A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: The Demography Cliff
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Demography Cliff
Weekly Standard, by Jonathan V. Last

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/20/2012 2:41:00 PM

The New York Times has finally discovered that fiscal cliffs aren’t the only thing that menace the modern nation-state. There’s a demographic cliff, too. A couple weeks ago, the Times’s Ross Douthat wrote a column about America’s bleak demographic future and suggested that the reason we aren’t having enough babies is that we’ve become a decadent society. Douthat’s column touched off something of a firestorm on the left as liberal writers flipped out over the ideas that (1) There aren’t enough babies; (2) More babies would be a good thing;

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: kiltedone, 12/20/2012 2:55:43 PM     (No. 9076455)

We aren´t having babies because women are taught to hate men. No man wants to have babies with a hateful feminist shrew.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: StormCnter, 12/20/2012 2:58:08 PM     (No. 9076462)

Please allow me to play devil´s advocate to poster #1. Perhaps not enough babies are being produced because too many men won´t commit to the relationship. Few women want to raise a child alone.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: zzzghy, 12/20/2012 3:13:08 PM     (No. 9076488)

There will always be enough babies -- just not the local brand we used to prefer.

Take a look at (once)Great Britain. Too few Englishmen in England these days, they say.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: lavalette, 12/20/2012 3:16:07 PM     (No. 9076495)

Having a child is an investment in the future, the future beyond your own life time. This requires a system of belief that values the future and sees your foregoing of some current pleasures as well worth it to build a family and a legacy. Our previous Christian world view supported this value system. Our present secular humanist world view does not.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: lavalette, 12/20/2012 3:16:57 PM     (No. 9076497)

God is not mocked. whatever a man sows he reaps. Conversely, whatever he fails to sow he fails to reap.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Rakasha, 12/20/2012 3:48:07 PM     (No. 9076534)

55,700,00

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: schnapps, 12/20/2012 3:58:13 PM     (No. 9076554)

As Mark Steyn says, the future belongs to those who show up for it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Blackeagle, 12/20/2012 4:19:35 PM     (No. 9076587)

The ´necessity´ of the two-income paradigm is a real family-formation damper. How we got there - and why we seem to be stuck there - is a topic deserving of a long public discussion. However, it seems to be more of an urban/Blue-State problem.

On the topic, if one is in a stable marriage and somehow thinks that having just two (or 2.1) children is all that the planet can handle - consider that so many folks are not in stable marriages - or too old to have kids safely. So you folks (including my three adult daughters), having three - or four - kids should be considered the new normal. And luckily here in Red State paradise that view seems to taking hold among the ´´affluent´´.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: bobgray2, 12/20/2012 4:40:32 PM     (No. 9076621)

Well thank heavens that the dems made sure that we all get free birth control. That should solve everything. Wait....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 10 - Posted by: bighambone, 12/20/2012 6:17:46 PM     (No. 9076718)

Liberals in the USA could care less about all the figures in the article. As they know that all they have to do is open up the US borders to the third world, and a multitude of young people and babies will appear to help transform America to a liberal utopia.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 11 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 12/20/2012 6:22:13 PM     (No. 9076723)

Any society which has given itself permission to kill its own babies has placed Evil at the core of its being. Death begets death.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: udanja99, 12/20/2012 6:44:34 PM     (No. 9076752)

Adding to replies #1 and 2...Perhaps men won´t commit to relationships because women are too willing to give it away for nothing - no ring, no wedding, no commitment, no responsibility, no future. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free is an old saying which is right on target today. I blame it on feminism. And I´m a woman, married 32 years. Got the ring, the wedding, the commitment, the responsibility and the future because I value myself enough to accept nothing less.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Crosscut, 12/20/2012 7:26:41 PM     (No. 9076803)

There are plenty of babies, they´re just the wrong kind.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: rocket-j-squirrel, 12/20/2012 7:27:21 PM     (No. 9076804)

What gets me is the fact that we all scoffed at the campaign ad, Life of Julia. Little did we realize that such a huge voter base existed. You want a dog whistle to your potential voters? This was barely heard by conservative humans, but too late to reverse the effect.

When you have irresponsible men planting the seeds of irresponsibility into women who don´t want to take care of a 20 something Baby Daddy along with their Baby Babies, and are willing to let the gov´t. take care of them while they troll for the next breed stud, we got a problem. To say nothing of the fact that the gov´t rewards such behavior while dictating the foods we should ingest, the medical procedures we are allowed to obtain, the acceptable use of private property, and the proper locations we might celebrate the birth of our Lord Jesus.

(ok, I´m shutting it down, rant off)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: subguru, 12/20/2012 9:00:04 PM     (No. 9076877)

#12 OTOH, what educated woman would want to marry a primitive ape who thinks in milk cow terms?

And on and on it goes.

