A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: No Shots Fired: State Dept
Benghazi Security Force Unarmed
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
No Shots Fired: State Dept
Benghazi Security Force Unarmed

Breitbart's Big Peace, by Kerry Picket

Original Article

Posted By:Oblio, 12/11/2012 6:01:09 AM

A source with personal knowledge of the security situation in Benghazi told Breitbart News that Senators who listened to closed door testimony about the Benghazi attack were shocked to learn State Department security personnel agents were not immediately armed. Additionally, agents separated from Ambassador Chris Stevens left to retrieve their M4 weapons in a separate building. Only one returned to protect the Ambassador, while the other two hunkered down in the barracks, the source relayed. “From the accounts I read, those guys were not ready. When the attack came that night, they had to

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: steveW, 12/11/2012 6:19:10 AM     (No. 9058940)

One senses that the Obama administration´s definition of security is reassuring the world that "the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam", and that a Benghazi scenario could play out anywhere around the globe.

When an embassy is attacked, on which side, as a true anti-American, does Obama stand? (that´s a rhetorical question, Democrats).

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 2 - Posted by: ratslayer, 12/11/2012 6:20:26 AM     (No. 9058941)

Does this mean that PIAPS is no longer favored to be elected Commandress in Chief? The crown of the smartest woman in the world is little tarnished by a mere 4 KIAs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: LittleHoodedMonk, 12/11/2012 6:32:32 AM     (No. 9058953)

FTA: "Questions as to why the consulate security force was unarmed within the confines of the consulate will likely be asked of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton."

It is a historical fact that the storming of an US embassy [takeover] back in Vietnam Era, changed the way that US security forces guard and protect ambassadors thereafter. That there was minimal or no support locally [let alone not sent] is criminal, and State and Intelligence Departments´ "heads" should roll at the very least. Hillary will more than likely pay for this 0bamaNation in the next life, but a "public rebuke" and stopping of future political ambitions should be the very least suffered by this cold and joyless woman.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 4 - Posted by: pineledger, 12/11/2012 6:37:12 AM     (No. 9058959)

She needs to do a Petraeus.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 5 - Posted by: muggy, 12/11/2012 6:47:43 AM     (No. 9058961)

The lack of a substantive response from the Obama administration is a provocation for further attacks by our enemies.

I don´t think this leftist in the White House understands that weakness in the face of militant extremists, is an invitation to further attacks.

We are inviting attacks through our feckless response to Benghazi.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 6 - Posted by: Janjan, 12/11/2012 7:10:34 AM     (No. 9058979)

Hillary is more than ready ro spin, mislead and outright lie about her part in this. No way is she going down for the mistakes of people who are beneath her. We have seen this played out before with this woman.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/11/2012 7:19:13 AM     (No. 9058985)

dems can´t wait to get Obama behind them and move on to Hillary.Don´t ask me why but there´s a lot of people who have favorable impression of her but Net was a fool for what he said.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: LZK, 12/11/2012 7:21:56 AM     (No. 9058989)

This is no surprise to those of US who have been following this mess....

Their last moments must have been with feelings of their country betraying them....

So sad........

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 9 - Posted by: nimby, 12/11/2012 7:28:56 AM     (No. 9058996)

I just don´t get why none of these maroons have been placed under suspension with loss of pay.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: twinkle93, 12/11/2012 7:30:41 AM     (No. 9058999)

Very simple. Disarm Clinton´s guards.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 11 - Posted by: Gartrell Bibberts, 12/11/2012 7:44:15 AM     (No. 9059026)

Had the State Department not paid out about $300,000,000 for entertainment of the Mexican President and the Indian head of state, they could have afforded better guards than these TSA rejects.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 12 - Posted by: privateer, 12/11/2012 7:57:38 AM     (No. 9059049)

This will not hurt the PIAPS´ chances for resident. With dims, the selection of dictator is very like the functioning of a Royal House: the next in line is the next in line; no matter if that be an idiot, a pervert, an incompetent or a traitor. Between H and O, they have all the bases covered. You might as well order her portrait. That is, of course, if the current El Supremo ever leaves.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: uno_thatguy, 12/11/2012 7:57:48 AM     (No. 9059050)

It was known on Sept 12 that the "guards" were not armed and the Senators were unaware?

Hogwash. They´re either lying or they´re so stupid..., er, so stupid it´s beneath description.

