A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The GOP Better Listen to
Bobby Jindal on Birth Control
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The GOP Better Listen to
Bobby Jindal on Birth Control

New Republic, by Amy Sullivan

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/19/2012 1:21:43 PM

Lost amid the shock and horror of Friday´s news was a remarkable op-ed in the Wall Street Journal by Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, who should no longer be called a "rising star" of the GOP. He commands attention by virtue of being smart, good at his job, and not a white guy. So it´s significant that he chose to use his platform to break ranks with many social conservatives in his party by calling for over-the-counter sales of birth control pills. Of course, Jindal did so by couching his argument

Comments:
Sullivan can´t help sniping at Jindal for a "hyper-partisan defensive posture", when he is only advising the GOP why our own rhetoric and postures should change.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Drive, 12/19/2012 1:29:45 PM     (No. 9074591)

East Indians are considered to be Caucasian which is based on their bone structure not skin color. FYI, most on the right believe in people making their own decision on birth control and not the government making us pay for it.


Reply 2 - Posted by: sardonic, 12/19/2012 1:36:45 PM     (No. 9074606)

I´ve grown tired of the open pillorying of "white guys." That said, Jindal rocks.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: AltaD, 12/19/2012 1:38:24 PM     (No. 9074608)

I´m not sure which is more insulting, the photo they ran of Gov. Jindal or "hyper-partisan".


Reply 4 - Posted by: Susannah, 12/19/2012 2:01:58 PM     (No. 9074648)

Jindal is right. De-politicize the issue, and you take away one of the Democrats´ most effective weapons. Who knows how much damage Santorum did to Republicans with his idiotic comment that, if he were president, he´d talk to the nation about how birth control wasn´t okay for Christians.


Reply 5 - Posted by: mitzi, 12/19/2012 2:47:26 PM     (No. 9074764)

Not "white"? Just what race is he?


Reply 6 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 12/19/2012 3:07:06 PM     (No. 9074793)

How is making birth control available over-the-counter going against conservative social values?

If it´s an over-the-counter medicine, it´s not covered under insurance. Nobody is forced to buy it, but they will spend their own money to buy it if they chose to buy it.

Employers won´t be forced to cover it in their insurance either, since over-the-counter drugs aren´t covered by insurance.

Laws are already on the books that wouldn´t force any pharmacy to sell it over-the-counter if they had moral convictions against it.

Most conservatives use birth control. I don´t know of any conservatives that want to ban birth control. They just don´t want to force any employer that has moral reasons not to pay for birth control to have to pay for it or go out of business (or at least pay huge fines).

Bobby Jindal is one of my few hopes left that the Republican Party might just survive as a real major party of conservatism and not a minor ´´Demon-RAT lite´´ party.


Reply 7 - Posted by: frenesi1, 12/19/2012 4:37:13 PM     (No. 9074971)

well, I don´t have a problem with what he said as long as I don´t hear any stories about what a devout Catholic he is. Republicans didn´t say anything about birth control as far and banning it so I wasn´t too concerned about it. Sounds to me like Jindal is letting the dems set the table on what we believe or don´t believe.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: vesicant, 12/19/2012 4:50:29 PM     (No. 9074986)

I remember when they banned phenylpropanolamine because 1 out of a 100 million women or some ridiculous number might possibly have a chance of perhaps someday having heart trouble. But yeah, let´s make birth control pills OTC so kids can buy them and get even further feminized. The war on men continues by all means possible.


Reply 9 - Posted by: BigGeorgeTX, 12/19/2012 5:45:03 PM     (No. 9075052)

I totally agree with Bobby Jindal on this. The overriding fear and suspicion liberals have of conservatives is that we want to restrict the ability to engage in sex of any sort, without dealing with the consequences. Of course, over the counter birth control won´t protect them against STDs, but might help reduce the number of abortions, the last chance birth control that is the holy grail of liberals.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Question_Assumptions, 12/19/2012 7:22:22 PM     (No. 9075168)

"Not ´white´? Just what race is he?"

Yeah, I have the same problem. A lot of people who seem to be classified as non-white (e.g., many Hispanics, Middle-Easterners, and Asian Indians) sure look white to me and fall into the classic "Caucasian" category and seem pretty white to me. I think the goal is to peel off enough "whites" by classifying them non-"white" so that they can declare "white" people a minority. They could get there now if they would just take a page from 19th Century nativists and classify people of Irish, Italian, Slavic, Greek, and Jewish descent as non-white, too.

Of course the real issue is culture, not skin color, facial features, or build, which is how all of those groups once attacked by the nativists came to be widely considered "white". It´s also why few people think of East Asians, or even Asian Indians for that matter, when they hear the word "minority" or "non-white" because those ethnicities have largely assimilated culturally.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Rakasha, 12/19/2012 7:24:30 PM     (No. 9075170)

First off, the author of this piece is an idiot.

Speaking to Governor Jindal´s comments, there are already several effective means of birth control available over-the-counter. The one type of birth control that both parties are politicizing can be a medical disaster for some people. This has nothing to do with conservatism and, as one poster has already pointed out, we need to quit letting them set the table.


Reply 12 - Posted by: kafir091101, 12/20/2012 12:53:06 AM     (No. 9075514)

The essence of the problem is not whether the author is an idiot or whether Jindal is a fool or anti-conservative or is giving in to the Marxist POS in DC.

The essence of the problem is why did we lose this last election and how will we hold the line in 2014 and win in 2016.

The lefties are laughing their butts off watching us rip ourselves apart from inside.

Between them and us, we are doomed!

As Rush recently said, ‘We are watching the collapse of the American society’.

Do you negative harpies want to continue supporting that collapse or are you ready to work for a consensus that creates a foot hold for rebuilding this republic.

Draw a line in the sand so the rest of us can determine those who are with us and those who are against us.

Do I support OTC Contraceptions? No.

Will the OTC Contraception issue allow Dems to keep control of the Senate and WH? Yes.

Will I concede the OTC Contraception issue? Yes, if it helps us control Congress and the WH.

We are looking at the probable permanent demise of the great experiment that is America.

We can either have an armed revolution or we can temporarily prostitute ourselves and win control of Washington and then start turning things around via a constitutional government that most of believe in…….

Think about it. The future of our children and grand children depends on our success or failure!

Kafir


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 716166




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Despite the WaPost, Benghazi
Is a Major Scandal
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM     Post Reply
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.

Role of Health-Law
´Navigators´ Under Fire
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM     Post Reply
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"

Labor unions break ranks with
White House on ObamaCare
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM     Post Reply
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal

Issa Warns Hillary
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM     Post Reply
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee

   

 

  


 
Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM     Post Reply
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...

How Hope and Change Gave
Way To Spying on the Press
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM     Post Reply
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,

Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi
Whistleblowers with Info
Devastating to Clinton and Obama
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM     Post Reply
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

   

 



 
White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement

   

Post Reply   Close thread 716166





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~