A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Scott Brown looking strong in
initial special-election polling
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Scott Brown looking strong in
initial special-election polling

Hot Air, by Ed Morrissey

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/20/2012 12:48:28 PM

Maybe Scott Brown will become the Manny Mota of politics — the guy who excels at pinch-hitting. After having just lost a statewide election to hold onto the seat he won in a January 2010 special election, Republicans want him back as their nominee if John Kerry gets his expected Secretary of State appointment. And according to a new poll from Boston’s NPR affiliate WBUR, Brown leads all of the expected Democratic candidates, too (via Sarah Rumpf): WBUR poll of 500 registered voters finds U.S. Sen. Scott Brown is in a strong position

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 12/20/2012 1:00:18 PM     (No. 9076293)

Massachsetts must be schizophrenic. They elect Brown, then switch to Fauxcahontas, and just a month later want Brown again.


Reply 2 - Posted by: civilservant, 12/20/2012 1:04:15 PM     (No. 9076299)

#1, I know schizophrenics, and your comment is truly unfair to THEM......;)

They aren´t schizo in MA., they are liberal, a far more pernicious, evil form of mental illness......one that seems to have no cure.........


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Susannah, 12/20/2012 1:18:46 PM     (No. 9076316)

Many of the people who voted for Warren don´t like her. But they voted for her because she was the Democratic candidate. From their standpoint, it´s no different from Republicans voting for an inept/disagreeable Republican candidate because he or she is the Republican candidate.

The difference between Democrats and Republicans is that Democrats get behind even a lousy candidate. Republicans form a circular firing squad, go third party, or stay home and pout. That´s how Democrats win elections.


Reply 4 - Posted by: golden, 12/20/2012 1:31:31 PM     (No. 9076332)

Susannah,
I have to agree with you on this. We need to stand united. Even if we are not in agreement 100%. I´ll take 90 or 80% of the time over someone on the other side of the isle.


Reply 5 - Posted by: enemyofthestate, 12/20/2012 1:45:14 PM     (No. 9076350)

I wouldn´t be so sure. An electorate that goes for a complete nincompoop like Warren can do it again. Don´t underestimate the capacity of low-information voters to do the wrong thing.


Reply 6 - Posted by: kens, 12/20/2012 1:50:29 PM     (No. 9076356)

If I were Brown I´d save my money. Besides, he is RINO anyway. Why not create real panic in the RNC and gain another Warren-like democrat..... why not another Kennedy? Any Kennedy? Capnip for Mass. voters.


Reply 7 - Posted by: dr.lakerman, 12/20/2012 2:14:20 PM     (No. 9076396)

If I understand #6´s post, a Kennedy, any Kennedy, drunk or sober, would beat the republican.
If Caroline Kennedy wants the job, she would probably get it without much resistence. I know she lives in NYC, but that makes no difference...


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: StormCnter, 12/20/2012 2:17:51 PM     (No. 9076405)

Special elections rarely draw voter interest that a regular election does. Brown just might sneak in. I hope so. I liked him.


Reply 9 - Posted by: horacer, 12/20/2012 2:58:08 PM     (No. 9076461)

In 2010 Scott Brown´s vote stopped the DISCLOSE Act. Without him free speech would have taken a huge hit. If Kerry´s appointed and he runs I´ll donate to him again.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Rafter, 12/20/2012 3:48:28 PM     (No. 9076536)

The artickle about Ben Affleck and the senate seat claims that...

another possible candydate would be...
Teddy Kennedy, Jr.

Caroline K-S is a New Yawkuh.
You know... ?
You know... ?
I mean...
Like... uhhhh...
You know... ?


Reply 11 - Posted by: MHR, 12/20/2012 5:03:25 PM     (No. 9076643)

Gee thanks 1&2, more upbeat comments about LDotters in Massachusetts! I´m sure your states have never elected any Democrats!!!

Go Scott Brown, would be a treat to have you back in the Senate, and we´re all counting the hrs until Lurch leaves us and heads to the State Dept, facelift, ne chin and all!!!


Reply 12 - Posted by: Susannah, 12/20/2012 5:31:00 PM     (No. 9076664)

Pardon the second post, but #8 makes an excellent point. Special elections won´t bring out all the college students who voted to get baked legally (medical marijuana) and the other non-resident flakes and grifters.

Brown was a good senator for Mass. and the nation; he voted against Obamacare (his first vote), against DREAM, against DISCLOSE (as a previous poster has mentioned), and a host of other legislation repugnant to conservatives. It´s true he´s not a purist--but he was upfront that he wouldn´t be.

To supplement my comment about Warren: Even her supporters refer to her, sardonically, as "Princess." But they voted for her because she was of their party. I once got a lefty acquaintance to admit that Teddy Kennedy was an idiot. But, my acquaintance added, "Kennedy is MY idiot."

