|
|
| |
Topic: Lieberman: We Don´t Want to Lose Our Freedom by Trying to Keep Terrorists from Crossing Border |
Lieberman: We Don´t Want to Lose Our Freedom by Trying to Keep Terrorists from Crossing Border
Cybercast News Service, by Patrick Burke
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 12/12/2012 9:55:28 AM
|
| Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn), the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, said Tuesday the U.S. has made it increasingly difficult for Hezbollah terrorists and their supporters to cross the U.S.-Mexico border--but there is still more work to do to make the border secure. However, Lieberman also warned that we don´t want to lose American freedom by trying to keep terrorist from crossing the border from Mexico into the U.S. “The security’s better on the U.S.-Mexican border than it has been before in terms of terrorists’ capacity to break through our borders in the south,
|
Comments: I have to give him credit for coming up with an excuse for not securing the border that hasn´t been mentioned before. s/o No wonder this country is in such bad shape.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
mickturn, 12/12/2012 10:05:13 AM (No. 9061295)
Dude, if we don´t close the border to everyone illegal there will soon be no freedom. What are you smoking?
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
CEP, 12/12/2012 10:05:55 AM (No. 9061297)
Say that again Joe? The stuff that comes out of politicians mouths these days is simply jaw dropping. These are the people that continue to lead the country to it´s doom. The founding fathers, the ones who pledged their lives and fortunes to a free country must be rolling in their graves for a country that was once so great to have evolved into one that mimics the movie "Idiocracy"
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
John c, 12/12/2012 10:23:16 AM (No. 9061342)
Joe have you been having lunch with biden?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
joew9, 12/12/2012 10:27:46 AM (No. 9061350)
And we don´t want to lose our freedom by not protecting our border. There is a balancing act. And for a long time the balance has not been on the protecting our border side.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Yephora, 12/12/2012 10:40:55 AM (No. 9061388)
New World Order gibberish. Lieberman is part of the problem.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 12/12/2012 10:56:55 AM (No. 9061432)
Lieberman - the unconscious of the senate.
Thank goodness this old goat is leaving. Bad news is he`s being replaced by another idiot.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Chuzzles, 12/12/2012 10:58:38 AM (No. 9061435)
I would need to see proof that Congress is actually doing something to protect our borders. Until then Senator, this is just a pile of meadow muffins.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
6079 Smith, W, 12/12/2012 11:03:17 AM (No. 9061450)
So, the Constitution IS a suicide pact after all!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
bighambone, 12/12/2012 11:17:06 AM (No. 9061494)
Common sense will tell you that international borders must be secure enough to keep masses of generally uneducated and unskilled foreigners from simply walking into the USA without complying with immigration and customs laws of the country they are sneaking into.
A secure borderline alone will not stop mass uncontrolled illegal immigration. Today probably more then half of the illegal alien population initially came into the USA through an official port of entry by showing either a temporary visa of some sort or a border crossing card.
Those documents allowed those aliens to come here for a temporary period of time, after which they where supposed to leave.
But intending illegal aliens allowed into the country temporary in that manner do not leave, instead they go to some interior city, stay as illegal aliens, blend into the general population, enroll their alien children in US public schools, obtain some sort of fraudulent or otherwise bogus ID and take an American job to which they are not entitled.
The number of aliens doing that is limited only by the number of temporary visas or border crossing cards issued by the US Government under a very liberal criteria.
Once in the interior of the USA, unless the illegal aliens are convicted of some very serious violent felony crime, under current Obama Administration administrative policy that is contrary to the intent of the law, those illegal aliens are considered low priority and are not pursued for arrest and deportation. Intending illegal aliens know that, and you could not ask for better encouragement for them to come into the USA. It will remain that way as long as the liberal Democrats consider just about all illegal aliens to be potential Democrat voters.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
JAN, 12/12/2012 11:48:38 AM (No. 9061561)
Talking out of both sides of his mouth.
No surprise there.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Sfacheem, 12/12/2012 12:05:15 PM (No. 9061593)
I guess we´d rather lose our lives, huh Joe?
No thanks. I´ll wait in line for the pat down.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
frenesi1, 12/12/2012 2:27:35 PM (No. 9061922)
This guy has no character at all.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
JustCause, 12/12/2012 10:05:59 PM (No. 9062551)
I guess Common Sense isn´t common after all.
FTA: chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee
I wonder if he locks his door at home or has a fenced yard.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
| |
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
| |
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
| | |
|
|