It´s time to clean house. How many times has that been said and we just got this nitwit regime reinstated!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 14 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 12/11/2012 8:01:02 AM     (No. 9059054)

Folks, this stuff has consequences and I can attest to them. I am 52 years old. When I was 15 and a Sophomore in high school, I was considering the military as a career option. Then Jimmy Carter was elected, and our military preparedness suffered as a result. Our international reputation was diminished ultimately to the point of our Embassy being taken over. The Marines at the Embassy did not have the authority to defend the property in an effective manner.

Ultimately Mr. Carter´s cowardice was exposed, but it was not the cowardice that runs from battle. Rather it was the cowardice of ineffective leadership that restricts the actions of capable men in hopes that they will disobey orders to preserve their own lives, an thus offer their commander the fig-leaf of deniability in the event that the outcome is less than ideal.

When the Iranian Hostage fiasco came to its conclusion, I was 20 years old with an adverse attitude towards military service largely attributed to Mr. Carter´s plundering. Over the next 4 years, under Mr. Reagan´s leadership, my respect for the military was restored, but by thaypt time,my window for pursuing that career pat was closed.

Bottom line, we will not appreciate the damage that has been done for at least 10 years.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: jorgecito, 12/11/2012 8:01:11 AM     (No. 9059055)

#2, my thinking was along the same lines as yours, after reading this article...

i.e. my first thought was "how in God´s name can Hillary Clinton be considered a viable candidate for anything after this?"

But that thought quickly turned to "it won´t matter how bad she is - Hillary will be confirmed/elected, no matter what."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 16 - Posted by: LadyVet, 12/11/2012 8:17:36 AM     (No. 9059073)

Hillary is in charge of embassies and those smarty-pants senators are "shocked!" that the security personnel were unarmed. Why were they shocked after this record tied to Hillary! and her hen-pecked husband:

>Two US servicemen captured in Hillary and BJ´s wag-the-dog war in Bosnia, neither of whom had ammo for their gun while on patrol on front line.

>Military training / target practice without ammo because the Clinton admin refused to buy bullets for the guns.

>No bullets for Marines stationed in Cairo, "guarding" US embassy.

>No bullets for guards on USS Cole

>Total "anti-gun" attitude by Hillary!

Who in their right minds even assumes that there are bullets in the guns or that the "guards" even had guns?

P.S. Ain´t that 60´s theme grand? Make love, not war. BJ and Hillary are old hippies with gray hair.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 17 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 12/11/2012 8:41:00 AM     (No. 9059117)

This sorry little bit of news was known from the early days of this story. But since Hill of Beans said ´she´ takes full responsibility, I thought the matter finished. I mean, she did say that.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Heil Liberals, 12/11/2012 8:55:22 AM     (No. 9059142)

Knowing that Lindsey Graham wants answers make me feel better. /s

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 19 - Posted by: DCGIRL, 12/11/2012 9:20:12 AM     (No. 9059195)

I say drag her (Hilary) by her gray roots before everyone...including cameras and expose the monster.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: artlover, 12/11/2012 9:39:11 AM     (No. 9059238)

While you are exposing Hillary, expose Obama too. You can be sure that he had a part in this and is lying every day about it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: jimmiet, 12/11/2012 9:41:03 AM     (No. 9059249)

Senators did not know. The party that has been going on in Washington for the past 40+ years has got to stop. Treason is taking place on a daily basis and we´re sending emails. There are no leaders, no men of courage and conviction but we have gay marriage and legalized pot. Unless the citizenry rises up, calls on the help of the Lord we are destined for slavery.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: MattMusson, 12/11/2012 9:43:32 AM     (No. 9059256)

#14 makes an excellent point. It does not matter how many weapons you have - if you are not authorized to use them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 12/11/2012 9:43:38 AM     (No. 9059257)

I`m shocked that senators on the foreign relations committee were shocked. What exactly is the purpose of the House Committee on Foreign Relations if not to know what type of security is present at our embassies? Nobody ever in the history of our govn ever thought to ask the question prior to someone being killed? Evidently we learned nothing from the Iranian hostage crisis in 1979.

As for Diane Feinstein, well, she has decades of experience in govn but seems to be as clueless as ever.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 24 - Posted by: beca, 12/11/2012 9:43:43 AM     (No. 9059258)

the whole thing stinks...obama lied...clinton lied...rice lied and who knows who else lied....that is all obama does...lie...hide info...distort....and this country is hyping hillary for president....good grief how stupid are we.....ok dont answer....i already know

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: beca, 12/11/2012 9:45:05 AM     (No. 9059262)

#18...at least graham is asking for answers..instead of knocking our repubs why dont we try to get behind them and support their quest for the truth.......

