|
|
| |
Topic: Hillary’s not so smooth path to the White House |
Hillary’s not so smooth path to the White House
Hot Air, by Jazz Shaw
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 12/10/2012 4:49:20 AM
|
| The Secretary of State is making all sort of headlines lately, and most of them don’t have much to do with her current job. (A woman with limitless options who is desired by 90% of the Democrats.) The word has hit the streets that Hillary Clinton’s future is pretty much cast in solid gold plated stone. (Snip)I do not like Hillary Clinton. In fact, I pretty much despise her, and have for quite some time. I was angry at her during her time as First Lady when duties involving public policy were essentially handed over to a non-elected
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
ZurichMike, 12/10/2012 5:04:27 AM (No. 9057241)
Four years from now is an eternity in politics. A whole other generation of voters will be saying "Who?" to this craven, almost 70 year-old candiate with unwashed hair, poor hygiene, a horrible, documented track record of failure, and a crackling, grating voice.
No, I don´t think so.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
chumley, 12/10/2012 5:19:52 AM (No. 9057244)
All socialist politics and criminal behavior aside, I bet she and Bill are a hoot at parties. They can have contests to see who brings home the cutest chicks.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Johnny Angle, 12/10/2012 5:27:07 AM (No. 9057246)
Maybe she can dance Gange style through the Benghazi issue and the Arab Spring.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Johnny Angle, 12/10/2012 5:28:36 AM (No. 9057248)
"Gangnam"?? Whatever, I like the image of her doing it.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ocjim, 12/10/2012 7:23:27 AM (No. 9057302)
Drudge reporting this morning that she is down with a stomach virus. TRANSLATION: She´s going in to get some work done.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Red Jeep, 12/10/2012 7:38:07 AM (No. 9057314)
No not Hillary, the Democrats will run minority presidential candidates from now on after their success with Barry, Maybe they will run a black woman next time like multi millionairess Susan Rice with investments in Iran, or, don´t laugh, Sheila Jackson Lee.
I agree with Reply #1. Four years from now at 70 Piaps will be too old, too wrinkled, and , who knows, might even be indicted for something by then.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 12/10/2012 7:41:55 AM (No. 9057320)
#1 is right. Hillary´s time has passed. If only she had defeated Obama in 2008. As much as I dislike Mrs. Clinton, I don´t believe she hates this country and she wouldn´t have set out to destroy us.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Scottyboy, 12/10/2012 7:47:55 AM (No. 9057329)
0bama got elected twice. Anything can happen. Hillary will inherit the 0bama machine. They are all fellow travelers bent of screwing America. Don´t understimate these slugs for a second.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
pineledger, 12/10/2012 7:53:47 AM (No. 9057335)
You´re assuming, 8, that The Won isn´t going to issue an Executive Order striking down the 22nd Amendment. Don´t put anything past him.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Pinchem, 12/10/2012 7:55:48 AM (No. 9057341)
People need to keep pounding on her Communist connections, from the SDS and her Alinsky thesis in college, through her employment at a law firm owned by a Card Carrying Member of the Communist Party USA through the present. Don´t forget Bill´s activities while at Rhodes and his connections.
WAIT: I forgot about the Attention Span of Liberal Democrats - 30 seconds or less.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
saucy, 12/10/2012 7:59:55 AM (No. 9057347)
Good women age gracefully....because of a clean heart.
This woman, PIAPS, is NOT gracefull...or good.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
BorninOKC, 12/10/2012 8:07:38 AM (No. 9057361)
I don´t like HC any more than the person who made the first comment. But I remember one pundit´s comment in 2008, that her nomination / election would mean a continuation of the Bush policies to a greater extent than any other Dim. And I remember in 1954 that the election of Eisenhower made some observe that we had an honorable man in the WH rather than the product of corrupt machine politics.
Ironic that some in 2016 some will tout HC as the candididate who would take us back to better times.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
LZK, 12/10/2012 8:27:31 AM (No. 9057384)
Well said poster #1 and #2.......
Merry Christmas everyone!!
LZK
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
southernboy, 12/10/2012 8:29:35 AM (No. 9057388)
Hillary is the same Marxist as Zippy….with focus…and a work ethic for her cause. She would finish the drive of America into the ground of dictatorship.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Catherine, 12/10/2012 8:34:09 AM (No. 9057398)
Unless the Republicans figure out how to stop the mastered art of election stealing by the democrats, I don´t care who runs - the D´s will win. Our whole system needs to be re-vamped.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Arby, 12/10/2012 8:38:07 AM (No. 9057408)
The very thought of seeing that greasy hair and hearing that voice at least once a day makes me cringe. Please, Lord, no PIAPS.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
nonsense, 12/10/2012 8:38:51 AM (No. 9057410)
Soros has unlimited funds to buy the highest office in the land for whatever the communist flavor of the day is.
