A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Gingrich: If Hillary Clinton Runs In 2016,
Current GOP ‘Incapable Of Competing’
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Gingrich: If Hillary Clinton Runs In 2016,
Current GOP ‘Incapable Of Competing’

Mediaite, by Anjali Sareen

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 12/10/2012 5:56:15 AM

Newt Gingrich told David Gregory on Sunday’s Meet The Press “the Republican party of today is incapable of competing” with a 2016 presidential run by Hillary Clinton. Gingrich thinks “every Republican” should be focused on 2016 because of the severity of their defeat in 2012. Gingrich said that if Clinton were to run in four years, “supported by Bill Clinton and presumably a still relatively popular President Barack Obama, trying to win that will be, truly, the Super Bowl.”

Comments:
Thank you, Newt. Now go away.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: frenesi1, 12/10/2012 6:06:51 AM     (No. 9057262)

Newt is at his best when putting the press in their place...not so great at predictions.


Reply 2 - Posted by: uno, 12/10/2012 6:07:45 AM     (No. 9057263)

Umm, just when we thought experience was important, 2008 came along. Then when we thought that zero accomplishments and the baggage of running the economy into the ground would do the trick 2012 got here.
I don´t want the Hillbag anywhere near the White House, but the fact remains that this is now a very different country and we have to learn how to re-take the office.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: srhcb, 12/10/2012 6:22:47 AM     (No. 9057268)

So what?

"The Republican party of today" will not exist in 2016.


Reply 4 - Posted by: geminale, 12/10/2012 6:29:36 AM     (No. 9057270)

1. I agree with Newt. 2. #3, from your lips.

I hope that either the tea party emerges as the genuine choice for Americans by the next election, or that the GOP gets a thorough housecleaning of all the progressive plants and democrat wannabes.


Reply 5 - Posted by: chumley, 12/10/2012 6:43:27 AM     (No. 9057275)

Not a tough call. If Karl Marx runs in 2016 the GOP cant compete.
They proved it in 2012.


Reply 6 - Posted by: steveW, 12/10/2012 6:44:39 AM     (No. 9057278)

Silliness. Most of Obama´s female vote comes from women who are, uh, "excited" in the nether parts by His Majesty (bad boy syndrome, perhaps). I´d bet that percentage is at least 96%. Hillary´s visage, on the other hand, repels red-blooded males like a tsunami of pepper spray. The only men who´d possibly vote for that walking insult to feminine charm are men who, uh, aren´t men.

No threat in 2016. The GOP will be incapable of competing only if it keeps caving in to the Obamas and Clintons of the world.


Reply 7 - Posted by: pickle1, 12/10/2012 6:45:42 AM     (No. 9057281)

She and Obummer will be in jail awaiting their trials for murder and treason.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: snapper451, 12/10/2012 6:48:15 AM     (No. 9057283)

Newt, of whom the Clinton machine made mincemeat of during their day. It looks like they still scare him to death. Our first enemy is the MSM in this country that covered our primaries in the most negative fashion and then did 90% + negative stories on Romney. Add to that the massive voter fraud in this country and you have not even touched a real conservative issue, The country is dying or dead due to people who are God-less and worship "things" like Obama and Obamacare, welfare, etc. This is where we start.


Reply 9 - Posted by: provide, 12/10/2012 7:02:20 AM     (No. 9057287)

She´ll have to beat Mrs. Greenjeans in the primary.


Reply 10 - Posted by: GringoinQuito, 12/10/2012 7:12:58 AM     (No. 9057293)

I don´t think she will run. They might not want to rehash the Whitewater controversy or the missing files.


Reply 11 - Posted by: bpl40, 12/10/2012 7:13:45 AM     (No. 9057296)

There is a proof of the pudding coming before 2016. It is the 2014 elections. Will they be a repeat of 2010 or 2012? That will give the answer to the real question Newt has raised.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Judith, 12/10/2012 7:27:13 AM     (No. 9057307)

Let´s see. In 2008 the gop ran a candidate with a questionable history of where he was born, against obama. In 2012 the gop ran a candidate who had signed (not authored)romneycare against obamacare obama.
You mean to tell me that somewhere in the ranks of the gop stable, they can´t find a skank who ONLY does the bidding of powerful men? I´m sure they will find the perfect candidate.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: beca, 12/10/2012 7:42:11 AM     (No. 9057321)

hey newt...shut up......2016 is a lifetime in politics.....


Reply 14 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 12/10/2012 7:47:19 AM     (No. 9057328)

So, if a habitual liar ran for President in 2016 and was supported by a perjurer and another habitual liar, then she would win the White House?
God help us.


