|
|
| |
Topic: On Christmas, Einstein And Atheists |
On Christmas, Einstein And Atheists
Irish Examiner USA, by Alicia Colon
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Drive, 12/20/2012 6:48:40 AM
|
| It´s that time of year when secularists and atheists join forces to eradicate all signs of Christmas from the Christmas season. Thus Christmas trees become "holiday" trees and timid Christians swallow the attacks on their faith and their intelligence. It´s become second nature for secularists like Bill Maher to mock Christians as fools for believing in intelligent design and something as ridiculous as the Virgin Birth and the Resurrection. Many atheists claim that Albert Einstein, reputed to be by some the smartest man ever, was an atheist and the recent sale of his ´God´ letter in which
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
M2, 12/20/2012 7:07:57 AM (No. 9075709)
Very good, Alicia, as always.
It then occurred to me that belief in the supernatural and otherworldly events requires one to be humble. Humility is probably the hardest virtue and Pride probably the most deadly sin. To surrender to a higher power and feel its love is a gift that is there for us all and it is in the Christmas season that we are reminded that God so loved the world that He gave us His only Son.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
M2, 12/20/2012 7:18:43 AM (No. 9075729)
...(hit the "submit" button too quickly.)
It is pride and lack of humility that keep most atheists as they are. I used to be one and in my case, Alicia is spot on -- in order to admit to a higher power, an intelligent first cause and sustainer of the universe, one must admit that intellectual prowess and scientific proof are the answers to all things, never realizing that in so admitting, the atheist is saying, "The human mind is as high as it gets".
More, the atheist loves his alleged intellectual approach to his position, usually saying something like, "If it can´t be proved by repeatable experiments, peer review and scientific methodology, I will not believe it." Again, he/she place his mind above all other ways to gain knowlege.
....continued
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
M2, 12/20/2012 7:19:32 AM (No. 9075733)
.... continued So what? The "what" is this: When one eliminates, a priori, the possibility of the supernatural (that which does not follow the laws of science and nature), one automatically eliminates and entire venue, an entire pathway through which to gain knowledge. It is pride that makes him do this = he is afraid of seeming like a dunce to his friends and family. He takes pride in the popular position he has taken that only science has the answers.
Christians by no means are anti-science. People like me, for example place a reasonable amount of assurance in science. But we have not cut off avenues of learning such as admitting that supernatural events could and often do occur. Hence my belief in the God of the Bible.
Atheists might do well to view Dawkins, Hitchens et al with a new perspective; why are they so adamant that everyone else take what they say as gospel and that they know what is right because they are "scientists". All that says is that they have been short-sighted enough to discard an entire avenue of scientific exploration -- the supernatural
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jfodoch, 12/20/2012 7:29:46 AM (No. 9075746)
Can´t they just disagree without the rudeness? I´ll bet scientists do this all the time regarding scientific theories of others without being disrespectful. As far as what so-called celebs think, why does anyone care?
Mike Huckabee recently said libs are tolerant only of things with which they agree. They really seem to have no lives of their own.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
WAN2, 12/20/2012 7:34:31 AM (No. 9075753)
"Libs are tolerant only of things with which they agree....." Ditto believers. In fact, ditto mankind. Beware believers (of anything...) WITH POWER!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Altoona, 12/20/2012 7:44:48 AM (No. 9075771)
Thank you, #1. Gives me hope that someone can change.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
gerty, 12/20/2012 7:44:51 AM (No. 9075772)
A wonderful article from a fellow L.DOTTER. Merry Christmas, Alicia!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Jehoshaphat, 12/20/2012 7:45:33 AM (No. 9075773)
Friends, ponder not because the folly of the wicked is their undoing and they have no peace or rest. One only needs to contemplate the fact that matter cannot create itself and the power of God´s Word was sufficient to create the heavens and Earth. Hebrews 11:3 By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible. Merry Christmas to all. May the God of all things bless and keep you and yours.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
VinGoombatz, 12/20/2012 7:48:20 AM (No. 9075779)
Scientists can fine-tune ideas about contingency. I´m all for it.
