A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Progressive Media Fear Exclusion
at Second Obama Inauguration
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Progressive Media Fear Exclusion
at Second Obama Inauguration

Breitbart´s Big Journalism, by Warner Todd Huston

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 12/8/2012 11:37:23 AM

Progressive journalists are worried that Barack Obama is going to cut them out from his second swearing-in ceremony. As Politico reports, rumors abound that this time ´round Obama is going to hold a private ceremony, one not open to the media. On Sunday, January 20, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts will perform the President´s swearing-in ceremony; then on Monday, Obama will hold his public inauguration where he will be sworn in a second time in a symbolic gesture. But Politico reports that some members of the inaugural committee have privately signaled to the press

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 12/8/2012 12:01:00 PM     (No. 9055319)

He´s afraid of screwing up the oath and doesn´t want it on visual record. What other reason could there be for excluding the press?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: TheMotherCO, 12/8/2012 12:12:09 PM     (No. 9055333)

I wonder if roberts will bow to him as he deigns to give the fraud his blessing. Roberts has a lot of baggage and not the good kind.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mitzi, 12/8/2012 12:16:12 PM     (No. 9055336)

We can continue swearing AT him on Tuesday.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: trapper, 12/8/2012 12:24:12 PM     (No. 9055346)

There WILL be a secret oath again, just like there was the first time, because Barack Hussein Obama is not his legal name. His name legally changed to Soetoro when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, and there is no record of it ever having been legally changed BACK to Obama.

My suspicion is that when Roberts was informed the first time around he refused to swear him in under an alias. However, there is nothing illegal about using an alias so long as you aren´t defrauding anyone out of money or property by doing it. Therefore, there is nothing illegal about having a public inaurguration ceremony using the alias in the "oath," and a separate oath-taking using the real legal name. It does not surprise me at all that Roberts would go along with that. The inauguration show is not his concern. Heck, LBJ was sworn in on an airplane.

Embarrassing? Sure. But it is not surprising that Obama would want to hide it. His entire family background is an embarrassment. Too bad he could not have just owned it. Too bad he still can´t.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: trapper, 12/8/2012 12:30:19 PM     (No. 9055357)

And a second thought. This may not even be Obama´s fault. The only name we know is the one our parents told us. It is not uncommon for people to order their birth certificate for something like applying for a passport, and finding that their real legal name is not what they thought it was all their lives. His goofy mother and weird grandparents filled his head with all sorts of nonsense. A made up name could be just a part of it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: farmwife, 12/8/2012 12:34:10 PM     (No. 9055364)

He doesn´t want the public to see that he´s crossing his fingers when he swears to uphold the Constitution.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: pindarjr, 12/8/2012 12:34:55 PM     (No. 9055365)

Keeping the press out of the swearing-in ceremony makes perfect sense. Obama fears (and, I think, rightly so) that the placing of the royal crown and the raising of the royal scepter would not be a good photo-op.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: wsdiego, 12/8/2012 12:39:21 PM     (No. 9055371)

Paranoia setting in! Curious-er and curious-er!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Hannah Columbia, 12/8/2012 12:45:24 PM     (No. 9055380)

He´s "swearing" in the 1st time to the Koran and sharia. There will also be cermonies "imprinting" the big round O on the latest followers (a la Warren Buffet, et al). Hint: followers come from behind.

Reggie will be there to take up the slack.

And I am serious. And I am sorry.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Periwinkel, 12/8/2012 12:47:02 PM     (No. 9055382)

Dear President Obama:

Please, please allow your good friends and supporters in the mainstream media to be present at your coron...strike that...swearing in ceremony on Sunday January 20, 2013. We promise not to tell anyone that you will use your real legal name, Soetoro, and will keep that secret as we have always done.

Sincerely,
Your Buddies in the American Press

p.s. We can´t vouch for the Daily Mail of London, though.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: bamapreacher, 12/8/2012 12:59:08 PM     (No. 9055398)

If the press were allowed at the ceremony, and Obama was sworn in on a Koran and refused to swear to support the Constitution the press would lie about it anyway to support him so what is he so afraid of.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: KTWO, 12/8/2012 1:13:00 PM     (No. 9055412)

Sure, this must be a major concern for the Left.

