A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: The Republicans Should Let Obama
Take America Off Of the Cliff
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
The Republicans Should Let Obama
Take America Off Of the Cliff

Forbess, by Louis Woodhill

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/14/2012 6:02:45 AM

For the good of the country and the survival of the Republican Party, the GOP must allow President Obama to take America off the so-called “fiscal cliff” on January 1. Given the intransigent position that Obama has taken on raising marginal tax rates, any deal that the Republicans in the House of Representatives could conceivably make with him before the end of the year would be counterproductive. It would impede economic growth, and thereby actually reduce the present value of future federal revenues.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: steveW, 12/14/2012 6:09:17 AM     (No. 9064761)

Obama has bad intentions, negotiates in bad faith, and is utterly dishonest about his purpose (blaming and destroying the GOP, not solving a fiscal crisis). What the GOP should be doing is shouting these truths from the rooftops, not sitting down to dine with this disgrace of a "president".


Reply 2 - Posted by: pineledger, 12/14/2012 6:09:54 AM     (No. 9064762)

It appears to me that the Republicans have offered several compromise positions.

The PINO is the intransigent one.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/14/2012 6:12:36 AM     (No. 9064764)

I agree 100%,take the cliff.Making a deal with Obama would be a disaster for the country and republican party.The blame the republicans would get would be short term. Obama´s still the president and can´t blame all problems on them.

I can´t afford my taxes going up 5% but I´d rather deal with that than give Obama more money to waste on his voters and donors.Union members will get creamed the worst and who can be against that?


Reply 4 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 12/14/2012 6:30:56 AM     (No. 9064771)

Why make a deal now? Making a deal now will have the same results as jumping out of an airplane that is about to crash. Either way, we are gonna hit the ground hard. We are already over the cliff. What we need is people to survive the initial shock of hitting the ground and then develop and execute a strategy to get us back in shape.


Reply 5 - Posted by: SpeedMaster, 12/14/2012 6:38:26 AM     (No. 9064775)

I do not know if all the conclusions in this article are correct, but I do know, if Republicans go along with tax increases they will take a beating in 2014. President Clinton did not balance the budget with his tax increases but despite them with the growth of the economy.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Rakasha, 12/14/2012 6:39:27 AM     (No. 9064777)

Is Mr.Woodhill really saying that not raising taxes on the middle class is the same as subsidizing them? That is strikingly familiar to the statist argument that spending cuts must be ´paid for´.

Government spending is the problem - on more than one level. And believing that the Democrats will negotioate in good faith is one of the reasons the Republicans are called ´the stupid party´.

The only way Republicans might be able to make going over the cliff the fault of the Democrats is to completely withdraw. Go home for Christmas. Let the Democrats craft the bill and pass the bill - with no Republican participation. Even at that I suspect that, with the creative writers in the media and the creative thinkers in the White House, they will find a way to convince the masses that Republicans are to blame.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Sfacheem, 12/14/2012 6:41:02 AM     (No. 9064778)

"The Republican Party is the party of economic growth--or it is nothing."

Finally, someone says it.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Country Boy, 12/14/2012 6:46:36 AM     (No. 9064781)

Hopefully Boehner is going to let us go "off the cliff", and his loose talk about raising revenues is just cover, so when we crash, he can tell the low information voters that he tried to reach a deal.

On the other hand, obama seems to relish the idea of going off the fiscal cliff. The media has amply cover for him on every one of the dozens of disasters of the first term. They are certain to continue.


Reply 9 - Posted by: jfodoch, 12/14/2012 7:28:10 AM     (No. 9064820)

LET him ? He doesn´t have enough committed opposition anywhere in congress to prevent him from doing anything he wants !


Reply 10 - Posted by: HotRodLincoln, 12/14/2012 7:38:15 AM     (No. 9064834)

Just do it. Read from the video clip the 10 states most effected by the expiration of the Bush Tax cuts:
1Conn;2NY;3NJ;4MA;5CA;6MD;7WY;8VA;9MN;10IL.
Too bad so sad.


Reply 11 - Posted by: DCGIRL, 12/14/2012 8:00:50 AM     (No. 9064889)

Just go off the cliff. If there are no serious reductions to government programs as well as entitlement programs, then there should be no discussions. This is on the president!!!!


Reply 12 - Posted by: bassman, 12/14/2012 8:26:43 AM     (No. 9064927)

Do not make a deal! Do not raise the debt limit!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Echohawk, 12/14/2012 8:29:55 AM     (No. 9064932)

Here is what fascinates me: The two parties have had to reverse positions regarding the fiscal cliff.
Republicans are always talking about spending cuts. Right on cue, the dems wail self-righteously about those evil Republicans throwing Grandma into the snow. Dem tax bills are passed in the dead of night.
But now, it is the GOP talking about tax hikes, and the dems have to come up with spending cuts. Spending cuts are Obama´s Achilles´s heel. He´s never had to say no to anyone before. This is why he is dodging and weaving.
Yesterday, Speaker Boehner hammered Obama about spending cuts. He should hammer him a whole lot more.
Sure, the GOP will be blamed in the first few months of the tax hikes, but eventually it will dawn on the Obamabots that he is the president--how could higher taxes on his pet constituents have happened? Isn´t he in charge?
And, the spending cuts inherent in the fiscal cliff are the ONLY spending cuts on the table.
Cliff diving!