Scientists can not get a grip on necessity.
Hence a huge lacuna in our understanding.
Nonbelievers who ignore this are revealed as a blinkered lot.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 12/20/2012 7:48:24 AM (No. 9075780)
Those who ´believe´ that human is as high as it gets, and that they just rot away in a sealed case after they die, are as sad, and ignorant, as it gets. There is so much more to know, to live and to love, and to aspire to.
I did not spring from an ape, as apparently did atheists. We call it FAITH for a reason. I am a faithiest.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Drive, 12/20/2012 7:53:14 AM (No. 9075789)
Einstein was no atheist so he was smarter than Dawkins et al. But he should have read the Book of Wisdom
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
dolphin, 12/20/2012 8:02:51 AM (No. 9075808)
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
600 years ago, the educated elite thought the world was flat and that disease was caused by vapours.
My computer is connected to all the computers in the world. I can find out a lot of things on it and talk to people anywhere. But my computer doesn´t know it´s sitting next to a vase of flowers.
There is a certain humility in knowing you don´t have all the answers.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
OhMy, 12/20/2012 8:31:44 AM (No. 9075852)
The truth about God is evident because God himself has made it evident in the things he has created..( Paraphrasing Rom 1:20-22 )
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Lawsy0, 12/20/2012 8:32:10 AM (No. 9075854)
Alica still finds the wonder in Christmas. Thank you. I am reminded of the child at the mall who upon seeing long lines asked, ´´Where is the line to see Jesus?´´ (Maybe the line forms this year just behind the children from Newtown.)
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
treyb, 12/20/2012 8:47:22 AM (No. 9075868)
Einstein thought the idea of a personal God to be silly.
Richard Dawkins would never deny that a personal God might exist.
The folks who are certain that there is a personal God are the problem in this world.
I am an atheist because I see no evidence of a God. That is all.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
tennisbum, 12/20/2012 8:53:56 AM (No. 9075879)
I often want to rant about the secularists and atheists and their "scientific" refutation of God. I often wish for scientific proof of God just to shut them up.. And then I realize that we are surrounded by God´s proof but many refuse to see it. Faith gives me great comfort; facts, not so much.
terrific column Alicia.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
happy conservative, 12/20/2012 8:54:37 AM (No. 9075884)
Thank you #13. Romans 1:16-2:11. Too long to type in, but oh so relevant to this discussion. "Professing to be wise they became fools." (Romans 1:22). Our God will not be mocked.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Mass Minority, 12/20/2012 8:59:09 AM (No. 9075893)
Too many who consider themselves the intellectual elite cannot admit, even to themselves, that some things are unknowable and unproveable. That is the essence of faith, believing in that which one can neither see nor prove. The existence (or nonexistence) of God cannot be proven. But that is the essence of mans purpose.
God gave man free will, if his existence were to be proven man would abey scripture out of fear, not out of love of his fellow man, out of faith. If his existence were disproven man would be free of any consequence for his actions, no guiding principles above his own selfish needs. No driving force for him to rise above the animals.
Everything else is immaterial. I personally believe in the Big Bang, evolution and many other seemingly disprovative scientific ideas. But those are just our limited glimpse into the ttols God used to create the cosmos and ultiomately us.
It is also why evil exists. God could easily stop it but to do so would break his own laws, miracles are wonderful things but they must be very rare events or man will stop excercising free will and simply wait for a miraculous salvation.
