A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Peter Schiff: Majority Doesn´t
"Have A Right To Steal My Money
Just Because They Voted For It"
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Peter Schiff: Majority Doesn´t
"Have A Right To Steal My Money
Just Because They Voted For It"

Real Clear Politics, by Staff

Original Article

Posted By:earlybird, 12/10/2012 4:41:59 PM

CNBC´s Eamon Javers reports the latest developments on "fiscal cliff" talks in Washington, and debating the financial benefits of raising taxes on the wealthy, with Peter Schiff, Euro Pacific Capital CEO, and Richard Brodsky, Demos senior fellow. ### SCHIFF: You know what the wealthy are going to do? They´re going to invest more abroad, they´re not going to work as hard, they´re not going to pay as much in taxes, they´re not going to employ as many people. Their employees are going to pay all the taxes.

Comments:
That is the entire print article.

Video with article.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: earlybird, 12/10/2012 4:43:08 PM     (No. 9058290)

Note to Staff: The ### is part of the article. Not (Snip).


Reply 2 - Posted by: God of Irony, 12/10/2012 4:48:30 PM     (No. 9058302)

Who is John Galt.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: FunOne, 12/10/2012 4:49:06 PM     (No. 9058304)

Atlas shrugged. And we are about to find out that there are a lot of John Galt folks out there.


Reply 4 - Posted by: horacer, 12/10/2012 4:54:27 PM     (No. 9058322)

Brodsky is shocking. Economic policy is set by the polling outcomes of economic illiterates. If the unwashed masses are for it then it must be good. The rich won´t flee higher rates, tell that to the French. Peter Schiff tried talking sense to the Occupiers too.


Reply 5 - Posted by: nonsense, 12/10/2012 5:05:54 PM     (No. 9058344)

I tried to watch that interview. Peter Schiff makes so much sense, but the Lefty/Liberal/Progressive would not shut his trap so that discussion points could be made. He did what all the Leftists do, talked over Peter when it was not his turn to talk. The Left is just filled with evil propagandists.


Reply 6 - Posted by: dolphin, 12/10/2012 5:13:15 PM     (No. 9058364)

This is slavery and happens when you have representation without taxation.

If you don´t pay tax you shouldn´t get to vote on how taxes are used.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Boston Federalist, 12/10/2012 5:34:34 PM     (No. 9058408)

Yes, Peter, they absolutely do have the right to steal your money. It´s the fatal flaw of democracy, and the tipping point just occurred this past election. De Tocqueville predicted it. John Adams predicted it. Benjamin Franklin and even Winston Churchill commented on it.

Too bad Romney made an intemperate comment that was made public, but it is the truth. Over half the population are total losers and takers, or are in the government bureaucrat / lawyer / media class that thrives on the expansion of the loser class.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Mother of AL, 12/10/2012 6:11:19 PM     (No. 9058463)

What #2 said...Who is John Galt?


Reply 9 - Posted by: artsy, 12/10/2012 6:26:49 PM     (No. 9058492)

Finally, someone just SAID IT! What else can the blacks, hispanics, poor single women, and non-religious demand of us? The imagination runs wild!


Reply 10 - Posted by: Twinkle93, 12/10/2012 6:31:57 PM     (No. 9058503)

The writers of the Constitution argued against the.tyranny of the majority. That is one of the reasons for longer terms for senators.


Reply 11 - Posted by: schnapps, 12/10/2012 6:49:00 PM     (No. 9058525)

When our country was founded, only men with real property or sufficient wealth for taxation were permitted to vote.
Anyone starting to see the wisdom in this?


Reply 12 - Posted by: St. Pitbull, 12/10/2012 7:19:38 PM     (No. 9058551)

Everyone needs to realize that the increased taxes are NOT indexed. Does everyone remember all of the QE programs? LOTS of money has been printed. It´s not really in circulation yet because the banks have borrowed newly printed money from the Fed (@ 0%) and invested it in gov´t bonds. It´s not a huge spread - but when you borrow at 0% - it´s pure profit.

Anyway, once that money starts leeching into the economy, we´re going to have BIG inflation. $100,000 will be the new $30,000. A whopping big tax increase for everyone. Bank on it!


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: viking diver, 12/10/2012 7:24:35 PM     (No. 9058560)


Reply 14 - Posted by: viking diver, 12/10/2012 7:26:27 PM     (No. 9058563)

we have come full circle "Taxation without representation"
Those who don´t pay taxes shouldn´t be able to vote on increasing taxes, and those who are on the government dole shouldn´t be allow to vote at all. Conflict of interest!


