A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Source: CT Murderer Lived
in Windowless Basement
Playing Violent Video Games
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Source: CT Murderer Lived
in Windowless Basement
Playing Violent Video Games

Breitbart´s Big Government, by Tony Lee

Original Article

Posted By:KarenJ1, 12/18/2012 10:49:59 AM

Adam Lanza, the shooter who massacred 20 children and six adults last Friday at Sandy Hook Elementary School, spent hours in the windowless basement of his home playing violent video games like "Call of Duty" and obsessing over "guns and military equipment." Peter Wlasuk, a plumber who worked at the Lanza home, told The Sun that Lanza "lived in the basement" and he found it "strange." "He had a proper set up down there — computers, a bathroom, bed and desk and a TV," Wlasuk said. "There were no windows.” Wlasuk said he went down to the

Comments:
It is so difficult to understand how you could allow an individual with mental challenges to have access to guns. He loved being careful with them and made it a source of pride?? How chilling.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: GreatGreyhounds, 12/18/2012 10:54:14 AM     (No. 9072545)

Instead, he should have been under 24 hour supervised medical care.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 12/18/2012 11:10:06 AM     (No. 9072575)

It’s good to know that mentally ill folks´ behavior is constantly protected and guarded by the ACLU.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: zzzghy, 12/18/2012 11:11:47 AM     (No. 9072577)

"CT Murderer Lived in Windowless Basement Playing Violent Video Games"

Well, there´s a shocker for you.

And for this, the libtard left once again ramps up their bogus progaganda wagon to wreck the Second Ammendment.

I´m saddened and outraged by the crazy violence of last week. We all are. But make no mistake, the influential powers on the left and their obedient tailpipe-sucking media minions have already moved on from the story -- which was never accurately reported anyway -- and are now in full-blown political agenda spin mode.

There is hardly a chance in hades that restrictive gun control laws at the fed level would have prevented this crazy lost soul from doing his hateful dirty work. No chance, actually.

As so many have already done, I refer you to the OKC terror bombing. If and when legal firearms are swept from the hands of law-abiding Americans, the next fad amongst young crazies will be kitchen cabinet explosives. The problem isn´t banana clips; the problem is twisted brain cells.

But, everyone already knows this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: zzzghy, 12/18/2012 11:13:20 AM     (No. 9072579)

(...make that proPaganda. Sorry)


Reply 5 - Posted by: wws, 12/18/2012 11:34:38 AM     (No. 9072624)

24 hour supervised care? Sorry to throw a stink bomb, but who´s supposed to pay for that? Not many middle class families can afford that, not even if they spend every cent they have. And trying to get such a thing is a good way to get your insurance canceled. So is this going to be another job for ObamaCare?

Do we make all current and potential psych patients permanent wards of the State?


Reply 6 - Posted by: Keekng, 12/18/2012 11:38:52 AM     (No. 9072632)

SEE?! If there were no violent video games the incident never would have happened!
OUTLAW the video games!


Reply 7 - Posted by: GhostofChesterton, 12/18/2012 11:45:47 AM     (No. 9072648)

Calls for banning violent video games is as futile as calls for banning guns. Neither are the root problem. We teach kids in schools that the human race is bad. We cause global warming, climate change, dead polar bears, hurricanes, overpopulation, and inequality among our fellow man. We are banned from teaching them in public schools that man was created in a Divine image, and that we were put on this earth to love one-another. Kids get this starting at age 5. Then you layer on parents allowing them to view violent shows, and play violent video games even before the kid has reached the age of reason. Layer on top of this all the psych drugs distributed like pez. During these formative years lies the roots of the cultural rot we see. Because of this, most organically normal kids today grow up to be libs, OK with abortion, and a 55% divorce rate. When the kid has an organic problem on top of that, we get last Friday´s disgrace. Violent video games are harmless in the hands of children who have been taught reason. Guns are harmless in the hands of people who respect them, and have learned responsible ownership and use.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: paulfromTexas, 12/18/2012 11:48:00 AM     (No. 9072653)

Don´t forget to add
"Eating Psychosis Inducing Drugs" to deal with his insanities.
never forget the pharmaceutical aspect....all the recent shootings involved these mindwreckers...


