|
|
| |
Topic: The Republican Tax Panic |
The Republican Tax Panic
Wall Street Journal, by Staff
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Desert Fox, 12/10/2012 7:28:14 PM
|
| If any Republicans thought that President Obama would respond with magnanimity in victory, they now know better. He is determined to rout them on taxes, give as a little as possible on spending, and blame them for any economic damage in the bargain. The question for the GOP is how to minimize the harm to the economy, as well as to their chances of a political and policy comeback in 2014 and beyond. So it´s a shame that Republicans are playing into Mr. Obama´s hands, negotiating in public among themselves, prematurely giving up on the tax issue and undermining
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Phil_hk, 12/10/2012 7:46:19 PM (No. 9058576)
The WSJ should have been saying this everyday for the last 4 years
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
sunsong, 12/10/2012 7:47:52 PM (No. 9058577)
[[[But Mr. Obama also can´t get what he wants without House Republicans. He needs their votes to extend current rates for lower-income taxpayers, as well as to prevent the Alternative Minimum Tax from hitting 27 million more taxpayers. Most of those new AMT taxpayers live in high-tax Democratic states. Meanwhile, the death tax rate reverts to 55% and a $1 million exemption. Senate Democrats running for re-election in 2014 won´t want that on their resume.
For all of his bluster about blaming Republicans, Mr. Obama also knows a budget failure would do enormous harm to his chances of second-term success. It would guarantee at least two more years of trench budget warfare and poison the chances of immigration or other reform. Another recession would be on his watch, not on George W. Bush´s.]]]
If the pubbies cave there is no use in having them!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
yuban, 12/10/2012 7:59:07 PM (No. 9058591)
If? Don´t you mean when? Just askin.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
greyseal, 12/10/2012 8:03:31 PM (No. 9058597)
There´s already not much reason to keep the Pubbies around. I´m tired of being taken for granted as nothing more than a fundraising tool. As best as I can tell there are the Demoncrats and the Demoncrat-lite. The days of Reagan and conservative values in the GOP are GONE. Anyone who would consider "moving more to the middle" (IOW, being more like the Dems) to simply win elections misses the point - if we win, what have we gained? Bragging rights? It´s about principles not a lack of them. I´d just as soon the GOP be out of power and wandering in the desert so they can learn that we already know.
Now excuse me, I gotta get back to work supporting the 98%...
greyseal
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
privateer, 12/10/2012 8:25:35 PM (No. 9058612)
Like many on this site, I used to believe the two parties were democrat and democrat-lite. Now I believe we have communists, and nascent Euro-socialists.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
noproblems, 12/10/2012 8:28:46 PM (No. 9058615)
Neither party has a principled position when you have allowed annual $1 trillion deficits and have accumulated $16 trillion in debt.
The Dimms have a temporary tactical advantage because of the bush rates expiring in a few weeks. Deal with and dont be stupid.
Frankly I do not gives a rats arse whether tax rates temporily go marginally higher. The government needs more of our money only because of the outrageous government spending that both parties abide.
If the Repugs want to ever again regain credibility they need to take a moral stand on deficit spending during the upcoming debt ceiling negotiations.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 12/10/2012 8:40:31 PM (No. 9058622)
The last thing we could look to Pubbies for was an unwavering stand to keep Democrats from raising taxes, regulating middle class businesses to extinction and small government. W was such a big government guy that we lost that issue. Now if (and it´s just a matter of time) our leaders raise taxes for WHATEVER reason, there is no need to support Republicans.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Muguy, 12/10/2012 8:40:59 PM (No. 9058623)
You can trust as marxist to be a marxist.
Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Oh year, Billy Clinton was a "new democrat"
Same old socialsm....
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
quark, 12/10/2012 8:46:41 PM (No. 9058628)
FTA: "If any Republicans thought that President Obama would respond with magnanimity in victory, they now know better."
No, if they really thought that then they are incredibly stupid!
