A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: What If Conservatives Have
Lost the Argument?
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
What If Conservatives Have
Lost the Argument?

Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 12/10/2012 11:09:03 PM

The debate over the “fiscal cliff” is an important tactical one and could have widespread political ramifications. There are complicated issues to consider. Should the Republicans give in to Mr. Obama’s demand that we raise the top tax rates? If so, what should they demand in return? If they don’t get it, is it more prudent to retreat in order to fight another day on more advantageous ground for the GOP? Or should Republicans be willing to go cliff diving with the president, confident that in the end Obama will own any future recession? Whatever the answer

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: reilly, 12/10/2012 11:15:23 PM     (No. 9058757)


Lost the argument to some idiot judges, maybe, but this doesn´t end well. Bank on it.


Reply 2 - Posted by: dallasdude, 12/10/2012 11:21:58 PM     (No. 9058762)

Stand your ground and face the consequences. Do what you say and say what you do.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: oh-heck, 12/10/2012 11:32:15 PM     (No. 9058777)

The extensions of unemployment benefits end just before the end of the year. The Bush tax rates end Dec 31. The Payroll Tax Holiday ends Dec 31. All the special credits that give money to those too poor to pay taxes end Dec31. The Sequester begins Jan 1. Just sit at the table and stare back at the President. The laws were bipartisan and signed by the President. Only 10% of the whopping tax bill will be paid by the rich. Don´t go creating new taxes when the Dems have already raised everyone´s taxes.


Reply 4 - Posted by: johnnygeneric, 12/10/2012 11:52:09 PM     (No. 9058791)

By losing we´ve one. Their "utopia" will be their undoing.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Pearson365, 12/11/2012 12:06:14 AM     (No. 9058801)

Repubs have to believe in something other than reaching across the aisle. Would suggest:

A. Since existing entitlements are approaching insolvency, demand that Dems rescind that the one entitlement that has not gone into effect, ObamaCare, be rescinded as of 12/31/12. Dems have to decide if SS, Medicare and Medicaid are more important that the ObamaCare montrosity sold on Obama lies.

B. Require that a budget be enacted by 12/3113. Budget would have to impose draconian cuts in federal departments such as Ag, Commerce, EPA, Energy, Ed.

C. Impose an immediate hiring freeze on all non-military departments and agencies. Impose an immediate 24 month ban on all new regulations and then require cost/ benefit analysis.

D. Remove the Obama prohibitions on energy exploration & extraction. A $40 barrel of oil price is a fantastic tax-in-kind cut.


Reply 6 - Posted by: oh-heck, 12/11/2012 12:08:10 AM     (No. 9058804)

Seriously, Obama was hoping to cut a bargain so he could ignore the spending cuts and continue to redistribute wealth. Then he was going to push for a carbon tax and start laying the ground work for raising taxes again on the top 2% and end the extension for the middle class in 2014. It throws a monkey wrench into his plans to end all these giveaways (Payroll tax, earned income credits, extended unemployment, etc) and to expect that the money go to pay down the deficit. The spending cuts through Sequester hurt even more. But he signed the bills last year.


Reply 7 - Posted by: kelty, 12/11/2012 12:29:30 AM     (No. 9058819)

I´m sure if they had managed to find a way to tax accrued wealth instead of income, reign in offshores, people would have preferred it, but this is all that was offered.

If there were any kind of feeling at all that "the rich" still felt any kind of loyalty to the US or its people, over global and cheap labor - I don´t think the percentages would have been so high.

That´s what conservatives need to address.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Nevadadad46, 12/11/2012 1:51:07 AM     (No. 9058842)

Yeah. for sure, I´m a cliff diver. Let´s just do it and see what comes out at the rocky bottom. It´s the only way to wake up these brain dead zombiefied Øbama voters. Let them march into the liberal Utopia to see what´s inside it- Just like Pelosie´s answer to the Øbama care law too big and bothersome to understand- "We have to pass it to find out what´s in it." Idiots are in charge now- let them see the result of their idiocy.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/11/2012 2:19:01 AM     (No. 9058853)

Expecting blood sucking,low information people to see the failure of their almighty chosen one ain´t gonna happen.There´s more than enough people in this country we can win with if we motivate them to the polls.

