|
|
| |
Topic: University of Iowa becomes first public university to ask applicants if they’re gay |
University of Iowa becomes first public university to ask applicants if they’re gay
Associated Press, by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 12/13/2012 5:44:40 AM
|
| IOWA CITY, Iowa— The University of Iowa has become the nation’s first public university to include optional questions about sexual orientation and gender identity on its application, a move hailed Wednesday by advocates hoping to improve the college experience for gays and lesbians. University officials say the move sends a strong signal that they value the diversity that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students bring to campus. They say that knowing some students’ sexual orientation will allow them to track their enrollment and graduation rates
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Lala, 12/13/2012 5:53:26 AM (No. 9062836)
Is nothing sacred or private anymore? All this to pander to maybe 2% of the population? Guess it is clear where their academic philosophy lies. Mamas don´t let your babies grow up to be Hawkeyes.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
redsquare76, 12/13/2012 5:54:27 AM (No. 9062837)
What´s next - ask them about their eating, sleeping and bowel movement habits?
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Rather Read, 12/13/2012 6:01:07 AM (No. 9062842)
I suspect that if you answer "none of your business" you will not be admitted.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
strike3, 12/13/2012 6:08:29 AM (No. 9062850)
Affirmative action of a different color? Or perhaps the pedophiles on the faculty don´t want to work for their sexual gratification?
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Spidey, 12/13/2012 6:14:33 AM (No. 9062854)
Government applications of all kinds shouldn´t ask any questions about race or now, sexual orientation. If a person applies for a government benefit is should be administered on a color and sex blind method.To do otherwise is a violation of equal protection against heterosexuals and white conservatives
I despise whole idea of diversity,it´s a liberal creation based on skin and not diversity of thought which would really enrich the school´s environment. All this crap leads to reverse racism which the SC has rejected many time. Affirmative action smoothly evolved into diversity which is an absurd concept. Why don´t these universities have quotas for conservative students?
If gays qualify for college admissions it should be merit based. I don´t see how being gay alone brings diversity to the table.This is the reason Obama took over college loans for idiotic social engineering which does the student no good at all.
the left thinks a merit based society is unfair.If you´re a failing individual,liberal utopinaism gives you equal standing a with an achiever.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Patchy Groundfog, 12/13/2012 6:48:13 AM (No. 9062886)
The only reason for gun registration is eventual gun confiscation.
The only reason for recording sex, age, race and sexual orientation is for segregation.
And how does asking a question ´send a strong signal?´
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
chillijilli, 12/13/2012 7:06:10 AM (No. 9062902)
U of Iowa must have a large grant to track GLBT admissions. Nowadays, you have to be out of the norm to get attention and assistance. I´m conducting a personal experiment when dealing with utilities, bureaucrats and communications companies. If I need help I initially pose as AnyNormalPerson...and I get automated voicemails or eventually an inflexible agent who´s unwilling to provide options about my requests. I then make a second call to the same office. I "become" a minority of some type and whammo! Within minutes, I am connected to the most compassionate, caring rep who will bust a gut trying to demonstrate how wonderful Comcast (the water department, tax assessor etc ) is, and I get special assistance AND follow up calls to be sure I was treated fairly.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
monique, 12/13/2012 7:47:33 AM (No. 9062976)
asking for personal information to supposedly ´improve´ the experience or what ever cockamanie excuse is collection of information that no public institution (or private one, for that matter) needs to have access to. are you gay? do you have guns? do you have a religious afflilation? lots of questions that no one needs to have access to the answers.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
skedaddle, 12/13/2012 7:51:18 AM (No. 9062983)
What if every applicant answered "yes" to the gay question? Give them what they want, in spades.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
fhancock, 12/13/2012 8:00:57 AM (No. 9062999)
How clever..."Are you gay?"...answer... "yep...and happy too"
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Udanja99, 12/13/2012 8:36:32 AM (No. 9063067)
#9 beat me to it. Answer "yes" and get special rights and better grades, not to mention all sorts of opportunities to file grievances.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
offrope, 12/13/2012 8:42:36 AM (No. 9063083)
If an applicant says they are black, it is obvious that they are. How exactly does one prove that they are gay?
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
ocjim, 12/13/2012 8:44:29 AM (No. 9063087)
More info to pigeon hole more people. Labeling people, counting them, etc., is a dirty, insidious business. It gets you the opposite of E Pluribus Unum. I remember going to U.C.L.A. in the late ´60´s and never questioning why a Black or Chicano person was in my classes. By the time I graduated, these groups were by and large hunkered down in groups, often isolated, many secretly in over their heads academically, and you wondered what kinds of breaks they got to even be there. Divisive stuff. Label on, Lefties! Break out the gays now in your misguided attempts to force inclusiveness.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
dr.lakerman, 12/13/2012 8:45:21 AM (No. 9063090)
#5, a quick history lesson. Back in the 1950s, the mantra was equal opportunities for blacks. But when that didn´t produce enough black hires or admissions, the 1960s and LBJ brought us affirmative action. And when affirmative action did not bring about the amount of admissions/hires, the mantra switched to diversity, for diversity´s sake, that there was strength through diversity, that diversity, by itself was valuable. This final position, which will be with us forever, will prevail. Diversity for diversity´s sake. And if anyone has two brain cells to rub together, that person will realize that in real live, we avoid diversity wherever possible, because it is discomfiting. But the myth will be perpetuated. Except for basketball and football.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Chuzzles, 12/13/2012 8:50:28 AM (No. 9063098)
Excellent way to take back word usage #10. I am going to have to try and remember that one for future use.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 12/13/2012 9:05:38 AM (No. 9063135)
Make them register with the police too. We need names and addresses... /s
Watch how fast they run back into the closet.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Salt5792, 12/13/2012 9:13:48 AM (No. 9063155)
Homosexual behavior is a choice. Straight today, gay tomorrow, straight again on day after. There´s nothing genetic about it.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Caveman, 12/13/2012 9:18:21 AM (No. 9063166)
Is there a check box for LUG (Lesbian Until Graduation)?