Reply 14 - Posted by: olcap, 12/14/2012 8:40:21 AM     (No. 9064951)

One thing both sides have in common, is that both dems and repubs are saying to go over the cliff. Go look at their sites and they are saying the same thing. Why is this? Who is right, and why?


Reply 15 - Posted by: oh-heck, 12/14/2012 9:15:57 AM     (No. 9064997)

The ideal for Dems is a one year extension of everything in return for a tax hike this year for the RICH. They can and will do this every year until they need the revenue from the nearly rich.

If we go over the cliff, taxes go up 4.5 trillion, they will need to cut more than the 1 trillion in the Sequester. And the money will need to go to reducing the deficit. This is completely contrary to big government goals.


Reply 16 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 12/14/2012 9:43:29 AM     (No. 9065063)

Let him have his cliff. A majority of Americans want real spending cuts. Walk away, and make it clear that Obama has refused to present a serious proposal to cut spending. You cannot cut spending by negotiating with Democrats. The only way spending will ever be cut is when the House refuses to give him the money.


Reply 17 - Posted by: kanphil, 12/14/2012 9:56:12 AM     (No. 9065094)

This is from Forbes. It ain´t your daddy´s magazine anymore. And Steve Forbes has no control over its editorial policy. Pity.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Yephora, 12/14/2012 10:29:27 AM     (No. 9065163)

Going over the cliff will do us no good.

This idea that 0bama will have to "own" the consequences is nonsense.

Why? Because the evil Demonrat-0bama-Media complex will relentlessly blame everything on Republicans.

Republicans as usual will be too tongue-tied to effectively counter-narrative and will consequently own ALL the blame.

Another win for Barack the Destroyer.


Reply 19 - Posted by: save America, 12/14/2012 10:50:53 AM     (No. 9065212)

We have already gone over the cliff,the recession never ended and there are 16 trillion reasons why.


Reply 20 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 12/14/2012 10:57:11 AM     (No. 9065222)

The Republicans are fools ,they are playing into the Democrat,I.E. Obama´s plan and guess who the Obama democrats will blame ? Youguessed it- the Republicans.How dump can the Republicans continue to be? And yes the MSM will help the neoMarxis blaining the GOP.


Reply 21 - Posted by: Tudball, 12/14/2012 11:28:01 AM     (No. 9065276)

Detroit has been over the cliff and smashed on the rocks below for years. Yet they still vote exclusively Democrat. The democrats know how to play this game. The idiots who voted for this mess will not wake up if we go over the cliff. They will be easily convinced that they are not to blame and that they should get more free stuff.


Reply 22 - Posted by: stablemoney, 12/14/2012 11:37:01 AM     (No. 9065291)

If the House does not approve the spending, then there won´t be any. Don´t tell me the Republicans don´t have power. Use it.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: noproblems, 12/14/2012 11:41:55 AM     (No. 9065305)

a slight increase in tax rates is going to kill this country? good luck with that messaging. do you really think the average person will buy that while watching their tax rates increase?

I hope the repugs are not stupid about this. this is a tactical situation and we need to make sure 0bama owns the upcoming recession.

then issue is spending and that is where we need the repugs to draw the line. i hope they have the courage and integrity to solve the spending problem. they have not had it in the past


Reply 24 - Posted by: retCPO, 12/14/2012 11:54:46 AM     (No. 9065331)

If the Republicans continue to be the "Stupid party" and sell out again it will be time to form a new Conservative party. We are split anyway so might as well make it official.

Stand fast, take the sequestration as it is the only way to get any real cuts. On the positive side the tax base will be broader. Having half of our workers pay no Federal taxes is a receipe for disaster and breeds class warfare.


Reply 25 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 12/14/2012 12:00:21 PM     (No. 9065344)

If the government toppled off the cliff many citizens would soar.


Reply 26 - Posted by: jfodoch, 12/14/2012 3:38:36 PM     (No. 9065835)

Even if the pubbies do the responsible thing, which I doubt they will, how many votes will they lose? As Janis Joplin sang in "Me & Bobby McGee," freedom´s just another word for nothing left to lose.

odumbo´s gonna set us free, and not in the way he imagined!


Reply 27 - Posted by: LadyVet, 12/14/2012 3:45:17 PM     (No. 9065858)

The Republicans need some talking points so that they repeat the same snappy message. Some suggestions:

Democrats want to suck money out of the private sector.