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: skedaddle, 12/11/2012 9:47:24 AM     (No. 9059270)

There´s a much bigger game being played in Benghazi and murdered Americans are acceptable collateral damage in the eyes of this administration. That´s my opinion and I haven´t seen anything to convince me otherwise since the whole mess happened. The only thing I´m not sure about is how much satisfaction the White House derived from listening in real time to our guys losing the fight for their lives.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: RancherJack, 12/11/2012 10:02:32 AM     (No. 9059306)

Uh huh.

Still no word on --

1. Why no armed elite Marine Guard presence at an embassy compound in a war torn Islamic nation known for jihadist recruitment

2. Why locals hired to "protect" embassy overseen by men from Britain with nothing but batons to protect the station?

3. Where was the Benghazi police for seven hours?

4. Where was the Libyan military for seven hours?

5. Who issued the stand-down and why?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 28 - Posted by: JAN, 12/11/2012 10:08:37 AM     (No. 9059320)

Same as the USS Cole terror attack.

No one on deck was armed.

Think back to our peace keeping marines in Lebanon during Reagan administration. The marines were not armed.

Seems we NEVER learn.

Heartbreaking.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 29 - Posted by: lalo, 12/11/2012 10:15:17 AM     (No. 9059337)

I agree with #26 - McCain & Lindsey may not always be my cup of tea, but at least they´re in there speaking up. And they´re not as easily dismissed in lib circles and media as hardliners - based on that very ´across the aisle´ reputation and credibility that is so maligned here.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 30 - Posted by: lalo, 12/11/2012 10:16:18 AM     (No. 9059342)

And thank you, #29, for that perspective.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 31 - Posted by: CEP, 12/11/2012 10:18:47 AM     (No. 9059350)

Well if everything is okay and they didn´t need security personnel, I propose that Obama and all the other jerks of Washington DC go without security when they leave to do all their unnecessary travels. Why does Michelle have all the security when she goes on vacation, why does the President have all the security when he goes to give a campaign speech, why does his best buddy Valerie have security at her daughters wedding?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 32 - Posted by: KanCreeper, 12/11/2012 10:40:49 AM     (No. 9059413)

The ineptness of the current Washington Regime, boggles the mind!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 33 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 12/11/2012 10:45:00 AM     (No. 9059421)

"Hell they had live ammon at Kent State Unisversity to shoot hippies..."

Hippies don´t rock and bottles; drunken, spoiled and destructive college kids do...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Palmetto Bug, 12/11/2012 10:47:07 AM     (No. 9059430)

I say "treason" - let if fall and fit where it may....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 35 - Posted by: LAW428, 12/11/2012 11:04:52 AM     (No. 9059484)

This current gaggle of Washington party-hearty miscreants is appalling. We are the greatest country in the world and are being dismantled by leftist/socialist hippies that wormed, weaseled, and scammed their way to the top.

The current Supreme Court is stacked in their favor; Congress is composed of eunuchs; we are left holding the financial bag of debt to China, while a self-worshiping president dismantles America.

It´s enough to make my stomach turn over and over and over. When will the insanity end and will we survive?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 36 - Posted by: snowoutlaw, 12/11/2012 11:15:12 AM     (No. 9059516)

Not armed because they might have hurt Obama´s brothers in arms.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 37 - Posted by: zbogwan2, 12/11/2012 11:24:00 AM     (No. 9059541)

Stevens and his alleged protectors have to have a screw loose, so to speak, by being in these Terrorist Countries with only their di*k in their hands for protection?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 38 - Posted by: hedduk, 12/11/2012 11:28:45 AM     (No. 9059555)

Take some time and read the referenced Canadian Free Press articles, Benghazi I and II - and become very, very troubled.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 39 - Posted by: chicodon, 12/11/2012 11:30:24 AM     (No. 9059566)

And now we have Hillary´s mystery stomach virus keeping her from going to the ME to praise the Syrian revolution. Syrian Opposition Force weapons ties to Benghazi? The plot thickens.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 12/11/2012 11:34:40 AM     (No. 9059577)

To be real honest, I wouid like to take a two by four to anyone that voted for this moron, killer, and spendthrift in the WH. What were they thinking, he was so obviously anti-American and stupid to boot.
As for the hag, she should be fired and jailed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 41 - Posted by: Billyc, 12/11/2012 11:50:22 AM     (No. 9059617)