There´s no apathy on the left because their reward is financial.The republicans have to win on more intangible things and it´s a tough sell.

Our biggest problem isn´t the minority vote but stupid white people´s votes.We´re being targeted for extinction and these people are too damn stupid to see it.


Reply 10 - Posted by: iamtinman, 12/11/2012 2:22:14 AM     (No. 9058854)

If conservatves have lost the arguement then we are doomed to repeat the disaster of the past 4 years.


Reply 11 - Posted by: TXknitter, 12/11/2012 2:24:56 AM     (No. 9058857)

As long as our side helps Dems to rescue dumbo voters/citizens from living in the consequences of Obama´s socialist utopian policies, America will continue to slide to the bottom.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Phil_hk, 12/11/2012 3:38:11 AM     (No. 9058875)

I have said and believe the only hope is for a terrorist attack that kills several million Obama voters.

The only other option is a genocidal civil war. Come on Muslims nuke NYC, LA and several other large liberal cities.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: sunsong, 12/11/2012 4:37:55 AM     (No. 9058896)

Good article. I think those are worthy questions to consider no matter the issue. We do need to pick our battles wisely. My view right now is that if we can´t get a good deal with significant cuts - then it´s time to call Obama´s bluff and see if he wants to go over the cliff over $85 billion.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Japanorama, 12/11/2012 5:22:14 AM     (No. 9058907)

The argument is simple:
Either you are for or against the American experiment.
One side wants to abandon it and hop the boat back to Europe.
The other side seeks to preserve this land of unprecedented freedom.
On which side are you? On which side were your parents?


Reply 15 - Posted by: OhMy, 12/11/2012 5:51:52 AM     (No. 9058929)

Stand fast on the debt ceiling and watch the takers attack Obama. The cry baby should understand he will never win the taker vote but he could loose the votes that put him where he is if he doesn´t do what needs to be done. It is too late to change horses in this race. No more extensions to unemployment insurance. No govt spending is a stimulant. It is sucking dry the private sector. The "redistribution" is not from the rich to the poor but from the productive private sector to the parasitic public sector and unions.


Reply 16 - Posted by: clayusmcret, 12/11/2012 6:01:52 AM     (No. 9058933)

Peter, like obama, misses the problem entirely. It´s not about blame. It´s about the very future of our country. It is impossible to sustain the governmental eating machine and still remain afloat much longer. We simply cannot borrow our way into oblivion and continue to think that we´re an economically sound country. At some point, very soon, the equivalent to an magnetic flip of the earth is going to occur and the 50 United States of America is going to cease to exist. I guess the real problem is.....is that obama´s end goal?


Reply 17 - Posted by: EllaZella, 12/11/2012 7:19:32 AM     (No. 9058986)

When we borrow 50 cents for every dollar we spend, and the suggestion is to hike the top marginal tax rate by a few percent, the math doesn´t work. Just to maintain present spending, we would have to more than double the tax money coming in.

Taking it all from the rich would kill the goose and stop the tax income. I think the point is to kill the goose.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: convert, 12/11/2012 8:40:16 AM     (No. 9059116)

The Republicans have lost the argument-clearly and unequivocably. If we go over the fiscal cliff, Repubs will be blamed and we´ll lose more seats in 2014. I think we have to negotiate the smallest increase possible and try to then get some major cuts in return. That´s our only option. I´m not happy about it or advocating it, but I´m pretty positive that´s where we are. The American people are in deep, deep denial and frankly, very ignorant, thanks to our media, of what the real numbers mean.