Obama wants to destroy economic growth.

Obama is giving your money to his cronies.

The Democrats want to change the country into Detroit.

This "cliff" was designed into the law by the Democratic Party over 10 years. The Democrats voted to raise taxes on lower income taxpayers.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Yephora, 12/14/2012 4:20:10 PM     (No. 9065917)

All good #27 except for one thing: when is the last time you heard one of the Grand Old Putzes criticize 0bama by name? The Stupid Party trembles at the thought.



Post Reply   Close thread 715578




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

The 10 P.M. Phone Call
National Review Online, by Andrew C. McCarthy    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:39:48 AM     Post Reply
‘What would you be focusing on in the Benghazi investigation?” I spent many years in the investigation biz, so it’s only natural that I’ve been asked that question a lot lately. I had the good fortune to be trained in Rudy Giuliani’s U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan. Rudy famously made his mark by making law enforcement reflect what common sense knew: Enterprises take their cues from the top. Criminal enterprises are no different: The capos do not carry out the policy of the button-men — it’s the other way around. So if I were investigating Benghazi,

Disturbing abuses of power
Washington Post, by Colbert I. King    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:34:57 AM     Post Reply
East Germany’s Ministry for State Security, also known as the Stasi, posed a major challenge during my three-year stint as an attache at the U.S. Embassy in Bonn during the 1960s. Detecting and preventing Stasi agents from penetrating the security of U.S. diplomatic facilities in West Germany was a 24-7 undertaking. The East German secret police were even more ruthless and relentless in operations against their own citizens. Political suppression in that communist state was total. There was no room for dissent. Thousands of East Germans were arbitrarily imprisoned for “internal security” reasons.

It´s Time To Discuss The
Secret CIA Operation At The
Heart Of The Benghazi Scandal
Business Insider, by Michael Kelley & Geoffrey Ingersoll    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:32:12 AM     Post Reply
In eight months since an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi left four Americans dead, a Republican-led investigation has focused on potential missteps by the White House — and come away with nothing significant. There has been little attention given, however, to covert actions by the Central Intelligence Agency that were partially uncovered during the September 11, 2012 attack. That may be changing. CNN´s Jake Tapper argued this week that we should give more scrutiny to the CIA´s presence in the Libyan port city. Congressman Frank Wolf (R-Va.) said the same, according to CNN:

John Edwards re-emerges,
begins public comeback
Washington Times, by Ben Wolfgang    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:16:32 AM     Post Reply
Mark Sanford is now a member of Congress two years after he stepped down as governor of South Carolina following a highly publicized extramarital affair. Anthony Weiner appears poised to run for New York City mayor not even two years after scandalous photos of the ex-representative hit Twitter. Perhaps, then, it should be no surprise to learn that disgraced former presidential candidate and North Carolina senator John Edwards is plotting his own comeback. The wealthy lawyer has reactivated his law license and also is hitting the speaking circuit, The Associated Press reported. Mr. Edwards is scheduled

Did Oprah make O.J. snap?
New York Post, by Emily Smith    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:13:24 AM     Post Reply
O.J. Simpson testified this week that he’d been drinking all day on Sept. 13, 2007, before he bizarrely robbed two sports memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas hotel. But sources close to the case wonder if it was watching “The Oprah Winfrey Show” that afternoon that made Simpson snap. Before Simpson headed to the Palace Station Hotel to rob the dealers, the family of Ronald Goldman, who was murdered along with Simpson’s ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson, were on “Oprah” to discuss the controversial book “If I Did It: Confessions of the Killer.” It was a repackaged version of a “fictitious”

Who Actually Cracked Linear B, the Ancient
Code of the Mysterious Knossos Labyrinth?
Daily Beast, by Malcolm Jones    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 4:58:46 AM     Post Reply
As Margalit Fox says at the outset of The Riddle of the Labyrinth, the story of Linear B is well known. This 3,000-year-old language was discovered on clay tablets excavated in 1900 on the island of Crete. It thereafter puzzled scholars for half a century before it was decoded by Michael Ventris, an English architect with no formal training in archeology or linguistics. Linear B’s history is an absorbing tale, full of mysteries both intellectual and historical, and it’s been told and retold since Ventris made his breakthrough. The problem, as Fox sees it,



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Raindrops wash away
reeling O’s fake veneer

46 replie(s)
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM     Post Reply
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons

Obama a new Nixon?
Oh, get serious.

43 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM     Post Reply
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting
Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.

41 replie(s)
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM     Post Reply
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,

NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP
Investigates Obama Scandals,
´The Voters Will Punish Them´

36 replie(s)
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM     Post Reply
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.

When it rains, it pours: Ten
press conference take aways

35 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM     Post Reply
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,

Obama 47 minutes late for his press
conference; leaves reporters in the rain

34 replie(s)
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM     Post Reply
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.

Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

32 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.


Post Reply   Close thread 715578





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~