|
|
| |
Topic: Vilifying the Salvation Army harms mission of charity |
Vilifying the Salvation Army harms mission of charity
Washington Times, by William Roberts
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 12/7/2012 5:23:08 AM
|
| This year’s Red Kettle Campaign has begun, the annual Christmas fundraiser that helps The Salvation Army collect money to meet human needs in local communities across the country. Each year’s campaign brings heightened media attention to The Salvation Army, particularly regarding its beliefs and practices. In particular, we face such questions as: How does The Salvation Army help people in need? Are we a church? Perhaps most important, is the organization truly committed to serving all those in need? The Salvation Army is a Christian organization, founded by a small group of people in
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
redinabluestate, 12/7/2012 5:36:49 AM (No. 9053024)
Just sent a donation to the Salvation Army as they were the only group driving around the Jersey Shore area offering hot coffee and snacks to everyone who was dealing with the destruction of their home. My neighbor said she got a hug too when she started crying. No sign of the Red Cross, just lots of Salvation Army trucks.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
seminolesecure, 12/7/2012 5:45:26 AM (No. 9053028)
I´ve rung the bell along with other members of my civic group for several years. The Sal Army is more than helping poor people by direct charity. It is also a job training center for the down and out but who are willing to try and work. Support your local Salvation Army store because that´s where the work product (refurbished furniture, housewares, clothing) is sold. Who knows? You might find an Antiques Roadshow treasure!
Mister
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Janjan, 12/7/2012 5:46:05 AM (No. 9053029)
The Liberal Army is on a neverending quest to eliminate any organization that does not uphold their politically correct groupthink. The Salvation Army does good work and they are constitutionally entitled to their religious beliefs as we all are. I am not a member of their church but I donate to them whenever possible. We need to hold on to whatever shreds of humanity still exist in this country.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Refried, 12/7/2012 7:59:49 AM (No. 9053166)
When you are down and nowhere to go, the Salvation Army is always there. Great organization!
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Standlow, 12/7/2012 8:22:21 AM (No. 9053219)
It was, however, really disheartening when Salvation Army joined very vocally with Christians Against Climate Change, a group of global warming airheads. Totally wrong for Salvation Army to inject itself into politics.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
thelmalou, 12/7/2012 8:37:40 AM (No. 9053244)
SA is one of the best orgs around. Always a very low overhead percentage and very high money directly to needy percentage. #5 - where did you see this?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
AltaD, 12/7/2012 8:49:40 AM (No. 9053263)
A charity we used to give to closed recently so I went on yelp.com to find the closest Salvation Army or Goodwill. I was only looking for directions but instead found hateful comments about S.A. telling people not to donate to them, claims that S.A. ate gays, they´re an evil Christian charity, the usual leftwing rants. So yes, we decided that Salvation Army is our new charity of choice.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
jerseyden, 12/7/2012 9:49:24 AM (No. 9053383)
Years ago when I checked about the % of money that the different charities received actually went to those in need the Salvation Army was at the top of the list. You would be surprised at the amount some of the other organizations take for overhead. That´s why the SA is at the top of my list when I give to charity.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
jmkotow, 12/7/2012 10:04:03 AM (No. 9053422)
The Salvation Army does what other churches and synagogues should be doing! They treated my Dad very well when he was shot WWll and said the Red Cross wanted to charge them for coffee and cigs. I ALWAYS give to the S.Army
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
privateer, 12/7/2012 10:17:02 AM (No. 9053465)
Ditto, 9, And my special preference is based on my Dad´s similar experiences in Korea. Plus the SA are good-hearted, sincere people who REALLY make a difference. It is outrageous that the sanctimonious left, ever preening about their concern for the less fortunate, have the rotten nerve to disparage those (the SA)they should be praising and helping.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
enemyofthestate, 12/7/2012 12:29:19 PM (No. 9053755)
Of course, the liberals are going after the Salavation Army. The libs´ real objective is to smear and destroy all societal institutions but the state-- thus the enless campaigns against the Boy Scouts, the Catholic church, the Baptist church, Christmas, Christianity, and on and on.
I´m going to make sure that I contribute more than I have in past Christmases to the Salvation Army.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
enemyofthestate, 12/7/2012 12:31:41 PM (No. 9053759)
Bad typo-- of course it´s not the "Salavation" Army.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
pinkpanther, 12/7/2012 12:55:00 PM (No. 9053805)
SA does great things and it´s a great charity but I hate that it´s squishy on abortion. I will keep giving my money to local pro-life charities and the Catholic church instead.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Despite the WaPost, Benghazi Is a Major Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.
|
Role of Health-Law ´Navigators´ Under Fire
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"
|
Labor unions break ranks with White House on ObamaCare
|
|
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal
|
| |
|
|
Issa Warns Hillary
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee
|
|
Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM
Post Reply
|
|
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...
|
How Hope and Change Gave Way To Spying on the Press
|
|
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,
|
Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
|
|
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
| |
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
| | |
|
|