A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Scalia blocks the aisle
against gay marriage
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Scalia blocks the aisle
against gay marriage

Washington Post, by Dana Milbank

Original Article

Posted By:Drive, 12/13/2012 7:45:49 AM

The Supreme Court’s announcement Friday that it will take up gay marriage is more than a chance for the justices to recognize the emerging national consensus in support of gay rights. It is a chance for them to overrule the medieval views of Antonin Scalia. As if in response to the court’s announcement, the acid-tongued justice visited Princeton University late Monday and reiterated his opinion, expressed in a 2003 dissent, that a law banning sodomy is on par with laws forbidding bestiality or murder.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: metalman2, 12/13/2012 8:02:05 AM     (No. 9063004)

What national consensus in support of gay rights is Milbank talking about. Every time gay marriage is put to a vote it goes down in flames.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: The Architect, 12/13/2012 8:09:57 AM     (No. 9063014)

Eh Dana, Gays are not being denied their rights they have the same rights as straight people. If a gay man wants to marry a woman, he can. If a gay woman wants to marry a man, she can. If gays want to co-habitate with their own gender, they can. It just doesn´t qualify as "Marriage"! Marriage between men and women was designed by God, or if you wish, nature since the first humanoids stood upright. It has been the highly successful norm for literally hundreds of thousands of years. Now you expect society to throw that all away for an aberation that has its roots in the "counter culture" of the 60´s? I don´t think so.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: yourblueroom, 12/13/2012 8:14:36 AM     (No. 9063024)

if you watch the video of Scalia (Dana, are you listening?) he states that the "beastiality/murder" reference was a "reductio ad absurdum" argument, not that they were equal in some way. too bad the bright "college kids" didn´t get it. nor did Dana. love him or hate him, Scalia is a genius.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: jlw509, 12/13/2012 8:19:45 AM     (No. 9063037)

Unfortunately gay marriage WAS voter-approved: 4 times out of 35 votes. So it´s "normalcy" that has had a consensus, but that consensus has been weakened.

One of the (many) bad things about pseudomarriage is that, once it´s approved, it´s hard to reverse. LAW TEACHES. In this case, law would teach a deformed "lesson" about sex and marriage. Now that "lesson" will be taught everywhere: from the law schools right down to the Kindergartens.

If you don´t want your kids/grandkids taught about hygienic battery-operated jiggler use and safe anal penetration --- if you don´t want them exposed to the "lesson" that religious beliefs are at best retarded and at worst criminally antisocial --- please get them out of public school now.

Home-schooling has gone from preferred to indispensable.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Catherine, 12/13/2012 8:42:35 AM     (No. 9063082)

# 1 beat me to it. There is no national consensus. And the states that did accidentally vote in favor of it had a contorted version of the question so voters were easily duped into the wrong vote if they disagreed. No one cares about this and whats the big deal of gay marriage? What do they gain? I´ve yet to figure it out.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Coy860, 12/13/2012 9:03:17 AM     (No. 9063128)

#5. What they hope to gain is acceptance, to go against the religious teachings of numerous religions.
If they win, government will force military chaplains to perform ceremonies against their religious beliefs, and Pastors will be arrested for refusing.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: southernboy, 12/13/2012 9:06:59 AM     (No. 9063139)

But, most importantly, they will be eligible for all the ´benefits´ now accorded to marriage. It´s all about the money!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: jackson, 12/13/2012 9:07:49 AM     (No. 9063141)

Hate crime! Hate crime! Hate crime! Dana commits the most common of liberal disses. Time hate. Yes, Why is Scalia wrong? Because his views are "medieval." If an idea is old, it is wrong, wrong, wrong. And if it comes from the time of Church prevelance it is positively evil! You know, like Neanderthal.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: wepeople, 12/13/2012 9:15:38 AM     (No. 9063159)

Nothing bias about this article: medieval ideas, acid tongue.../s

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Johnny Angle, 12/13/2012 9:17:01 AM     (No. 9063162)

It all depends on precisely what they have on Roberts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: gusman, 12/13/2012 9:30:54 AM     (No. 9063198)