Reply 19 - Posted by: nonsense, 12/11/2012 9:33:12 AM     (No. 9059220)

#3 and #6 Not to mention the VAT that has Demonrats drooling. All that lovely money that they can steal from each and every American, even the 50% who so far contribute not one thin dime to the Treasury. If they get their dream wish, we will all be even poorer.



Post Reply   Close thread 715158




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Petraeus’s role in drafting Benghazi
talking points raises questions
Washington Post, by Scott Wilson and Karen DeYoung    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 11:03:01 PM     Post Reply
The controversy over the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack last year began at a meeting over coffee on Capitol Hill three days after the assault. It was at this informal session with the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that the ranking Democrat asked David H. Petraeus, who was CIA director at the time, to ensure that committee members did not inadvertently disclose classified information when talking to the news media about the attack. “We had some new members on the committee, and we knew the press would be very aggressive on this, so we didn’t want

With more clarity, White House
adds to confusion on IRS
Washington Post, by Dan Balz    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:59:54 PM     Post Reply
It is never good for an administration when a front-page newspaper article about an ongoing controversy begins as follows: “The White House offered a new account Monday of how and when it learned .?.?. ” That’s what readers of The Post awoke to on Tuesday. In trying to contain the controversy and protect President Obama, White House officials have only added to questions about what happened. Until this week, the story of how White House officials learned that the Internal Revenue Service was targeting conservative groups was fairly straightforward. White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler was notified in late April

   

 



 
In AP, Rosen investigations,
government makes
criminals of reporters
Washington Post, by Dana Milbank    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:56:21 PM     Post Reply
There are various reasons you might not care about the Obama administration’s spying on journalist James Rosen and labeling him a “co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor” in an espionage case. Liberals may not be particularly bothered because the targeted journalist works for Fox News. Conservatives may not be concerned because of their antipathy toward the news media generally. And the general public certainly doesn’t have much patience for journalists’ whining. But here’s why you should care — and why this case, along with the administration’s broad snooping into Associated Press phone records, is more serious than the other supposed

White House meltdown: A truth deficit
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:53:11 PM     Post Reply
There seems to be bipartisan consensus that whatever the White House is doing to fend off scandal is making things worse. Howard Fineman sounds a lot like Right Turn these days: “White House aides are tempting fate with their reluctant, piecemeal and contradictory disclosures of what they knew and when they knew it, especially about a report on the Internal Revenue Service’s 18-month effort to target tea party and other conservative groups for special scrutiny.” The constantly shifting stories from Jay Carney and the IRS dissembling and pleas of ignorance only heighten concern that there has been serious wrongdoing.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

‘Rosen’s in the Wind!’
National Review Online, by Jonah Goldberg    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:29:36 PM     Post Reply
John Podhoretz has a good column today on the Obama administration’s travails. I did not know this bit until I read the column: Even more startling, the search warrant makes clear that the FBI already had everything it needed on the leaker, as the request for a search warrant features quotes from an interview that were tantamount to a confession. It asked that the warrant be sealed — in other words, that Rosen not be told — because knowledge might “cause subjects to flee”! Imagine it: Rosen, an on-air reporter

All of Obama´s Scandals Are
Ultimately About Information Control
National Review Online, by Jim Geraghty    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 9:26:54 PM     Post Reply
There’s really no reason for the press to suggest that the recent slew of scandals involving the Obama administration — Benghazi, the AP phone-record seizure, the snooping in James Rosen’s e-mail, the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups, and so on — are a confusing jumble. There is a very clear thread running through all of the administration’s actions: The U.S. deputy chief of mission in Libya, Gregory Hicks, says that he was told not to speak to a member of Congress about Benghazi without a State Department lawyer present, that he received a phone call from Hillary Clinton’s



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
71 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
54 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

50 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Leaks turn to deluge
for reeling White House

48 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Podhoretz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM     Post Reply
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”

Top IRS official will
invoke Fifth Amendment

48 replie(s)
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”

Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi
is a Laughable Joke’

41 replie(s)
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM     Post Reply
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.

   

Post Reply   Close thread 715158





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~