A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: President Obama’s speech
at prayer vigil for
Newtown shooting victims
(Full transcript)
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
President Obama’s speech
at prayer vigil for
Newtown shooting victims
(Full transcript)

Washington Post, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 12/16/2012 11:14:28 PM

Full transcript of President Obama’s remarks at a Dec. 16 prayer vigil for victims of the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. OBAMA: Thank you. Thank you, Governor. To all the families, first responders, to the community of Newtown, clergy, guests, scripture tells us, “Do not lose heart. Though outwardly we are wasting away, inwardly, we are being renewed day by day. “For light and momentary troubles are achieving for us an eternal glory that far outweighs them all, so we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Dreadnought, 12/16/2012 11:15:00 PM     (No. 9070006)

His new campaign...

We can’t tolerate this anymore. These tragedies must end. And to end them, we must change.


Reply 2 - Posted by: nigella, 12/16/2012 11:19:29 PM     (No. 9070016)

Sorry, I don´t believe Obama is sincere. I´ve seen enough to know that this man doesn´t care about anyone but himself and what he can do for his "political" career....


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Straitpath, 12/16/2012 11:26:12 PM     (No. 9070022)

Gee, the full transcript? Thanks, but no thanks.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Mike PHX, 12/16/2012 11:26:56 PM     (No. 9070024)

Anyone who bought this load of crap is dumb enough to vote for this "man".
Oh. Sorry. That would be over 50 % of you.
What a stupid country we are.


Reply 5 - Posted by: VinGoombatz, 12/16/2012 11:32:25 PM     (No. 9070035)

It was half fearmongering, half self love.

And way way too long. (as in political events)


Reply 6 - Posted by: smcchk, 12/16/2012 11:38:06 PM     (No. 9070043)

My husband noted that Obama likes to show up at trouble spots for which he bears no responsibility but not for the ones which he does.


Reply 7 - Posted by: flatwater, 12/16/2012 11:39:48 PM     (No. 9070046)

This man is an advocate for infanticide, as well as being responsible for arming Mexico´s drug cartels.

He doesn´t give a damn about "the children" beyond the fact that he can hide behind their corpses to continue his attacks on our Constitutional rights.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: athina, 12/16/2012 11:45:50 PM     (No. 9070052)

Does he even know what those scripture passages mean?


Reply 9 - Posted by: Justavoter, 12/17/2012 12:13:46 AM     (No. 9070072)

It was obvious that Obama had no input on writing this. It was without feeling until he got to the political points. Obama is as evil as the shooter since he has hundreds of lives on his hands


Reply 10 - Posted by: Aria, 12/17/2012 12:15:48 AM     (No. 9070073)

This bugs me.....this was not a government issue - at least on the surface - like a military issue or like 911 in which war was declared on us. So why is zero even there speaking, muscling in on the grief of the loved ones???

He ought to leave them alone but instead he can´t resist being the center of attention.


Reply 11 - Posted by: jdh, 12/17/2012 12:22:07 AM     (No. 9070077)

I think it was nice that he quoted scripture in English rather than farsi or arabic.... /s


Reply 12 - Posted by: BcdErick, 12/17/2012 1:02:11 AM     (No. 9070100)

I watched the speech. One has to admit, he is a very smooth liar. Obama quoting the Bible is preposterous. Obviously didn´t write the speech. It is well known, even among his supporters, he is a pathological narcissist. So why did he get elected and re-elected? Because: "You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time." Turns out you can fool 50.1% all the time.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: PChristopher, 12/17/2012 2:20:25 AM     (No. 9070132)

Tragedies like this will never end as long as Commucrats can get some use out of them.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Tianne, 12/17/2012 4:23:59 AM     (No. 9070179)

Oh, please forgive me, but the off-handed manner in which President Obama delivered his poorly prepared and disjointed speech made me cringe throughout.

The Speech: “Um, things have got to change. I’ve seen too much of this. Scripture says, um…. You’re not the only ones hurting – I’m hurting. I’m President. I’m going to change things. I come to offer love and prayers. We can’t take care of our own children – we need a nation. God said something about this, um… Change. We can do better. I’m doing change – no politics, but I’m changing things – I’m going to use all of my power. Um, most religions ask why are we here? If we teach our children, we know it’s right (or it’s not wrong or something). As a nation, um... God bless everyone.”

