans together philosophically is the belief in holding down taxes. Not one of them in Congress has voted for a significant increase in more than two decades. Now that very issue is tearing the GOP apart and making it an all-but-ungovernable majority for Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) to lead in the House. Disarray is a word much overused in politics. But it barely begins to describe the current state of chaos and incoherence as Republicans come to terms with electoral defeat and try to regroup against a year-end deadline to avert
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 12/21/2012 10:40:49 PM (No. 9078738)
Not to be catty, but the Democrats have always made clear their desire is to raise taxes. They´ve got their way and taxes are going up. Whose taxes will they not raise? Which of President Obama´s tax credits or holidays will they allow to expire? If taxes increase by 452 billion in 2013, what will they cut so that cuts are 3 to 1 more than tax increases?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Knotwyrkin, 12/21/2012 10:41:53 PM (No. 9078739)
THE PEOPLE elected tax-avoiding Republicans to the house to do what they are doing now. THE PEOPLE have spoken with their vote, and decided they want a divided governence in Congress. THE PEOPLE want the House to be in Republican control and to fight against 0bama. 0bama WON the Presidency, but THE PEOPLE want a check/balance on his imperial/dictatorial/executive order presidency.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bhkat, 12/21/2012 10:51:12 PM (No. 9078745)
I want the leeches of this country to starve on the street. I am tired of paying for their laziness.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
avikingman, 12/21/2012 11:00:08 PM (No. 9078749)
I don´t see chaos, Tumulty´s hyperbole notwithstanding. I see conviction and adherence to the Constitution.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
RedWhiteBlue, 12/21/2012 11:03:27 PM (No. 9078752)
Typical Tumulty drivel.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Butch, 12/21/2012 11:07:08 PM (No. 9078755)
"...making it an all-but-ungovernable majority for Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) to lead in the House."
That´s exactly right, and it´s why we need a new Speaker in January. Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) comes to mind. I´d like to see a tough conservative Republican House really get under Obama´s skin, and Paul Ryan is just the man to lead that noble and long-overdue effort.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
smcchk, 12/21/2012 11:20:04 PM (No. 9078771)
I think we´ve lost the war. Why did we need to die on the hill of no new taxes for millionaires? Come on! The GOP could have sent it to Reid and Obama and let them figure out how to say that everyone has to pay more. Now the GOP is branded forever as the protector of millionaires. Call me a RINO but politics is ugly and rarely pure. There is no conservative Messiah, there is no Santa Claus and Paul Ryan supported Plan B.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
synchronicity, 12/21/2012 11:29:15 PM (No. 9078774)
Chaos? Danger and opportunity - which is more dangerous:
- the current status quo and everything in our culture that supports it and ignores reason.
or
- the opportunity to blaze a renewed path (and until recently the path the U.S. was originally conceived and founded on) to demand our rights as creations of God to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
There is no middle ground - our souls require liberty or we die. In this life due to slavery, in the next due to cowardice. Liberty or death - everything else is PC sound bites.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
rinohunter, 12/22/2012 12:03:13 AM (No. 9078791)
I have to respond to #7: The answer to the question as to "why we have to die on the hill for no new taxes to millionaires?" First because it is right and moral. Second the typical response of #7 shows that he/she has swallowed the whole class warfare kabuki theater goofiness that is Baracaca Hussein Obanana and his freak show followers. Boner´s got to go! Boner´s got to go! Boner´s got to go!
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
surgedr, 12/22/2012 12:03:46 AM (No. 9078792)
Chaos! The Republicans in disarray! Obama can now blame the Republicans for the fiscal cliff!
I think what one doesn´t understand is that as Rush states the low information voter has no clue about the fiscal cliff, no clue about taxes and no clue about how the economy works. They are too busy watching The X factor, and TMZ to realize what is at stake. So the grown ups in the room have to make the decisions for the children who don´t know any better. In the end when they grow up and understand what has happened..they will thank us. (I hope!)