Should Progressives immigrate to Canada in protest? Or set themselves on fire on the Capitol steps?

My answer is "yes" to both. But they won´t.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: The Advocate, 12/8/2012 1:42:33 PM     (No. 9055441)

Is Roberts being blackmailed about rumored irregularities in his adoptions from South America?
If his name is soetero, is he an Indonesian citizen and dual national?


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: august9, 12/8/2012 2:19:46 PM     (No. 9055457)

Has any other president had more then one swearing-in per term?

Why doesn´t the MSM ponder this question? (Stupid question, I know!)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: M Stuart, 12/8/2012 2:27:28 PM     (No. 9055463)

Could Roberts refuse to do this in secret?

Everything about 0bama is rotten and suspect. I figure it´s probably irregularities about his name also. Maybe the same problem with his law license?


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 16 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 12/8/2012 2:32:50 PM     (No. 9055471)

If they would also fear the demise of this nation we might could get somewhere.

But they don´t.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: strike3, 12/8/2012 2:33:53 PM     (No. 9055472)

Is this where they shave his head to reveal the 666?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 12/8/2012 3:09:33 PM     (No. 9055498)

I´m with #9. There´s nothing anyone WILL do now, so what´s the reason to hide it any longer? As to CJ Roberts, S.P.I.T!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 19 - Posted by: hamrman, 12/8/2012 3:24:38 PM     (No. 9055509)

I am sure that his closest advisers from MSLSD will be there...!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 20 - Posted by: gagolfer, 12/8/2012 3:32:48 PM     (No. 9055518)

A private swearing-in ceremony has been held by every President when Jan 20 fell on a Sunday and the public ceremony was held on Monday the 21st. There has to be a swearing-in on the 20th. The first to do this was James Madison and the last was Ronald Reagan, the last time the 20th was on a Sunday. So this is not unusual or anything just done by Obama.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 21 - Posted by: ArthurDent, 12/8/2012 3:45:39 PM     (No. 9055541)

Are they afraid they won´t get an opportunity to provide "happy ending"? XD

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: KimoSaavy, 12/8/2012 3:55:21 PM     (No. 9055552)

#4, how about a ding!! ding!! ding!! ding!!. But the worst part is that CJ Roberts is going along with all this. He reminds me of criminals that robbed a bank then the head criminal shoots his cohorts after the getaway because he does not want lose ends. CJ Roberts is nothing but a lose end and I don´t care how much he might be getting blackmailed. This will not end well.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Coy860, 12/8/2012 4:05:35 PM     (No. 9055563)

When it first came out that Barack Obama (who)? was considering a run for president, I looked up any information I could find.
His application for the BAR was available then (now scrubbed)..one of the questions was: Have you ever gone by an alias or other name. He checked NO. So, his registration to school in Indonesia, which shows him enrolled as Barry Soetero proves he lied on his application for the BAR!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 24 - Posted by: Blackeagle, 12/8/2012 4:11:36 PM     (No. 9055572)

´´Progressive Media´´ - I read elsewhere that libtards really love it when you call them progressive - but hate it when you call them ´´left wing´´

So a little rewrite is in order:

Left-wing Media Fear Exclusion at Second Obama Inauguration

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 25 - Posted by: coyote56, 12/8/2012 5:50:05 PM     (No. 9055674)

I don´t plan on watching this fiasco so I don´t give a damn what they do or how they do it! I never call him "President Obama" - anyone notice that Peggy Noonan & others don´t call him "President" either?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 26 - Posted by: Spidey, 12/8/2012 6:04:54 PM     (No. 9055697)

I don´t think he wants the public to see the big corporate donors bankrolling the affair.These are all Obama´ s crony capitalists who get special favors and exclusions from Obama´s bully policies that strip everyone else.