Republicans and conservatives might do well do adopt such an attitude. Plus have the satisfaction of knowing that in voting for Scott Brown, you´re not voting for an idiot.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: ccprops, 12/20/2012 6:12:43 PM     (No. 9076711)

You´re absolutely right, #12. This is how Brown was elected in the first place. He would probably win again in an off-year.

As sick and twisted as is the state of Massachusetts (and I´ve lived there for 35 years, so I know), Brown has a very large non-moonbat base of support. Enough of a base to win again. Let´s hope he gives it another go.


Reply 14 - Posted by: civilservant, 12/21/2012 9:52:23 AM     (No. 9077535)

#11, nothing personal, you should read what I say about my fellow NJ residents........I was only referring to ´D´ voters in your state.

Merry Christmas!!



Post Reply   Close thread 716281




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Boehner: House won´t just ´take up
and accept´ Senate immigration bill
The Hill [DC], by Russell Berman & Mike Lillis    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 3:26:29 PM     Post Reply
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Thursday said the House won't pick up the Senate immigration bill and pass it. "The House remains committed to fixing our broken immigration system, but we will not simply take up and accept the bill that is emerging in the Senate if it passes," said the statement from Boehner, his top three lieutenants and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction on immigration. "The House remains committed to fixing our broken immigration system, but we will not simply take up and accept the bill that is emerging in the Senate if it passes," the statement said. "Rather, through regular order,

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable
American Spectator, by Betsy McCaughey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 6:20:22 AM     Post Reply
President Obama offers only weasel words to explain deaths in Libya and IRS abuses. He’s the master of verbal evasion. House Republicans need to replace debate with action to hold the president accountable on these issues. To get to the bottom of why four Americans died in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, House Republicans should issue a formal resolution demanding to know where the president was on the night September 11 and what role he played. Obama needs to be put on the hot seat. Benghazi- For eight months, the White House has maneuvered

   

 

  


 
What the White House Really Thinks
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:59:25 AM     Post Reply
Much has been written and said about the astoundingly tone deaf performance of White House spokesman Jay Carney during this past month of scandals. The former journalist has lost the confidence of the people who were once his colleagues due to his unwillingness to tell the truth about his own deceptive statements (never mind those he represents in front of the press) about the Benghazi talking points or even to acknowledge that he has changed his story. The same applies to the shifting story he has told about the Internal Revenue Service scandal

All in the Family
Washington Free Beacon, by C.J. Ciaramella    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:44:55 AM     Post Reply
A nonprofit connected to Rep. Corrine Brown (D., Fla.) and run by a local political power player overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million, the Florida Times-Union reported. According to an audit by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, the Community Rehabilitation Center in Jacksonville overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million. Reggie Gaffney, a former Jacksonville Port Authority board member, runs the nonprofit, which provides medical services for mental illness, substance abuse, and HIV/AIDS for low-income residents. Brown’s daughter, Shantrel, is a lobbyist for Arlington-based Alcade and Fay, whose clients include the nonprofit. C

Slain Russian ‘intimidated’ neighbors
Boston Herald, by Laurel J. Sweet*    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:40:57 AM     Post Reply
Former Cambridge neighbors of a Russian mixed martial arts brawler shot dead by an FBI agent early yesterday in Florida — after ?being questioned about his ties to the marathon bombing and a Waltham triple murder — said he was nasty. Ibragim Todashev, 27, also hung around with slain marathon bombing mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26 — swilling beer and eating chicken on a stoop on Harding Street, they said. “I was the happiest person when they moved. ... It’s a little more peaceful since they left,” a neighbor told the Herald yesterday of the Russian buddies.

The Real Voter Suppression of 2012
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:29:41 AM     Post Reply
The 2012 election season was filled with angry cries of “voter suppression,” almost all of them regarding attempts by states to require voter ID and otherwise improve ballot integrity. Bill Clinton warned that “there has never been — in my lifetime, since we got rid of the poll tax and all the other Jim Crow burdens on voting — the determined effort to limit the franchise that we see today.” Democratic-party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said “photo-ID laws, we think, are very similar to a poll tax.” All of this proved to be twaddle.

The ‘Criminal’ press
New York Post, by Michael A. Walsh    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:24:39 AM     Post Reply
The Justice Department’s secret seizure of phone records from The Associated Press and its monitoring of Fox News reporter James Rosen are nothing less than thuggish attempts to criminalize the practice of journalism — the only profession specifically protected by the US Constitution. Free and open inquiry is also the cornerstone of our democracy, a legacy of the Enlightenment that found its clearest expression in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” By which the Founders specifically meant political speech. They understood that, even with the checks and balances

   

 



 


Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
75 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Lois Lerner´s Brief And
Awful Day On Capitol Hill

53 replie(s)
NPR, by Frank James    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM     Post Reply
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to

Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

53 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Why was the Department
of Homeland Security monitoring
Tea Party IRS demonstrations?

47 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM     Post Reply
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

   

Post Reply   Close thread 716281





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~