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
dr fate, 12/22/2012 12:08:49 AM (No. 9078800)
Plan B was never going to be up for a vote in the repulsive Reid-led Senate, so passing it would have been a futile exercise in addition to the pubs tacitly admitting that tax increases for a segment of our society actually would be a good thing. We would have been haunted with this forever to no real avail. Zippy will now proceed to Plan F which is what he wanted all along. Elections including a population of morons have consequences.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
smcchk, 12/22/2012 12:22:56 AM (No. 9078814)
Plan B would have never been put to vote in Reid´s Senate but that is the point! It would have been Reid´s/Obama´s problem, their mess to clean up. Now, it is still the House´s. It´s getting ridiculous. If anyone was going to raise taxes on everyone, it should be Obama and the Democrats, not the GOP by default.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
sickened, 12/22/2012 12:54:28 AM (No. 9078834)
"Chaos"? No, just a lack of leadership. And that only means Boehner has to be shoved aside. Surely, though, we can do better than Ryan. Has he ever come up with a plan to significantly cut anything? Which Congressman wants to close the Dept of Education, or the EPA, or the Dept of Energy? Find one who wants those things, and can also communicate effectively (see Bill Whittle on youtube) -- there´s our Speaker.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
kanphil, 12/22/2012 1:01:13 AM (No. 9078835)
And #7, to add to #9´s excellent point, the conversation should not have been about raising taxes at all, it should have been about meaningful cuts in spending! Boehner was getting outmaneuvered at every turn. Obama´s promises of spending cuts later reminded me of Wimpy of Popeye fame: "I would gladly pay you next Tuesday for a hamburger today", only of course, Tuesday would never come.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
PChristopher, 12/22/2012 1:50:51 AM (No. 9078857)
The problem isn´t the issues, the problem is Boehner. Get a true conservative speaker and the problem will greatly diminish.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
LanieLou, 12/22/2012 2:32:14 AM (No. 9078870)
Why can´t someone switch the conversation from a political ploy called a Fiscal Cliff to the legal requirement of a Balanced Budget?
All Americans, even those on the dole, have to live with a budget... If gov´t spends more than we make... even their freebies are at risk!
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
BreakRight, 12/22/2012 2:49:28 AM (No. 9078874)
#14, to your Popeye/Wimpy comparison, I´d add this: Obama´s reaction to Boehner´s plan B was that plan B meant the Republicans had conceded that taxes must go up, but they needed to be raised on a larger segment of the population. That reminded me of the old joke where a guy asks a girl if she´d "do it" with him for a million dollars, and upon getting a "yes" answer, he asks if she´d do it for $10, to which she replies huffily: "No, what kind of a girl do you think I am?"... to which he replies "We´ve already established that, now we´re just haggling over price"
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
LaVallette, 12/22/2012 4:13:42 AM (No. 9078895)
Karen, dahlink, when are we going to get a budget under this Administration?!!!!
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Spidey, 12/22/2012 5:04:41 AM (No. 9078908)
The republicans are open about their disagreements while all the dems are being told to keep their mouths shut for Obama´s sake.Don´t think there isn´t dissension among the dems but none dare challenge King Barky.
There´s 2 lawmaking branches of government and all the country´s problems are being dropped in one person´s lap for a grand solution.Neither Reid or Obama have stuck their necks out because they´re political cowards.Boehners trying things and still gets the rotten tomatoes.
They´re trying to set republican up as the gang who can´t shoot straight so they´ll lose in 2014.I haven´t seen a viable option for Boehner to do instead of what he´s doing.He could have passed the million dollar offer with dem support and now all of a sudden they´re the protectors of millionaires.
Obama´s winning the battle right now but he´ll lose the war when there´s a massive job exodus from blue states thanks to obamacare.Texas is a job magnet because people think it´s the safest state to do business in right now.