Humility is the best character trait. One can recognize the greatness of human accomplishment without declaring themselves gods. We are in Einsteins library, a little older and we have read the first couple books, but a vast warehouse full of ever more wondorous things remains untouched.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Drive, 12/20/2012 9:12:06 AM (No. 9075911)
Looks like the 6 year Matt is smarter than Dawkins
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Artie Choke, 12/20/2012 9:16:25 AM (No. 9075920)
A priest came up with the Big Bang Theory which Einstein initially rejected (your math is correct but your physics is not, he said)
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
ramona, 12/20/2012 9:17:39 AM (No. 9075921)
Thanks to OP for posting and to our own Alicia - thank you for putting into words what so many of us think. And Merry Christmas to you and Matt and all your family, Ramona (the Pest)
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
tee seeker, 12/20/2012 9:37:43 AM (No. 9075952)
Well done Ms. Colon. It is difficult to improve upon what she has written. I do wish, however, that Christians would defend their faith more vigorously. Happy holidays is a most vacuous greeting if I ever heard one, especially painful to hear it instead of the beautiful Merry Christmas. Well Merry Christmas and May God Bless you all.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
lilo, 12/20/2012 10:06:46 AM (No. 9076012)
If atheists don´t believe God exists, why are they so terrified of Him? Why do they feel the need to crush out all forms of worship?? If belief in God is only a myth, much like Santa and the Tooth Fairy, why do they feel the need denigrate the believers?
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 12/20/2012 10:11:56 AM (No. 9076023)
Sir Isaac Newton.
Every mathematician, physicist and scientist venerate the man and his astounding body of work.
But ... they fail to recognize his "science wok" was only a third of his output. The other two-thirds was devoted to studying the Scriptures and contemplating the mystery of God in our lives.
Most Astounding Book I´ve Ever Read
Temple At The Center Of Time
Examines and exposes Newton´s real life´s work. Go to Amazon and check it out.
Now, that said, a relative who is a theoretical mathematician for one of our alphabet agencies and the world´s foremost computer companies scanned this book and said, "Yeah? This doesn´t prove anything. Let me show you ..."
His intellect is in Total Competition Mode all the time. Can´t even respect Newton because "his" mind is so much more advanced.
Pride does indeed go before the fall.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Udanja99, 12/20/2012 10:13:53 AM (No. 9076026)
From poster 1-3, ...."If it can´t be proved by repeatable experiments, peer review and scientific methodology, I will not believe it."
And the same people swallow the global warming scam like pudding spooned into them by frauds.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
UncleCliffie, 12/20/2012 10:14:20 AM (No. 9076028)
The message at the funeral of an atheist; All dressed up, and nowhere to go. Over the years there have been so many events in my life that some would consider to be a coincidence, but I am convinced are the result of guidance by the unseen Hand of God. In February and March of this year I spent over 30 days in the hospital recovering from a by-pass operation that did not go well. While I won´t try to explain it, as I laid there, somewhere between the now and the hereafter, the feelings I had as the result of the prayers from the hundreds of people in my circle of friends and relatives was so strong, I could almost reach out and grasp it in my trembling fingers. Uncle Cliffie
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Gallo3, 12/20/2012 10:32:23 AM (No. 9076066)
Reminded of the Dyslexic Agnostic that was not sure if there was a Dog.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
toddh, 12/20/2012 10:33:16 AM (No. 9076067)
Yes, again, we have the Exceptional Commandment - Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness, *except* against atheists.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Melody, 12/20/2012 10:46:44 AM (No. 9076095)
I´m so glad to see others quoted the scripture I was looking for. ´´... that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse...´´
Nature shows us God´s hand. Creation Moments is a web site with a free daily newsletter, and today´s article told about life being found even in rock in Antarctica´s Victoria Land arctic desert. They referenced an article called ´´Living in rock and lichen it.´´ What an awesome God we serve.
Ah, there´s the rub, isn´t it? If we recognize Him as God, we will serve Him. We would rather serve our own pleasure than His. Intelligent people should be able to see, however, that the Creator´s ways are higher and better than our choices.