Just read that the Hildabeast may work for Soros in the future. What a laugh, as if he does not own her already.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
snapper451, 12/10/2012 8:49:24 AM (No. 9057425)
Let´s get at her transcripts and her thesis from college (on communism) and not let up until they are released. Don´t let up on Libya nor Whitewater and how the billing records were hidden in her closet in the White House. We can also talk about Ron Brown and all of the other dead bodies from the Clinton years. We won´t have the press to help us.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Gallo3, 12/10/2012 8:53:30 AM (No. 9057433)
Think it is about time OUR Goldfingers- Adelson, the Koch Bros etc step up and buy Comcast which owns NBC/MSNBC and turn it over to Roger Ailes to help us change the country before the PETUIATE becomes POTUS. Then we need to get a nominee that is first and foremost not a RINO Harvahd or Yale grad.
Sarah, Cruz, Mario, etc. Any Tea Party favorite.
Could do better then Romney/McCain. Maybe even beat Monica´s Boyfriend´s Wife.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 12/10/2012 8:59:11 AM (No. 9057442)
0 will select the next Dem nominee. It will be himself, his wife or somebody else.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 12/10/2012 8:59:37 AM (No. 9057443)
Well, as per Drudge, Old Hill has got diarrhea. I´d say that´s a start. (Yes, I know that´s mean.)
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
congaree53, 12/10/2012 9:22:02 AM (No. 9057480)
Ever since Drudge failed miserably in getting his heart- throb Romney elected, his website is starting to look the National Enquirer. I don´t care about Hillary´s GI tract.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Crosscut, 12/10/2012 9:24:06 AM (No. 9057484)
The GOP should attack Hillary relentlessly until another gomer sticks his or her head up. That´s how the Dems do it. There certainly plenty of mud to dump on her. Particularly with Benghazi gate.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
JAN, 12/10/2012 9:33:29 AM (No. 9057500)
The msm is already planning for the heinous one´s coronation.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
homjett, 12/10/2012 9:43:22 AM (No. 9057513)
I agree with #19´s first sentence. Also, #20 may have it right. Look for Mrs. Obama to run for the Senate from Ill. Or maybe Hawaii. As long as the Repub Party stays divided, an the Economy does not tank, we can expect the Dems to hold the WH for some time. We need the Sen an the House.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 12/10/2012 9:49:32 AM (No. 9057518)
Some of you are saying the republicans need to learn how to be conservatives. There is no money in it for them.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Starlifter Nav, 12/10/2012 9:58:45 AM (No. 9057533)
The Newt story started off my morning by giving me the Yips. Hopefully #1 (and #7, who I hold in high regard) are correct.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Hobbiest, 12/10/2012 10:02:53 AM (No. 9057542)
So Hillary has no chance. I fail to take much comfort in that prediction as it mostly seems to be coming from the very same posters who thought Ann Romney was a huge asset to the Republican ticket and Mitt would get elected in a landslide.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Reality, 12/10/2012 10:07:27 AM (No. 9057555)
There is a lot of speculation about what Mrs. Slick Willie is going to do after she leaves he cameo role as Secretary of State. I believe that she should go back to a career of doing things that she has experience for. Like rural real estate development or Trading in the futures market
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
BaseballFan, 12/10/2012 10:13:34 AM (No. 9057574)
How soon we forget. In 2004, Obama was pretty much an inexperienced, no account, nobody. Look what the media did for him in just four short years.
Be afraid.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 12/10/2012 10:20:41 AM (No. 9057595)
I don´t know what Newt did this morning, but he has been speaking out well in a way that Boehner cannot conceive.
I did NOT however appreciate his saying that Hillary would win easily in 2016 with the R´s in such disarray. Not helpful, Newt!