The SC ruling on Obamacare was atrocious but it threw a wrench in Obama´s plan to get all states to roll over.They´re not prepared to set up federal exchanges in 35 or so states.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
IdahoJoe, 12/22/2012 6:29:27 AM (No. 9078938)
I nominate Jason Chaffetz for speaker. There were no freebies or goodies - not even drinks served at his campaign rallies - he said he did not believe in taking money from one person and giving it to another.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
MisterDickens, 12/22/2012 6:48:31 AM (No. 9078952)
Boy, this is some fine reportin´! That Karen Tumulty, she´s really somethin´.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
hotcorner, 12/22/2012 10:39:01 AM (No. 9079311)
The Post is Pravda.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl, 12/22/2012 11:30:37 AM (No. 9079436)
In your dreams #12 - even if Plan B had passed the House, Reid and BO would have just crossed their arms and said, "no." Then the Republicans would have been excoriated by the press for not solving the fiscal cliff.
The House has passed several bills addressing the fiscal cliff this year, and they´ve died in Reid´s Senate. Plan B would have been no different. Anyone who thinks otherwise is naive.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
bob913, 12/22/2012 12:27:14 PM (No. 9079509)
Cut spending to what it was prior to obama. It wasn´t needed. John Boehner and his supporters are the ones who undermined everyone.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Petraeus’s role in drafting Benghazi talking points raises questions
|
|
Washington Post, by Scott Wilson and Karen DeYoung
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 11:03:01 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault. It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack. “We had some new members on the committee, and we knew the press would be very aggressive on this, so we didn’t want
|
With more clarity, White House adds to confusion on IRS
|
|
Washington Post, by Dan Balz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:59:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It is never good for an administration when a front-page newspaper article about an ongoing controversy begins as follows: “The White House offered a new account Monday of how and when it learned .?.?. ” That’s what readers of The Post awoke to on Tuesday. In trying to contain the controversy and protect President Obama, White House officials have only added to questions about what happened. Until this week, the story of how White House officials learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups was fairly straightforward. White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was notified in late April
|
In AP, Rosen investigations, government makes criminals of reporters
|
|
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:56:21 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There are various reasons you might not care about the Obama administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen and labeling him a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor” in an espionage case. Liberals may not be particularly bothered because the targeted journalist works for Fox News. Conservatives may not be concerned because of their antipathy toward the news media generally. And the general public certainly doesn’t have much patience for journalists’ whining. But here’s why you should care — and why this case, along with the administration’s broad snooping into Associated Press phone records, is more serious than the other supposed
|
|
White House meltdown: A truth deficit
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:53:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There seems to be bipartisan consensus that whatever the White House is doing to fend off scandal is making things worse. Howard Fineman sounds a lot like Right Turn these days: “White House aides are tempting fate with their reluctant, piecemeal and contradictory disclosures of what they knew and when they knew it, especially about a report on the Internal Revenue Service’s 18-month effort to target tea party and other conservative groups for special scrutiny.” The constantly shifting stories from Jay Carney and the IRS dissembling and pleas of ignorance only heighten concern that there has been serious wrongdoing.
|
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
|
‘Rosen’s in the Wind!’
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:29:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
John Podhoretz has a good column today on the Obama administration’s travails. I did not know this bit until I read the column: Even more startling, the search warrant makes clear that the FBI already had everything it needed on the leaker, as the request for a search warrant features quotes from an interview that were tantamount to a confession. It asked that the warrant be sealed — in other words, that Rosen not be told — because knowledge might “cause subjects to flee”! Imagine it: Rosen, an on-air reporter
|
All of Obama´s Scandals Are Ultimately About Information Control
|
|
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
McCain warns Obama-Nixon comparisons are ‘overreaching’
|
|
Boston Herald, by Hillary Chabot
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/20/2013 9:36:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
U.S. Sen. John McCain bucked the party line coming from many of his fellow conservatives this morning, saying suggestions that compare the trio of scandals gripping the White House to Watergate are “overreaching.” “I think it’s overreaching. We need a full and complete investigation and then we will decide the dimensions of it,” said McCain while campaigning for Republican Senate candidate Gabriel Gomez in Dorchester. “It is terrible but we have to have a full investigation before we leap to conclusions.” The maverick’s caution is a sharp contrast to the response of many Republicans
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|