Reply 15 - Posted by: TXknitter, 12/10/2012 7:29:25 PM     (No. 9058565)

None of these things could happen if we still had a representative republic. Now those elected to represent us have other agendas other than what is best for the country.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Coy860, 12/10/2012 8:44:17 PM     (No. 9058626)

There is no RIGHT to vote for President..
see Gore vs Bush (Supreme Court ruling)


Reply 17 - Posted by: MrYules, 12/10/2012 9:20:54 PM     (No. 9058654)

There is a moral dimension to this problem. The idea has become fashionable that certain people (insert your favorite hated target group such as "the rich", or "the jews", or "the whites") are intrinsically evil and "deserve" to be treated violently, whether that violence is in the form of economic confiscation, or through other levels of violence. The end game is the ultimate violence, namely to murder the hated other. The 20th century was a vivid example of this principle, with high-sounding "philosophies" ("Marxism-Leninism", "National Socialism", and the like) being used. This process appears to be continuing in the present century, aided by the vast increase in technical means to control populations. Read "Lethal Politics" (R. J. Rummel) and "Murderous Science" (Benno Muller-Hill) to see what may be in prospect for the human race.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: mathman, 12/11/2012 9:38:21 AM     (No. 9059233)

Yes they do.
"All your bases is ours."

We have been nationalized.
We are owned, we are slaves, we are state property.
Karl Marx said so.
So forget about it.
If you read Lucianne, you have no representation in Congress. Congress represents only those who cling to power by lying.

Enjoy your slavery. Don´t worry. You won´t live long. The Death Panels will see to that.



Post Reply   Close thread 715129




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"



Pfeiffer on IRS Scandal:
The Law Is Irrelevant
Washington Free Beacon, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/19/2013 1:06:30 PM     Post Reply
White House advisor Dan Pfeiffer said “the law is irrelevant” when asked by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos Sunday about whether President Obama thought the IRS’ targeting of conservative groups was illegal: Stephanopoulos: What does the president believe? Does the president believe that would be illegal? Pfeiffer: I can’t speak to the law here. The law is irrelevant. The activity was outrageous (Snip) Stephanopoulos: You don’t really mean the law is irrelevant, do you? Pfeiffer: What I mean is whether it’s legal or illegal is not important to the fact that the conduct doesn’t matter.

Retired officer is charged with rape
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:49:24 PM     Post Reply
A former Philadelphia police officer, once hailed as a hero and given a seat next to the first lady at a 2009 speech by President Obama, has been arrested and charged with rape and other crimes. Authorities allege that Richard DeCoatsworth left a party with two females early Thursday and took them to another location, where they allege that he produced a handgun and “forced the two females to engage in the use of narcotics and sexual acts.”(Snip)DeCoatsworth was hailed as a hero after he was shot in the face during a traffic stop in September 2007 but still

IG letter to Geithner: Targeting
not among top concerns
CNN, by Jessica Yellin    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:36:47 PM     Post Reply
Treasury officials were made aware in June 2012 that the IRS inspector general was reviewing the office that handles tax-exempt applications, but a letter from October shows that the inspector general did not highlight the audit as a top concern for the agency. In a memo dated October 15, 2012, to then-Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner about IRS challenges for 2013, Inspector General J. Russell George noted other problem areas, but made no mention of the investigation taking place at the time of the agency´s intense scrutiny of conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status.

   

 



 
IRS breaks the rules
Boston Herald, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:17:25 PM     Post Reply
It eventually comes down to who — who at the IRS was responsible for targeting conservative and Tea Party groups for special scrutiny. Because, after all, you can’t put a “system” in jail. You can’t put a report in prison. You can’t indict a department for corruption. At the end of the day it’s people who are responsible for using the enormous powers of the Internal Revenue Service to go after other people and groups because of their political beliefs. U.S. Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) told the tale of one of his constituents who applied for tax-exempt status for her Tea Party group in July 2010.

After ravages of flesh-eating
bacteria, Aimee Copeland
uses new bionic hands
CNN, by Michael Martinez    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:08:41 PM     Post Reply
Flesh-eating bacteria amputee Aimee Copeland now uses the latest technology in prosthetic hands to chop vegetables, pick up tiny items like Skittles, and comb and iron press her hair. With the bionic hands, Copeland is looking forward to cleaning her house -- she´s a neat freak, she tells CNN -- and cooking her own food. She´s something of a foodie but has been able to eat only microwaveable foods, she adds. (Snip)"It just mimics so well a natural hand that it really just reminds me of before the accident, how I would have done things,"

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Applications for Tax-Exempt
Status Were Down When IRS
Began Targeting Tea Party
Breitbart Big Government, by Mike Flynn    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 5:22:58 PM     Post Reply
In House testimony Friday, former Acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller explained that the IRS mistakes in handling applications for non-profit status from tea party groups were due, in large part, to a flood of applications following the Citizens United decision. Miller said the targeting was a botched attempt to centralize the process to account for the increased workload. There were fewer applications in 2010, when the IRS began targeting conservative groups, than the year before, however. (Snip)Moreover, the IRS reportedly abandoned the targeting in early 2012. It presumably had little trouble handling the increased number of applicants



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

57 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

43 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

   

Post Reply   Close thread 715129





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~