Reply 9 - Posted by: provide, 12/18/2012 11:49:31 AM     (No. 9072655)

New government guidelines will call for all new construction basements to have windows.


Reply 10 - Posted by: CEP, 12/18/2012 12:07:01 PM     (No. 9072712)

The guy was crazy, he could have been playing with dolls and he would still have done this. It was this guy, not games, posters, guns etc but this sick demented person.


Reply 11 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 12/18/2012 12:29:26 PM     (No. 9072770)

"It is so difficult to understand how you could allow an individual with mental challenges to have access to guns."

Actually, OP, it is difficult to understand how this mother would allow her son to live closed off in her basement with access to a computer and violent video games, which she probably provided him. She should have exercised some control what went on in HER home.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Davids918, 12/18/2012 12:31:49 PM     (No. 9072775)

#5, the ACLU sued the state of CT to prevent involuntary commitment for mental health assistance.

The mother was unable to get her son the help she probably knew he needed but was unable due to him being an adult.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: rabbit, 12/18/2012 12:33:32 PM     (No. 9072781)

Many a person on the autism spectrum would be far more content in a windowless basement room. Why? Because the wind doesn´t make noise at windows in the night. You can´t see lightning during a summer storm. Acorns don´t fall off the tree and hit the window, waking you up. These might seem minor to someone who doesn´t know autism...but they can be the source of panic and meltdowns for some people on the autism spectrum. If I had a windowless basement bedroom in my home, I would absolutely offer it to my loved one on the spectrum.


Reply 14 - Posted by: rabbit, 12/18/2012 12:40:04 PM     (No. 9072799)

#11, that is very easy to understand...if you know autism. As I explained above, a windowless basement room is a great choice for someone on the autism spectrum. As to why he spent his time down there - there are precious few options for adults on the autism spectrum. Once out of school, services cease. Few are employed; the unemployment rate is higher than for most any other disability. From what I have read, she was trying to find a school for him and was planning to sell the house and move to another state so he could attend an appropriate school (very few exist). Likely he was the calmest when at his computer in his own room...and she chose to allow him to be where he was the calmest. Her tragic mistake was having guns in her home. She thought her training was adequate. But she probably didn´t fully recognize the difference between a psychotic break and his everyday behavior.


Reply 15 - Posted by: killerbee, 12/18/2012 12:43:52 PM     (No. 9072814)

Gossip. I´m so sick of the media running rumors and gossip about these people. As above poster says, maybe the windowless basement was the only calming place the guy had in the house. Who knows if he played violent video games? And who´s defining violent? Is it Super Hero Squad violence where the Hulk and Wolverine bash each other? Or is it Grand Theft Auto which has no redeeming social value whatsoever? Or Call of Duty? Or Lego Batman where they bash each other to pieces only to reform again?

I was sick of the perfidious media before this but now I can barely hold me breakfast down thinking about them and their nasty little agendas. Such jerks.


Reply 16 - Posted by: rolfnader, 12/18/2012 1:03:32 PM     (No. 9072866)

Here´s something else that might help with many ´spectrums´.A gun safe. This mother knew the kid had problems and there is no excuse for him having easy access to a gun. Even a BB gun.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Observer177, 12/18/2012 1:09:51 PM     (No. 9072878)

From its picture, the woman and her sons lived in a rather large mansion in one of the costliest areas in the country, and reportedly her ex-husband--wanting to make sure that his son was well provided for--was giving his ex something like 250K per year in child support.

Lanza was also apparently early diagnosed with mental illness, she caught him burning himself with a lighter, and, yet, his mother--with all the "wherewithal" in the world--had him in regular school, not one tailored to his needs, and allowed him to sit in a windowless basement and obsessively play violent video games, and dwell on violence and weapons?