Marriage is between a man and a woman, simple as that. The only reason we have to now define it by law is because sick F´n people want to re-define marriage. Here is my solution as to if being gay is "normal and genetic", put a fence around California and one right down the middle. Put the gay men on one side and the lesbians on the other, lock them all in and see how long their "cuture" lasts? Me thinks only that generation! Simple fact twobays or two girls can´t make baby, so conclusion is- not natural or normal, not genetic!!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: noproblems, 12/13/2012 9:39:36 AM     (No. 9063217)

Dana is amazingly stupid about our Constitution and the role of the judiciary. Our republic is through if one gay federal judge can overturn the desires of 6 million Californians

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: jimmiet, 12/13/2012 10:07:04 AM     (No. 9063260)

Just another skirmish in the left´s unrelenting war with God. Hath God said? Marriage preceeds the Ten Commandments, Adam and Steve were never mentioned.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: oceanbeach, 12/13/2012 10:15:13 AM     (No. 9063277)

Scalia is simply confirming that law is more important than a claim of national consensus. Law is not to be a popularity contest. If we truly had a national consensus, we could easily make the law reflect that fact.

The law must come first. Frankly I care more about rule of law than I do about gay marriage one way or the other.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: msjena, 12/13/2012 10:17:18 AM     (No. 9063287)

If there was a national consensus in favor of gay marriage, it would be legal in more than a handful of states. All of this is just publicity intended to make the Supreme Court think that a ruling against gay marriage will be unpopular and damage the image of the Court. We see how well that kind of reasoning worked out in Roe v. Wade. Justice Roberts wanted Obamacare left to the democratic process. Will he use the same reasoning for gay marriage? And if DOMA is struck down--forcing the Federal government to recognize a Canadian gay marriage--will the Feds also have to recognize polygamous marriages in Muslim countries?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 12/13/2012 10:29:24 AM     (No. 9063316)

Yes, isn´t it disgusting that anyone in this modern enlightened era would still be against something as wholesome and fair as allowing sodomites to marry. That backward thinking is so out dated, so bigoted and biblical. God and his stinkin´ Christians must be punished until they change their thinking. LET´S SHOW THEM WHO IS BOSS

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: mickturn, 12/13/2012 10:54:17 AM     (No. 9063372)

...as the acid-tongued Dana Milbank spewes hate...

What vile pieces of work Libs are!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: ROLFnader, 12/13/2012 1:23:39 PM     (No. 9063710)

I´ll bet Diana Milquetoast left a wet spot on the chair when she stood up from writing this tripe.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: FL_Absentee_Voter, 12/13/2012 2:23:34 PM     (No. 9063796)

#15 asks a VERY interesting question re DOMA.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: Griller1, 12/13/2012 4:08:28 PM     (No. 9063957)

If I were very wealthy, I believe I would push for homosexual marriage. With the unlimited marital deduction for gifts and bequests, you could pass virtually every estate in the country tax free by having your surviving spouse marry someone half his/her age and then avoid the estate tax altogether. Of course you can do that now, but then you take the chance you wind up with an Anna Nicole Smith situation where the surviving spouse is just a crack whore.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 21 - Posted by: saguni, 12/13/2012 8:39:00 PM     (No. 9064383)

I know petitions.whitehouse.gov may not be the most popular website with many of the poster here, but there has been a petition for 0bama to approve "polyamorous relationships" I guess by Executive Order. It goes on to describe "polyamorous" as a relationship of one woman with multiple men OR one man with multiple women, but if it includes two or more men with two or more women, I must have missed it.

So, they haven´t really settled gay marriage, and they already want more!