I wouldn´t vote for Hillary, but Dems think that ugly women are smarter.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 12/10/2012 10:35:51 AM (No. 9057632)
The next progressive nominee for president in 2016 will be whoever Obama chooses. He isn`t initiating socialism for 8 years only to have it all undone by the next president.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
larryp, 12/10/2012 10:41:41 AM (No. 9057644)
Obama will run again in 2016 due to the 22nd amendment being scotched bythe Supreme cout. alredy somneN Y legislators are crafting a bill.I read it has 85 sponsors.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
enemyofthestate, 12/10/2012 10:58:04 AM (No. 9057663)
Mizzuz Clinton´s resume reads like a bus schedule, but get past her titles, and she has no accomplishments. None whatsoever. The woman travels the world and cannot even find a good hairdresser. But while she was doing that, Benghazi happened.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
f64, 12/10/2012 11:38:41 AM (No. 9057736)
In re #33 - Jose E. Serrano, NY16 has introduced that bill in every session of Congress since 1997, regardless of who was/is President. See:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/termlimits.asp
So have several others from both parties. The SCOTUS can´t overturn the 22nd Amendment, it must be repealed by another Amendment passed by both Houses of Congress and ratified by 3/4ths (38) of the States.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
glcinpdx, 12/10/2012 11:39:55 AM (No. 9057743)
It won´t be PIAPS, it will be our very own Imelda Marcos: Moochelle Antoinette and her $2000 tennis shoes...
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
gone2pot, 12/10/2012 12:21:32 PM (No. 9057802)
For now Hillary WILL BE the next president no matter what. The press has already elected her. The only way this will change is if the DNC changes their fax blasts to the Fourth Estate with Van Jones (yes, I mean THAT Van Jones), et al, then he or whoever the DNC deems will be the next president. If you haven´t yet figured it out, elections are nothing more than window dressings from here on out. Saul Alinsky owns the country now and will until we´re taken out. And spare me with the "You´ve given up" nonsense.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
bighambone, 12/10/2012 12:37:31 PM (No. 9057826)
It´s not a sure thing that the Democrats will nominate Hillary Clinton in the end, as look what happened last time when Barack Obama showed up out of nowhere. Remember the Democrats need a large black vote to win national elections. So if an Obama clone suddenly shows up and runs against Clinton in the Democrat primaries, and if the Democrats want to win the general election they might be forced to pick the black clone over Clinton to ensure that a big portion of their black base will not feel insulted if Clinton were to knock out their black candidate for the nomination.
The only way to get past that is to nominate Clinton with a black candidate, maybe Michelle Obama as VP on a Clinton ticket. The liberal media would then crow about Clinton winning in 2016 and 2020, with Michelle Obama then keeping the Democrats in the White House through 2024 and 2028.
If that liberal dream were to happen, the resulting progressive agenda would ensure that the USA would be an entirely different country indeed.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Mike6, 12/10/2012 1:08:59 PM (No. 9057881)
Hillary is a liar and incompetent in everything she does. She threw Mubarek under the bus and Mubarek was an American friend who kept the peace for 35 years. It should have been cleat to Hillary that the Muslim Brotherhood would be elecelected in Egypt with +70 of the popular vote. Now the Muslim brotherhood is arming Hamas and may be planning to declare war on Israel. It is going to be a tough summer in Israel. Hillary should stop planning to run for President in 2016. Hillary should retire, bake cookies and keep an eye on Bill before he exposes himself to a younger Paula Jones.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 12/10/2012 2:36:22 PM (No. 9058042)
After seeing this nation elect Obama, I suppose it´s possible that they´d elect Hillary. But she´ll be 70 years old, and looking pretty ragged by then.
But with the MSM covering for her (cattle futures, Whitewater, her Alinsky-ism, the 900 FBI files, Huma Abedin, Benghazi, and so on), anything could happen.
Did anyone hear Ellen Degeneres asking Christina Aguilera about Hillary checking her breasts out? Christina Aguilera claimed to be equally entranced by Hillary.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
ok state mom, 12/10/2012 2:46:51 PM (No. 9058056)
Michelle Obama will be the candidate in 2016. I´m not sure if the GOP needs to even run a candidate.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 12/10/2012 5:36:37 PM (No. 9058411)
There may be enough men in both parties to stop either Hillary or Michelle simply because they will never accept a woman let known two with such questionable members of the gender. Other than black women for a black I just don´t see the lady parts voters rallying around an old biddy or a dominant black female wanna be. From most the posts on L Dot since the election the GOP factions have to reclaim something missing in the courage and cooperation department to even make the first step into retaining freedom.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Mustang, 12/10/2012 7:08:36 PM (No. 9058540)
The reason Repubs can´t get anyone elected is clearly obvious just by reading this thread.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
ketchuplover, 12/10/2012 9:49:01 PM (No. 9058680)
Hillary is not interested in being president. Everyone knows that she is an expert in the cattle futures market....at finding FBI files on her desk........at getting shot at while boarding a plane.......at imitating Black Southern "tired" women...at being a lifetime fan of the Yankees....at pushing (ahem)RESET buttons with former adversaries....at the Olympic lamp-throwing competition....