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
MrYules, 12/10/2012 8:51:47 PM (No. 9058633)
The people who run this "administration" are not so much politicians as idealists. They are relentless, remorseless, and dedicated to total victory, which means the figurative (and in some historical periods) annihilation of their enemies.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
zaphod, 12/10/2012 9:21:35 PM (No. 9058655)
The repubs need a SIMPLE plan: No tax changes for the "rich" 10% tax cut for other taxpayers Eliminate negative taxes (tax credits)
Let the demonrats stew
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
QRP, 12/10/2012 9:46:32 PM (No. 9058675)
Lawn Chair Johnny Boehner needs to call Bush 41 and ask what happens when you fold on a tax pledge. Each day we will be a little less prosperous and a little less free than the day before and the RINOs are not going to anything to stop it.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
sanchin, 12/10/2012 9:53:51 PM (No. 9058686)
It has taken the last six years, and especially the last 4, for me to wake up to fact that the Republican Party and its leaders are LOSERS. Not since Reagan have we had someone who cared about the people of America and America´s future. The curent leadership will sell us out to save themselves and the supposed deep bench we have will not win in 2016. I am finished with them and so is everyone I know. Good riddance.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
jntsrgn, 12/10/2012 9:55:04 PM (No. 9058689)
Obama WANTS to go over "the cliff".
ALL rates will rise and the Dems will then offer legislation to LOWER taxes for everyone under $250,000.
The GOP will be forced to vote for it and the Dems get to be the party of lower taxes.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
scrubber, 12/10/2012 10:02:15 PM (No. 9058693)
And just why is this a Republican problem? Why must we keep hearing questions posed from the left?
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
bluefindad, 12/10/2012 10:21:28 PM (No. 9058710)
Obama is marching toward the world he imagines. It is not an idealistic world in which people have an opportunity to fulfill their dreams. It is a world ordered by ´scientific´ social structure.
Obama does not consider himself to be the president of all of the people. They are not his concern. He will pat them on the head like a man pats a dog who is about to be put down, but without real compassion (see ´Sandy´ people).
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 12/10/2012 10:22:39 PM (No. 9058712)
I´ve already written Boehner and asked him to step aside because he cannot communicate the problem effectively.
I also got a notice that only 16 more votes are needed to replace him. I want my guy to do it.
Newt Gingrich´s list of five things that the R´s need to do to combat the problems of the next four years. He is right.
R´s have to change the narrative and use the appropriations power that they have. They ought to be able to change the subject to spending just as 0b0zo changes every subject to the mean Republicans and tax increases.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Davids918, 12/10/2012 10:33:22 PM (No. 9058722)
So, what will Obama do if he gets 8 days worth of increased taxes from the top 2%?
How will that solve the trillion dollar deficits under Obama?
And how bad is this economy when over $1 trillion more in spending is taking place and it´s limping along?
Dems want Clinton-era tax rates? GOP should then demand Clinton-era spending levels.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
kahunavol, 12/10/2012 11:27:23 PM (No. 9058769)
How we became a country that has had no budget and therefore no accountability for the past 4 years is beyond my ability to comprehend. That it wasn´t mentioned and hammered every single day in the recent presidential campaign is amazing. Debt limit increases without a budget are irresponsible and without real world analogs.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 12/10/2012 11:34:52 PM (No. 9058778)
Agree, #19. Lack of a budget all these years is astounding. You can get away with anything if the media is on your side.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
golden, 12/11/2012 12:51:52 AM (No. 9058833)
Whats that story about the scorpion and the frog? Oh yeah Obama is the scorpion. Don´t be a frog.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Spidey, 12/11/2012 2:05:19 AM (No. 9058851)
Boehner needs to call Obama´s bluff. Obama raised a billion dollars+ in the election,there´s a lot of fat cats waiting on their reward money they can´t get without House approval.
Even if Boehner struck a deal with Obama,he still has to get his folks to vote for it.Then it has to go through the senate grinder and back again.
They´re not going to get a big deal done by the end of the year,so my guess is you´ll see a couple month extension of the current situation.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
steveW, 12/11/2012 2:22:44 AM (No. 9058855)
We can now officially call them Cavemen, so anxious is the GOP to cave and grovel before His Majesty.