We need to experience God for ourselves. We can meet Him in His Holy Word, and we can meet Him through prayer. I had heard about big bears, but one day a huge one ran out of the woods and down the hill toward our house. Hearing about big bears and experiencing that one running into our yard were two very different things. God is there. It is important to experience Him for yourself.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Aunt Agnes, 12/20/2012 10:50:51 AM (No. 9076102)
Like #26, I also have had a few "intervening experiences" that I don´t think were coincidences. I observe nature up close when painting, & some things occur to me. Nature has a repeating pattern which causes me to think that while we are all different we are all alike, too. For instance, I was sketching a leafless tree seen at a distance. I saw for the first time how much it resembled the coronary venous system & how much they both resembled riverbeds & streams photographed from a great height. There is a design in the natural world that has a reassuring symmetry & mathematical rhythm that is at the same time enormous & microscopic, seen & unseen. Look at human achievement - we can use our gifts for big things that glorify, or small things that diminish. I choose to think that God reveals himself that way.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
steph_gray, 12/20/2012 10:54:56 AM (No. 9076108)
Loved #12´s post about the computer and the flowers. Says so much.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Arby, 12/20/2012 11:04:44 AM (No. 9076124)
It is indicative of the vacuity and decadence of our times that Bill Maher could have a platform within our society. Who cares what he thinks about anything?
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Butch59, 12/20/2012 11:12:58 AM (No. 9076136)
Such a wonderful article. There are many comments that can be made about it and many great ones already posted. I would like to add some myself.
Going back to the days of Adam and Eve, it´s clear to me that the serpent that induces Eve to eat the forbidden fruit was his (the serpent) way of telling Adam and Eve that if they ate the fruit, then they would be as gods themselves and as such would no longer be bound to God´s commands. And mankind has doing just that ever since.
Another point that is very difficult to understand. After so many failures (read the Old Testament) I believe that the Almighty made the decision to try something else. So, He sent his Son to live among men and teach to them about the changes being made. And one of those was the freedom of absolute choice. From that time onward, all mankind gets to make the choice of accepting God and his Commandants or go another way of their own choosing.
I choose to worship God and follow the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Merry Christmas to all.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
JHBoatwright, 12/20/2012 11:23:25 AM (No. 9076153)
Atheists have one day of the year solely dedicated to them.
April 1,,,,,,,
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
jimmiet, 12/20/2012 11:28:07 AM (No. 9076161)
Merry Christmas to all, believers and those who will.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
little guy, 12/20/2012 11:38:24 AM (No. 9076176)
Another good one from Ms. Colon.
C.S. Lewis used to say that he never met a true atheist --- a believer in nothing. Instead, what he met after his lectures were people who claimed to be atheists. But after he spoke to them (& grilled them) they almost always said that they believed in ghosts, UFOs, aliens from Mars, the power of the stars, luck, karma, birth signs, etc. In short, their disbelief was all based on themselves and their inability to transcend the natural plane they were stuck on by being human. They couldn´t expand their understanding to encompass the miracle of God --- but they readily did just that to believe in junk science!
I´ll continue to believe in God until anyone can prove He doesn´t exist. Can´t do that? Then leave me alone --- and stay in your self-created darkness.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
OdinsAcolyte, 12/20/2012 11:41:19 AM (No. 9076182)
The higher Power does exist whether we believe in it or not. It does not require our belief. It is not what we imagine it is because it may not be encompassed by the human mind so many human minds reject it. Humility is a virtue that is in minimal supply today. One can tell by the tone of voice and language used by the population in general. We are forgiven. All we need do is ask.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
lasvegaslou, 12/20/2012 12:14:06 PM (No. 9076226)
Excellent, excellent, #12. Your simple post says so much.
A couple of days after the horror in Conneticut, while walking through the supermarket, a beautiful rendition of "Silent Night" by some unknown children´s choir was playing on the store speakers. When they reached the line "Sleep in heavenly peace, sleep in heavenly peace..." I had to stop and take off my glasses to dry my eyes. I was not surprised to see the same reaction from others in the market - here in Sin City.
By the way, for what it´s worth, I believe Las Vegas has more churches per capita than any other city in the nation. We need them, I guess. So many of us here have a lot to atone for.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
octrojan, 12/20/2012 12:32:34 PM (No. 9076259)
Dennis Prager always says those that don´t believe in God don´t believe in nothing; they believe in anything.