Reply 15 - Posted by: SpencersMom, 12/10/2012 7:54:33 AM     (No. 9057337)

In our brain dead hip society, by 2016 half of the people of voting age will not remember the Clinton years. I doubt Bill Clinton who will be around 70 will make any 20 somethings swoon and Hillary will also be around 70. I doubt there is a makeover anywhere that could make the hag look even remotely attractive.


Reply 16 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 12/10/2012 8:00:30 AM     (No. 9057348)

I´m no expert on Sharia Law but will we still get to vote ?


Reply 17 - Posted by: Jebediah, 12/10/2012 8:01:30 AM     (No. 9057349)

And considering what a disaster the woman has been as secretary of state, and not JUST with Benghazi burt all round, this speaks volumes about the American electorate, who seem to swallow anything without thought.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: kahunavol, 12/10/2012 8:01:38 AM     (No. 9057350)

It appears that the Pubbies have learned absolutely nothing from losing twice to Obama, except blame the electorate so, yeah, he´s got an excellent chance of being right on this prediction.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Jebediah, 12/10/2012 8:05:26 AM     (No. 9057357)

As to poster #6, Romney won the male voter....it was the young ´ens and the free birth control and the Hispanics and Asians that lost the race, and nothing is being done to either court or educate them....at least without destroying all our ethics and principles. (Forget the Blacks--they largely seem to knee jerk to another 1/2 Black no matter WHAT he does, and that goes for Colin Powell as well.)


Reply 20 - Posted by: adguy47, 12/10/2012 8:06:36 AM     (No. 9057359)

Can´t stand Newt but this time, for the first time in years, he´s correct. The sooner the party´s leaders get together and cobble together a platform that reflects we are living in the 21st century and tells those who don´t agree to form their own theocratic party, the better. Otherwise it´s doomed.


Reply 21 - Posted by: birmingham, 12/10/2012 8:41:28 AM     (No. 9057417)

Unfortunately for my optimism levels, I have the same dreadful feeling that Hillary will be our next president. Makes me throw up in my mouth. The GOP is so weak that Boehner is getting ready to give Obama what he wants with higher tax rates. The idiot public will only see that the Annointed One runs the country without any help from Congress once again and be thrilled. Won´t matter what Boehner gets in return...


Reply 22 - Posted by: dolphin, 12/10/2012 8:41:49 AM     (No. 9057418)

The left began shredding Sarah Palin the day after she lost the 2008 election. They were successful. We should learn from them. The best defense is a good offense. The worst defense is to give up four years early.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: AltaD, 12/10/2012 8:49:08 AM     (No. 9057424)

How does he know who will emerge for the GOP over the next 4 years? In 2004 did he predict that obama would win in ´08?

I´m really tired of hearing from doom and gloom "conservative" talking heads. They sound like Winnie the Pooh´s pal Eeyore, not very inspiring.


Reply 24 - Posted by: jackie, 12/10/2012 8:55:33 AM     (No. 9057437)

Unless the States get in gear and purge the voter list of dead and illegals and pass voter ID NOW... we will loose. They know the Liberal election stealing is coming but still they scratch themselves until about 2 months before the election then decide maybe they should look into it... Too busy enjoying their power until they are about to loose it..


Reply 25 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 12/10/2012 9:00:15 AM     (No. 9057445)

I do not pretend to know who will run next election for the prez - I do know that Newt is a sleazebag that I do not want to listen to or see. I would have trusted Mitt with my life and the country´s health. The Republican party needs to have people voting despite their like or dislike of the candidate. The country cannot stand much more of the dim rule and spending. Even if it meant voting for newt - not even he would destroy us.


Reply 26 - Posted by: birmingham, 12/10/2012 9:00:16 AM     (No. 9057446)

I totally agree except that Dems play dirty so win, while Repubs cave every chance they get so they can be "liked" too. W fell prey to that syndrome in his second term and was giving entitlements away in a failed attempt to get some appreciation from the lefties. How many times do you see his great work for AIDs victims be mentioned? Ask a Dem who gave them prescrition coverage to see how well that worked out. Ask a Dem who voted for civil rights legislation. Only thing they know is that JFK sent the Guard in to integrate the school that the Dem governor was blocking, so voila! A Dem president integrated schools!


Reply 27 - Posted by: 4freedom, 12/10/2012 9:07:11 AM     (No. 9057455)

This talk about Hillary won´t matter, after skippy gets the 22nd amendment scrubbed, he´ll get another close but landslide victory.


Reply 28 - Posted by: realrep, 12/10/2012 9:32:22 AM     (No. 9057496)

I think PIAPS wants a power job at the UN. It will be a position for life. No elections. Little accountability. She and her kind can quietly take over world systems without much fanfare.