Gee, looks like a "ticking time bomb" to me.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 12/18/2012 1:52:54 PM     (No. 9072942)



One thing that definitely needs changing ASAP is the way law enforcement and other public officials manage the release of information after things like the Sandy Hook massacre. They appear to be stuck in the pre-instant media and pre-internet days. They drag their feet. They hold back. They refuse to say what they know even though they know they know it. This was appropriate before the era of truly instantaneous mass communications. It is not appropriate any longer. It risks grave social damage. The needless delay in making everything that is known available results in the proliferation of theories, rumors, false narratives, misinformation, all of which has an effect and takes on a life of its own. When such errors are permitted to exist and flourish, they are not necessarily completed corrected when the truth is finally revealed. There is a kind of burn-in on the cultural motherboard that can have a lasting effect.

Juridical concerns are legitimate reasons for withholding information from the public - but I do not think that most of the time that is the only reason law enforcement is so incredibly stingy and slow with information they already possess. They just don´t seem to realize that times have changed, that minutes are now days, and that delay leaves a gap that is somehow going to be filled in by theorists and speculators.









Reply 19 - Posted by: controlfreak, 12/18/2012 2:35:24 PM     (No. 9072992)

First we heard from the yard man, now we hear from the plumber. However do they know so much about their customers?


Reply 20 - Posted by: Maybeth, 12/18/2012 2:45:11 PM     (No. 9073001)

Video games are violent?
Video games teach our young how to hate and how to kill?

Who knew!
s/o


Reply 21 - Posted by: tech10171968, 12/18/2012 2:46:31 PM     (No. 9073004)

Funny how no one ever mentions all those kids who grew up with guns, played violent video games and *DIDN´T* end up shooting up elementary schools. Oh well, as Rahm Emmanuel likes to say, "Never waste a crisis..."


Reply 22 - Posted by: Observer177, 12/18/2012 3:26:20 PM     (No. 9073058)

I think the point is that, back then, several very innocent by today’s standards decades ago, it was B & W films, cap guns, Gene Autry, the Lone Ranger, and simple toys for kids were often sticks you could straddle with cloth horse heads, not ultra-violent video games, and the standard was bad guys who gave up, or got shot and dropped and never bled; a fairly restricted stock of pretty benign, pretty much bloodless images and violence.

Nowadays its SAW, the Chain Saw Massacre, and a host of other slasher movies, blood splatter, gore, and violence in video games, in movies, on TV, in song lyrics and images, all in life-like sound and color, virtually everywhere you turn, and each new “entertainment” tries to top the other in gore and shock value. Intense violence and images—bound to influence people for the worst, change their views of the world, their values, their expectations, their tolerance for violence and bloodshed, and their behaviors --that would never in a million years have been shown in the past.

So, it’s the relatively small store of not so violent and no so visual and powerful, fairly unrealistic violent actions and images of several decades ago vs. an ever growing, 24/7, virtual 360 degree coverage, tidal wave of ever more intense, violent, and bloody images and actions filling people’s heads, and there to desensitize and accustom them to violence, blood, and slaughter, and to powerfully influence them.

Our modern day equivalent of the Roman Arena that we tell ourselves is "harmless" because no one is actually killed, but which is the template for such actual killing.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: stablemoney, 12/18/2012 8:31:45 PM     (No. 9073478)

No mother is ever going to imagine or believe her son is capable of this type of behavior.


Reply 24 - Posted by: saguni, 12/18/2012 8:47:41 PM     (No. 9073492)

There is speculation that the mother never tried to lock the guns away from this young man.

We cannot know what was in the house when the mother went to bed Thursday evening.

Maybe she had one handgun available in her bedroom for self protection, and the rest locked away.
Adam Lanza was reportedly very smart, if she had one and he was determined, he could have found the one that wasn´t locked away.
After he had killed her in her bed, he could take all the time he needed to find the key to unlock the rest of the guns that may have been locked away for safety.

Since they lived in a state that makes it almost impossible to hospitalize an adult against his will, you can only speculate as to what steps Mrs. Lanza had taken to try to get her son the help he needed.