He also quotes a Rabbi who said: We have to believe in free will; we don´t really have a choice.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Bla Bla, 12/20/2012 1:06:36 PM (No. 9076300)
Thx OP -- I sent the link to this article to all my friends & family as my Christmas e-card! Fabulous & timely piece!
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
thelmalou, 12/20/2012 1:34:31 PM (No. 9076336)
Thank you, Miss Alicia...always a joy. Merry Christmas.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
Hoosier, 12/20/2012 2:51:57 PM (No. 9076452)
"If it can´t be proved by repeatable experiments, peer review and scientific methodology, I will not believe it."
Luke 4:12 Jesus answered, “It is said: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’ ”
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
kono, 12/20/2012 3:01:00 PM (No. 9076466)
Following-up on #2 -- Science, by its definition and rules, excludes anything supernatural. That´s why it´s referred to as natural science. Only things that can be sensed, measured, and manipulated are allowed in that arena. So God is not welcome.
As such, we have a small arena of facts that human beings understand, and research seeks to broaden until it encompasses all facts and known truths. [Understanding, seeking truth.]
Theology and other religious study begins with a particular body of truths that we take and pass on as God´s revelation of truth. Biblical scholars and other such ´researchers´ seek to understand that revelation ever more deeply and completely. [Truth, seeking understanding.]
The popular fallacy is that science and religion are in direct conflict with each other, and only one of them can be valid. But they simply start at opposing ends of the connection between truth and understanding, and are trying to fill-in the space between.
Science and religion complement each other and contextualize each other´s insights. The war between the two is as contrived and misleading as the recent "GOP war against women". And I´m convinced a thoughtful scientist will, noticing how stupefyingly limited our ability to perceive/detect things is, acknowledge that there is more to the universe than we can ever know, no matter how much time we have to study it. The ´fractal´ nature of reality virtually guarantees that we will never quite reach that retreating horizon of absolute truth.
Sorry for the length of this. But a truly Happy Holy Days to the whole Ldotter gang.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
grundoon, 12/20/2012 3:02:46 PM (No. 9076468)
#s 26 & 30: I think it was Einstein who said that "coincidences were just God´s way of remaining anonymous."
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
kono, 12/20/2012 3:15:28 PM (No. 9076492)
#23 -- Don´t fall into the same dumb fallacy that LGBT activists do, assuming (and insisting) that any who oppose their views are AFRAID of them.
During my evangelical-athiesm years, I denigrated religious people, simply because I saw them as brainwashing others to accept imprisonment by superstition and myth. I worked diligently and passionately to reason believers into theological doubt, and I´ll work the rest of my days trying to make up for that.
It wasn´t out of fear, but anger and resentment at what I saw as profound injustice, that made me rail against religion. Judging others´ motives (like saying "atheists fight against religion out of fear", or "she meant to hurt that boy") is contrary to Christian belief.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
NMPatriot, 12/20/2012 3:50:27 PM (No. 9076539)
I suggest a new approach. Evolution, as it may be proved scientifically, is only a tiny fraction of understanding of our whole universe and reason for being. Creationism does not go far enough. I believe that mankind´s miniscule understanding of this carnal universe we live in cannot begin to explain the basic questions of "Why do I exist and understand that existence?", "Why am I a sentient being separate from all others?" and "Do I have an immortal soul and will it be held responsible for my actions here in this world by a greater power?" .
I posit that no matter how we try to explain these questions and no matter the ideology, evidence or reason, we and this are all only a small part of a much grander design. I call it "Divine Design".
Divine Design is God´s plan for everything which has existed before the so called "Big Bang" or start through to the end of the universe (if there ever actually is a "beginning" or "ending"). It is all encompassing and we are too extremely primitive to begin to understand Divine Design. It is just pure arrogance to say we understand anything beyond the most basic laws of our physical universe. I think Einstein may agree.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
faith_and_reason, 12/20/2012 3:54:42 PM (No. 9076544)
#15 wrote:
"Richard Dawkins would never deny that a personal God might exist.
The folks who are certain that there is a personal God are the problem in this world.
I am an atheist because I see no evidence of a God. That is all."