Reply 29 - Posted by: Hobbiest, 12/10/2012 9:33:25 AM     (No. 9057499)

The GOP proved incapable of competeing in 2012 and so far I don´t see much sign that people have learned much from the lesson.

Personally I think that all those who were gung ho for Romney are the ones who need to go away. Not only were all their predictions wrong, they ares till blind as to why that was so.


Reply 30 - Posted by: sickened, 12/10/2012 9:48:22 AM     (No. 9057517)

I think Newt underestimates the appeal of youth. A haggard Hillary is unlikely to win against an opponent in their 40´s or early 50´s, as long as they are not obese (e.g. Gingrich).


Reply 31 - Posted by: ScarletPimpernel, 12/10/2012 10:10:23 AM     (No. 9057565)

Newt is right. The GOP is currently incapable of competing. Why would we expect them to be able to do any better in 2016?


Reply 32 - Posted by: msjena, 12/10/2012 10:18:09 AM     (No. 9057585)

Shut up, Newt. If Newt, who left the House of Representatives in disgrace, is the new spokesman for conservatives, count me out.


Reply 33 - Posted by: janjan, 12/10/2012 10:23:40 AM     (No. 9057598)

#23 - I agree.
#33 - some of us still care and do not intend to let the liberals do exactly what Obama is trying hard to do - which is to demoralize the conservatives in this country to the point where we have been effectively shut up and will no longer vote.

We have about 2 years before the next crop of GOP contenders start getting serious. Hope it´s Rubio.


Reply 34 - Posted by: jdf, 12/10/2012 10:24:12 AM     (No. 9057600)

I was rather hoping Newt would go away, along with Dick Morris.


Reply 35 - Posted by: Rubinski, 12/10/2012 10:38:16 AM     (No. 9057636)

Barring devine intervention, by 2016, we will be Zimbabwe, and they´ll be so many uninformed irresponsible voters we wont have a chance.


Reply 36 - Posted by: Erastus, 12/10/2012 10:45:56 AM     (No. 9057649)

Hillary in four years? Just for today she has a virus and certain viruses, untreated, become chronic and progressive resulting in an inability to run.


Reply 37 - Posted by: thatsomewhereplace, 12/10/2012 10:48:27 AM     (No. 9057652)

Newty is right!


Reply 38 - Posted by: toodles3956, 12/10/2012 10:53:51 AM     (No. 9057658)

Wonder how Hillary would look in a burka? She´ll need one by then.


Reply 39 - Posted by: tisHimself, 12/10/2012 10:59:42 AM     (No. 9057665)

I´m sure the establishment palace guard can find us another severely conservative Rockfeller republican that can come within one hundred electoral votes of her.


Reply 40 - Posted by: KTWO, 12/10/2012 11:07:32 AM     (No. 9057681)

IMO Hillary won´t run. And ditto #13.


Reply 41 - Posted by: ramona, 12/10/2012 11:14:15 AM     (No. 9057695)

GOP & Sycophants to the base: "Conservatives not welcome here. Leave us alone to burn the Constitution."
Ramona (the Pest_


Reply 42 - Posted by: NOBS, 12/10/2012 11:37:15 AM     (No. 9057731)

#33UPCHUCK-if you are inclined I too live in Roswell-maybe the Lucianne web site can get us to communicate. Annette


Reply 43 - Posted by: whyyeseyec, 12/10/2012 11:41:27 AM     (No. 9057744)

If the GOP is unable to compete in 2016 then most likely they can not compete in 2014 either. We might be seeing Speaker Pelosi again along with billions in `stimulus` an every other crazy piece of leftist legislation they couldn`t push through in the 111th Congress.


Reply 44 - Posted by: doctorfixit, 12/10/2012 12:19:37 PM     (No. 9057798)

The GOP is finished at the national level through a combination of illegal immigration, demographics, and Free Stuff. The Presidency should be written off, let the establishment run their RINOs, and concentrate on efforts to promote de facto secession through governors refusing federal directives. The Supreme Court doesn´t have an army, and federal judges should simply be ignored.


Reply 45 - Posted by: plumnellie, 12/10/2012 1:31:42 PM     (No. 9057925)

Newt was corrupt morally. He had no way of winning against Clinton. This holds true of Justice Roberts, who must have a huge secret. Anytime Obama takes on one of the Repubs you can be sure he has the dirt. I had hoped Romney´s clean character would prevail but he lacked one thing: guts and passion. He had ambition and integrity and know how...but so what if you can´t out gun your enemy.


Reply 46 - Posted by: DocH, 12/10/2012 3:22:01 PM     (No. 9058129)

For some reason I am reminded of that Geico commercial with the witch in the broom factory, where she takes a broom from a worker, and he says, ´´I´m gonna stand up to her,´´ and his coworker says, ´´No you won´t.´´

That´s the GOP and Hillary. No guts.