Obama pretends to be the champion of the poor and doesn´t want to be seen with fat cats he decries everyday in his class warfare vindictives.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: pineledger, 12/8/2012 8:23:41 PM     (No. 9055816)

One swearing in isn´t good enough for The Won.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 28 - Posted by: Trigger2, 12/9/2012 4:28:00 AM     (No. 9056047)

A private swearing in with his corrupt hand on a Koran; a public one with a Koran inside a fake bible cover.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 714910




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Social Security stops trying
to collect on old debts by
seizing tax refunds
Washington Post, by Marc Fisher    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2014 10:13:04 PM     Post Reply
The Social Security Administration announced Monday that it will immediately cease efforts to collect on taxpayers’ debts to the government that are more than 10 years old. The action comes after The Washington Post reported that the government was seizing state and federal tax refunds that were on their way to about 400,000 Americans who had relatives who owed money to Social Security. In many cases, the people whose refunds were intercepted had never heard of any debt, and the debts dated as far back as the middle of the past century. “I have directed an immediate halt to further

Wendy Davis Ethical Questions Surface
Breitbart Texas, by Bob Price    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2014 8:58:53 AM     Post Reply
Despite promises to the contrary, it appears that State Senator Wendy Davis (D-Fort Worth) voted on bills that affect her clients and favorably impact the bottom line of her law firm. “I have never done anything in a way that represents a conflict in my voting and something that would benefit me personally,” she said in an interview, but state records seem to tell a different story. The Dallas Morning News´ Senior Political Writer Wayne Slater (DMN) reported that Davis supported legislation governing a toll road project. That would be all well and good except for the fact that the

Democrats Lose Two More Special
Elections They Didn’t Expect To
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/14/2014 8:38:34 AM     Post Reply
Democrats have had a recurring problem in special elections this year: Their voters aren’t turning out. If a weak economy and continued Obamacare problems persist, the November elections could be a disaster for Democrats. Last week, Democrats lost two special elections they weren’t planning to. Arlington, Va., is a classic wealthy ObamaTown, filled with government workers and limousine liberals. Mitt Romney won only 29 percent of the vote in 2012. But last Tuesday, Democrats lost their first election for the five-member Arlington County Board in 15 years when John Vihstadt, a Republican running as an independent, won a vacancy on

Nevada ranch standoff could leave
dirt on Harry Reid’s reputation
Washington Times, by Valerie Richardson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/13/2014 10:19:32 PM     Post Reply
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said little as federal agents seized and then released cattle last week from the Bundy ranch, but there is little doubt that the highly charged episode was threatening to become a political headache for the Nevada Democrat. The Bureau of Land Management is headed by former longtime Reid aide Neil Kornze, who was confirmed by the Senate as BLM director on Tuesday, just as federal authorities descended on the cattle ranch outside Mesquite, Nev. Mr. Kornze issued a statement Saturday saying that the bureau would return the cattle and withdraw its agents from the ranch

Democrats settle on fairness
issues hoping to avoid a repeat
of 2010 midterm disaster
Washington Post, by Wesley Lowery    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/13/2014 10:16:38 PM     Post Reply
On the defensive about their prospects in the midterm elections this fall, congressional Democrats have spent all of April savaging the Republican budget proposal, decrying the Koch brothers and championing a series of bills meant to ingratiate themselves to struggling middle-class voters. In promoting legislation that would extend unemployment benefits, increase the minimum wage and promote equal pay for women, the Democrats have declared themselves the party that will ensure a “fair shot” for all. Republicans, they insist, are the party of special interests. It has been a classic Washington messaging campaign for these partisan

For Hillary Clinton and Boeing,
a beneficial relationship
Washington Post, by Rosalind S. Helderman    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/13/2014 10:13:05 PM     Post Reply
On a trip to Moscow early in her tenure as secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton played the role of international saleswoman, pressing Russian government officials to sign a multibillion-dollar deal to buy dozens of aircraft from Boeing. A month later, Clinton was in China, where she jubilantly announced that the aerospace giant would be writing a generous check to help resuscitate floundering U.S. efforts to host a pavilion at the upcoming World’s Fair. Boeing, she said, “has just agreed to double its contribution to $2 million.” Clinton did not point out that, to secure the donation, the State Department