The worst part is not understanding the intentions of the Democrats. Or, if some in the GOP actually do understand those bad intentions, never calling them out and exposing them. Bad only grows where it is allowed to grow. The GOP has had its chances, over and over and over, yet still acts clueless. That´s what happens when you buy into the lie that Democrats want to "help people" and, more insidious, that "helping people" is the purpose of your party, too. That´s a cave-in already, at the very root of it.
The rest is silence.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Trigger2, 12/11/2012 5:58:41 AM (No. 9058932)
Each and every nickel to be gained by raising rates has already been spent by the demonrats. NONE of it will go to paying down the debt. By the time the bozo finally has to leave office, the US debt clock will read $30 trillion and counting. The real debt of $100+ trillion from unfunded entitlements will still be hidden.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Desert Fox"
|
An ObamaCare Board Answerable to No One
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by David Rivkin and Elizabeth Foley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/19/2013 9:55:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Signs of ObamaCare´s failings mount daily, including soaring insurance costs, looming provider shortages and inadequate insurance exchanges. Yet the law´s most disturbing feature may be the Independent Payment Advisory Board. The IPAB, sometimes called a "death panel," threatens both the Medicare program and the Constitution´s separation of powers. At a time when many Americans have been unsettled by abuses at the Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department, the introduction of a powerful and largely unaccountable board into health care merits special scrutiny. For a vivid illustration of the extent to which life-and-death medical decisions have already been usurped by government bureaucrats,
|
Flexibility: Obama Gives Away America´s Nuclear Arsenal
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/19/2013 6:57:00 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Disarmament: President Obama has proposed targeting cuts in deployed atomic weapons of up to a third below levels achieved in a 2010 treaty with Russia. He wants a world without nuclear arms — specifically ours. Only a shameless politician could invoke the name of President Kennedy in Berlin to announce the nuclear disarmament of America. When Kennedy proclaimed "Ich bin ein Berliner" in June 1963, it was a statement of solidarity with the free people of West Berlin and a pledge of resistance to the tyranny that surrounded it. It was not an act of
|
In Afghanistan, Obama Repeating Big Vietnam Mistake
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/19/2013 6:52:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
War On Terror: President Obama is practically engineering a silent coup against flawed Afghan President Hamid Karzai, with whom we replaced the Taliban in 2001. He´s copying America´s worst mistake of the Vietnam War. A perfect comparison it may not be, but disturbing similarities exist between the Obama administration´s unfolding abandonment of Afghanistan´s corrupt President Karzai and the Kennedy administration´s betrayal of South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem 50 years ago. Karzai on Wednesday backed out of impending talks with the Taliban after the U.S. announced its diplomats will negotiate directly with the country´s bloodthirsty former rulers.
|
Obama Rhetoric Matches That Of Old Soviet Leaders
|
|
Investor´s Business Daily, by Svetlana Kunin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/19/2013 6:48:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama insists his policies are driven by a "common sense" approach. He also speaks in terms of "we the people" and "the government is us." Such declarations are reminiscent of old Soviet posters displayed for all to see: "ALL POWER BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE" and "PEOPLE AND COMMUNIST PARTY ARE ONE." But the real power in the USSR was in the hands of Communist Party leaders. They, in the name of the people, defined foes of centralized government as "enemies of the people." Similarly, Obama´s Department of Homeland Security has defined right-wing extremists as "those that are mainly anti-government,
|
|
Obama Falls Flat in Berlin
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/19/2013 5:26:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: I´ll get to Obama and Germany. There were two things he did in Germany. He had a press conference with Merkel and he had a speech, the Brandenburg Gate. If you remember, in 2008 Obama went over to Germany and he requested at that time to speak at the Brandenburg Gate, and the Germans, boy, they were under a lot of pressure because back then Obama was The Messiah. He was making a tour of Europe on his messianic pilgrimage as part of his campaign. He requested to
|
Interview: Senator Cruz on the Amnesty Bill
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/19/2013 5:19:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: We´d like to welcome to the program for the first time, freshman Senator from Texas, Ted Cruz, who wants to weigh in on a number of things, including the Gang of Eight immigration bill. Senator, welcome. It´s great to have you here, sir. CRUZ: Rush, it´s great to be with you. Thank you for your clarion voice for liberty every single day. RUSH: Thank you, sir. We had a great interview with Senator Cruz in the Limbaugh Letter not long ago so I have spoken to him on a previous occasion and, sir,