The pivotal point to address should be ´who gave the order or command to stand down or do not help the Consulate personel´. Each department it appears. periodically comes up with we did it or Hilary to protect and took the blame.It cannot be Jarrett and it can only be one person who is authorized to issue such a command . That´s Obama our Commander in Chief. This coward is such a wimp that he will not go public and tell the public it was his fault. Also personally I would like to see Panetta let all of us know why no relief was forthcoming . You may recall he mumbled a few reasons why they could not send for help . All these reasons were absolute nonsense and not true.Would like to see Panetta hauled up before a house tribunal and find out whether it was a cover for Obama´s boast that El Quada were defeated ( anti Muslim film et al baloney). Frightening is this imbecile in the WH must confront Syria. Iran , North Korea . China. He is still a community organization attested by his voting wins.Foreign Affairs no way !.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: comstock, 12/11/2012 11:59:00 AM     (No. 9059639)

Benghazi was not a diplomatic mission - it was a CIA run weapons smuggling operation providing munitions to one side or the other in these "Arab Spring" uprisings. That´s why there were no Marine guards. Stevens was there to make a deal with the Turks.

The idiots at the State Department believed their pap about Libya being pacified, they all love us over there, you know. The CIA guys were screaming for security because they knew Al Queda had taken over, but to provide security would have exposed the operation and put the lie to the Hillary/Obama fairy tale about their Oh, So successful foreign policy.

Will somebody in Congress please grow a set and expose and destroy Hillary before the morons elect her to succeed Obozo.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 43 - Posted by: Rafter, 12/11/2012 12:16:00 PM     (No. 9059687)

Bamster lied.
People died.

Of course, other liars include the cast of the Usual Suspects...
Hill-err-ee-ass Herself...
Susan Steamed Rice...
Joseph "Upchuck" Buh-Biden...
and no doubt the con-genital liar...
BillyBob Klintoon...
amongst other sick twisted unworthies...

Merely collateral damage for the Fascist Left.
RPG´s.
IED´s.
KIA´s.
Who cares?
Not commie liberoids.
Velcome 2 AmeriKa... 2012.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 44 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 12/11/2012 12:53:33 PM     (No. 9059777)

Well, now we know the reason for Hillary!´s stomach virus.

/disgust off/


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 45 - Posted by: P51DMustang, 12/11/2012 1:07:53 PM     (No. 9059821)

I think to myself, potus, Ms. Clintoon and the hired help must have been absent from knife and fork school when the always be prepared lesson was taught.

“BLESSED BE THE LORD MY STRENGTH
WHICH TEACHETH MY HANDS TO WAR
AND MY FINGERS TO FIGHT”
PSALM 144


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 46 - Posted by: Bla Bla, 12/11/2012 1:45:58 PM     (No. 9059896)

Well, but, of COURSE there were no bullets available to shoot a Muslim terrorist attack. It is the Obama Administration´s POLICY to never harm a Muslim! Jews & Americans are always to defer to the lives of Muslims. It´s in his "Dreams of My Father" book. When "political winds" (think: video protests) are shifting he plans on standing with the Muslim. Always.

After seeing some of the gaffes & entertainment choices at the White House lately, I have now come to the conclusion that our President is ill-informed & downright stupid. Make that stoopid. I think he truly believed all the Ambassador was dealing with was a protest mob when they were begging for more security.

And Hillary? AWOL at her post as Secretary of our freakin´ State! Even Maddie Albright would have been complaining to the POTUS that they needed real bullets & more guards.

What will the future bring for the next four years when our enemy realizes this, if they haven´t already?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 47 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 12/11/2012 1:54:56 PM     (No. 9059913)

Rant in here all you want. The damage is being done as we speak and no one is backing our Senators and Congresspeople. Write letters, call them. Protest as loudly as possible. They must know we still support them. This fight for our nation and freedom has just begun!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 48 - Posted by: Partisan62, 12/11/2012 2:19:07 PM     (No. 9059983)

Well, this should put an end to it but you know that the Liberals will be making excuses for Obammy forever.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 49 - Posted by: caddyjak, 12/11/2012 2:24:46 PM     (No. 9060000)

The fact that Hillary might possibly be considered for any position in government is a tribute to the traitorous American Media. True that most of our electorate is functionally illiterate but the fact that Hillary is the queen of all political liars and thiefs should be self-evident.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 50 - Posted by: texas_gop, 12/11/2012 2:27:40 PM     (No. 9060006)