My question: Are you certain there is no personal God who could and would give me justified certainty without also giving it to you?
It seems that your certain (without reason) that "The folks who are certain that there is a personal God are the problem in this world."
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
faith_and_reason, 12/20/2012 3:56:20 PM (No. 9076546)
Sorry... You are (not "your")
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
treyb, 12/20/2012 3:59:04 PM (No. 9076557)
"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this."
Albert Einstein
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 12/20/2012 6:32:44 PM (No. 9076742)
I am an humble man- as smart as most, and have studied extensively on the subject of God, the Bible, etc. I had some sort of strange event in my life that gave me insight- I believe. And, my faith tells me, God is not at all- not in any sense, what people think. Neither is the Bible, nor Jesus. Man´s relationship with God is actually Man´s relationship with himself. Evil and good both come directly from the human heart and mind. Animals have no concept of either. We make our own hell and we can have our own heaven- it´s entirely up to us- All God did was make us aware of that fact!
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
John Rocker, 12/20/2012 6:34:51 PM (No. 9076745)
To paraphrase Blaise Pascal´s Wager on Faith: If you are right and I am wrong, I have lost nothing, however If I am right and you are wrong, you have lost everything.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
kayjaymac, 12/20/2012 7:31:59 PM (No. 9076812)
God has definitely blessed L-dotters with great insight and the talent to put it into words. I especially appreciate the visual of #14´s post. Merry Christmas to all of you.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 12/20/2012 10:53:43 PM (No. 9076958)
Living with GOD in our hearts is like opening our souls and letting the sun shine in reflecting the Lord´s very being. If we relax and accept we come to know of the many times we do find his hand directing our lives and receiving comfort through his son who chose via love to endure our frail efforts and guide our said souls. To celebrate his coming the Lord Jesus the Christ year after year through the centuries is to give him the honor denied too many times as he walked among frail mankind. Atheists and others though find it not troubling to jump into every pagan concept and falsehood that arrives on the winds of whimsey. They push the disbelief agendas if they are daring God to manifest his power by their order and quell their fears. They are in exile and their souls will be lost.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
tukaram, 12/20/2012 11:46:49 PM (No. 9076992)
#15, it is interesting: you see no evidence of a God....and I see nothing but evidence of God. And I remember seeing the world, once upon a time, the way you see it now.
William Blake, seeing the works of "Enlightenment" thinkers, wrote:
Mock on, mock on, Voltaire, Rousseau; Mock on, mock on; ´tis all in vain! You throw the sand against the wind, And the wind blows it back again. And every sand becomes a gem Reflected in the beams divine; Blown back they blind the mocking eye, But still in Israel´s paths they shine.
The Atoms of Democritus And Newton´s Particles of Light Are sands upon the Red Sea shore, Where Israel´s tents do shine so bright.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
hammondb3, 12/21/2012 2:16:10 PM (No. 9078158)
15,
I look around see nothing but evidence of a God. With my mind and 5 senses I have enjoyed Beethoven Piano Concertos, Bach Partitas, the hugs of my children, southern pan-fried chicken, numerous books, great films and other forms of art. I can personally find no adequate resolution to the atheist´s notion that all of these things were created, and enjoyed, by randomly rearranged dirt.
The complexity of even the simplest form of life yet discovered is still well beyond the reach of being replicated by the collective minds of the world´s most brilliant scientists who are at it 365 days a year, 24 hours a day.
If, at some point in the future, these scientists succeed in creating a legitimate, replicating form of life (it has to self replicate to count, in my book), atheists worldwide will likely herald the end of the idea of an intelligent creator.