Post Reply   Close thread 716030




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"



Remember when Fox News
wasn’t ‘real news’?
Human Events, by David Harsanyi    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:21:41 PM     Post Reply
We now know that the Justice Department kept exceptionally close tabs on Fox News reporter James Rosen in 2010, following his trips in and out of the State Department, hacking his personal emails and phone calls. Normal newsgathering activities are being treated as criminal activities by the White House. But consider what the same White House had to say about Fox News back in 2009. You might remember the concerted effort by White House officials to brand the right-leaning Fox News as a bogus news outlet, unworthy of attention.

More Secrets From Huma Abedin
FrontPage Magazine, by Arnold Ahlert    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:03:59 PM     Post Reply
Huma Abedin, former Secretary of State Hillary’s Clinton’s long time aide with extensive ties to Muslim Brotherhood groups, was granted an arrangement by the State Department to do outside consulting work, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. Abedin did not disclose either the arrangement, or how much she earned from it, on her financial report, despite a requirement that public officials must disclose significant sources of income. Clinton advisor Philippe Reines contended she was under no obligation to do so. Abedin, who has served Clinton for 15 years, became a “special government employee”

Judge ruled feds need not
notify Fox reporter of search
Politico, by Josh Gerstin    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 6:45:33 PM     Post Reply
A federal judge in Washington ruled in 2010 that the Justice Department was not required by law to notify Fox reporter James Rosen that prosecutors had obtained his emails in connection with an investigation into a leak about North Korean plans to test a nuclear weapon. In September 2010, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth overruled the conclusion of federal magistrate John Facciola that Rosen—whose Gmail account was searched—was entitled by law to be informed. Prosecutors contended that under the statute used to get Rosen´s emails, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, they were not

DOJ Reacts to Rosen
Report in Statement
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:45:19 PM     Post Reply
The Department of Justice released a statement moments ago amid reports of the department obtaining a subpoena in order to access Fox News reporter James Rosen´s personal emails. "Leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to our national security and it is important that we pursue these matters using appropriate law enforcement tools. Such investigations and prosecutions, including this particular case, follow all applicable laws, regulations, and longstanding Department of Justice policies intended to safeguard the First Amendment interests of the press in reporting the news and the public in receiving it."

Malkin To Kelly: IRS Not Just
Scandal Because Of ‘Ideology,’
But Because Of Obama’s ‘Brass-
Knuckled Intimidation’
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:34:03 PM     Post Reply
Michelle Malkin joined Megyn Kelly on Fox News Monday afternoon to discuss the latest developments in the investigation into the IRS targeting conservatives for audits. Malkin insisted it was not merely her “ideology” that has led to critique the Obama administration on their handling of the IRS issue and others, but rather the evidence she’s seen of their “bully brigade tactics” to “intimidate and criminalize their political opponents.” Malkin began by going after White House Press Secretary Jay Carney for his handling of the various Obama “scandals,” saying the “clown Carney press briefings have turned in

Fox News Will Defend Reporter
Against ´Co-Conspirator´ Charge
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:05:36 PM     Post Reply
The Justice Department, already under fire for seizing AP phone records, also viewed e-mails of Fox News chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, calling him a criminal ´co-conspirator´ for his reporting. Fox News´ executive vice president of news, Michael Clemente, released a statement defending Rosen. The statement issued Monday afternoon is below: "We are outraged to learn today that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter," Clemente said. "In fact, it is downright chilling. We will unequivocally

Former Counterterrorism Head:
FBI Never Called Ft. Hood
´Workplace Violence´
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:49:11 PM     Post Reply
Michael Steinbach, former head of the FBI’s counterterrorism division and now special agent in charge of Miami, told over 30 congressional staffers in March of 2012 that, contrary to the White House´s classification, the bureau does not refer to the Fort Hood shooting as "workplace violence." As head of the FBI counterterrorism division, Steinbach oversaw the investigation into the mass murder at Texas Army base. Steinbach made this claim during an unclassified counterterrorism briefing on Capitol Hill. “Do you guys teach your agents that Fort Hood was workplace violence?” one staffer asked.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

60 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

60 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News

49 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM     Post Reply
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:

Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?

44 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM     Post Reply
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week

White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM     Post Reply
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.

If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM     Post Reply
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement


Post Reply   Close thread 716030





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~