|
|
Vince Flynn was a Man´s Man
|
|
Rushlimbaugh.com, by Rush Limbaugh
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/19/2013 5:13:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
RUSH: Hello, folks, and welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network. Middle of the week, Wednesday. It´s a thrill and a delight to have you with us. It is also a day of really profound heartbreak for those of us who knew the author Vince Flynn, who passed away this morning at 1:50 a.m. Central time at a hospital in St. Paul, Minnesota. Prostate cancer that was discovered too late. I´m numb sitting here today in a state of shock about this.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
TWA Flight 800 investigators break silence in new documentary, claim original conclusion about cause of crash is wrong
|
|
FOX News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: smcchk- 6/19/2013 12:41:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago. However, the six whistleblowers, all part of the original investigation team, stopped short of saying the plane was shot down. Flight 800, a Boeing 747, had just taken off from JFK airport with 230 people aboard on July 17, 1996 enroute to Paris when it exploded
|
Benghazi Whistleblower Lawyer Says Joint Chief’s Chairman Lied to Congress
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Fred Lucas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/18/2013 8:06:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
An attorney whose firm represents two Benghazi whistleblowers said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, lied to the Senate when he said there was never a “stand down” order during the Benghazi attack on Sept. 11, 2012. “What was fascinating is that he explained his lie to them,” Joe DiGenova, an attorney representing one of the whistleblowers, told CNSNews.com. “He actually said they were sent to Tripoli. They were needed in Benghazi,” said DiGenova, a former U.S. attorney, now with the Washington firm of DiGenova & Toensing.
|
Obama: ´If Catholics Have Their Schools and Buildings and Protestants Have Theirs ... That Encourages Division´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 3:46:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Likening religious schools to segregation--a racist system that forced blacks to attend different schools and use different facilities than whites in the American South--President Barack Obama told a town hall meeting for youth in Belfast, Northern Ireland on Monday that there should not be Catholic and Protestant schools because such schools cause division. "Because issues like segregated schools and housing, lack of jobs and opportunity--symbols of history that are a source of pride for some and pain for others--these are not tangential to peace; they’re essential to it,"
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
G8: Barack Obama looks like a president going through the motions
|
|
Telegraph [UK], by Alex Spillius
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/19/2013 4:58:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Listening to Barack Obama give his speech in Belfast on Monday, it was hard not to stifle a yawn. I kept waiting for the part when he would say something interesting, but, about three quarters of the way through, realised it wasn’t going to come. Judging from television pictures some of his young audience felt the same, after the initial rush of euphoria of receiving the rock star president in their midst had passed. This is not surprising, for we had already heard this number about the inspirational role of the Northern Ireland peace process and the Emerald Isle’s
|
How Democracies Perish, Deathbed Edition
|
|
American Thinker, by Daren Jonescu
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: steveW- 6/18/2013 6:11:46 AM
Post Reply
|
|
This is the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of How Democracies Perish, an analysis of the spread of world communism by Jean-François Revel, one of freedom´s most serious French defenders since Tocqueville. At the heart of this work, Revel details "The Tools of Communist Expansion," among which the most relevant for understanding our current situation comes in Chapter 16, "Ideological Warfare and Disinformation." The profound simplicity of Revel´s nuts and bolts account of totalitarianism´s Cold War advance, far from being obsolete
|
Obama: You Can´t Fathom ´Complexities´ of Syria Policy ´If You Haven´t Been in Situation Room´
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Daniel Halper
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 6/18/2013 5:30:04 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Charlie Rose last night asked President Obama his new Syria policy. The president first objected to it being called a new policy. "I´m not sure you can characterize this as a new policy. This is consistent with the policy that I´ve had throughout," he said. Obama then explained the goal is regional stability, and especially in Syria. "Really, what we´re trying to do is take sides against extremists of all sorts and in favor of people who are in favor of moderation, tolerance, representative government, and over the long-term, stability and prosperity for the people of Syria," said Obama.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|