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
SouthSanAntonio, 12/13/2012 1:01:03 PM (No. 9063662)
Sadly, to get admitted, you are probably going to have to answer ´´yes´´ to that question.
You know the whole purpose of that question is to make sure that every homosexual that applies gets accepted. That way they can honestly claim that 60% of their freshmen are homosexuals, so that must be the % of homosexuals in the general population of this country. Which, of course, the MSM will immediately start to report as the truth!!!
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
|
Obama Denies Role in Government
|
|
New Yorker, by Andy Borowitz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 12:57:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON —President Obama used his weekly radio address on Saturday to reassure the American people that he has “played no role whatsoever” in the U.S. government over the past four years. “Right now, many of you are angry at the government, and no one is angrier than I am,” he said. “Quite frankly, I am glad that I have had no involvement in such an organization.” The President’s outrage only increased, he said, when he “recently became aware of a part of that government called the Department of Justice.” “The more I learn about the activities of these individuals,
|
|
All the Lonely People
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 6:24:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
OVER the last decade, the United States has become a less violent country in every way save one. As Americans commit fewer and fewer crimes against other people’s lives and property, they have become more likely to inflict fatal violence on themselves. In the 1990s, the suicide rate dipped with the crime rate. But since 2000, it has risen, and jumped particularly sharply among the middle-aged. The suicide rate for Americans 35 to 54 increased nearly 30 percent between 1999 and 2010; for men in their 50s, it rose nearly 50 percent. More Americans now die of suicide
|
| |
|
Obama adminstration talking points scrubbed jihadists from Cairo as well as Benghazi
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 6:13:07 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the days after the Benhazi attack, the State Department scurried to cover up its failure to heed warnings of such attacks while the White House scurried to cover up the fact that that attacks were the work of al Qaeda-linked terrorists of the sort President Obama supposedly had largely vanquished. The final Benghazi “talking points” and Susan Rice’s talk show appearances represent the product of this scurrying. To help advance the narrative that the Benghazi attacks were spontaneous, and thus (a) not to have been anticipated and (b) not linked to al Qaeda,
|
Toronto Mayor: That Wasn´t Me Smoking Crack In That Video
|
|
Reuters, by Julie Gordon & Cameron French
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 6:08:26 AM
Post Reply
|
|
TORONTO - Toronto Mayor Rob Ford, a target of criticism for his often unconventional conduct, on Friday denied media allegations that he had been caught on video smoking crack cocaine. "Absolutely not true," Ford told reporters gathered outside his west Toronto house, before driving off in his SUV. Reporters for the Toronto Star and Gawker Media said late on Thursday they had watched a cellphone video that appears to show Ford smoking crack, although both news outlets said they had declined to pay the $100,000 price asked by the tipsters,
|
Navy dolphins discover rare old torpedo off Calif. coast near Coronado
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Tony Perry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 5:54:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
SAN DIEGO — In the ocean off Coronado, a Navy team has discovered a relic worthy of display in a military museum: a torpedo of the kind deployed in the late 19th century, considered a technological marvel in its day. But don´t look for the primary discoverers to get a promotion or an invitation to meet the admirals at the Pentagon - although they might get an extra fish for dinner or maybe a pat on the snout. The so-called Howell torpedo was discovered by bottlenose dolphins being trained by the Navy to find undersea objects, including mines,
|
|
It´s not Obama´s fault... It´s Bush´s!
|
|
Boston Herald, by Howie Carr
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 5:50:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
It must be George W. Bush’s fault. Everything else is. The moonbats’ verdict is in. Barack Obama couldn’t possibly have done all those terrible things the vast right-wing conspiracy is accusing him of. And they’re not scandals, either. Obama’s troubles are merely “controversies” or, to use Dear Leader’s own phrase, a sideshow. Scandals only happen to Republicans, just like Deval Patrick didn’t go on a junket to Ireland. It was a “trade mission.” Democrats never make mistakes either — “mistakes were made,” in the passive voice.
|
At least someone in the MSM covers Benghazi
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 5:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Jay Carney insists Benghazi, Libya, is not a scandal, but then he doesn’t admit to having misled the media about the origin of the attacks. The administration now tells CBS News, “We’re portrayed by Republicans as either being lying or idiots. It’s actually closer to us being idiots.” It would be nice if the source specified what part(s) of the administration were idiotic and why it’s “closer” but not all attributable to incompetence. The problem with claiming incompetence is two-fold. First, it raises the question as to where the president was on Sept. 11, 2012,
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
| | |
|
|