|
|
| |
Topic: Mark Steyn: Tapper´s promotion to CNN a lesson for the ´J-school zombies´ in the WH press corps |
Mark Steyn: Tapper´s promotion to CNN a lesson for the ´J-school zombies´ in the WH press corps
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:sparky86, 12/21/2012 11:18:55 AM
|
| On Thursday in his weekly appearance on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show, National Review columnist Mark Steyn explained what was to be learned from Jake Tapper’s decision to leave ABC, where he had been the network’s White House correspondent, for an anchoring position at CNN. Steyn, author of “After America: Get Ready for Armageddon,” said that while the rest of the reporters in the briefing room at the White House have very uninspiring approaches to their questioning of the president, Tapper is the exception. “People think it’s odd that Jake Tapper, who is nobody’s idea of a right-wing nut
|
Comments: That is true, there aren´t a lot of Jake Tapper wannabes reporting on Obama these days, at least ones that he will call on on a consistent basis.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
LittleHoodedMonk, 12/21/2012 11:27:22 AM (No. 9077809)
I have always liked Jake Tapper. He is not a conservative, but seems to be interested in the "true" story. Can´t stand listening to any news conference because questionnaire seems controlled by desire to be like by his/her peers [lemmings].
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
athina, 12/21/2012 11:33:21 AM (No. 9077829)
He asks a good question and then he sits there nodding thoughtfully as if Obama´s answer is serious and true, as he did the other day about ´where were you´ during the previous massecres. So it seems like a setup to allow Obama to look ´presidential´, rather than a serious attempt to get answers. Never a follow-up, never a back and forth. Where´s Sam Donaldson?? Oh, he´s driving around drunk now and nobody wants to be like him with this president.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Supercollider, 12/21/2012 11:33:44 AM (No. 9077832)
Brit Humme followed a similar path after being a thorn in Clinton´s side.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JAN, 12/21/2012 11:46:50 AM (No. 9077867)
We have not seen one minute of Tapper on CNN so there is no sense speculating.
Who will he replace, Jack Cafferty?
He´s a lib with an occasional sensible comment.
Nothing to write home about.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
thelmalou, 12/21/2012 11:48:45 AM (No. 9077868)
I think this is a great move. Tapper is one of the few out there whom I consider to be a real journalist in the old style of journalism. Wouldn´t it be a kick in the head if Zucker moved CNN to the right, after creating the leftist monster(s) at NBC? Godspeed, Mr. Tapper!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 12/21/2012 11:50:55 AM (No. 9077875)
Not excited by the "promotion" Mr. Steyn. Captain Outrageous´s network is no my idea of an instrument for "truth, justice and the American Way."
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
msliberty1937, 12/21/2012 11:55:25 AM (No. 9077887)
Tapper from ABC, a major ´get´ for CNN. Ed Henry from CNN to Fox a major coup for Fox.
With Jake no longer in the room to rankle Jay and O, who besides Henry will ask the tough questions? What a sorry pass that only these two are ever mentioned out of that whole gaggle of geese called the press corps(e).
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
BcdErick, 12/21/2012 12:04:13 PM (No. 9077905)
Well....maybe. Jake was the best the LSM had. And now he stays in DC plus hosts his own show. And no doubt gets more money. Good for him. One little problem. CNN is a horrific network and compared to ABC no one watches it. And rightfully so. Fox beats MSNBC and CNN combined in the ratings.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
submariner, 12/21/2012 12:08:05 PM (No. 9077914)
#8 and both MSNBC and CNN are included in basic Cable packages, while Fox requires an upgraded subscription. Very telling.
Jake Tapper has indeed bucked the LSM trend by not automatically proceeding with the liberal pre-suppositions.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
earlybird, 12/21/2012 12:13:36 PM (No. 9077932)
Some here have criticized Tapper for not being sufficiently conservative.
Doesn´t that run counter to what we expect of real journalists: That they be neutral except for having principles? That they go for the truth no matter who they have to subject to intense grilling?
The news is supposed to be neutral. The truth. It is only in editorials that opinion is supposed to be put forth.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
ASAvet, 12/21/2012 12:34:06 PM (No. 9077992)
So, Tapper is goiing to CNN. Could be a career-ending decision. No one serious about news watches CNN (Communist News Network)>
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 12/21/2012 2:57:59 PM (No. 9078218)
Jake only ends up winning if he would have been picked up by FNC. Two could be dumped (Geraldo and Juan) and just hire Jake.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 12/21/2012 3:25:57 PM (No. 9078264)
Lou Dobbs took this path to enlightenment.
Tapper has done well in that gonad free zone.
At some point a few J-school leftists are going to notice that the emperor is sooooo naked that they can´t keep up the charade any longer.