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s nurses admit it’s hard not to call him ‘hon’
|
|
Washington Times, by Cheryl K. Chumley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 11:08:16 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Nurses treating Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev say their natural inclination toward compassion makes it difficult to see the 19-year-old as a possible terrorist. And they have to make concerted effort — and buddy-system pacts — to keep from referring to him with terms of endearment such as “hon.” One 29-year-old nurse said on Gawker: “When you’re in the room, it’s just a patient. You’re here to … make sure they’re feeling better. When you step away, you take it in. I am compassionate, that’s what we do. But should I be? The rest of the world hates him right now.”
|
Fox News Reporter May Face Criminal Charges for Reporting on the CIA
|
|
Atlantic, by Philip Bump
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 11:03:53 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The government will use any and all information at its disposal to find journalist sources, as shown in The Washington Post´s report this morning on a Department of Justice investigation into Fox News chief correspondent James Rosen, who may face criminal charges for reporting government secrets. In June 2009, Rosen reported on CIA analysis suggesting that North Korea might respond to new UN sanctions with renewed nuclear tests. In order to determine how Rosen learned of the analysis, which had been issued by the CIA only a few hours prior, FBI investigators used every tool at their disposal: analyzing
|
|
It’s.The.Law
|
|
American Spectator, by Ross Kaminsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 6:17:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Last Thursday, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) started a Twitter prairie fire with his call for people to describe #ObamacareInThreeWords. (My contribution was “Sorry, Doctor retired.”) (Snip) The White House, never shy to jump into social media, responded with a flurry of tweets, including “It’s. The. Law.” which smacked, more than anything, of typical Obama chest-thumping. Is the administration sure they want to aggressively take credit for a law which, for almost the entire three years since its passage, has had more Americans supporting its repeal than supporting the law itself and which, according to Rasmussen Reports
|
Tooth and Nail: Fluoride Fight Cracks Portland´s Left
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Joel Millman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:57:35 AM
Post Reply
|
|
PORTLAND, Ore.—In the 1950s, after health authorities began fluoridating U.S. water supplies, they faced opposition from groups like the John Birch Society, which called it "an unconstitutional mass medication of the public." Sixty years later, the fight over fluoridation has erupted in Portland, where the battle has drawn in the city´s craft-beer brewers, organic-food purveyors and environmentalists. Even some of the city´s famed indie-rock musicians are taking sides. The debate has prompted something of an existential crisis in this self-consciously liberal city, which votes Tuesday on whether to overturn the city council´s 2012 decision to fluoridate.
|
What Angelina Jolie forgot to mention
|
|
CNN, by H. Gilbert Welch
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:54:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I first saw the headline early Tuesday on Real Clear Politics, a political news site where I generally start my morning. It´s not where I expect to see a story on breast cancer. Then I checked my e-mail messages -- they all seemed to be about Angelina Jolie´s op-ed. Students in my undergraduate class wanted to discuss it in our next session. Colleagues expressed concern and wondered what the right response was. People I don´t even know sent e-mails. One, from a research fellow at the International Agency for Research on Cancer, nicely summed up the general concern:
|
|
Three Signs There’s a Cover-Up
|
|
National Review Online, by John Fund
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:46:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The late columnist William Safire once said that a good clue that someone in Washington was engaged in “an artful dodge,” i.e., a cover-up, was that they used the phrase “mistakes were made.” Safire defined it as a “passive-evasive way of acknowledging error while distancing the speaker from responsibility for it.” The phrase became infamous when both Richard Nixon and Ron Ziegler, his press secretary, deployed it to explain away Watergate without explaining who did what and when or whether any ill motive was involved. Astonishingly, the Internal Revenue Service resurrected the Nixonian expression within hours
|
Deval as Holder’s fill-in? That just wouldn’t be just
|
|
Boston Herald, by Holly Robichaud
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/20/2013 5:27:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Just when you think the news surrounding Obamagate cannot get any worse, it does. Some say U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s days on the job are numbered and that it’s just a matter of when he’ll be forced to resign. While I’ll not shed a tear over Holder’s departure, one of the replacement names being floated has me reaching for tissues: Gov. Deval Patrick. Patrick has denied he’s interested — but the job isn’t on offer yet. If it is, President Obama should not select him nor should he be confirmed by the Senate for a plethora of reasons.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|