Funny. I would argue that the decades of research and refinement of technologies are actually evidence that life can ONLY be created by an intelligent cause.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 12/21/2012 11:27:01 PM (No. 9078773)
What saddens me the most is the number of young people that don´t know G-d and mock religion.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"
|
Carney: Senior White House staff knew of IRS probe
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/20/2013 4:04:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — The White House says White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was first informed about an audit of the IRS´ inappropriate targeting of conservative groups on April 24 and that she notified senior staff, including Denis McDonough, the chief of staff to President Barack Obama. White House press secretary Jay Carney says Ruemmler "appropriately" decided not to tell Obama at the time because the audit was ongoing. The audit by a Treasury Department inspector general found that IRS employees singled out groups with names like "tea party" and "patriots" for special scrutiny that delayed their applications for tax exempt status.
|
Exclusive: Hillary´s Benghazi ´Scapegoat´ Speaks Out
|
|
Daily Beast, by Josh Rogin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/20/2013 4:02:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Following the attack in Benghazi, senior State Department officials close to Hillary Clinton ordered the removal of a mid-level official who had no role in security decisions and has never been told the charges against him. He is now accusing Clinton’s team of scapegoating him for the failures that led to the death of four Americans last year. Raymond Maxwell was placed on forced “administrative leave” after the State Department’s own internal investigation, conducted by an Administrative Review Board (ARB) led by former State Department official Tom Pickering.
|
Organized labor to oppose President Obama´s nomination of Penny Pritzker for commerce secretary
|
|
New York Daily News, by James Warren
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 1:53:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Organized labor will break its silence and oppose President Obama´s nominee for Commerce Secretary, Chicago´s Penny Pritzker, the Daily News has learned. The decision stems from long-standing grievances with labor practices at the Hyatt Hotels chain, a source of her family´s fortune, and despite earlier reports that unions would not raise objections to the nomination. Donald "D" Taylor, president of the national Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees (HERE), confirmed the move to The News on Monday. His opposition was spurred by his just learning that the Senate Commerce Committee was moving up its confirmation hearing for Pritzker.
|
Report: DOJ Leaked Docs To Smear Fast & Furious Whistleblower, Says IG
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Matthew Boyle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 1:38:38 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General published a new report Monday that confirms former U.S. Attorney for Arizona Dennis Burke leaked a document intended to smear Operation Fast and Furious scandal whistleblower John Dodson. The DOJ IG said it found “Burke’s conduct in disclosing the Dodson memorandum to be inappropriate for a Department employee and wholly unbefitting a U.S. Attorney.”
|
Three Fox News Staffers Targeted By Justice Department
|
|
Breitbart Big Journalism, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 1:30:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Fox News reports that three Fox staffers, two reporters and one producer, were targeted by Barack Obama´s Justice Department. Fox doesn´t have all the details yet on a reporter William La Jeunesse and producer Mike Levine, but their emails showed up in a IG report regarding Fast and Furious. Either their emails were leaked by the Justice Department officials they were sent to, or the email accounts of both were subpoenaed and invaded by government investigators. The IG report does say that subpoenas were issued to obtain emails. Whose email was targeted is not yet known.
|
IRS Was Afraid of the Constitution, the Obama Scandal Suggests
|
|
New York Sun, by Ira Stoll
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 1:23:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Of all the discouraging news in the scandal involving President Obama’s Internal Revenue Service, the most illuminating is that one of the things that triggered additional scrutiny from the IRS for groups applying for tax-exempt status was any plan for “educating on the constitution and bill of rights.” As the details of the situation have emerged, various explanations have arisen for the behavior of the IRS officials involved. A 2,700-word report issued over the weekend by a team of seven New York Times journalists attributed the problem to “an understaffed Cincinnati outpost that was alienated from the broader I.R.S. culture.”
|
IRS To Pro-Life Groups:You Know You’re Gonna Have To Give Up This Whole Protest Thing, Right?
|
|
Hot Air, by Duane Patterson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 12:38:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We already have seen that the Obama administration doesn’t think much of the freedom of religion clause when it interferes with the HHS regulations. We’ve been shamed into giving up the 2nd Amendment, for the children. We’ve seen the freedom of the press isn’t really freedom anymore if the Justice Department doesn’t like what you’re writing about. But with the testimony Friday of Steven Miller to the House Ways And Means Committee, we see now that what you pray about is a legitimate tax question. And on the Hugh Hewitt
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|