Reply 47 - Posted by: mercedesops, 12/10/2012 11:29:37 PM     (No. 9058773)

She will be 68 years old and won´t be able to raise the money she needs. Plus she will have to run against Biden and the failed Obama record.She is not a lock.



Post Reply   Close thread 715054




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Obama Denies Role in Government
New Yorker, by Andy Borowitz    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 12:57:20 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON —President Obama used his weekly radio address on Saturday to reassure the American people that he has “played no role whatsoever” in the U.S. government over the past four years. “Right now, many of you are angry at the government, and no one is angrier than I am,” he said. “Quite frankly, I am glad that I have had no involvement in such an organization.” The President’s outrage only increased, he said, when he “recently became aware of a part of that government called the Department of Justice.” “The more I learn about the activities of these individuals,

All the Lonely People
New York Times, by Ross Douthat    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 6:24:58 AM     Post Reply
OVER the last decade, the United States has become a less violent country in every way save one. As Americans commit fewer and fewer crimes against other people’s lives and property, they have become more likely to inflict fatal violence on themselves. In the 1990s, the suicide rate dipped with the crime rate. But since 2000, it has risen, and jumped particularly sharply among the middle-aged. The suicide rate for Americans 35 to 54 increased nearly 30 percent between 1999 and 2010; for men in their 50s, it rose nearly 50 percent. More Americans now die of suicide

Obama adminstration talking
points scrubbed jihadists from
Cairo as well as Benghazi
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 6:13:07 AM     Post Reply
In the days after the Benhazi attack, the State Department scurried to cover up its failure to heed warnings of such attacks while the White House scurried to cover up the fact that that attacks were the work of al Qaeda-linked terrorists of the sort President Obama supposedly had largely vanquished. The final Benghazi “talking points” and Susan Rice’s talk show appearances represent the product of this scurrying. To help advance the narrative that the Benghazi attacks were spontaneous, and thus (a) not to have been anticipated and (b) not linked to al Qaeda,

Toronto Mayor: That Wasn´t Me
Smoking Crack In That Video
Reuters, by Julie Gordon & Cameron French    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 6:08:26 AM     Post Reply
TORONTO - Toronto Mayor Rob Ford, a target of criticism for his often unconventional conduct, on Friday denied media allegations that he had been caught on video smoking crack cocaine. "Absolutely not true," Ford told reporters gathered outside his west Toronto house, before driving off in his SUV. Reporters for the Toronto Star and Gawker Media said late on Thursday they had watched a cellphone video that appears to show Ford smoking crack, although both news outlets said they had declined to pay the $100,000 price asked by the tipsters,

Navy dolphins discover rare
old torpedo off Calif.
coast near Coronado
Los Angeles Times, by Tony Perry    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 5:54:00 AM     Post Reply
SAN DIEGO — In the ocean off Coronado, a Navy team has discovered a relic worthy of display in a military museum: a torpedo of the kind deployed in the late 19th century, considered a technological marvel in its day. But don´t look for the primary discoverers to get a promotion or an invitation to meet the admirals at the Pentagon - although they might get an extra fish for dinner or maybe a pat on the snout. The so-called Howell torpedo was discovered by bottlenose dolphins being trained by the Navy to find undersea objects, including mines,

It´s not Obama´s fault... It´s Bush´s!
Boston Herald, by Howie Carr    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 5:50:40 AM     Post Reply
It must be George W. Bush’s fault. Everything else is. The moonbats’ verdict is in. Barack Obama couldn’t possibly have done all those terrible things the vast right-wing conspiracy is accusing him of. And they’re not scandals, either. Obama’s troubles are merely “controversies” or, to use Dear Leader’s own phrase, a sideshow. Scandals only happen to Republicans, just like Deval Patrick didn’t go on a junket to Ireland. It was a “trade mission.” Democrats never make mistakes either — “mistakes were made,” in the passive voice.

At least someone in the
MSM covers Benghazi
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/19/2013 5:33:33 AM     Post Reply
Jay Carney insists Benghazi, Libya, is not a scandal, but then he doesn’t admit to having misled the media about the origin of the attacks. The administration now tells CBS News, “We’re portrayed by Republicans as either being lying or idiots. It’s actually closer to us being idiots.” It would be nice if the source specified what part(s) of the administration were idiotic and why it’s “closer” but not all attributable to incompetence. The problem with claiming incompetence is two-fold. First, it raises the question as to where the president was on Sept. 11, 2012,



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
72 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

56 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

Camelot Is Burning
46 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part


Post Reply   Close thread 715054





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~