In my own life, I don´t see this as a problem. "Feminism" isn´t even on the radar in 2012. Both the 20-something males and females are perfectly willing to commit and most find someone.

I´m going to go closer to home. The economy. It´s not affordable to raise more than a couple kids who have a decent chance to grow up and not be part of the economic underclass. Not only do you and your wife have to get educated and established and pay off your student loans, at which point you´re getting pretty old, but you have to have enough $ for the kids to be raised properly to have a high chance of getting in the correct schools, and getting through grad school, etc.

I´m not being classist, but realistic. A service economy is not something you really want to pass down to the next gen. It wasn´t always that way. The next gen used to automatically do better than you.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Post Reply   Close thread 716290




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



The Increasing Desperation of Democrats
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 5:19:02 AM     Post Reply
Harry Reid isn’t backing down from his claim that rancher Cliven Bundy’s supporters are “domestic terrorists.” It’s astonishing rhetoric given the White House’s characterization of the mass shooting by a genuine terrorist, Major Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 Americans at the Fort Hood Army base after yelling “Allahu Akbar!” (God is great.) Rather than labeling Hasan’s actions “domestic terrorism,” the Obama administration is prosecuting him for having committed “workplace violence.” Democratic rhetoric is become ever more desperate and overheated as we approach the November midterm elections. Last week, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said that GOP positions on immigration were motivated by

   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Obama admin wants to require companies
to give workers’ numbers, addresses
to unions before labor elections
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 5:15:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to change regulations to allow for union “ambush elections” in which workers have less time to decide whether or not to join a union — and in which workers’ phone numbers and home addresses are provided to unions. The administration’s National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) proposed rules would allow for union elections — in which workers at a company vote whether or not to unionize — to be held 10 days after a petition is filed. And what, exactly, would be happening to the unions during those 10 days? The new rules require employers to disclose

Discovery Channel Cancels Its Terrible Idea
Everest Jump Now That 13 Sherpas Are Dead
Atlantic Wire, by Sara Morrison    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 5:11:04 AM     Post Reply
Following the deadly avalanche that killed at least 13 people, the Discovery Channel has realized that a live jump off the summit of Mount Everest is just a bad, bad plan and has cancelled the special. "In light of the overwhelming tragedy at Mount Everest and out of respect for the families of the fallen, Discovery Channel will not be going forward with Everest Jump Live," the network wrote on its website. "Our thoughts and prayers go out to the whole Sherpa community." Joby Ogwyn was to jump off Everest in a wing suit on May 11. On Friday, while the climbers

The Epic Hypocrisy of Tom Steyer
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 4:57:29 AM     Post Reply
Billionaire hedge fund operator and “green” energy magnate Tom Steyer has pledged $100 million in the 2014 election cycle to help Democratic candidates who oppose the Keystone pipeline and who favor “green” energy over fossil fuels. Steyer claims to be a man of principle who has no financial interest in the causes he supports, but acts only for the public good. That is a ridiculous claim: Steyer is the ultimate rent-seeker who depends on government connections to produce subsidies and mandates that make his “green” energy investments profitable. He also is, or was until recently, a major investor in Kinder

Iran Won’t Have a Nuclear Weapon. Period!
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 4:52:33 AM     Post Reply
What happens when presidents lie? The American public has had plenty of experience with this in recent years. Liar-president could be the new hyphenate occupation like writer-producer or architect-contractor. Almost every president has shaded things a bit, but three modern ones have been unabashed bull artists — Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton and, of course, Barack Obama. Clinton ultimately got a pass for his prevarications. Nixon didn’t. Neither deserved one. But our current liar-president deserves one even less, because his lies have been of substance, affecting policy. Nixon and Clinton just lied in self-defense — normal human cowardice. Obama is something else again. He

Obama shuts down debate
New York Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 4:43:12 AM     Post Reply
When President Obama trumpeted the 8 million figure representing people who had signed up for ObamaCare, he didn’t just declare it a victory. He declared the debate over — and told Republicans “it’s well time to move on.” Now, we understand the eagerness of politicians to declare debates over. It’s certainly easier than defending ObamaCare’s broken promises, or even providing the breakdowns behind that 8 million top-line number that would let us measure if the program is getting the sign-ups it needs. Increasingly, however, it seems that the “shut up and move on” trope has become the go-to response of liberals on

   

 



 
Oklahoma will charge homeowners
who generate their own power
Hot Air, by Jazz Shaw    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/21/2014 4:39:18 AM     Post Reply
A disturbing story out of the Sooner State this week, noted by Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway. Under the terms of a recently passed bill, expected to be signed by Governor Mary Fallin, homeowners who install their own private solar or wind turbine energy resources and sell some of the juice back to energy companies will be paying a fee for the privilege. Utility customers who want to install rooftop solar panels or small wind turbines could face extra charges on their bills after legislation passed the Oklahoma House of Representatives on Monday. Senate Bill 1456 passed 83-5 after no debate