Leaves podium; walks off stage; talks to woman; walks back on stage; pauses on stage and waves; walks off through curtains. Standing ovation. The end.

In the words of the President, “we can do better”.


Reply 15 - Posted by: ocjim, 12/17/2012 4:34:53 AM     (No. 9070186)

Sorry. Long ago --- very long ago --- ceased to believe that Obama has a guileless or sincere bone in his body. I certainly do watch his speeches to see what he´s up to and what his angle is each time, and there always is an angle, a purpose. And he is the master of the rhetorical feint, the straw man, the false choice and the Big Lie. Like so many, I´m on to him, and know that with him, without exception, EVERYTHING political and purposeful.
Touched by that speech tonight? Of course not.


Reply 16 - Posted by: JackBurton, 12/17/2012 7:19:44 AM     (No. 9070325)

Great...

The end result is that he gets to raise taxes. This takes the heat off him doing anything about the tax rate expiration, dunnit.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Michaelus, 12/17/2012 7:23:13 AM     (No. 9070329)

He quoted Matthew 19:14 - the Gospel verse that the Church cites as encouragement to freely bring children into the world - one of the reasons that we know birth control is wicked.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: AltaD, 12/17/2012 8:32:16 AM     (No. 9070463)

Not quite the full transcript, they left off the name(s) of the person(s) who wrote this for Obama to simply read.


Reply 19 - Posted by: bullhead, 12/17/2012 1:29:37 PM     (No. 9071061)

This is truly faux-sentimental, syrupy, disjointed, political pap.

Our "Dear Leader" at his best.



Post Reply   Close thread 715825




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Petraeus’s role in drafting Benghazi
talking points raises questions
Washington Post, by Scott Wilson and Karen DeYoung    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 11:03:01 PM     Post Reply
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault. It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack. “We had some new members on the committee, and we knew the press would be very aggressive on this, so we didn’t want

With more clarity, White House
adds to confusion on IRS
Washington Post, by Dan Balz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:59:54 PM     Post Reply
It is never good for an administration when a front-page newspaper article about an ongoing controversy begins as follows: “The White House offered a new account Monday of how and when it learned .?.?. ” That’s what readers of The Post awoke to on Tuesday. In trying to contain the controversy and protect President Obama, White House officials have only added to questions about what happened. Until this week, the story of how White House officials learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups was fairly straightforward. White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was notified in late April

   

 



 
In AP, Rosen investigations,
government makes
criminals of reporters
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:56:21 PM     Post Reply
There are various reasons you might not care about the Obama administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen and labeling him a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor” in an espionage case. Liberals may not be particularly bothered because the targeted journalist works for Fox News. Conservatives may not be concerned because of their antipathy toward the news media generally. And the general public certainly doesn’t have much patience for journalists’ whining. But here’s why you should care — and why this case, along with the administration’s broad snooping into Associated Press phone records, is more serious than the other supposed

White House meltdown: A truth deficit
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:53:11 PM     Post Reply
There seems to be bipartisan consensus that whatever the White House is doing to fend off scandal is making things worse. Howard Fineman sounds a lot like Right Turn these days: “White House aides are tempting fate with their reluctant, piecemeal and contradictory disclosures of what they knew and when they knew it, especially about a report on the Internal Revenue Service’s 18-month effort to target tea party and other conservative groups for special scrutiny.” The constantly shifting stories from Jay Carney and the IRS dissembling and pleas of ignorance only heighten concern that there has been serious wrongdoing.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

‘Rosen’s in the Wind!’
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:29:36 PM     Post Reply
John Podhoretz has a good column today on the Obama administration’s travails. I did not know this bit until I read the column: Even more startling, the search warrant makes clear that the FBI already had everything it needed on the leaker, as the request for a search warrant features quotes from an interview that were tantamount to a confession. It asked that the warrant be sealed — in other words, that Rosen not be told — because knowledge might “cause subjects to flee”! Imagine it: Rosen, an on-air reporter

All of Obama´s Scandals Are
Ultimately About Information Control
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM     Post Reply
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark

62 replie(s)
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.

Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
54 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
47 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

44 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 715825





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~