3 dead after suburban Kansas City shooting
Associated Press, by Maria Sudekum    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 4/13/2014 5:39:19 PM     Post Reply
OVERLAND PARK, Kan. — Three people were shot and killed Sunday afternoon in suburban Kansas City, and a spokeswoman for a local hospital said a 15-year-old boy is in critical condition. Overland Park city spokesman Sean Reilly says two people died at the Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City campus and one was killed at Village Shalom, which is a retirement community that is several blocks away from the center. Overland Park Fire Department spokesman Jason Rhodes said Sunday afternoon that one person of interest is in custody. The Jewish Community Center of Greater Kansas City in Overland Park



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Ben Carson: White House wanted
apology for ‘offending’ Obama

54 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Alex Pappas    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/15/2014 5:22:51 AM     Post Reply
Neurosurgeon Ben Carson says the White House wanted him to apologize for “offending” President Obama after he famously delivered a conservative message at the National Prayer Breakfast last year. Carson, the former director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, recalls the events surrounding his 2013 speech in his new book, One Nation: What We Can All Do To Save America’s Future. The Daily Caller obtained an advance copy of the book, which is set for release May 20. “He did not appear to be hostile or angry,” Carson writes of Obama, “but within a matter of minutes after the conclusion of

Obama Generation Losing
Interest in Obama

46 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by James Freeman    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/14/2014 4:23:09 PM     Post Reply
President Obama inspired a generation of young people to support his historic election in 2008. And in 2012, despite the struggles of his first term, Mr. Obama still managed to win the support of a full 60% of voters age 18-29. But the man who once dreamed of being a transformative leader in the Reagan mold is inspiring few of those young people to follow his lead. "For all the talk about the movement that elected Mr. Obama, the more notable movement of Obama supporters has been away from politics. It appears that few of the young people who voted

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Chelsea Clinton no longer
ruling out politics

35 replie(s)
The Hill (Washington DC), by Judy Katz    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/14/2014 11:57:36 AM     Post Reply
Chelsea Clinton says when people ask her these days whether she wants to go into politics, her answer isn’t an automatic “no.” The 34-year-old former first daughter told Fast Company in an interview published Monday, “for so long the answer was just a visceral no. Not because I had made any conscientious, deliberate decision, but since people had been asking for as long as literally I could remember, it was no." Now, the only child of former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explains, "I live in a city and a state and a country where I

Glaring limits of the Civil Rights
Act: We need to redistribute wealth

34 replie(s)
Salon Magazine, by Matt Bruenig    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/14/2014 7:20:41 PM     Post Reply
Although the Civil Rights Act, the landmark legislation which just reached its 50th anniversary, made great strides in desegregating the economy, economic discrimination is still widespread, and anti-discrimination legislation alone can never rectify the economic damage inflicted upon blacks by slavery and our Jim Crow apartheid regime. The Civil Rights Act was a mild reform, all things considered, but one conservatives fought with vigor and one many conservatives are still bitter about to this day. When the Civil Rights Act passed in 1964, the primary purpose was to root out discrimination in public accommodations (like hotels and movie theaters)

Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

32 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

White is not right: Campus admins ask
for help weeding out white people

31 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Robby Soave    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 7:47:18 PM     Post Reply
Western Washington University sent a questionnaire to students asking them for advice on how the administration could succeed at making sure that in future years, “we are not as white as we are today.” The question notes that WWU’s racial make up does not perfectly reflect the nation at large, and asks students to consider strategies that other universities have used to focus on skin color as the paramount indicator of a student-applicant’s worth. The president of WWU has stated that his explicit goal is to reduce the white population on campus, according to Campus Reform. “I’ve said before and I’ll say it


Post Reply   Close thread 714910





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~