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



´America´s royal baby´: How Chelsea´s first
child could give Hillary Clinton a boost in
the polls if she runs for president in 2016

42 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Jessica Jerreat    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/19/2014 7:12:10 PM     Post Reply
For Hillary Clinton, having her own baby grandchild to kiss on the campaign trail, could be one of the biggest boosts to her possible presidential election campaign. Although the former Secretary of State and First Lady has not said if she will run in 2016, the arrival of her first grandchild will soften her image, analysts have said. While Chelsea only revealed her pregnancy on Thursday, supporters of her mother have already started cooing over a possible baby in the White House. With the Clintons having a near-royal status in the U.S., the announcement of a new arrival due this fall has sent

Living in the New York Times World
39 replie(s)
American Thinker, by J. Paul Masko    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/19/2014 7:48:36 AM     Post Reply
I began reading the entirety of the first section of the New York Times at nine years old, and continued that practice, more or less, for decades.(snip) ...the power of reverence, intrinsic to what I call the “cascade” of The Times: the near avalanche-like flow and distribution of information through electronic and print networks: through like-minded network newscasts, magazines, local newspaper s, blogs, daytime talk TV, late-night entertainment, statements at media award ceremonies, the celebrity Twitterverse, etc. The cascade rolls through Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, The New Yorker, the mouths of third-grade teachers, Elmo, Madonna and Susan Sarandon …through

Barack Obama and the politics of lies
36 replie(s)
Washington Examiner [DC], by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/20/2014 5:45:25 AM     Post Reply
That was quite a victory dance President Obama did Thursday while claiming Obamacare is “working” because eight million people have now supposedly signed up for the health care program. He even indulged in some less-than-subtle mockery of Republicans - and by extension the majority of Americans who have disapproved of Obamacare since before it became law. "The repeal debate is and should be over,” Obama said, taking a dig at Republicans who are “going through, you know, the stages of grief … anger and denial and all that stuff …” But a president who is viewed by most Americans as less

White House asks American parents to
monitor their children for signs of terrorism

33 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Eric Owens    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/19/2014 5:50:04 PM     Post Reply
In a speech earlier this week, Lisa O. Monaco, President Barack Obama’s assistant for homeland security and counterterrorism, insisted that American parents must be vigilant because their “confrontational” children could be on the verge of becoming terrorists. Monaco’s full, prepared text is available here. She presented the speech, entitled “Countering Violent Extremism and the Power of Community,” at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government on April 15. Monaco began her remarks by eloquently describing the lives tragically lost last year during the Boston Marathon bombings. Interestingly, the Harvard grad failed to mention the religion or the motive of brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan

In a Hole, Golf Considers
Digging a Wider One

32 replie(s)
New York Times, by Bill Pennington    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 4/19/2014 10:48:33 AM     Post Reply
GREENSBORO, Ga. — Golf holes the size of pizzas. Soccer balls on the back nine. A mulligan on every hole. These are some of the measures — some would say gimmicks — that golf courses across the country have experimented with to stop people from quitting the game. Golf has always reveled in its standards and rich tradition. But increasingly a victim of its own image and hidebound ways, golf has lost five million players in the last decade, according to the National Golf Foundation, with 20 percent of the existing 25 million golfers apt to quit in the next few years. People under 35 have especially spurned the game, saying it takes too

Obama: ´For me, Easter is a story of hope,
a belief in a better day to come´

30 replie(s)
Investor´s Business Daily, by Andrew Malcolm    Original Article
Posted By: SurferLad- 4/19/2014 9:16:36 AM     Post Reply
Hi, everybody. For millions of Americans, this time of year holds great meaning. Earlier this week, we hosted a Passover Seder at the White House, and joined Jewish families around the world in their re-tellings of the story of the Exodus and the victory of faith over oppression. And this Sunday, Michelle, Malia, Sasha, and I will join our fellow Christians around the world in celebrating the Resurrection of Christ, the salvation he offered the world, and the hope that comes with the Easter season. These holy days have their roots in miracles that took place long ago. And yet, they still inspire us, guide us, and strengthen us today. They remind us of our

Harry Reid calls dissident Nevada ranchers
´domestic terrorists´ following show of
force against the federal government

30 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/19/2014 9:29:17 AM     Post Reply
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday that a family of dissident ranchers and their supporters in his home state of Nevada are ´domestic terrorists,´ citing this week´s standoff with the federal government´s Bureau of Land Management. Cliven Bundy has refused to pay grazing fees for land where his hundreds of cattle roam every day. The land is owned by the federal government, which says he owes more than $1 million. Bundy, however, insists that since his family has been using the land since the 1870s, Uncle Sam can´t collect the grazing fees. A tense standoff developed this week after

   

Post Reply   Close thread 716290





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~