I can´t think of a worse situation, imagine the number of in-laws that would involve!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 715457




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Drive"



Police: Ohio Man´s Drone
Hindered Medical Chopper
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/15/2014 12:12:31 PM     Post Reply
SPRINGFIELD, Ohio -- A man is facing charges after deputies say he was flying a video camera-equipped drone that hindered the landing of a medical helicopter at an accident scene. Kele Stanley, of Springfield, said he´s been unfairly charged and would have landed it immediately if he knew the medical helicopter was en route. "I´m not an idiot," he said. The hobbyist was flying the $4,000 drone over a crash scene on Saturday morning to shoot photos and video. Authorities said both fire officials and a Clark County sheriff´s deputy told Stanley to stop flying his remote-controlled

Obama uninterested in helping
Ukraine defend itself
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/15/2014 12:09:35 PM     Post Reply
The administration’s “smart diplomacy” does not include providing aid to those who fight internal oppression or outside aggression and whose victory potentially would obviate the need for direct U.S. action. Hence, President Obama gave Iran’s Green Revolution the cold shoulder in June 2009. He denied aid, and then dragged his feet on delivering aid to non-jihadi rebels in Syria. Now, it should come as no surprise, he is unwilling to provide Ukraine with military aid or intelligence to defend itself against Russian aggression.

Census Survey Revisions
Mask Health Law Effects
New York Times, by Robert Pear    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/15/2014 12:04:11 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — The Census Bureau, the authoritative source of health insurance data for more than three decades, is changing its annual survey so thoroughly that it will be difficult to measure the effects of President Obama’s health care law in the next report, due this fall, census officials said. The changes are intended to improve the accuracy of the survey, being conducted this month in interviews with tens of thousands of households around the country. But the new questions are so different that the findings will not be comparable, the officials said. An internal Census Bureau document said that the new questionnaire

Obama Isn´t Inspiring People to Run
for Office the Way Nixon and Reagan Did
The Wire, by Phillip Bump    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 4/15/2014 6:57:01 AM     Post Reply
Very few of the young Americans who carried President Obama to electoral victory in 2008 have chosen to follow him into public service, The New York Times reports on Monday. Which made us wonder who inspired the current Congress to seek office. The answer? Two Republican stalwarts. There are a lot of caveats that should be applied to the Times story, not the least of which is that most candidates for office tend to skew a little older than the 18-year-olds that cast their first votes six years ago. But regardless, Jason Horowitz writes, "[u]nlike John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan,

WTC parachutist: It’s a
once in a lifetime jump
New York Post, by Lorena Mongelli    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 4/14/2014 1:21:23 PM     Post Reply
The ironworker who parachuted from One World Trade Center said his death-defying leap was “amazing,” but it’s not something he would try again. “No, I wouldn’t do it again,” said James Brady, 32, who BASE jumped off the roof of the tallest building in the nation last September, along with two fellow thrill-seekers. “It’s amazing,” he told The Post when asked to describe the now-infamous plunge. “If you could take the realest, happiest moment of your life and relive that, that’s what it’s like.” “It’s just the realest moment you can experience,” said Brady, who faces serious criminal charges for the stunt. He was indicted

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Search for
Missing Jet Enters New Phase
Wall Street Journal, by Rachel Pannett and Ross Kelly    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 4/14/2014 7:47:53 AM     Post Reply
SYDNEY—An unmanned vehicle was due to begin searching the Indian Ocean seabed for wreckage from Malaysia Airlines 3786.KU -2.33% Flight 370 on Monday, as authorities lost hope of detecting any new signals from the missing jet´s black-box flight recorders. Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston, who is leading the multinational search, said a series of "ping" signals detected last week by a U.S. Navy black box detector remains the most promising lead in the search for the plane, which disappeared en route to Beijing from Kuala Lumpur on March 8.

Anti Semitism and the Blind Jew
Jewish World Review, by Alicia Colon    Original Article
Posted By: drive- 4/14/2014 7:08:58 AM     Post Reply
Several years ago, I happened to tune into a radio broadcast called "Jewish News and Views," conducted by Shifra Hoffman. The callers were berating Ms. Hoffman for spreading what they called the myth of rampant anti-Semitism. One man said he was tired of hearing about the Holocaust, and that "we Jews ought to stop whining about it." I called in and identified myself as a Christian who was very much aware of widespread but hidden anti-Semitism. I gave her examples of the anti-Semitic remarks I had heard from people in all walks of life who assumed I shared their views because



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

54 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

46 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

31 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it


Post Reply   Close thread 715457





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~