Press, WH and Libs will cry witch hunt and good chance nothing will come of this. As we all know, if this had been Bush, for example, this would be dealt with and reported very differntly. Very sad. Libs care very little about individuals, just like their Maoist heros.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 51 - Posted by: janylou, 12/11/2012 7:06:54 PM     (No. 9060434)

Does this remind anyone else of right to carry laws versus strict gun laws and waiting for the cops to show up? Keystone Kops!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: Crosscut, 12/11/2012 8:18:05 PM     (No. 9060533)

Washington Democrats should be ashamed of Obama and his administration. They are a total disgrace and embarrassment to America. Prison would be almost too good for many of them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 53 - Posted by: Lonestar Jack, 12/11/2012 9:06:52 PM     (No. 9060586)

No ammo rounds in a war area to protect our personnel, but 1,000,000,000 .40 hollow point (like a dum dum) on our land to protect against the civilians in case of an uprising.

Makes sense?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 54 - Posted by: walcb, 12/11/2012 9:18:18 PM     (No. 9060594)

Benghazi wasn´t an embassy and wasn´t a consulate. Why does even Breitbart report them as such?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 55 - Posted by: philemon1967, 12/11/2012 10:20:30 PM     (No. 9060651)

It is almost as if God is trying to render the last remaining superpower ineffectual in the Middle East and begin the Apocalypse by causing the election of a feckless American president who destabilizes the region. Maybe, Obama is vying with Ahmadinejad to be the forerunner of the coming al-Mahdi. I see Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Syria, Hamas, Hezbollah with new leaders who are among the Ten in the Last Days who are in power for "only an hour" who will give their allegiance to one Supreme Leader with the expressed goal of wiping Israel off the face of the map.

Sun Tzu says that if you know your enemy and yourself, you´ll always win, if you don´t know your enemy but you know yourself, you´ll win half the time. But if you don´t know your enemy and you don´t know yourself you will always lose. The last case is, unfortunately for America, true of Obama and his clueless administration apparatchiks who see everything through their Alinski tinted glasses.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 56 - Posted by: Trigger2, 12/12/2012 4:20:03 AM     (No. 9060865)

I can´t wait to hear her testimony. Any bets on how often the following will be heard?
1) I can´t recall.
2) I have no memory of that.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: Heil Liberals, 12/14/2012 12:06:53 AM     (No. 9064577)

#26 & #30 - I guess that the "across the aisle" people aggravate so many of us because when they do reach across it is almost always to bend over backwards to accommodate the Socialists/Marxist that make up the majority of the Democratic party. They are pretty quick to throw under the bus any right of center conservative for the expediency of the deal.

In fact, I don´t think anyone here would mind across the aisle compromises if the compromises that are crafted are fair and reasonable and American. Instead, we get demands for congress to abdicate its Constitutional responsibilities and turn over fiscal authority to the executive branch of the U.S. government. How do you reach across the aisle with the likes of Hairy Read? How do compromise with a moonbat like Nancy Pelousy? These are the EXACT same people who said we would have to pass the most destructive law since LBJs Great Society swindle in order to know what was in it! Good God!

So, when some of us vent a little (or a lot) of bitter sarcasm toward the crossover Pubbies, it is because they have a long, colorful history of compromising conservative principles for political expediency.

Sorry moderators, but I really think I needed to respond to those two posts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment



Post Reply   Close thread 715177




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"



The Secrets of Princeton
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM     Post Reply
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —

Piercing the secrecy of
offshore tax havens
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM     Post Reply
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.

Former News Corp President
Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM     Post Reply
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.

After Pentagon investigations, three
Army generals censured for misconduct
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM     Post Reply
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.

Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration
minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM     Post Reply
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”

Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney
General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM     Post Reply
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that

Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer    Original Article
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM     Post Reply
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

47 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL

33 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Fox News Poll: Many voters say Obama lies
to the country on important matters

30 replie(s)
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 7:39:27 PM     Post Reply
About six in ten American voters think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters some or most of the time, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday. Thirty-seven percent think Obama lies “most of the time,” while another 24 percent say he lies “some of the time.” Twenty percent of voters say “only now and then” and 15 percent “never.” Click here for the poll results. President Obama has been accused by political opponents and media fact-checkers alike of telling falsehoods. Frequently cited: His repeated claim that under Obamacare “If you like your plan, you can keep


Post Reply   Close thread 715177





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~