The greatest danger to the left is becoming unfashionable.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Northlander, 12/21/2012 4:36:03 PM (No. 9078383)
I´ll take a wait and see approach, don´t forget Jeff Zucker, the architect of NBC/MSNBC, was recently hired to oversee CNN. Honestly I´ll be very surprised if CNN moves towards the center.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
kono, 12/21/2012 7:48:05 PM (No. 9078593)
Pretty pathetic reflections by Poor. For one thing, Tapper is certainly not ´a right wing nut´ -- he can´t even be considered Conservative in any meaningful way, except perhaps from a devout Marxist´s point of view.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "sparky86"
|
Krauthammer: Obama IRS scandal statement ´a holding operation,´ ´the absolute minimum´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 5/15/2013 8:50:09 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Immediately following President Barack Obama’s remarks on Wednesday about the current scandal embroiling the Internal Revenue Service, Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer reacted by downplaying the gesture. “That was a holding operation,” Krauthammer said. “That was the absolute minimum he could have done. He relieves one person. He obviously had to. He had to relieve at least one person. And he chose, of course , the acting commissioner. But, I would have expected more. The other actions he announced are up to now meaningless. Obama and this administration have said a hundred times they’re going to
|
| |
|
George Will on IRS Tea Party attacks: ´How stupid do they think we are?´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 5/13/2013 9:48:19 AM
Post Reply
|
|
George Will joined the chorus talking about the prospect of impeachment for President Barack Obama after last week’s admission from the Internal Revenue Service that it had targeted groups with the phrases “tea party” or “patriot” in their tax-exempt applications for extra audits . On Sunday’s broadcast of ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” Will proposed a scenario wherein the Bush administration had targeted groups with the word “progressive” in their names and concluded the situation would be much different in terms of expressions of outrage. “Mr. Hicks, when he was in Libya, said his jaw dropped
|
Brit Hume: ‘No way’ for Hillary Clinton to escape responsibility for Benghazi
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 5/7/2013 8:06:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Senior Fox News political analyst Brit Hume laid out why this week’s testimony on last September’s terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya could be problematic for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Hume, speaking on Tuesday’s broadcast of “America Live,” said there is no feasible way for her to escape any responsibility since she had to be involved in the crafting of the talking points that came out after the attack that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including then-U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. "There’s really no way for her to escape responsibility for this if this
|
NY Times makes same arguments for immigration reform they did ahead of 1986 amnesty
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/28/2013 11:16:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Back in the 1980s, the country faced a familiar dilemma to the one it faces today — the border was insecure and too many illegal immigrants had moved into the United States. At the time, the proposed solution was a bill crafted by then Wyoming Republican Sen. Alan Simpson and Kentucky Democratic Rep. Romano Mazzoli. Signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, it instantly granted 3 million illegal immigrants legal status. Yet a little over 30 years later the problem has returned, with more than 11 million illegal immigrants now in the United States.
|
Bill O´Reilly attacks MSNBC´s Alex Wagner: ´Beyond stupid´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/26/2013 7:24:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
“The O’Reilly Factor” host Bill O’Reilly on Thursday criticized those seeking to downplay the role of Islamic extremism in the Boston Marathon bombings. “There is no question that many on the left are very disappointed the two suspects in the terror bombing are Muslim,” O’Reilly said. “And it is sad to say that many in the Muslim world will never believe the Tsarnaev brothers committed the atrocity.” O’Reilly referred specifically to comments by Zubeidat Tsarnev, the mother of suspected Boston Marathon bombers Dzohkhar and Tamerlan Tsarnev. “Now, there is nothing on Earth that can make that woman accept reality
|
Pat Buchanan calls ´Gang of 8´ proposal acts of ´madness,´ ´suicidal folly´ for GOP
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/22/2013 4:56:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Conservative columnist Pat Buchanan says the “Gang of Eight” immigration reform bill will, if passed, threaten national security and destroy the Republican Party’s ability to compete on a national level. Buchanan, author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?” told radio host Laura Ingraham on Monday that passing a “blanket pardon” of illegal immigrants would be “an act of madness,” particularly in the wake of last week’s terrorist attacks in Boston. “It’s been one week since something like 178 to 180 Americans — three of them murdered — but 178 injured, maimed and wounded by two
|
| |
|
Joe Scarborough: Republicans that filibuster gun control ´put rapists´ rights over parents´ rights´
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: sparky86- 4/8/2013 11:05:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On Monday’s broadcast of MSNBC “Morning Joe,” host Joe Scarborough voiced his agreement with Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, who on Sunday’s “Face the Nation” on CBS questioned those Republicans who are threatening a filibuster on pending gun control legislation. Scarborough said such a filibuster would be an example of the GOP putting “rapists’ rights ahead over parents’ rights.” “[I] tell you what, Richard Haass, I saw John McCain there,” Scarborough said. “And I’m hopeful. Because, you know, there are a lot of guys out there in the Senate and they are going out because it’s a free shot.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
| | |
|
|