A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Collective Solutions Rarely
Solve Individual Problems
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Collective Solutions Rarely
Solve Individual Problems

Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh

Original Article

Posted By:Desert Fox, 12/19/2012 5:30:42 PM

RUSH: Hey, guess what, folks? Obama is TIME Magazine´s Person of the Year. What a shock. What an absolute shock. And wait ´til you hear why TIME Magazine chose him. It is a vindication of me, your host, El Squisho, El Rushbo here at the EIB Network and the Limbaugh Institute. TIME Magazine actually goes out and they say Obama is president because people that don´t know anything voted for him in greater numbers than anybody else. And that is a testament to his strength, to be able to convince

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: WAN2, 12/19/2012 6:11:47 PM     (No. 9075094)

After 22+ years of (over?) optimism, Rush sees the light and even HE depresses. No more tilting at windmills, my man. When rape is inevitable, lie back and try to enjoy it.


Reply 2 - Posted by: janylou, 12/19/2012 6:23:25 PM     (No. 9075103)

The dim solution to everything is one size fits all-including health care. Their solutions fail every time and yet they are given credit for trying. It is about time someone give them an F for effort!


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: rabbit, 12/19/2012 7:24:30 PM     (No. 9075171)

Rush, Rush, why can´t you see the obvious? You wrote about it when you mentioned the psychiatrist who feared his patients calling at night...but he couldn´t get them admitted because they chose not to be. The reason he couldn´t get them admitted is that the law says they can´t be admitted without their consent - even for a 24 hour hold while they are being evaluated - unless a judge intervenes. Not a medical doctor, not a psychiatrist...but a judge. Now, if the patient´s own psychiatrist knows he needs to be admitted, why do our laws require a non-psychiatrist judge to give his opinion first? But that is how the laws are set up.

Change this simple law and you solve a whole lot of problems, both collectively and individually. Permit either the treating psychiatrist or immediate family members to place a person in a 24-hour hold inpatient while he is being evaluated. The result of that evaluation can be taken to a judge for a request for a longer stay.


Reply 4 - Posted by: LouD, 12/19/2012 8:02:08 PM     (No. 9075202)

Try telling that to the ACLU, #3.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Lt.Mom, 12/19/2012 9:16:46 PM     (No. 9075323)

Soviet psychiatrists were very helpful in diagnosing mental health problems in political dissenters during the communist era. Would anyone here like to be accused and held without legal representation? I wouldn´t like to give such powers to my friends and relatives, nor to some mental health expert that I did not know and trust, especially in the Obama era.

I would like to remind people that ´mental illness´ is a rather nebulous term that can describe a very wide range of behaviors, and diagnosis is not always reached by a consensus of experts. I want the legal protections to be in place if the powers that be are given authority to lock someone up with a mental health diagnosis. It is possible to get an emergency crisis intervention under certain circumstances, but we must have some type of due process to protect the person being held, in order to protect their rights.



Post Reply   Close thread 716193




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"



Report: Justice Department targeted TWO
Fox News Channel reporters and a producer
for talking with government sources
Daily Mail (U.K.), by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/20/2013 9:47:03 PM     Post Reply
The Fox News Channel is outraged over new revelations that three of its reporting staffers were targeted by the U.S. Department of Justice in criminal investigations related to their attempts to obtain information from government sources. James Rosen, the network´s chief Washington correspondent, has become a First Amendment cause celebre over his treatment by the Obama administration. But the DOJ, Fox says, also investigated the Emmy Award-winning investigative reporter William La Jeunesse and Fox News producer Mike Levine. Rosen, according to affidavits filed by FBI agents, was considered a possible criminal co-conspirator The Washington Post reported Monday morning that Rosen

   

 

  


 
The White House’s
shifting IRS account
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/20/2013 9:43:02 PM     Post Reply
The White House on Monday once again added to the list of people who knew about the IRS investigation into its targeting of conservative groups — saying White House chief of staff Denis McDonough had been informed about a month ago. Press secretary Jay Carney said again that no one had told President Barack Obama ahead of the first news reports: not his top aide McDonough, nor his chief counsel Kathy Ruemmler, nor anyone from the Treasury Department. Monday’s revelation amounts to the fifth iteration of the Obama administration’s account of events, after initially saying that the White House had first

White House senior aides knew details of IRS
probe but didn’t tell Obama, spokesman says
Washington Post, by Juliet Eilperin and Zachary A. Goldfarb    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/20/2013 9:41:35 PM     Post Reply
Senior White House officials, including Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, learned last month about a review by the Treasury Department’s inspector general into whether the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status, but they did not inform President Obama, the White House said Monday. The acknowledgement is the White House’s latest disclosure in a piecemeal, sometimes confusing release of details concerning the extent to which White House officials knew of the IG’s findings that IRS officials engaged in the “inappropriate” targeting of conservative non-profits for heightened scrutiny. Previously, the White House said counsel Kathryn

Study: White Americans More
Likely to See Obama as
Angry Than Non-White Americans
U.S. News and World Report, by Elizabeth Flock    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/20/2013 9:36:28 PM     Post Reply
White Americans are more likely to see anger in the facial expressions of President Obama than non-white Americans are, according to a study from the University of Arkansas that will be published in the journal Political Psychology in July. The study showed more than 100 participants – who identified as white, black, native American and Asian – a silent video of Obama´s 2010 White House Correspondents Dinner speech, a night in which the president traditionally cracks jokes at the press and lawmakers, and asked them to describe how they thought Obama was feeling based on his facial expressions.

5 Troubling Questions
About The IRS Scandal
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/20/2013 9:31:14 PM     Post Reply
Scandal Watch: Despite White House attempts to brush the IRS scandal aside as "irrelevant" or the work of rogue miscreants, huge questions remain about who ordered IRS agents to harass Tea Party groups, and why. Every day, in fact, raises new and more disturbing questions that congressional investigators must get answers to. Among them: 1. Who told Internal Revenue Service workers to target conservatives? It´s becoming increasingly clear these workers did not act on their own. Over the weekend, the Washington Post quoted an IRS staffer saying how "everything comes from the top."

A Journalist ´Co-Conspirator´
Wall Street Journal, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/20/2013 9:29:47 PM     Post Reply
Ok, we´ve learned our lesson. Last week we tried to give the Obama Administration the benefit of the doubt over its far-reaching secret subpoenas to the Associated Press, and now we learn that was the least of its offenses against a free press. No attempt to be generous to this crowd goes unpunished. The latest news, disclosed by the Washington Post on Monday, is that the Justice Department targeted a Fox News reporter as a potential "co-conspirator" in a leak probe. The feds have charged intelligence analyst Stephen Jin-Woo Kim with disclosing classified information to Fox reporter James Rosen.

   

 



 
The Obama Objective:
To Control The News
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/20/2013 9:25:00 PM     Post Reply
First Amendment: For awhile, it looked like the White House wanted just to control "the narrative." But its seizure of AP phone records and surveillance of Fox employees now show its real aim: to control the news. The Obama political team at the White House has always prided itself on its media savvy. After all, they got a candidate with an otherwise unsalable socialist past elected on a campaign that sold his personality, not his platform. They won saintly press coverage, with much blather, mostly from the Washington Post about how Obama was all about "storytelling" and selling a "narrative."



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

   

 

  


 
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

   

Post Reply   Close thread 716193





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~